« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
State IG to Probe Deals Between Texas Oil Firm and Iraqi Kurds
Publicly, the U.S. State Department said it was discouraging U.S. oil companies from forging deals with Iraqi Kurds last year.
But privately, Bush administration officials may have sent different signals.
Now the State Department's Inspector General has launched an investigation into what exactly was said to whom.
The New York Times reports:
The State Department's internal watchdog division will investigate allegations that department officials did nothing to prevent a Texas oil company with close ties to President Bush from concluding an oil deal with the Kurdistan regional government that undermined both American policy and the Iraqi central government.The Kurds' deal last year with Hunt Oil Company of Dallas -- and similar contracts between the Kurds and other energy companies -- have infuriated the Iraqi government, which has called them "illegal" attempts to usurp Baghdad's authority.
American officials have also stated publicly that the contracts undermine Baghdad's fragile central government and that they have discouraged such deals until the Iraqi government passes a national oil law.
But earlier this month a Congressional committee released internal e-mail messages and documents from the State Department and Hunt Oil that suggested that State Department officials did not try to dissuade Hunt Oil from signing the deal with the Kurds.
This week, the acting inspector general of the State Department, Harold W. Geisel, disclosed in a letter to lawmakers, which was also provided to The New York Times, that he had "initiated a review of the responses provided to the Congress recently on the issues surrounding oil contracts, oil field development and U.S. policy in Iraq."













I'm ordinarily not so cynical but an investigation or probe, especially by the state department tends to evaporate. I'm still waiting for a legitimate investigation of Obama's passport breach.
July 25, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ho hum. Another lie by the White House. Another internal investigation. What difference does it make if you lie and break the law, if nothing ever happens?
I used to think that being caught blatantly lying would cause one to lose credibility. For Bush, I guess, credibility is over-rated. He can lie continuously and nothing ever happens.
Sigh.
BP
July 25, 2008 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Was energy consultant and library fundraiser Stephen P. Payne somehow involved in this deal?
July 25, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Whats the matter, does ExxonMobil think it is unfair that Hunt got the ONLY signed contract deal in Iraq at the end of 8 long years?
If it's Hunt oil, than goody buddy James Baker must have have given it his big fat green light, okay. With Repugs, it all who you know, not if it's legal or not. Legal's never had anything to to do with it. I mean, if Bushie can illegal wiretap, illegal torture, that unfair business practise and deals are a no brainer and a big part of the GOP makeup. In the Bush administration, the only law is the law of favortism and no member of the press or or some pesky investigation has ever got in way of criminal WhiteHouse conduct.
Republicans are just criminal people and that is way it is.
July 25, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, yes, it is an illegal oil war. But that does not mean you can't distribute the war booty to your best campaign contributors and very best Texas cronies, buddies, and good old boy friends.
Cowboy up - this is bu$$hCo bu$$h league cowboy fascist capitalism. Yee-haaw, fuck fairness and the rule of law - this is privatization, rape of natural resources, and empire building. What good is war is you can't plunder, pillage, and realize obscene and astounding self enrichments ?
July 25, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink