« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Palin Probe Could Mean Election-Eve Trouble for McCain
It looks like John McCain's new running mate, Sarah Palin, could be hit with some decidedly negative PR at the worst possible time. The Alaska legislature's investigation of whether Governor Palin improperly fired a state employee is scheduled to wrap up and release its findings just days before the November election.
The firing is at the center of a scandal that has largely remained confined to the Alaska press, but is now likely to become a national story in the wake of Palin's selection -- one that could conceivably have an impact on the presidential race.
As it happens, we've been tracking the story closely here at TPMmuckraker.
The scandal concerns allegations that Palin's office improperly fired the state's public safety commissioner because he refused to remove Palin's ex-brother-in-law from his job as a state trooper after his bitter divorce from Palin's sister. In addition to the legislature's investigation, the Alaska attorney general is also looking into the matter.
Palin had at first denied that her office had a hand in pushing to have the trooper fired, but was forced to retract those denials when taped evidence emerged that a staffer in her office was involved.
If the investigation finds that her personal involvement was more extensive than she has admitted, it could create some damaging headlines for the McCain campaign at the worst possible moment.
Here's a recap of the story:
The scandal began on July 11, when Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan was removed from his post with little explanation, a move whose abruptness quickly raised questions in Alaska. A few days later, Monegan decided to blow the whistle, and came forward to tell local media that he had been dismissed because he refused to fire trooper Mike Wooten, the ex-husband of Palin's sister, after having been pressured to do so by aides to Palin. (Monegan's replacement, former Kenai Chief of Police Chuck Kopp was only lasted two weeks on the job once past complaints of sexual harassment from 2005 were publicized.)
Critics pointed out that the effort to fire the trooper might have been directly related to the fact that Palin's family had a longstanding grievances with Wooten. In an internal state police investigation in 2005, Palin herself had accused Wooten of threatening to harm her father during the breakup of her sister's marriage. (The Palins claimed, among other things, that Wooten had used a taser on his 10-year-old stepson, and shot a moose without a permit.)
Since Monegan made his allegations, Palin has denied that she personally had a role in the effort to fire Wooten. On July 28, the state legislative council, a bipartisan panel of senators and representatives, appointed a special commission to probe the matter.
Her backtrack on her office's role was prompted by the preliminary findings of a separate ongoing investigation into the matter by the state Attorney General, launched on August 4, that she herself put into motion. At a press conference at which Palin revealed some of that investigation's finding, she acknowledged that in February, state troopers had taped a phone call from Frank Bailey, Palin's director of boards and commissions, whom she appointed in August 2007, in which Bailey appeared to push for the firing of Wooten on Palin's behalf.
In the call, Bailey appeared to say that Palin and her husband were frustrated that Wooten still had his job. "The Palins can't figure out why nothing's going on," Bailey said in the recorded phone call. "Todd and Sarah are scratching their heads ... 'Why is this guy representing the department, he's a horrible recruiting tool.' You know? So from their perspective everybody's protecting him."
The investigation could be particularly poorly timed for the GOP. Steve Branchflower, a former state prosecutor who is conducting the investigation, has a three-month contract for his work, which started August 1, and will end October 31, according to Alaska State Senate Judiciary Committee chair, Hollis French (D), who is overseeing the probe. French told TPMmuckraker that he expects Branchflower to release his report in the days before the November 4th presidential election.
A spokeswoman for Palin told TPMmuckraker that the governor's office would be fully cooperating with Branchflower.
Palin won the governor's office in 2006 as a squeaky clean reformer. "She portrayed herself as an open-government, ethical person," Rep. Mike Doogan, a Democratic state lawmaker, told TPMmuckraker. "You can see the obvious problem." He added: "These things don't help her [politically]."
And they may not help John McCain either.
(ed.note: The original version of this post incorrectly stated that the state legislature was in Democratic hands and ordered the probe of Monegan's firing. In fact, the senate is under the control of a coalition of Democratic and dissident Republican lawmakers and the House of Republicans. The state legislative council, which ordered the probe, is a bipartisan panel made up of members of both bodies.)













This story needs to be passed around and talked about quickly. She was FOR the bridge to nowhere before she was against it.
Here's what she told the Anchorage Daily News on October 22, 2006, during the race for the governor's seat (via Nexis):
Q: Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges?
Palin: Yes. I would like to see Alaska's infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now - while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.
http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/08/29/did-palin-really-fight-the-bridge-to-nowhere.aspx
August 29, 2008 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean 22 months ago, before she held state-wide elected office?
August 29, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
She killed the bridge, but kept the money for other projects.
August 29, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
True, but she was fine with it before. Read the link.
August 29, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Her saving grace might be that the allegations are true... "Yes, I used my position of power to help fire my ex brother-in-law who tasered his own stepson, my nephew. Wouldn't you do the same to protect your family?"
August 29, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is why I think people are too giddy over this situation, without knowing where the equities lie. She defeated an incumbent Governor of her own party so the party establishment and state government apparatus is likely working against her to a point. As I read this today, it is not a good argument against her.
Much better is how utterly unqualified she is to be Vice President and how repulsive and nasty the comparison of her to Senator Clinton is.
August 30, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
The best way to frame McCain's selection of Palin is simple: she is a "trophy pick." It goes to the heart of both McCain's strategy for winning the presidency and his view of women.
August 30, 2008 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but it wasnt her brother-in-law she fired - it was his boss. Fired because he wouldn't do what she wanted as it was illegal!
