« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Mukasey Tells DOJ Workers That Political Scandal Has "Harmed" Department

Attorney General Michael Mukasey sent a letter to all Department of Justice employees yesterday trying to boost morale and addressing the Inspector General's report from Monday that concluded numerous high-ranking officials violated civil service laws.

In the letter first reported by the Wall Street Journal, Mukasey wrote:

I was disturbed and disappointed by those reports: disturbed by the finding that some Department employees had violated federal law, rules and regulations; and disappointed that these actions have harmed the reputation of this great institution.

He outlined several changes the Department has made in recent months, including a new process for hiring immigration judges and "mandatory training for all political appointees regarding prohibited personnel practices."

Mukasey also referenced the two additional pending reports from the IG, one about the firing of U.S. Attorneys and the other about politicization in the Civil Rights Division.

I do not know when those reports will be issued or what they will find. I am hopeful that they will recognize the many changes and actions taken by current Department employees to address the relevant issues. But I will review carefully those reports and any recommendations in them, as I have past reports, and I will not hesitate to respond as appropriate.

Read more for the full text of Mukasey's letter

When I was sworn in as Attorney General last November, I pledged that I would work with you to ensure the even-handed application of the Constitution and the laws enacted under it. That pledge includes ensuring the even-handed application of the laws within our own Department.

As I expect you know, the Department's Office of Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility have recently released two joint reports setting forth their findings that improper political considerations were used in hiring decisions relating to certain career employees, including Immigration Judges, Assistant United States Attorneys, and employees detailed to offices in Main Justice, and relating to candidates for the Attorney General's Honors Program and the Summer Law Intern Program.

I was disturbed and disappointed by those reports: disturbed by the finding that some Department employees had violated federal law, rules and regulations; and disappointed that these actions have harmed the reputation of this great institution.

I want to reiterate to each of you what I have said repeatedly in private meetings with Department employees and in public appearances: It is neither permissible nor acceptable to consider political affiliations in the hiring of career Department employees. I have acted, and will continue to act, to ensure that these words are translated into reality so that what is described in the recent OIG/OPR reports does not recur.

I also want to let you know that the Department has acted. Indeed, many of the problems identified by OIG and OPR were addressed before the reports were issued. For example, last year the Department revised the processes for hiring Immigration Judges, Honors Program candidates and summer law interns. More recently, I instituted mandatory training for all political appointees regarding prohibited personnel practices. And I have directed implementation of all the institutional recommendations made in the OIG/OPR joint reports.

Many dedicated Department employees - both career and political appointees - have worked hard to revise policies and procedures to ensure that the types of improper activities detailed in the OIG/OPR reports are prevented in the future. These revised policies and procedures will serve the Department long after my tenure as Attorney General is finished.

Although I am confident that the Department has taken important steps to address the institutional weaknesses that contributed to the improprieties reported so far, we continue to consider ways to improve the Department institutionally. In addition, OIG and OPR have indicated that there are two more joint reports to be issued. I do not know when those reports will be issued or what they will find. I am hopeful that they will recognize the many changes and actions taken by current Department employees to address the relevant issues. But I will review carefully those reports and any recommendations in them, as I have past reports, and I will not hesitate to respond as appropriate.

I wanted to communicate this information to you directly, to make clear just how seriously I take these issues and to show that the Department has taken, and will continue to take, action in response to the problems identified in these reports.

Although the publication of these reports and the headlines they generate are painful for all who work here, they are an important part of determining and acknowledging what went wrong and why it went wrong, and crucial to ensuring that we do not again have to face such problems. Unfortunately, overlooked in many of the headlines and editorials about these reports is the valuable and skillful work you are doing on behalf of the American people. I ask each of you to keep it up, and thank you for your dedicated efforts.


11 Comments

| Leave a comment

From Mukasey's letter:

When I was sworn in as Attorney General last November, I pledged that I would work with you to ensure the even-handed application of the Constitution and the laws enacted under it.

So when does he plan on keeping his word? The Constitution requires that he enforce the Contempt of Congress citations issued by the House of Representatives against Miers, Rove, and others.

