« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Source: Sex Assault Program Cited in Monegan Firing Targeted Child Abusers
So Sarah Palin's latest explanation for why she fired Walt Monegan is that he had gone over her head in seeking federal money for an initiative to combat sexual assault crimes, before she had approved the program.
But it now appears that the program in question is one that most elected officials would be wary of admitting they hadn't strongly backed. According to Peggy Brown, who heads the Alaska Network on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, Monegan wanted to use the federal money to hire retired troopers and law enforcement officials, and assign them to investigate the most egregious cases of sexual assault -- including those against children.
In other words, if Palin's new story is true, she fired Monegan for being too aggressive in going after child molesters.
ABC News reported yesterday that, although Alaska leads the nation in reported rapes per capita, Palin hasn't made the issue a priority as governor.
Monegan, however, appeared eager to change that. "He seemed to get the issue and really took it seriously," Brown told TPMmuckraker.
According to the Palin camp, too seriously.













"Love Hurts"..John Mellencamp
September 16, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Nazareth sang "Love Hurts". Or Roy Orbison.
Mellencamp sang "Hurts So Good".
September 16, 2008 7:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Everly Brothers did "Love Hurts".
So I guess it's been going on for a long time.
The citizens of Alaska should start a RECALL on her.
September 17, 2008 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeez, you can't make this stuff up.
September 16, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's like the Iraq war. Here a reason. There a reason. Everywhere a reason, reason. How many reasons will there be? Something else to count.
September 16, 2008 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Here a reason. There a reason. Everywhere a reason, reason"
very catchy, that tune :)
September 17, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great - now can we get this in an ad, please?
September 16, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed. This needs to be in advertising in every contested state. Protecting children against sexual abuse is backed by almost everyone.
It should also be noted that the gynecologist who delivered Palin's own latest child also specializes in cases of child sexual abuse. Is this a coincidence, or part of why the Palin family chose her?
September 16, 2008 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bizarre. Yo, MEDIA! There's a STORY here!
September 17, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ya see, Palin was sexually abused as a child; that's what expalins the non-pediatrician/gynecologist GP expert in child sexual abuse delivering her kid. IT just took an unusually long time to come to term.
I still think the expert was involved because the kid is actually Bristol's (or her sister's?).
There's llits of talk about inbreeding in the south. And in ME. But Alaska!?
September 17, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
So that makes both halves of the GOP ticket pro-child molester! McCain, of course, went after Obama for trying to protect kindergardeners from abusers. Put that in an ad and its game, set, match.
September 16, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was going to point out the same thing. It's ridiculous, of course, but it fits a narrative that, were the tables turned, McCain-Palin would surely be pushing.
September 16, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
No different than the crowd we have now. They allowed Gonzo to avoid prosecuting guards in a Texas prison for raping their young inmates...no proof of violent injury, or that they didn't consent.
September 17, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who are McShame/Palin attempting to reach? I've heard of kissing babies for votes, but this is bizarre and outrageous. Is their base actually pedophiles?
September 17, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give me a break! She fired him for insubordination. She wss his boss and he went behind her back. The man was an at-will employee and served at the discretion of the governor.
Get over it.
September 16, 2008 6:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Then why did the REPUBLICAN controlled legislature begin an investigation months ago? If there is NOTHING to hide why are McCAIN'S ATTORNEYS trying to shut down the investigation.
WHAT IS PALIN HIDING?
September 16, 2008 7:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since when has a state government ever been an "at will" hire/fire organization?
September 16, 2008 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since never! State jobs are probably the closest thing one can get to a lifetime appointment without wearing a judge's robe.
Although it is the case that folks in publicly visible positions with the state might get tossed to the wolves to atone for some sin of their department.
Governments are institutions, and good institutions are not dictatorships. If you have a talented and tenured professional in a position of power, that person is there for a reason. You may not get along with that person, but you respect that person even if he doesn't always do what pleases you. As long as the results are there--as long as the person is doing good work that aligns with the goals of the institution--you don't yank him, his knowledge, his skills and throw them away because he didn't obey your demands. That's petty and small-minded and bad leadership.
Given that, her whole "loyalty test" bit is rather mind blowing. Imagine the president doing that to all the flag officers in the military.
September 17, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Give me a break!
Palin and Bush both have the right to fire competent government employees, and replace them with partisan hacks.
It's a shame the American people (and in this case, sexually abused children) have to suffer for it.
But I guess, whatever it takes to get Republicans elected so we can have four more years of Bush's successful economic policies.
September 17, 2008 3:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, right: his effort to get Federal monies for sexual assault programs threatened her unequivocal opposition to earmarks, and lipstick -- I mean, pork.
Or was it because he didn't go through Ted Stevens (R-Indicted)?
September 17, 2008 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
ALASKA'S RAPE EPIDEMIC SWEPT UNDER PALIN'S RUG
So far, the Troopergate story has been a tempest in a tea kettle -- a roguish cop triggered a hot-tempered governor into some minor abuses of power, which lead to a decent man (Monegan) getting fired. Sad, but still a parochial story. Hardly headline fare, except that in the mean time Palin moved onto the national stage.