August 31, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think abusing your position of power to avenge the event years after it happened will wash, even with the "Momma bear protecting her cubs" angle.
The story parallels the attorney firings and Monica Goodling hiring practices in some ways, so there is a kind of archetype to tap into. People have heard this story from the Bush administration repeatedly, and the "Do you want four more years of an abusive executive branch?" argument may resonate.
Having said that, I agree that there are enough unknowns that the factual and spun versions of the story may yet play out in her favor. I don't think it likely, but it's hard to tell in the odd political world.
August 31, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about the fact that she filed a law suit to prevent the Polar Bear from being placed on the endanger list for fear that it would infringe on oil drilling. This woman is really bad.
August 30, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you TPM, I hope the pundits will pick up on that one. Also, I am wondering what is the status on McPa to claim executive privileges?
August 29, 2008 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me that even if Palin had absolutely no personal involvement in this mess, she will never be completely exonerated. Why in the world would McCain put his campaign at risk by picking her?
August 29, 2008 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because secretly, he's in love with Obama.
August 29, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Certainly having the report delayed or even canceled is not beyond the skills of our Constitution-ass-wiping Republican administration.
August 29, 2008 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I was just your average hockey mom in Alaska," she said today.
Hmmm, probably not so average.
The base loves her and there are no recordings of her dissing McPain. And she was Miss Congeniality so that's a contrast with McGrump. And best of all she can pander to disaffected "Democratic" women with a grudge against the DNC.
So what if Palin has opposed everything Senator Clinton has stood for throughout her career.
August 29, 2008 7:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The window is now - while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist. = Before Young and Stevens go to prison.
August 29, 2008 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did McWar thought of vetting her?
August 29, 2008 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jesus. A right-wing Evita a heartbeat away from stowing her nail polish in an Oval Office desk. How do you think that will sell in the hinterlands? This is all showbiz and sop for the PUMAs; she'll top the news cycle a few days and then we'll get back to the business at hand.
August 29, 2008 7:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes - McCain is in love with Obama.
Here is a great parody of McCain celebrating his birthday and commiserating about Obama's acceptance speech last night.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jFW14t8Pio
August 29, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain should have done a simple web search and he would have found this local news report on the Palin TrooperGate Scandle.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UojMnCgqVA
August 29, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wouldn't you think McCain's people would have vetted Palin nine ways from Sunday? Maybe all the dirt is out.
August 29, 2008 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
from WaPo interview today:
August 29, 2008 7:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
the WaPo blog on her is absolutely dripping with glad tidings. They don't miss a beat those bad boyz. Check it out.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/08/29/palin_pick_leaves_bruised_feel.html
August 29, 2008 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you don[t think that maybe it's a John Edwards thing---that maybe McCain and she--ya know. We never expected it from Edwards, and you've gotta say this impromptu "selection" without vetting is totally bizarre. Looks to me like she's got a lot of #hit on her shoes. Should be fun.
August 29, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you don[t think that maybe it's a John Edwards thing---that maybe McCain and she--ya know. We never expected it from Edwards, and you've gotta say this impromptu "selection" without vetting is totally bizarre. Looks to me like she's got a lot of #hit on her shoes. Should be fun.
August 29, 2008 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you don[t think that maybe it's a John Edwards thing---that maybe McCain and she--ya know. We never expected it from Edwards, and you've gotta say this impromptu "selection" without vetting is totally bizarre. Looks to me like she's got a lot of sh7t on her shoes. Should be fun.
August 29, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, you don[t think that maybe it's a John Edwards thing---that maybe McCain and she--ya know. We never expected it from Edwards, and you've gotta say this impromptu "selection" without vetting is totally bizarre. Looks to me like she's got a lot of sh7t on her shoes. Should be fun.
August 29, 2008 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, hate to be a cynic, but....do any of us really believe, after watching what's been happening the last 8 years, that there's a snowball's chance this isn't either delayed or just outright swept under the ice flow?
August 29, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
It probably will be swept under the rug but the story about it is already getting reported by the MSM.
August 29, 2008 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
**Was the trooper arrested for tasering the ten year old or was that an allegation made after they divorce papers were filed?
August 29, 2008 8:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
after - the kid, believe it or not, thought it was cool and asked to be tazed. The dad put it on its lowest settings.
August 29, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The whole fucking crew are mutants. This is like Twin Peaks.
August 30, 2008 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"McCain should have done a simple web search and he would have found this local news report on the Palin TrooperGate Scandle."
If you can't use a computer, you can't do a web search.
August 29, 2008 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love how the Democrats have effectively and subliminally brought McCains age and health fully into the debate with him picking Palin. Notice how they keep saying "a heartbeat away from the presidency" when questioning her experience.
August 29, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
This might be a good opportunity for Obama to put up an ad in response to McCain's "Congratulations Barak" ad of yesterday. In this case Obama should smile and say, congratulations on your Veep pick, John. An excellent choice."
Frankly, if McCain was going to go the bimbo route, he should have held out for Harriet Miers.
August 29, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand why all the talking heads are referring to this "Hail Mary" pass as a BOLD one. Maybe I don't know football well enough, but I always thought you threw a Hail Mary pass when you're DESPERATE, not when you're trying to be bold.
August 29, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love the photo that the crew picked to illustrate the teaser on the main page of TPM. I knew I had seen her before. That photo reminds me. It was in a movie I hate to admit I actually paid to see, but the scenes that followed almost made it worth the ticket price. I'm sure UTube will have bits of the film available soon - no, wait - UTube doesn't allow porn do they?
August 29, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Makes sense. McCain wants to double down on Bush the 3rd term- qualities.
August 29, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Election eve trouble? Any bets on whether she'll last through next week?
August 29, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Two more oil people in the white house?
OMG
and this case will get paid off mark my words
then she says her husband is a fisherman, but what him working for BP...Palin's husband, Todd Palin,[80] works for the energy corporation BP at an oil field on Alaska's North Slope[81] and works as a fisherman in his hometown in the summers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Palin#Family_and_personal_life
She admits that she used marijuana at a time when the state had legalized possession of small amounts (though possession was still illegal under federal law). She says that she did not like it and does not smoke it now, and she does not support legalizing marijuana, worrying about the message it would send to her kids
State Senate President Lyda Green, a Republican who has often feuded with Palin, remarked, "She's not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?"
Palin, when asked about Senator Clinton's complaints regarding her coverage by the press, said "that doesn't do us any good, women in politics, women in general, wanting to progress this country...when I hear a statement like that from from any woman, I think that there is a perceived whine."
It was alot of firing and people getting kick in and out of office up there? All I can say is DUCK!
This is way over my head...
McCain Just Doesn't Get It...If anything was to happen to him say a week into office, what happens to Troops,this is a poor VERY POOR SHOW OF RESPECT TO OUR TROOPS it's a ashame we cant start a petition.
August 29, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or does Palin look like Tina Fey trying to act like a VP Candidate? It just goes to show you how much of a joke the McBush campaign is. What a horrible pick. Kay Bailey Hutchinson would have been formidable, not Ms. Alaska.
August 29, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or does Palin look like Tina Fey trying to act like a VP Candidate? It just goes to show you how much of a joke the McBush campaign is. What a horrible pick. Kay Bailey Hutchinson would have been formidable, not Ms. Alaska.
August 29, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Daw you have it backwards. This is a case of a vice presidential candidate trying to look and act like Tina Fey.
August 29, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know . . . I'm reading all these comments. I'm just . . . this whole choice is weird. It feels like he kind of lost it, really. Like he got so mad at the Rovies for not letting him have Liebchenmann that he did a McCain tantrum and . . . lobbed a big FU to 'em. I'm disturbed, just a bit. It seems pathologically fraught.
August 29, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any thoughts that this could be a devious head-fake by McCain & Co.?
McCain selects Palin and then, after a fire-storm of controversy, throws her under the bus, and makes a new selection.
Far-fetched, yes.
But 1) His second pick will look stellar by comparison and the "change" will boost his campaign, 2) If he can bait the Democrats into attacking Palin, he can blame her failure on the Dems (who robbed Hillary and now destroyed Palin), 3) While Palin might be a terrible choice for VP, the announcement sure drew attention away from Obama and the Democratic Convention, 4) McCain shows the Right-wing Republicans that he wants to cater to their demands for a true conservative, but "unfortunately" she doesn't work out and he has to pick his second favorite.
August 29, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
After all, it worked so well for George McGovern picking Tom Eagleton.
August 30, 2008 11:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
After all, it worked so well for George McGovern picking Tom Eagleton.
August 30, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
After all, it worked so well for George McGovern picking Tom Eagleton.
August 30, 2008 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think you may be right. I saw the whole McCain sideshow as a cynical attempt to derail conversation away from answering issues brought up by the Democrats. The first half the day was spent leaking fake Veep picks to talking heads build up the hype. Then the "Breaking News" announcement of Palin being picked as McCain's Veep. Followed by the press conference as a way to try to suck the oxygen out of the news cycle, and kill the buzz about Obama's speech the night before.
No wonder McCain will not tell the press the definition of honor.
August 30, 2008 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't imagine any benefit that would outweigh the cost of reversing the selection. Changing the running mate now admits poor judgment on McCain's part, and a poor organization supporting him. The gut reaction is "Is this how he's going to run the country? This sloppy?" If she has to leave the ticket, it will be for some other (manufactured) reason.
August 31, 2008 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
"the announcement sure drew attention away from Obama and the
Democratic Convention" -- I don't know, Mishima. I've heard that comment on the air three times tonight. But each time I hear it, it occurs to me that the speaker is referencing the Dem Convention, AND suggesting that McSame's primary justification is to steal a few days of attention from Obama-Biden. Seems like John might be calling attention to the convention by this transparently calculated political move.
August 29, 2008 11:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's my opinion that this choice is purely reactionary. The GOP was clearly on its heels and needed to stem the further damage that would have come from a day of coverage of Obama's speech. In that sense this choice is already a success, I don't think it would've been unreasonable that McCain would've been 10 pts behind nationally.
On the other hand I don't know where they're gonna go from here. It seems to me the less she does from here on our the better for McCain
Strategy
August 29, 2008 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's an interesting perspective on Governor Palin from an Alaska resident: Mudflats Blog
I thought it was a very interesting and concise view on her governorship.
August 29, 2008 11:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not a lawyer. However, I've done some reading and research on police disciplinary boards, and Palin's behavior sounds fishy. Josh et al, it would really behoove you to explain the nitty gritty details of how disciplinary boards work.
My understanding of police procedures is that state laws create a procedure by which police discipline is handled internally. Generally, these proceedings are done in confidence, and average citizens don't know what happens. The police board will hear a charge, and if the charge is found to be true, then discipline is issued. Under the union rules and laws, there are safeguards to ensure that the cops get some appeals.
It sounds like Palin was leaning on the officer to issue harsh discipline on her ex-brother in law even though the board had already disciplined him. I'm not sure about the legal implications, but that seems troubling for a few reasons. Ordinary citizens wouldn't get that access to officers nor to the proceeding. But a governor would. Besides that, as a matter of due process, it is patently unfair to punish someone who has already punished.
The brother in law sounds like a jerk, but Palin sounds pretty petty, if not abusive of her office.
August 30, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
On CNN tonight it was pointed out that McCain had met his new VP candidate exactly once before picking her. Could it be that he just forgot what he was picking her for? She does have a degree of attractiveness, especially to old codgers like John and me. We are the same age, by the way.
Much more probable is that McCain had nothing to do with picking her. This looks a lot more like a complicated Rove move to me. And, I agree with Mishima that this is most likely a "head fake". The real candidate is likely to be so obnoxious, so flawed, so unpopular, but so amenable to being manipulated, that Rove didn't dare put that candidate's name out there cold.
August 30, 2008 12:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like the Tina Fey link but you must consider the Mary Ann connection. Now that is something to consider.
See the story here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77AQHYWzGFQ
August 30, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
man, McCain shoulda gone with Michele Bachmann. She's cute and a fundie nutcase too! MN has more EVs. Her "husband" is a gay "fixer." what the hell happened??
oh, wait, she's psychotic, tho. nevermind
August 30, 2008 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Curt,
Do you really believe the PUMAs are legit? I think they are financed completely by the Republicans. They were never for Hillary, it's a sham. I saw one of the frauds on Larry King tonight. She got her talking points straight from the RNC. Why isn't the media covering this?
Rob
August 30, 2008 1:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
The president always has the upper hand in Supreme Court appointments
We all know the next president will nominate 2 and possible 3 Supreme Court justices.
Even with a democratic congress, the president has the advantage because the president chooses who comes before the confirmation committee. Sure a democratic congress might be able block the most extreme justices but a justice does not have to be extreme to be dangerous.
Roe v Wade and other womens rights is one justice away from being overturned
The court is currently split, 4 conservative, 4 liberal and 1 moderate justice (Kennedy) providing the swing vote. Yes, Roe v Wade and other women’s rights is one justice away from being overturned. The next 3 justices to retire are the 2 liberal and the one moderate.
If the next president is a Democrat the alignment of the court remains as it is today, if it is a Republican; the court will have 7 conservative and 2 liberal justices.
If John Mcain and Sarah Palin become president and vice president, the conservatives will be ecstatic. Why, presidents come and presidents go but a Supreme Court appointment last 20-30 years. Long after john McCain and Sara Palin are gone; a conservative supreme court will be the gift that keeps on giving.
For those who may say I am a social conservative, I would welcome a conservative court, keep in mind that the supreme court decides far more cases that affect women (Equal Pay, Title Nine, Workplace Discrimination, Sexual Harassment, etc) than it does social issues.
Those who do not learn from history will learn, but it will be painful.
August 30, 2008 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well put. Do you mind if I copy/paste your comment and send it to every woman I know?
September 1, 2008 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes the Puma's are frauds they got their directive from the so call Limbaugh voters who voted for Hillery to stop Obama from winning. These people are not loyal Dems, and never were. It is all a front to divide the party by gender.
August 30, 2008 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is disturbingly messy and has to make voters think twice before pulling the lever for the McCain / Palin ticket.
Assuming the allegations are correct Palin and her husband assuredly tried to improperly influence Monegan to fire Wooten. That the husband wife duo didn't recognize the personal conflict, appreciate the circumvention of due process or the clear abuse of public office should make people wary.
It's interesting how this has a tone similar to the politics as practiced by the Bush clan both in Texas and in Washington. Everything is personal and has little to do with ethical conduct or the rule of law. It's about an ideological point of view and a distorted sense of justice that isolates things from each other that are obviously associated which can't logically be disconnected. Bush has never recognized this conflict and Palin seems to be a carbon copy who actually may raise the dissonance a notch or two.
Frankly it is more than a little scary to have someone with these traits holding such high office. We have ample evidence with Bush that having such a temperament creates havoc within a democratic system. In our system there is a definite workable range relative to an ideological midpoint within which government must conduct itself. I think Bush is outside that range and Palin is likely more so. Along those same lines McCain is somewhat schizophrenic. Cheney is less so in this regard. He is more a pure product of paranoia, the cold war era and corporatism.
All of the above operate with too many distorted perceptions to be effective leaders. They collectively lack the ideological, philosophical and objective temperament necessary for leadership under the democratic form.
August 30, 2008 5:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Righties won't care about troopergate - they see a pic of a chick with a gun and it's case closed, she's the VEEP. I just hope women choose not to vote against their own best interests by casting their lot with those freaks on the rethug ticket.
August 30, 2008 7:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
The question is, has she shot any of her friends yet?
August 30, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The more I think about it, the clearer it becomes that Palin is John McCain's Harriett Miers, patently -- even scarily -- inexperienced, and chosen by a man who really has no idea how misguided his decision was.
August 30, 2008 8:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is it just me or does the action of John McCain VP pick her problem with covering up Trooper gate
seem to be kind action that Dick Cheney would do? Dick Cheney has covered more crap that a cat with discharge problem. Seem Alaska ex-governor has the same problem. What gamble I have question McCain judgement and stability of mind well he has confirm my thoughts.