Lets just say the letter is only for CYA purposes. He makes it sound like he knew of all the shinanigans sometime ago and he straightened everything out prior to the report.
Blowing the horn of deceipt by Mr Law enforcement.
Corruption rules at Justice!

user-pic

Of course, being AJ does not mean he will actually prosecute the offenders and put them away for crimes...

That's only for the insolent peons farther down the food chain...

So what is the attorney general propose to do about all of these people who were hired under false pretenses?

Why does closing the barn door after the cows get out come to mind?

So we've got a bunch of Republican ideologues in the DOJ. What's to prevent them from implementing their agenda?

user-pic

"Many dedicated Department employees - both career and political appointees - have worked hard to revise policies and procedures to ensure that the types of improper activities detailed in the OIG/OPR reports are prevented in the future."

This scares me. I have a feeling that it means that policies were changed so that a future administration cannot remove these overly-religious, "farm-system" idiots, and prevent the hiring or more qualified replacements.

So much cleaning up to do of this now scary-looking and corrupted, federal government.

I don't really think they can, unless they're part of a union. The JD employees serve at the pleasure of the AJ, and the AJ serves at the pleasure of the President.

Dear U.S. Attorney General Mukasey;

I am contacting you under the provisions of statute:

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 4
§ 4 Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

I have been pursuing several complaints against the U.S. Marshals Service. The former Chief of the U.S. Marshals Service Office of Inspection Yvonne Bonner stated to me in writing that they would conduct an official investigation but “Due to privacy issues you are not entitled to know the outcome of the investigation” which is "obstruction" & violates U.S. Department of Justice polices. (Yvonne Bonner is currently under an investigation by the Office of the Inspector General for possible ethics violations involving an unrelated incident).

I contacted the Hon. Senator Charles E. Schumer & the Hon. Congressman Charles B. Rangel requesting their assistance. The former Chief of U.S. Marshals Service Congressional Affairs division John J. McNulty, III responded in writing twice to the Hon. Senator Charles E. Schumer & once to the Hon. Congressman Charles B. Rangel "denying in writing" the very existence of the investigation which contradicts the document from the former Chief of the U.S. Marshals Service Office of Inspection Yvonne Bonner. This facilitates the appearance of an ongoing cover-up & is "obstruction of justice" at the highest level & is also in violation of:

TITLE 18 > Part I > CHAPTER 47 >
§ 1001 making false statements

I submitted my documented proof of these allegations to the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation & the Office of the Inspector General & they all refuse in writing to take any action under federal statute of law. I feel that my only recourse may be found under federal statute:

TITLE 28 > PART IV > CHAPTER 85 > § 1361
§ 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

I would appreciate any assistance which you are able to legally mandate under federal statute of law. All of my supporting documents with detailed information can be downloaded as a pdf from my website located at DaProcess.com Thank you.

I think the main problem is that these rules were not designed to totally prevent subversion of the institution by the executive. The real problem is this administration's agenda to politicize, tame, or subvert every part of the government to further their agenda (regardless of long-term damage).

Mukasey should hook up with Scott Bloch for some down-time up in the piney woods - a little hot oil and nude puddle-jumping to shake things out. Snap some towels, chase some cooter... let it all hang out. These guys are tired, man. You think it's easy to shred a Constitution - piss on 220 years of law and tradition? Hey... know what? You try it some time.

user-pic

He seems only upset about the reports, not the actions described in the reports. All those now working for the justus department have been revealed to have obtained or retained their jobs due purely to a perverted version of affirmative action in favor of Bush-worshipping lackies. Such exposure must surely be demoralizing.

US Office of Special Counsel (OSC), not DOJ, has primary jurisdiction for the civil service laws broken at DOJ. The AG never mentions the victims of the DOJ lawbreaking, OSC has the positive duty to protect them, which means "make whole" remedies. When does that piece get addressed?

Clearly "the public interest in a civil service free of prohibited personnel practices (at DOJ) was (NOT) adequately protected" from 2001 to 2007. So why and how did the US Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) fail in it duty to ascertain and report this?

DOJ's lawbreaking was enabled by OSC and MSPB lawbreaking and did not occur in a vacuum. OSC and MSPB lawbreaking impact the entire executive branch, not just DOJ. See OSC Watch website

Leave a comment

Tag Cloud

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address