« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Lawmakers To Issue Subpoenas, But Not For Palin, on Trooper-Gate
Despite stone-walling from Sarah Palin, Alaska legislators aren't backing down in their quest to uncover what happened in Trooper-Gate.
The bipartisan committee overseeing the investigation announced today in a press release that they're moving up the date that they release the results of their investigation by three weeks, meaning it should come out in early October. The commitee, led by Sen. Hollis French, an Anchorage Democrat also announced that it would meet on September 12 to issue subpoenas in the case.
But according to the release, Palin herself will not be subpoenaed. The committee still holds out hope that she will talk to indepedendent investigator Steven Branchflower voluntarily.
"We also discussed and agreed amongst ourselves that no subpoena will be issued for the Governor," said
Representative Nancy Dahlstrom, R-Eagle River. "She has told the public that she intends to cooperate with
the investigation, indeed, she has told the public that she welcomes the investigation and I have every faith
that she means it. If necessary we can send Mr. Branchflower to wherever the Governor is, or she can give
her statement to him over the telephone, whatever is most convenient for her. We recognize that her
schedule is extremely busy, and we want to accommodate that."
French had initially indicated that subpoenas likely wouldn't be necessary, since Palin had pledged her full cooperation. But earlier this week, Palin's lawyer warned that unless the case were handed over to the state personnel board -- whose three members are appointed by the governor -- Palin would not be made available to testify. And according to the release: This week, seven key witnesses informed Mr. Branchflower through their attorneys that they would not provide depositions. Their depositions, which had been agreed to and scheduled earlier with Mr. Branchflower, were cancelled within the last 72 hours."
The case centers on allegations by former Alaska Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan that he was fired because of his reluctance to fire a state trooper, Jim Wooten, who was divorced from Palin's sister and was embroiled in a family dispute with the Palins. Palin has denied her personal involvement in the effort to have Wooten fired, though emails from Palin provided Wednesday night by Monegan to the Washington Post show that in February 2007 she complained to Monegan that Wooten was still employed.
Speaking to ABC News, French accused the McCain-Palin campaign of using stall tactics to prevent him from releasing the results of the probe by October 31st -- just four days before the election.
The issuance of subpoenas will need to be voted on by the full Judiciary Comittee, which is composed of 8 Republicans and 4 Democrats. In late July, the Committee voted 12-0 to hire an independent investigator to look into the affair.
It's worth noting that the legislature doesn't have the power to compel witnesses to be deposed by Branchflower. Rather, it can require them to testify, under oath, at public hearings.













Obviously all of Karl Rove's practice with legal stalling tactics is paying off. This will go nowhere.
September 5, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Doesn't have to go anywhere, it only needs the turd blossom odor that it now has.
September 5, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama CANNOT miss his small window of oppty here: NOW is the time for Palin ads painting her as deceitful, out-of-touch right-wing fanatic and incomptent BEFORE the GOP puts them on the defense or successfully completes her branding.
She is not doing interviews, so set the agenda in regards to Palin NOW.
The Obama team is SO SLOW and needs to be more aggressive.
September 5, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree. Go after her on the lies she's been telling. Go after her as a Maverick of convenience. It will be tough for the McCain camp to defend her without putting her in front of reporters.
http://pufferfish.typepad.com/
September 5, 2008 3:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sure the Dems should be busy defining her now (carefully or it could easily backfire) so that when she finally comes out from under her protective rock she has to spend a lot of time answering attacks rather than launching them.
It has to be done carefully though. If the troopergate thing is turned to nothing by the Republican-run Alaskan legislature, then any attacks based too heavily on that would backfire.
Attack her based on what she is being "taught" by Lieberman and AIPAC and the neocons: hammer how they have been dead wrong on EVERYTHING so that when she robotically repeats neocon talking points they fall flat.
Attack her for wanting to ban books.
Attack her for her belief that our occupation of Iraq is "serving god" (she is a crusader).
Attack her in ways that also attack McCain.
September 5, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read an article out of an Alakan newspaper that the State Senate committee consists of 8 Republicans and 4 Democrats. If it were an us vs. them attack Palin would not have a thing to worry about. However, seeing how the committee is heavy on the Republican side, it tells me Palin has a serious Legislature problem. Could explain why all of a sudden she is pushing for the State Ethics Board to weigh in, especially since she appointed all the standing members.
September 5, 2008 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems I confused the Judicary Committee with the Senate Committee on the members political affiliation. I'll go back and see if I can find that article.