August 30, 2008 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just found this site via a web link. Mercy, how many of these
whining sites are there?
This is just another propaganda tool of the whining liberals who haven't had a fresh new idea in years.
Well, BHO is their latest attempt at a new idea. More like an old nightmare. More of the same from the socialist liberals. You don't have to be old in years to have old, destructive ideas. BHO is proof.
Since you guys hate this country so much, why not just go live in the 'wonderful' place called Iran. You're politics would definitely find a welcome home there.
August 30, 2008 11:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Knowing the media theme of "everything is good for McCain", an election eve judgement on Palin would be wicked good news for McCain/Palin.
Why?
Fundamentalists already feel like they're discriminated against by not being allowed to rewrite the constitution. Anything handed down on Palin that has the wafting odor of liberal media feeding frenzy will whip these people up in mass victimage to storm the polls and vote heartily.
And this is how Karl Rove works.
August 30, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I came across this site via a web link. How many of these hack sites are there? This is nothing more than a whiney liberal
scum pool parading all forms of socialistic destruction.
The socialistic liberals haven't had a fresh new idea in years. BHO is the only new idea they've had. It just goes to show you don't have to be old in years to have old destructive socialistic ideas.
Yep, let BHO win and we'll see the U.S.A. thrust in a major way in the direction of China, Russia, and Iran. Remember, you're voting for this guy.
August 30, 2008 11:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
What? Did you say something? Two posts within 20 minutes, practically the same thing but slightly altered.
I'm sorry, little one, are you lost? Can I help you find your parents?
August 30, 2008 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rereading my post, it becomes clear.
Palin is McCain's armour. Any attack on Palin, valid or otherwise, is an attack on Fundamentalism. Any wisecracks on her womanhood is misogyny.
Even though she completely undermines McCain's most effective arguments against Obama, this lays out McCain's plans: drive the fundies to the polls.
It will be interesting to watch the GOP convention, and see if they lean on the "Obama-Untested", or "Voting for Palin will make Liberals insane" theme.
The "insane Liberals" seem to guide most of their arguments.
August 30, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
By being thrust in the direction of Russia, China and Iraq, does the previous writer mean, "In Healthy Financial Shape"?
August 30, 2008 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin has [or is] a beautiful, smiling face.
Smiling faces, smiling faces sometimes they don't tell the truth, uh
Smiling faces, smiling faces tell lies and I got proof.
from "Smiling Faces Sometimes" (As recorded by The Undisputed Truth) BARRET STRONG, NORMAN WHITFIELD
August 30, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin appear not to know the meaning of third party review or conflict on interest. Any public official should know this type of stuff need be avoided; if her sister's case was as been suggested civil or criminal court action was a remedy.
On the matter of judgment, the fact that she is implicated in this matter is problematic.
Republicans have pulled stunts as the nomination of Palin for the past forty years. This is another Rove caper; it is habitual, the call to their base combined with a call to the wider electorate with a range deceptive themes. She has had a day of fame; she is best left to the devices of her handlers.
August 30, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
While a grand gesture of family loyalty, that reasoning is far from excusable. If the Governor used her influence to settle a family matter, it's a disgusting abuse of power.
Whatever the former brother-in-law may or may not have done was for the family (and if necessary, criminal) court to decide.
The fact that she lied about it at first, only to backtrack later, shows that she knew what she did was inappropriate. It's never the crime; it always the COVER-UP!!
While this remains to be proven, the man in question (Monegan) told David Schuster that there were 24 (TWENTY-FOUR!!) telephone calls between him and the Governor, her husband and her staff (YES, he has said that Palin and her husband also put pressure on Monegan to act in their favor) over the course of this story.
Right now--today--this story doesn't pass the smell test. There is more to be learned about this.
What is apparent, is that McCain only cared about winning this election. He didn't think this selection through. There are too many questions and unknowns with this pick and McCain wasn't thinking about my safety, your safety or that of our troops. He wanted a woman and he didn't care if she was fully qualified or not; it's hard to deny this when there are a few other female Republicans out there who are better prepared to step into the presidency, if necessary.
August 30, 2008 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey waitaminute -- what about all the good "Bushies" that have now filled the judiciary? Will negative results actually see the light of day?
August 30, 2008 1:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
why did john mccains staff investigate palin more thourghly before choosing her as his running mate.
mitt romney was the guy for the job;hopefully she will come out of this investigation unscathed.i will still support the mccain,palin ticket;no matter the outcome;she has morals!!!
shalom
glenna hill
valdez, alaska
August 30, 2008 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems to me that whose who lack morals are always the first to point to someone who has them as they begin to paint their own sick picture of how they think things should be...
If you want to talk about the Commander of the Alaska National Guard, why don't you talk about her to God? Or don't you know how to contace Him?
August 30, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The traders and speculators don't like the Palin pick.
McCain's stock dropped 2 points overnight, and inTrade has him down into the 39th percentile so far as his chances of winning the election.
August 30, 2008 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
More details about this story seem to have come to light.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/08/the_washington_post_trumps_up.asp
August 30, 2008 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are a couple of important items that appear to be a bit hazy on the edges.
First, mush has been made of the whole concept that this issue revolves around an allegation that trooper Wooten had engaged in violence directed at his wife. Further, in some the reports I have heard Governor Palin was concerned about her sister, the professional conduct of this trooper, the allegations of domestic violence and the direct threat she perceived her sister to be under.
