« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Media Declines To Challenge McCain's Evidence-Free ACORN Charge
In last night's debate, John McCain claimed that ACORN "is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy."
That's quite an allegation against a group that's working to register low-income voters. You'd hope that the media would ask McCain's campaign for some evidence for the claim, or at least note that the candidate himself didn't offer any. Or that moderator Bob Schieffer would have followed up in real time.
You'd be disappointed, of course. Reporters were too distracted by Joe the Plumber to pay much attention to McCain's hyperbolic accusation.
Of course, McCain had essentially no backing whatsoever for his claim. As TPMmuckraker and others have pointed out, there's virtually no evidence that fraudulent registration forms of the type erroneously submitted by ACORN in their thousands in some states ever turn into fraudulent votes.
(Indeed, the whole voter fraud controversy is such baloney that now even Florida's Republican governor Charlie Crist, a big McCain backer in the primaries, felt compelled to throw some water on it, telling reporters yesterday: "I think that there's probably less [fraud] than is being discussed. As we're coming into the closing days of any campaign, there are some who enjoy chaos.'')
But the media's failure last night is in keeping with its broader failure to explain that key distinction between voter registration fraud and voter fraud point. We've highlighted some egregious examples of CNN conflating the two. But there are plenty more from other outlets.
Here's a report from ABC's World News Tonight, flagged by Media Matters, which aired Tuesday night, in which correspondent Jake Tapper, keying off claims made by McCain, sounds the alarm about "voter fraud." Rather than stating authoritatively that the fraudulent forms aren't going to lead to fraudulent votes cast, the story goes he-said she-said, leaving it to Barack Obama to say it while talking to reporters about the charges -- as if this were a debatable point, when in fact it's a crucial fact which undermines the essential premise of the story.
Or consider this NBC News "Deep Background" investigative report, which stokes fears of voter fraud by running down ACORN's history of legal disputes over its registration activities, without ever explaining that in not a single one of these cases was there evidence that fraudulent voting took place.
It's thanks largely to this ongoing media failure that the McCain camp is continuing to flog the issue. Already today, Sarah Palin told a crowd in Bangor, Maine that voters face "a choice between a candidate who won't disavow a group committing voter fraud and a leader who will not tolerate the voter fraud."
Given how clueless the reporting on this story has been, it's almost hard to blame them.













Zach hits the key point here: Voter registration fraud does not lead to fraudulent votes. And the process of review by elections officials identifies bad forms. And ACORN itself turns in the bad forms from its canvassers because it's against the law to throw away a completed voter registratoin application.
But facts don't matter when the goal is exclusively to stir up fear, overwhelm election administrators in places where D's have registered a lot of folks, etc.
Here's an image that may help people understand the difference between registration fraud and fraudulent votes (which also touches on "voter impersonation," the non-existent problem that voter ID is supposed to prevent:
http://www.reasongonemad.com/blog/2008/10/key-arrest-in-so-called-voter-fraud.asp
October 16, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin is right, though. McCain won't disavow the republican party, even though so many of its people have been caught committing fraudulent acts to tamper with elections.
October 16, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad to see I'm not the only person going crazy over this issue. The experts in voter fraud have always been repubs.
October 16, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad to see I'm not the only person going crazy over this issue. The experts in voter fraud have always been repubs.
October 16, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
The major media has failed this country for the last eight years of this lying,sadistic, psychopath`s administration.They have consistently gone along for the ride.Now the new irresponsibility of allowing this bull shit fraud case.They allowed it in 2000,they dropped the ball on the swiftboaters who smeared a decorated war hero,after they allowed an illegal war in which nearly a million have been killed and several million displaced.
Hell of a job FOX,CNN,MSNBC,NBC,CBS,ABC,WaPo,NYT, and the rest of the so-called Major media.Does the word "Major"refer to their rank in the Army?
October 16, 2008 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't the Repub strategy becoming fairly clear here? Over and above strengthening the economic message to the middle and whipping up the base, say it's two-pronged. First, character assassination by robocall etc. to move undecideds toward McCain--and if they're still undecided they're probably all too movable. Second, voter intimidation and suppression conxtextualized by the Acorn nonsense, which is an excellent reason to figure out means to pressure the MSM--letter-writing campaigns? I don't know--to report the Acorn story accurately. I wouldn't be surprised to see challenges by the hundreds of thousands on Election Day, though perhaps I'm ill-informed about what's physically possible--in any case, numerous enough to completely muck up the voting process in Democratic precincts and send many newly registered voters home either out of sheer impatience or by means of bogus challenges and never-to-be-counted provisional ballots (why, by the way, is no one mentioning the rather scary Palast-Kennedy voting comic book that's a paid insert in this week's Nation?). In a close election, Obama will need his new voters. Will they get to vote in Virginia, Colorado, and New Mexico, never mind Ohio and Florida? I'm quite worried. Somebody explain to me why this is paranoid so I can get some sleep the next three weeks. I'll need it to canvass and phonebank.
October 16, 2008 8:38 PM | Reply | Permalink