September 5, 2008 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many of those Republicans are the 'old guard'. Sarah isn't popular with them as she wouldn't put up with their shenanigans.
September 5, 2008 9:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ms. Palin is hiding in order prevent being asked questions she'd have to answer "on the record" before the election. She's trying to avoid having to lie now and being caught in a lie later. If she were innocent with no need to lie, why wouldn't she confront this issue now and remove the cloud of doubt it hangs over her VP candidacy? Obviously, the McCain campaign thinks going "on the record" now would hurt McCain's chances of winning the presidency or force Ms. Palin to lie. They don't care how she would be perceived after the election. This is same old stonewalling that comes out of the Bush/Rove White House. McCain is no different than Bush. His ambition is more important to him than his integrity.
September 5, 2008 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tom Brokaw says Troopergate is a non-issue. Why won't people just believe him?
September 5, 2008 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
What make Brokaw an expert?
September 5, 2008 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tom Brokaw is a Member in Good Standing of The Village, a Grand Poobah of Conventional Wisdom. And a putz.
September 5, 2008 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe him! Thanks, I can tune this out now.
September 5, 2008 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin and her machine, with the help of Washington Republicans, are clearly moving fast to shut this thing down. They've gotten to 7 of the key witnesses and told them to clam up, and you'd be a fool to think it ends there: the kicker for me here is that the Judiciary Committee is composed of 8 Republicans and 4 Democrats. Those 8 Republicans will absolutely, without question be leaned on, and instructed to obstruct any issuance of subpoenas (subpoenae?). There's absolutely no way in hell this thing is going forward.
And mk3872, I couldn't agree more on the Obama campaign's slowness and shocking lack of vitality when it comes to taking on McCain. They are constantly given McCain gaffes that for some utterly unfathomable reason they refuse -- refuse! -- to capitalize on. McCain says "Social security is a disgrace," while still collecting it himself. Has the Obama campaign turned that into an ad that's playing non-stop in Florida and other states with huge elderly populations? Nope. McCain goes to Colorado and mentions that he wants to revisit the water-rights pact between it and AZ and CA, etc. -- a suggestion that sends Coloradans through the roof. Did Obama turn it into an ad? Nope. Has anyone seen an ad made from Phil Gramm calling unemployed Americans whiners? Nope. The list goes on, of course, and the 8 houses thing is the exception that proves the rule. Every time McDroolCup makes a new gaffe it joins the rest of them, blithely passed over and left uncontested. It's crazy. I had no idea Axelrod and Plouffe et al were so passive.
Well, here's hoping the GOTV is as vaunted and effective as all the hype is telling us it is, because it's all Obama's got now that he's ceded message, perception, character and personality to the Republicans.
September 5, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's an interesting development that 7 key witnesses have said that they would not provide depositions. There's more here than what's being printed. I'm wondering if those 7 aren't being coached by some of the Bu$h operatives working with McCain's campaign to always answer with "I don't remember" like so many Senate and House hearings have had to endure?
September 5, 2008 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sometimes traps simply need longer to spring. They are giving Palin all the oppty to come forward. Essentially the Brother-in-law and State Police Chief have come forward to the press and told their stories, the emails are released so what if she came forward and said in a Checkers like speech....my brother-in-law tazored my nephew....I thought it was so grievousness to fire him....I was wrong....
But now as she goes around stonewalling and going back on the promise to her citizens of AK then a narrative can be made that she is no different than what is in DC now with Bush and Cheney.....Thus the trap.....That McCain knew and he still chose her....more of the same....
It is the independents and unaffiliated that is the audience....
Let her go and hide for a few weeks and then paint her in the old pol corner who simply is wearing lipstick (her words not mine)
September 5, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
This investigation is nothing but a witch hunt led by modern day Torquemada Hollis French, a partisan Democrat state senator. Kudos to www.notwrightforamerica.com for beating everyone to this story.
French has leaked statements about how this investigation would be "damaging to the Governor" almost before it even started! This supposedly fair and independent investigation is nothing of the sort--it's a witch hunt, and it puts the execution before the trial.
September 5, 2008 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
You make no sense. Why would a legislative committee with twice as many republicans as democrats appoint a "partisan democrat" to lead a "witch hunt" against a republican governor? Hell, man, the vote was 12-0. This guy French can't be what you say he is or he would have never been given the gig.
September 5, 2008 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
In Alaskan politics 'republican' vs 'republican' is not unusual. The 'old guard' doesn't like Sarah.