This forms the moral outrage that is the basis of Palin's public shield for her and her staff's conduct in these matters.
Here is the deal, it is a federal offense for any person who has been convicted of any level of offense of domestic violence or of violence directed against a spouse or domestic partner (live in girl/boy friend) to own or posses any firearm or ammunition.
Therefore, IF Trooper Wooten had been convicted of any such charge, to include a minor non traffic citation or the lowest level of misdemeanor, punishable with a small fine the State of Alaska would be REQUIRED to relieve Wooten of all duties that involve contact with firearms. Most often in law enforcement the only option available is termination because the nature of the issue is moral qualification for continued employment.
So, if Governor Palin's argument held water there should be zero drama because Wooten would have been fired without the need for a call or personal contact from anyone in the Governors office due to the nature of the situation.
By raising the issue in this way the potential exists that Governor Palin or her staff were attempting to use the power of the office, or just to muddy the waters surrounding a family court action, not only to effect the basis and outcome in a "messy divorce and custody case", but in the ability of Trooper Wooten to provide proper support and enjoy custody or visitation with his children by destroying his career in law enforcement, for cause.
Additionaly, I can attest to another dynamic here. In NRA/second amendment circles taking part in actions specifically designed to deprive a citizen of the lawfully protected right to possess firearms based upon unproven allegations is as low, low, low a deed as one can be involved in without violating the law themselves.
In other words, these are fightin' words in NRA land and for someone who is a life member of the NRA and basses much of her political appeal upon the moral principles espoused by her membership and lifestyle the taint of involvement in activities designed to deprive a fellow citizen of their 2d amendment rights would be cause for their support to evaporate..
So, it would be good if it can be determined through FOIA what exactly Trooper Wooten has ever been charged/convicted of, the time lines for these events, contacts and legal filings. Most of this falls within the public domain and should be readily available.
I hope if I am off track here someone will set me straight and if I am providing illumination my desire is that someone with the capacity to track these basic points down will be able to do so..
peace
August 30, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is all under investigation and will be brought out.
August 30, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is all under investigation and will be brought out. You can rest assure that her enemies in Alaska will come out of the wood work to make sure the public know all their is to know about this woman. From her own account, in reference to how she fought corruption, there should be plenty.
August 30, 2008 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can see problems with each candidate - however which Presidential Candidate do you think the enemies of the U.S. want as President? - Greg---http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2734923/
August 30, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
"however which Presidential Candidate do you think the enemies of the U.S. want as President? "
They want McCain. He will borrow more from China to fund his wars, further alienating other nations, and bankrupting the U.S.
August 30, 2008 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a little bit salacious, admittedly, but try typing in "Sarah Palin recent pregnancy", on google. Then look at articles at the time of the announcement, and the comments. Interesting stuff there. And her oldest daughter was out of school at the time. And the alaska.gov site took down ALL pictures of Palin in the last 'term' of her 'pregnancy'.
Again, this is salacious, circumstantial stuff. But. A story worth following...
Also, plays right into the Eagleton, Hariet Myers, GOP scheming meme. Eyes open people, we are about to see some Hollywood shit in the next few months
August 30, 2008 4:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is a link worth reading. See what her AK colleagues think of her readiness:
http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/510249.html
My favorite is "She's not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?" said Green, a Republican from Palin's hometown of Wasilla. "Look at what she's done to this state. What would she do to the nation?"
August 30, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
But she IS Governor so she must be prepared. 2 years and the state is still a state. Maybe your source is a poor choice for information.
August 31, 2008 12:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
The photograph of that woman sticking her tongue out is the most repellent thing on this blog other since the profile shot of that vile pig Rove that shows up whenever he's featured here...
August 30, 2008 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mark My Word: She will not last beyond the end of next week. John McCain will be forced to ask her to "leave the ticket" in the interest of the party and the nation. He then will be able to select Mitt Romney or Joe Liebermann to the spot, without incurring the wrath of right wing evangelicals. This was the plan all along, as he looked for some "nuclear waste material" to basically nullify Barack Obama's speech last Thursday. So, once again, if you weren't reading right, Sarah Palin will be history by the end of next week...! You can take that to the bank...!
August 30, 2008 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow!! It all makes some sense, but how and why did you come to that conclusion? Tell us more.
August 30, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
That ain't the half of it. batten down the hatches cause here comes BABYMOMMAGATE!
August 30, 2008 9:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about the fact that she filed a law suit to prevent the Polar Bear from being placed on the endangered list for fear that it would infringe on oil drilling. This woman is really bad.
August 30, 2008 11:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
So it will be interesting to watch to see how many of McCain's staff will resign in the next few week. Iam sure that their must be some discontent about the Pelin pick. I have already read about some rumors on the blogs. Does anyone else know anything about this. I guess McCain's right wing evangelicals didn't want Lieberman the Jew or Romney the Mormon. Discrimination on the basis of religion I say discrimination!!!!
August 30, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain doesn't know how to use a computer, this is by his own admission. I think someone framed the old man. I have always said that there was someone from the inside of his campaign that did not want him to be president. He has been screwed.
August 30, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
...buh bye, sarah!
August 31, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
We all know what this choice says about McCain but has anyone stopped to think about what this says about her? Is her ego so huge, is she so bent on pursuing her own goals, that she actually believes she's ready for this job?
