TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Report: Gonzo Told Investigators That Bush Directed Him To Ashcroft's Hospital Bed

Murray Waas reports on the website of the Atlantic that Alberto Gonzales is now telling investigators that he was being personally directed by President Bush when, as White House counsel, Gonzales made a much-discussed late-night visit in 2004 to the hospital room of then Attorney General John Ashcroft, in order to get Ashcroft to certify that the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program was legal.

During Congressional testimony last year, Gonzales repeatedly refused to answer persistent questioning from Sen. Chuck Schumer as to whether the president, or Vice President Cheney, had directed him to seek out Ashcroft in the hospital.

Cheney himself told CNN's Larry King shortly afterward: "I don't recall that I gave instructions to that effect."

It's an important question, because its answer would shed light on the extraordinary lengths to which the president was willing to go to see the wiretap program reauthorized. At the time of the hospital-room meeting, Ashcroft, in Waas's words, "had been in intensive care for six days, was heavily medicated, and was recovering from emergency surgery to remove his gall bladder."

Waas adds:

Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey has said that he believes that Gonzales and White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, who accompanied Gonzales to Ashcroft's hospital room, were trying to take advantage of Ashcroft's grievously ill state--pressing him to sign the certification possibly without even comprehending what he was doing--and in the process authorize a government surveillance program which both Ashcroft and the Justice Department had concluded was of questionable legality.

Gonzales' claim has come to light as part of an investigation being conducted by the Inspector General for the Department of Justice into whether Gonzales lied to Congress. In a separate story posted today, Waas reports that DOJ investigators are also looking into whether Gonzales created a set of fictitious notes to provide a rationale for the president's reauthorization of the program.

Gonzales had claimed during his testimony that at a 2004 meeting just prior to the Ashcroft hospital visit, Congressional leaders had given their support to the program. Four of those leaders have since denied that. President Bush had cited Gonzales' notes of the Congressional meeting as a rationale for reauthorizing the program. But the notes weren't written until days after the meeting, and after Bush and Gonzales had officially reauthorized the program. Gonzales has told the investigators that Bush personally directed him to write the notes, though it is unclear when. Investigators believe that, depending on when they were written, the notes could be evidence of an effort to provide a post-hoc justification for the reauthorization of the program.

Update: Evidence of Bush's involvement in Gonzales visit to Ashcroft's hospital room was previously reported by Barton Gellman, who wrote in his recent book, Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency: "The phone rang at Ashcroft's bedside. Bush told his ailing cabinet chief that Alberto Gonzales and Andy Card were on their way." It had not been known, however, that Gonzales has told DOJ investigators of Bush's involvement.



14 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic
Murray Waas reports ... that Alberto Gonzales is now telling investigators...

Who are the investigators, in this case? Is it DOJ, FBI, or something led by Congress??

Also, is impeachment still out of the question?

-- ARG

user-pic

Nov 5th. I hope to God!

Inspector General of the DOJ.

user-pic

Thanks, I missed that. I'm 0 for 2 this afternoon. Probably need a nap.

-- ARG

user-pic

Dirt comes out on a Friday! In the middle of the mcCain histrionics.

@#$%&*^%$#@!!!!!

"I DON'T RECALL." Thought that was Gonzo's line. Dick Cheney using it now.

I thought we already knew how this went down. The "Angler" book provides a pretty clear timeline as to how and why the hospital visit happened. Cheney was really pulling the strings here (with Addington and Gonzo as accomplices) - he deliberately misled Bush, deciding not to let him know that there was significant opposition in DOJ to the program. So when Bush sent Gonzo he thought Comey was just going off half cocked in opposing the wiretapping.

I didnt think that this account was controversial - it seems to have been backed up by both Comey and loyal bushies in the book.

ah . . . well . . .

although that story comports nicely with the "Cheney as evil pupper-master" meta-narrative, isn't it worth considering, given the VOLUMINOUS streams of evidence now being released one step ahead of the ensuing prosecutions, that GW Bush is fully capable of concocting EE-VIHLS of his own?

Reading the story again I guess the real issue here is whether after the Hospital visit (and before the program was remodeled to placate opponents) Bush ordered Gonzo to fabricate misleading minutes of a congressional meeting to justify their unprecedented approval of the program without DOJ approval.

I think though that Bush sent Gonzo to the hospital largely in ignorance of the scale of the insurgency at DoJ. I dont think that this is at all to Bush's credit though - on the contrary it exposes his administration's inherent dysfunction and untrustworthiness.

Ain't nothin' gonna happen. Obama's gonna win the election, thank God, and the Girlie-Crats are going to have an even bigger majority in Congress than they do now. And there ain't nothin' gonna happen.

EastWest

Worth noting:

  • Domestic spying without court authorization at that time was a felony
  • Any statute of limitations on such a felony will still be in effect even after the DoJ is purged of the neo-fascists put in place under Bush the Lesser
  • If a conspiracy to commit a felony complete with actions designed to cover up their role in the crime is proven with some RICO-like twist, the whole pack of them could be standing before a judge facing hard time in prison
  • How can it not be proven, since they have already admitted to it?
  • This is wa-a-a-ay beyond simple impeachment, since all impeachment does is remove the offender from office

Once the DoJ is freed from its current neo-con servitude, this could be completely out of the hands of Congress and placed where it belongs.

In court.

They are deep-Red criminals. If any energy is directed anywhere, it should be in pressuring whoever is Attorney General under President Obama to whip up a grand jury as soon as they're sworn in and have purged a sufficient number of equal-justice-refuseniks left over from Bush the Lesser, Ashcroft, Gonzalez and Mukasey.

EastWest,
"And their ain't nothing gonna happen "
You might want to keep an eye on what Senator Durbin does after the election -regarding going after the torturers & other war criminals. Also Vice President Biden will be heavily involved in rounding up the rouges elements within the gwb43 failed administration .
valmurph makes an excellent points about the DOJ insurgents trying to stop bushcnehey's assault on the Constitution. there will be a lot of ground to cover -but first we depose all the "insurgents '
And eastwest I would double dog dare you to call Senator Whitehouse a "Girlie-crat ' in person ...

user-pic


And we are not supposed to impeach Bush because.........................

user-pic

Too late in the game and it is most likely a scenario the Republicowards have prepped for. Stall the investigation, take the negative spotlight off McBush and refocus on Congressional Dems with the hope the shadow is long enough to cover Obama. A postelection investigation would be more effective.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address