Several of the 'old guard' are now in jail due to the FBI.
September 5, 2008 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you so much for the link to that marvelous notwrightforamerica nonpartisan site. It is truly a font of knowledge. However, I have not found a written statement from Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh confirming the "witch hunt" nature of the investigation, and without their articulation of the same I cannot boldly repeat these points to friends, comrades and neighbors. Could you be so kind as to direct me to their talking points on the topic.
September 6, 2008 7:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Know the difference in the Alaskan hockey mom and a pitbull? 1 ball!
September 5, 2008 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Correction to my mistatement :
The Alaska Judicary Committee that is looking into Palin's "possible" abuse of power concerning Trooper-gate consists of 2 Democrats and 3 Republicans. So its lopsided in her favor politically, but as I said earlier, she seems to have a Legislature problem so she's throwing it to the Ethics panel cause she appointed the three sitting members.
September 5, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why no subpoena for Sarah? Did the Bush-Cheney-Rove Goon Squad that went up to Anchorage leave some horse heads in beds?
September 5, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's what I suspect when I first heard McShame dispatched a plane load up there just after announcing her as his running mate. I suspect they've been terrorizing the locals. I just wonder how Alaskan feel about people from the lower 48 coming up to their territory and telling them what to do, not do, say, not say. And I always thought they were so fiercely independent. Seems they have a herd instinct, especially seeing how summer is waning and winter is starting to settle in.
September 5, 2008 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seems to me that ... www.notwrightforamerica ... is a white trash url. Just like Palin.
September 5, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
This isn't good news for the Dems, but it's not terribly surprising and in the end maybe not all that important. The media still seems to be pursuing her aggressively enough that I think the Obama camp is smart not to "define her". Let this play out a while longer. See if the NE does to her what it did to John Edwards and keep to the (accurate) message that McCain/Palin promises more of Bush/Cheney.
September 5, 2008 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't this whole Sarah Palin soap opera getting to be a big bluf by the McCain camp?
We're supposed to just believe them when they say she's "ready to be VP"? Because the media can't question her, we're supposed to take a pig in a poke and vote for her? How far would all this get if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Barack Obama not taking questions?
On top of all the secrecy, now the campaign is doing all it can to cover up "TrooperGate". When I heard last weekend that the McCain camp was sending its' own lawyers up to Alaska to "check things out", my first thought was that they'd try to cover it up.
Looks like I was CORRECT!
September 5, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't this whole Sarah Palin soap opera getting to be a big bluf by the McCain camp?
We're supposed to just believe them when they say she's "ready to be VP"? Because the media can't question her, we're supposed to take a pig in a poke and vote for her? How far would all this get if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Barack Obama not taking questions?
On top of all the secrecy, now the campaign is doing all it can to cover up "TrooperGate". When I heard last weekend that the McCain camp was sending its' own lawyers up to Alaska to "check things out", my first thought was that they'd try to cover it up.
Looks like I was CORRECT!
September 5, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't this whole Sarah Palin soap opera getting to be a big bluf by the McCain camp?
We're supposed to just believe them when they say she's "ready to be VP"? Because the media can't question her, we're supposed to take a pig in a poke and vote for her? How far would all this get if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Barack Obama not taking questions?
On top of all the secrecy, now the campaign is doing all it can to cover up "TrooperGate". When I heard last weekend that the McCain camp was sending its' own lawyers up to Alaska to "check things out", my first thought was that they'd try to cover it up.
Looks like I was CORRECT!
September 5, 2008 4:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I read the transcript of Bailey's call to the Highway Patrol on Palin's behalf. It was released by the troopers' union when they filed their lawsuit on 9/3. It's very damaging to Palin, in my opinion. Bailey is very uncomfortable, as is the Lieutenant he is talking to, especially when Bailey mentions Wooten's worker's compensation files, which they both know are confidential. But Bailey also throws in asides about the governor's support for department funding and how she really likes Walt (Monegan, the guy she eventually fired), but they just can't understand how Wooten can still be on the force. I think a good prosecutor would eat her for lunch.
September 5, 2008 4:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
No doubt the Palin interference was a very personal thing, but she should have left it to the review board. And, after all, the Palin sister chose this goof for a husband. In these matters, this sort of problem often develops. Plenty of free complaints from family members on both sides. However, in any of the family court cases we have had including the very hate-filled ones like this, I have never seen any official interfere in the livelihood of an ex-brother-in-law. In fact, that would even hurt the children of the marriage. All these Palin complaints seem far from being objective even in the light of police groups that protect their own.