If Palin were an intelligent woman with strong ethics she would have thanked McCain for the invite but said "Really, I'm not ready. I'm a governor of a small state people wise and I've never really dealt with the sort of problems running a country would require. Thanks, really, but I think you need to find someone a bit more qualified for possibly being the leader of the free world. But thanks a lot."
I'm thinking she's a major egotistical putz, who puts herself before everything. Looking at her past jobs, including beauty contestant, it's a lot of ego stroking rapped up in her personal appearance. Her smile is as empty as McCain's, only worse.
You don't have 5 kids, a baby with down syndrome, and decide "Gee, it might be fun to run for VP."
The woman is an empty vessel.
August 31, 2008 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, at this point I am just excited for the next week to unfurl. I literally have no idea what the state of this race will be in a week (on the GOP side I mean).
Don't get me wrong, they are a bunch of scum bags, but the lengths they'll go to to keep their money hungry hands on power is really, really, REALLY remarkable.
The life of a seemingly nice 44 year old mother of 5? Political expediency. The integrity of a 72 year old POW? Just the same. As long as power remains static, there is no end to the treacherous wiles of the GOP.
I love it, this is better than the movies. (!!!)
Also, excuse my cynicism, but at this point (my voting life has consisted of the elections of 200 and 2004) what is right seems to be what is impossible.
August 31, 2008 1:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is kinda taking on a "soap opera" theme!
August 31, 2008 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also, interesting stuff from the New Yorker
August 31, 2008 1:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, this won't work. This tasering happened nearly 5 years ago. The whole family knew this happened 5 years ago and did nothing because at the time, the parents were happily married.
This attempt to get this guy fired happened just recently.
There is only one way to explain this delay. The firing was NOT about child abuse. It was about revenge for a bitter divorce.
There is no other explanation that can explain the delay.
This kid is 17 now. He was 11 when it happened.
August 31, 2008 1:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
She might have faked her pregnancy.
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-69834
The nation has been abuzz today with talk of Sarah Palin, John McCain's surprise vice-presidential pick. The internet and news media exploded in the hours following the announcement.
Along with all the stories making their way through the news cycle is one regarding Trig Palin, her youngest child. Apparently, there has been suspicion, some reported through Alaskan media outlets even before the Vice Presidential buzz, that the child actually belongs to her daughter, Bristol Palin. Normally this would be a personal issue, but this becomes a public matter because of Sarah Palin's stance against abortion and birth control, promoting 'abstinence only' beliefs.
The story seems ludicrious, and surely the GOP workers that vetted her would have stopped McCain from choosing her if anything like this were true. Only, now it has come out that Governor Sarah Palin was not vetted properly. The McCain camp states that they didn't feel it was necessary.
August 31, 2008 2:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the fake pregnancy story is true she will be gone. I don't think it will hurt McCain though. There will be a lot of sympathy for her.
August 31, 2008 3:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Governor Palin appears to be very well-spoken, an advocate of political reform and yes a self-described hockey mom. But she also a blatant liar who didn't think her plan to attempt to cover up her oldest daughters pregnancy would ever come back to haunt her.
August 31, 2008 9:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but it wasn't her brother-in-law she fired - it was his boss. Fired because he wouldn't do what she wanted as it was illegal!
August 31, 2008 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
The biggest problems I see for this story to have any true impact are these:
Okay, so there is Keith or Bill Maher — but they are almost drowned under the weight of the others who spend 60% of their reporting time focused on Obama, but 75% of which is looking at his negatives (recent Pew media research results). You know, think of Obama's "trouble" with working-class white voters — but forget the polls that show O 20 points in front of McC with that same demographic.
On other matters concerning Palin:
August 31, 2008 3:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
The biggest problems I see for this story to have any true impact are these:
Okay, so there is Keith or Bill Maher — but they are almost drowned under the weight of the others who spend 60% of their reporting time focused on Obama, but 75% of which is looking at his negatives (recent Pew media research results). You know, think of Obama's "trouble" with working-class white voters — but forget the polls that show O 20 points in front of McC with that same demographic.
On other matters concerning Palin:
August 31, 2008 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I listened to the taped phone call posted a DKos this morning and Palin's associate tells the guy there is no proof the tasering ever happened. He clearly does not know if its a fact or not.
One things for sure, she has 19% Cheney approval rating written all over her. She runs things like Cheney, but on a Monica Goodling scale.
Tape:
http://www.gov.state.ak.us/audio/FrankBaileyCDaudio.mp3
diary:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/104617/671/991/580751
August 31, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to one thing I read Palin is a runner. But even a marathon runner we knew peraonally who ran through her 7th month of pregnancy did show at that point, small but still obviously pregnant. I have to say I was discounting this story until I saw the video of Palin linked above. Her daughter out of school for 4-5 months due to mono is a whopper, and a poor excuse to give. Mono would put someone in bed for awhile but not 4-5 months out of school. It looks pretty bad.
Seems someone pulled a Bree trick without using a tummy form. Another photo of her daughter was taken at 6 weeks before the birthdate. Looks about right.
August 31, 2008 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just slightly off topic. We can expect a great deal to be made of Palin's decision to keep her Downs syndrome child. I find this insulting to women because it implies that most people would abort such a child. That aside, with Palin's positions on creationism and abortion, what is her position on birth control? She just had her 5th child at age 44. With 6 billion people on the planet is that socially responsible? Can we expect her to continue to spawn until menopause?