So, besides partisanship, why should the public care about this story? Well, two recent stories have a common theme of rape and they make one wonder.
The stories are : McClatchy, 9/12/08, "Wasilla Rape Victims Billed When Palin Was Mayor" and ABC, Brian Ross, 9/15/08, "Critics Question Palin's Record on Rape Epidemic, Domestic Violence in Alaska."
The common theme of the two stories is rape and Gov. Palin's apparent distain for the victims.
What if Governor Palin has a blind spot about rape? What if she has a blame-the-victim philosophy? That should be reported.
Alaska has the highest rate of rape in the nation. That is an embarrassment and a shame in and of itself and should be discussed.
What has Governor Palin done about this problem? Did she support programs and policies to fix it? Did she provide budget for those programs? Did she seek Federal earmarks for them?
Or, as the ABC story alleges, did she fire Chief Monegan because he was trying to do something about it while she was trying to cut budget for anti-rape programs?
This is an important policy issue. If Monegan was fired for trying to do something about Alaska's rape epidemic, then Troopergate becomes very, very important.
September 16, 2008 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Alaska has the highest rate of rape in the nation. That is an embarrassment and a shame in and of itself and should be discussed.
"What has Governor Palin done about this problem? Did she support programs and policies to fix it? Did she provide budget for those programs? Did she seek Federal earmarks for them?"
The only thing normal for Republicans is to accuse others of their own sins. They accused Obama of wanting to provide "comprehensive sex education" for kindergartners -- implying HE was a preditor.
So Palin opposes abortion in all cases, protects rapists, and has an expert in CHILD sex abuse deliver HER kid when she was 44!?
Wait a minute: WHO's kid is it? Was there rape or incest involved?
Not only, "Who's the daddy?" -- who's the mommy!?
September 17, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
527s? Calling all 527s? decentamericansagainstchildmolestingunlikesarahpalinwhofirespeopleforfighting.org?
September 16, 2008 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Different subject check this:
Schwarzenegger, a Republican, made the announcement this afternoon. The veto will mark the first time in modern history that a California governor has rejected a veto a state spending plan. The Democrat-controlled Legislature has said it is prepared to override a veto. http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2008/09/schwarzenegger.html
did anyone catch it...?
September 16, 2008 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the problem for women voters. Palin held up this Earmark!
Alaska is the # 1 state in the country for Rape and has been for 23 out of the last 30 years !!!
(FBI’s Uniform Crime Report, http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm)
September 16, 2008 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's better than that. She held it up because it interfered with her earmark strategy, and she had more imporant priorities for Uncle Ted.
September 16, 2008 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sex offenders in Anchorage
www.familywatchdog.us
Or by state
http://www.familywatchdog.us/OffenderCountByState.asp
September 16, 2008 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pattern of not taking sexual abuse seriously. Add that onto charging victims for rape kits.
September 16, 2008 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Republicans for Child Molestation!
Republican Presidential Candidate, John McCain criticized Senator Obama because Senator Obama supported Illinois legislation which required schools that have sex education classes to also teach about the problem of child molestation. When asked about this, Senator McCain could only say, my friends, child molesters are my friends too.
Republican Vice Presidential Candidate, Sainte Sarah, fired public safety director because he sought funds to combat child molestation in Alaska. When asked about this, Governor Sainte Sarah responded, God loves child molesters too. And, Alaska comes first.
September 16, 2008 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
All this while John McCain was busy hugging Bush while the financial and insurance giants were raping their investors,
while the mortgage lending industry was raping the most vulnerable homeowners,
while Exxon and Chevron were taking turns on every man, woman and child in America,
and our troops were dyin' in a war of lyin'
and all the aroused necrophiles blamed the corpses when the levees and emergency officials were breaking.
And the reformers keep performing the reform of something that nobody at all can see.
You can tan that moosehide and lip gloss over the facts while winning something in the United Slates of Iraq's and spin magic on every page of the tragic,
but I can't afford to buy it at any old size
cuz the inflation's too great on that sad pack of lies.
September 16, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
very nice message and clave.
September 18, 2008 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
So Palin saw rape as a source of State revenue, in that victims were billed for their rape kits.
Monegan saw things differently. I imagine any civilized person would.
September 16, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, in order to increase revenue, one ENCOURAGES rape?
September 17, 2008 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Presumably, that's what was on Cheney's mind when he greenlighted the Iraq invasion.
September 18, 2008 1:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Sanity again. I was entertaining myself posting on Pajamas Media but the right wing blogosphere are vicious, condescending, sexist and scary. (posted as avoidswork, for whatever reason TPM and I have huge password issues)
At least I got an author of an article to reply and insult, etc. I mean, these are the kind of people that use the word "womyn". I also was told in a kind manner to go ahead and kill myself if I wished b/c it was better than murdering a baby.