September 5, 2008 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another sad day for the democracy. Justice is being laughed at every day. And now, we have someone said first she was going to help with the investigation, and now decides otherwise.
Only in America, you can see such as scam. A total unexperienced politician may become one heartbeat from the presidency...
MSNBC is selling the idea that Pitt bull is the most experienced person in the country, more than any other politician, and sadly more than 50% in the country believe it.
This is really sad, but i guess at the end, Americans deserve their politicians...
September 5, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Folks - another distraction.
The real story on Palin: She never told Congress to take the bridge and shove it. Congress killed it a year before she came into office.
Why is she lying to make herself look good?
September 5, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why the Airplane EBay Story matters. John McCain repeated the lie today that Sarah Palin sold the state plane on EBay "for a profit". Of course she did put it on EBay, but ultimately sold it through a private plane broker for loss. It appears that the purchaser was a Palin campaign contributer, but that part of the story is still being confirmed. This is important because it not only amplifies that McCain has bad judgment because he doesn't properly research things before he says them, but it shows how bad a VP Palin would be. She'll stand by and let her boss get it wrong when she herself knows the truth. This is the same old GOP with lipstick.
The good news is that the MSM is just now catching up on the reporting on this story.
September 5, 2008 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh: Maybe a DAYS-WITHOUT-PRESS-CONFERENCE counter would be appropriate for the Vice-Maverick.
Can we start one?
It's now 7 days since her intro - how bout we start there?
September 5, 2008 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's so much to attack where do we begin?
September 5, 2008 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama does not have to attack these people, they will hang themselves if you give them enough rope. Look at the way Obama never attacks them personally. That means as soon as you do wrong and the press make it an issue, by not making it one the press will stay on the story. republicans are in trouble and they know it. "IF" (just like the polls!!)40 million people watch her speech then why can't they sell out a small arena!! If the polls are right then how come I never see more then 200 people at a McCain rally? Where are all of the McCain supporters, they are WHERE!!! People don't hide their choice. Smoke and mirrows is all it is. When the smoke clears Obama will win in a land slide!!!
September 5, 2008 6:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mike Wooten is a loose cannon that needed to be tossed over board.
The Alaska State Troopers have a long history of high profile cases involving their own, gone bad.
A little digging into the blunders and errors of the AST over the years would reveal a pattern of behavior very similar to Trooper Wooten by various members of the AST.
JS
September 5, 2008 6:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone know why Wooten was fired? What did he do?
September 5, 2008 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wooten has not been fired, and he is still a trooper in the state of Alaska...
Palin is accused of using her power to fire Walter Monegan, the Public Safety Commissioner of Alaska because he refused to fire Wooten...
September 5, 2008 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry for the mistake. Why did she want him fired?
September 5, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
The larger issue about troopergate and the firing of Walt Monegan is that it reveals how Palin's actions as mayor and governor replicate the Bush administration's abuse of office scandals - particularly the Department of Justice firing of 7 US District Attorneys. In their article "Palin's Start in Alaska - Not Politics as Usual", the NY Times reports that even as mayor Palin fired a librarian (later reinstating her after protests) who refused to censor books she took exception to. They also report she forced out and fired several government employees who were less ideologically committed introducing a form of ideological wedge politics they describe as unheard of in small-town Alaska.
The firing of Walt Monegan, allegedly because he refused to fire Palin's brother-in-law, seems not exceptional but part of a pattern of abuse of office. And it is an abuse of office that is at the heart of the Department of Justice firings and points to how closely Palin's governing style mimics that of the Bush administration. This is the picture the Obama campaign should be emphasising: that Palin abuses office; that Palin is too ideologically committed to govern competently; that she hires and fires people not because of their skills or how well they do their job but by how much they serve her agenda.
September 5, 2008 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that the Palin narrative will change after the debates. Biden needs to do two things: 1) take a hammer to the clay feet of her "record", as you have started to outline, but the keys will be taxes (raised them), debt(started with no debt but left Wassila with over $20 million in debt), priorities (instead of sewers and streets, she built a hockey rink that is losing money), not a reformer (Troopergate, Librarian-gate, cronyism) and 2) don't be "sexist". Everyone already knows the GOP playbook here. The prepackaged playbook will use any one of Biden's best punches against him as "sexist."