August 31, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not a HUGE point...
but I haven't seen mention of Palin's little
flip flop on whether she'd accept a VP nod.
In June '08 , she told Glenn Beck "No"
(with the usual, politician qualification comments).
Too much good she needed to do in Alaska, y'know?
Now of course, she has the right to pull a total 180,
but shouldn't someone ask what was SIGNIFICANTLY
different in the U.S. (or Alaska?!?) that dramatically
changed a solid "No" into an unqualified "Yes"
in just a couple months?
Admittedly, I was on vacation...but if America changed
dramatically in that time, I missed it.
August 31, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
are serious people seriously talking about a faked pregnancy? I don't know, haven't looked at any of the stories, but if they're claiming that their daughter was out of school for up to five months with mono, that's highly suspicious.
OTOH--I think the risk of Downs increases with the age of the mother/parents. Of course everyone screams sexism when this is mentioned, but a normal infant requires a lot of care, not to mention a special needs infant. Say what you will, I think it's totally irresponsible to run for high office under these circumstances. And it did look like her older daughter was holding the baby during the rally-is she the one responsible for the infant's care while the mother runs around the country for the next two months?
August 31, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh, and don't give me the shit about her running the state while having the baby. Alaska is smaller than Cincinnati. And when we talk about size of states, we mean population, not land mass--so don't even give me that "biggest state" shit.
August 31, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
POW for McCain
PTA for Palin
Already at work. This stuff is absolutely amazing.
WALLACE: But, Senator, you talked about her years of experience. Ten of those years were as a city councilwoman and mayor of a town of 9,800 people. And in terms of foreign policy, in March of 2007, after, two months after the surge had started, she was asked about it, and she said: "I've been focused on state government. I haven't focused on the war in Iraq." Understandable for a governor; not understandable for a vice president.
MCCAIN: Well, by the way, also she was a member of the PTA.
August 31, 2008 6:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Curious....with the announcement of Palin as McCain's running mate, this investigation by the Alaskan state legislature has not only become much more important, but has also become much more important to a lot of very powerful people who have a vested interest in the "right" outcome.
I'm guessing the original investigation was not designed to be of such national interest. Have the members of the investigative team taken any measures to counter this potential, additional interference?
(I can see the nightmare unfolding: the initial results of the investigation decide the presidential election a few days later. Months later (after a new administration has been inaugurated) we come to find out that the investigation itself was corrupted for political purposes and the initial results were tainted. To counter public outrage, the new administration will then quickly throw a few chosen staff members under the bus, and claim it had no direct knowledge of this terrible corruption. The administration will then launch a new investigation into the first corrupted investigation. This new investigation will lead to the prosecution of one dispensable staff member, who will then be pardoned by the President if found guilty.)
I'm not trying to put out preemptive conspiracy theories here, I'm just trying to learn from the past.
August 31, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cut to the chase:
Monegan says he has e-mails from Palin.
Not much reason to doubt it, given the
pattern that is already known.
It's hard to believe that Palin would've been
dumb enough to type and send a smoking
gun...but using gubernatorial power as she
had otherwise--on a personal matter--
suggests that her personal feelings MAY
have trumped her professionalism.
When do we get to see Monegan's e-mails?
August 31, 2008 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
And it's only been what..3 days? I can't wait to see what will come out in a week. Nice that 'we the people' have to vet the Vice Presidential nominee. More outsourcing I guess.
August 31, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin/McCain will likely have more scandal-related trouble, as The Times Of London has picked up on babygate...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4647965.ece
August 31, 2008 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where is Obama? The Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Subcommittee on European Affairs has convened no policy hearings since Obama took over as its chairman last January. Now, if Governor Palin is unqualified because she doesn't have any international experience what does Obama have if he has never showed up? Hummmmm........?
August 31, 2008 11:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
"...we will act as Americans, not as Republicans."
John McCain 31 August, 2008.
Said without a trace of irony...
September 1, 2008 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is McCain admitting that for the
last decade plus, that his team
has cynically been acting as
"...Republicans, not as Americans."
Isn't it odd that McCain considers
"...we will act as Americans, not as Republicans"
to be newsworthy?
September 1, 2008 5:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden's. Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units. She's also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security's counterterrorism plans. Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country's defense. Given Alaska's proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don't even know about. She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.
Biden's seat on the Foreign Relations committee would expose him to information on a very wide array of topics. But her experience in keeping the homeland safe fits perfectly with her image as the competent American woman. It's not the same as having your finger on the button, but it a heckuva lot closer than Biden or Obama has ever been.
It will be tremendous fun to watch a couple of complete political tools like the Hope&Change duo attempt to attack a record of substance not words, to attack a record of action not bloviation.
Perhaps Obama's supporters are taking a stance between old and new. Maybe they don't care about McCain's service or his strength of character and unblemished qualifications to be President. Maybe 'likeability' is a higher priority for them than 'trust'. Being a prisoner of war is not what qualifies John McCain to be President of the United States of America - but his demonstrated leadership certainly does.
The problem with many Americans is they don't want to know the truth about Obama and won't even open their minds to it. I guess reading is too much of a chore for them, it’s easer to let the bias mainstream and network new media tell them what to believe.
September 2, 2008 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
View slideshow from Anti-Palin rally this Sunday in Anchorage, AK
go to:
http://bigshow.bigfolio.com/?s=000011662&t=0e6a8ae03101be65098418ccb735e4a1
September 16, 2008 4:26 PM | Reply | Permalink