When you press them on stuff like the rape kit charges, about Alaska's state statistics on violence against women, rape and incest crickets chirp. They have no comprehension of how PALINs POV on such issues of choice, abstinence and the like could, like, be an issue because VPs don't make laws, Congress does.
Yeah, except there is this scary elephant in the room called "Supreme Court Justice" appointments.
The right doesn't care that she's a liar. That she is NOT a feminist. That between her state and mccain's record on women's issues they don't represent women.
They don't talk Troopergate and would never respond to anyone pointing out the hypocrisy in firing a man who wants to tighten controls on the worst state in America's sexual abuse situation.
And they don't care that this is a woman who, if her daughter was raped, would "choose life." They will not answer you when you ask them to look a young teenage female who has been raped in the eye and tell them that they have to suffer the consequences of an act not in their choosing and "choose life."
I had no true comprehension until posting at the conservative site how hate-filled, vicious and frightening these people are...
September 16, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
STOP calling them "conservative". Teddy Roosevelt was a conservative. These frootloops are NOT CONSERVATIVE: they are what have always been traditionally called LUNATIC FRINGE.
STOP giving them false credibility by playing by their warped dictionary!
September 17, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
its never the crime its the always the coverup but in Palin's case she is so dumb its both
September 16, 2008 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone want to bet that a relative (or friend) of
Sarah's was coming under investigation?
September 17, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly! The original "Who's kid is it REALLY?" question is STILL relevant. A CHILD sexual abuse expert delivers the child of an ADULT WOMAN of 44!?
And SHE APPEARS to want to PREVENT investigation of rapes and CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE!?
Along with: "Who's REALLY the DADDY?"
September 17, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why isn't this story on the front page of the NYT or the WaPo?
September 17, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Does this help explain why the question of statutory rape never came up with her daughter? Note that I have no idea how old the boyfriend is, but I think the daughter is definitely a minor.
September 17, 2008 3:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why does Sarah Palin support child sex abuse?
September 17, 2008 9:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
At least she isn't a flip-flopper: there's no evidence she was against it before she was for it.
September 17, 2008 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Finally -- an issue about which she is consistent!
September 17, 2008 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to proliferate porcine platitudes, but doesn't Palin remind anyone else of that sow's ear we always hear about?
With a complicit media and a swooning Oedipal and Electra base that is desperately seeking thier mother-grizzly protector, this silk purse has bristles.
Palin surely "Electra"-fied the old men in the GOP. Freud would have a field day with this Republican ticket...
September 17, 2008 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gad!
We have that photo of McCain submissivlely hugging Bushit.
And then he hugs to his heart this MASSIVE multi-level SCANDAL!
September 17, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is with Palin and sexual assault? Perhaps she believes that women are to submit to men as their temporal and spiritual masters. Is that why "First Dude" (what an utterly trite nickname) has his hand in all key decisions? Some wacky, religious thing, maybe (there's plenty of color to be had on that subject and Palin).
September 17, 2008 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
You think this has some jackdawed connection (in Palin's mind) to her beliefs about abortion?
That maybe if someone can't move forward with a rape case they will have to keep any living products of the violent encounter? To leave it in the hands of God?
Or do you think that trimming the budget for the installation of the grand Wasilla sports complex was more important in Palin's mind than a shattered victim?
What a humanist! What a warm and fuzzy, lipsticked, soccer Mommy!
September 17, 2008 11:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
RECALL! RECALL! RECALL!
September 17, 2008 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I simply can't understand people who think like this. How can any woman not want to do every thing possible to stop rapes and help women and children who were raped? It makes no sense to me and as an RN I have been around many differant people in my long career.
As for the people on the "conservative" blogs etc they are brutal. I have never heard or felt such hate and anger as when I read the comments on the ABC website after Palin's first interview. They were over the top! How can someone go through life so angry all the time?
September 17, 2008 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
McCain and Palin babble about change and reform.
What we can expect, if they are elected (horror!), is chump change and DEform.
September 17, 2008 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
This sounds bizarre and downright sick but it appears that Palin is actually PRO-RAPE. Yes, I know what you're thinking, that's totally nuts, but bear with me a sec.
Palin has stated that there should be no exceptions to a ban on abortion. In the case of rape, (perhaps the one case where every sane person, even abortion foes, agrees that abortion should be available), Palin has said abortion should not be available even to rape victims. This is so far outside of the mainstream that not even GOP policy supports this.
By way of explanation she stated that the unborn should not have to pay for "the mistakes of society".
Mistake? She considers rape a mistake?
Perhaps this is why she believes rape victims should have to pay for their own treatment and that someone should be fired when they attempt to agressively pursue child molesters.
September 17, 2008 11:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK ... so which one of Gov. Palin's relatives do you wanna bet is a child molester? Why else would the conservative, pro-life, law & order, fire the trooper, marry your baby-mama, conservative Gov. Sarah Palin be concerned about the state's safety commissioner getting tough on child molesters?
September 18, 2008 3:49 PM | Reply | Permalink