September 5, 2008 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
One other point that Biden should make is that "what kind of VP do the American people want, one who speaks their mind when they know the truth or one who stands silently by while the boss states an easily provable lie (sold the plane on Ebay for a profit when she actually sold it privately to a campaign contributor at a loss to the state). Also, when someone says "thanks, but no thanks" they usually return the money, and instead of spending it on the "bridge to nowhere" spends it on the "road to nowhere."
September 5, 2008 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can see why they can release this report 3 weeks early. All they will have are phone records and e-mail exchanges. Since Sarah Palin was named as McCain's VP everybody suddenly lawyered up and now nobody is talking. Politics 1 Accountability 0.
September 5, 2008 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that the Palin narrative will change after the debates. Biden needs to do two things: 1) take a hammer to the clay feet of her "record", as you have started to outline, but the keys will be taxes (raised them), debt(started with no debt but left Wassila with over $20 million in debt), priorities (instead of sewers and streets, she built a hockey rink that is losing money), not a reformer (Troopergate, Librarian-gate, cronyism) and 2) don't be "sexist". Everyone already knows the GOP playbook here. The prepackaged playbook will use any one of Biden's best punches against him as "sexist."
September 5, 2008 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Her experience? Governor of a big state? Really? Surely that doesn't qualify Palin for the VP role -- a heart beat away as they say. The last guy as I recall used this on his resume. And not even his good-old-boy Tx Ranger sports talk made up for his ineptitude.
September 5, 2008 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
The window is closing, you are so correct.
NOW is the time to brand Mrs. Palin as a deceitful, out of touch right wing fanatic.
September 5, 2008 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someone - the media perhaps - needs to enlighten people that Palin actually got a very significant amount of money thrown to Alaska (called pork by McCain). Surely that fact can be shown without someone being slandered as sexist. I have seen video of her bragging about it and thanking Stevens for all his help. And, the next story would be just who helped her grease the wheels. Many more beyond Stevens.
September 5, 2008 10:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it is eally important that the following information gets out to the MSM. We need to know more about this person. God forbid this scary woman ever gets elected to a major office...we will be screwed!
http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/05/alaskans-speak-in-a-frightened-whisper-palin-is-%e2%80%9cracist-sexist-vindictive-and-mean%e2%80%9d/
September 6, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it is eally important that the following information gets out to the MSM. We need to know more about this person. God forbid this scary woman ever gets elected to a major office...we will be screwed!
http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/05/alaskans-speak-in-a-frightened-whisper-palin-is-%e2%80%9cracist-sexist-vindictive-and-mean%e2%80%9d/
September 6, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think it is eally important that the following information gets out to the MSM. We need to know more about this person. God forbid this scary woman ever gets elected to a major office...we will be screwed!
http://www.laprogressive.com/2008/09/05/alaskans-speak-in-a-frightened-whisper-palin-is-%e2%80%9cracist-sexist-vindictive-and-mean%e2%80%9d/
September 6, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Little known facts about Ms. Palin: 1) pushed for censorship in Alaskan libraries. 2)Sarah Palin refused the building of the bridge only after she saw it was advantageous to her politically but she kept the MONEY! all $223 mil...[talk about more of the same...uuuggghhh!]
September 6, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
WOW, I hope this gets properly confirmed. She needs to go away!
September 6, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Little known facts about Ms. Palin: 1) pushed for censorship in Alaskan libraries. 2)Sarah Palin refused the building of the bridge only after she saw it was advantageous to her politically but she kept the MONEY! all $223 mil...[talk about more of the same...uuuggghhh!]
September 6, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Little known facts about Ms. Palin: 1) pushed for censorship in Alaskan libraries. 2)Sarah Palin refused the building of the bridge only after she saw it was advantageous to her politically but she kept the MONEY! all $223 mil...[talk about more of the same...uuuggghhh!]
September 6, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
The McWar camp is now nixing the investigation. It is on newsweek....
http://www.newsweek.com/id/157439
This is the reform to believe in....
And another scam that Americans will accept,
September 6, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is complete and utter scum of the earth. If the repugs get elected, this country is done for. We either get on the right path now or never. Four years will be too late. Someday soon, I hope to retire to a sane place and watch the meltdown from afar.
September 6, 2008 6:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
I strongly agree that SOUTH DAKOTA BOUGHT OFF PUNK, TOM BROKAW has sold out......and is a worthless self serving punk putz.
Brokaw actually stated that "....the bloggers are responsible for the school shooters" after the West Virginia shooter went nuts???????????
How many people think that BLOGGERS are the cause of the MK ULTRA MANCHURIAN CANDIDATES SHOOTING UP SCHOOLS?????????????
September 6, 2008 11:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Last one to get a subpoena is the focus of the investigation.
September 6, 2008 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what will these "family values" people spin if the National Enquirer allegations are correct that wholesome Sarah had an affair with her husband's business...who tried to close his divorce records to the public and lost?
September 6, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
So what will these "family values" people spin if the National Enquirer allegations are correct that wholesome Sarah had an affair with her husband's business partner...who tried to close his divorce records to the public and lost?
September 6, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with the earlier poster that we need to attack her NOW. Attack her extremist views on abortion and global warming. Point out her husband's membership in the Alaskan Independence Party. Paint her as the nutjob she really is. The choice issue, especially, is one that could swing independents - not even being in favor of abortion in case of rape or incest is far out of the mainstream - it isn't even in the river.
September 6, 2008 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
When will dems learn how to pick a nominee? We always lose presidential elections, because we don't pick winners. Obama is such a girly man. Sara has been landing left and right hooks on him since she got the nomination, while he refuses to hit back. He will lose. He is not a fighter. Hillary is a fighter and she and Bill have beat the republicans more than once. Enjoy 4 more years of the repubs.
September 6, 2008 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
TPM, Daily Kos, Politico, and Huffington and the established mediaisare not putting alleged Palin's affair on their sites. Why not? This would really hit the right wing in their family values pretensons. Check www.thefirstpost.co.uk
September 6, 2008 4:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Currently, all voters (regardless of party affiliation or where they fit on the conservative/liberal continuum) should be interested in having the following three questions answered: 1) Is Sarah Palin qualified to be "one heartbeat" away from the presidency (especially when her party's presidential candidate is a 72 year-old cancer survivor)? 2) Is Sarah Palin in actuality a political reformer (keeping in mind the reports concerning her ties to a Ted Stevens 527 fundraising unit, her retention of a lobbyist associated with Jack Abramoff, her love of earmarks, etc.)? 3) Does Sarah Palin -- who compares herself with a pit bull and was once nicknamed Sarah Barracuda -- have the right set of social skills and the temperament to be Vice President (at a time when voters of both parties want there to be more cooperation, compromise and bipartisanship in Washington, as a means to address major problems such as the souring economy, the energy crisis, etc.)? In addition to the three questions above, there is a fourth question for moderates and independents: 4) Is Sarah Palin a conservative or do her positions on certain issues make her an ultra-conservative with radical views (keeping in mind her failed attempt at banning books from the public library, her views on abortion in the event of rape or incest, her support of teaching creationism in the public schools, etc.)?
September 6, 2008 6:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Currently, all voters (regardless of party affiliation or where they fit on the conservative/liberal continuum) should be interested in having the following three questions answered: 1) Is Sarah Palin qualified to be "one heartbeat" away from the presidency (especially when her party's presidential candidate is a 72 year-old cancer survivor)? 2) Is Sarah Palin in actuality a political reformer (keeping in mind the reports concerning her ties to a Ted Stevens 527 fundraising unit, her retention of a lobbyist associated with Jack Abramoff, her love of earmarks, etc.)? 3) Does Sarah Palin -- who compares herself with a pit bull and was once nicknamed Sarah Barracuda -- have the right set of social skills and the temperament to be Vice President (at a time when voters of both parties want there to be more cooperation, compromise and bipartisanship in Washington, as a means to address major problems such as the souring economy, the energy crisis, etc.)? In addition to the three questions above, there is a fourth question for moderates and independents: 4) Is Sarah Palin a conservative or do her positions on certain issues make her an ultra-conservative with radical views (keeping in mind her failed attempt at banning books from the public library, her views on abortion in the event of rape or incest, her support of teaching creationism in the public schools, etc.)?
September 6, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Senator Obama, being a responsible legislator --unlike his opponent -- cannot act on unfounded speculation. He cannot act on rumors and potentially false accusations. Imagine if she's exonerated in this investigation and he's accused her of a wrongdoing.
You people who want him to fight dirty like everyone else forget why we support him and began supporting him in the first place. We support him because he is not like everyone else. We support him because he is smart, level-headed, cool, thinking, rational, fair, noble and diplomatic. We trust him to act on facts, not "gut instincts."
Therefore, in this regard, he cannot act erratically. The United States is suffering from two terms of misguided, ill-guided, illogical, erratic, irresponsible, short-sited, stupid, and criminal actions. That's how we got into Iraq.
September 8, 2008 9:10 AM | Reply | Permalink