« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Missteps Lead to Blocked Voters in Swing States
On Monday, the Social Security Administration sent out a curious press release asking six states -- four of which, Ohio, Indiana, Nevada and North Carolina, are swing states -- to review their voter registration verification procedure.
When TPMmuckraker called to see what was behind the out-of-character notification, Mark Lassiter, the SSA's press officer told us that those states had been requesting an inordinately high number of checks for voter's registrations from the SSA. For instance, the relatively large state of California only requested 410,000 verifications of voter's registrations based on social security numbers, while the significantly less populous Georgia requested almost 2 million.
The discrepancies seem to be a result of different states interpretation of a new federal law: the Help America Vote Act passed in 2002. HAVA says that states must exhaust checks in their own identification databases -- like drivers licenses and ID cards -- before turning to the often unreliable federal database with the Social Security Administration. Instead, states like those mentioned above have been improperly relying on the SSA to verify voter registrations.
The apparent violations of HAVA aren't necessarily nefarious. Nevada's uptick in SSA checks was apparently due to county clerks entering social security numbers and driver's license number in the wrong fields, state officials told the New York Times , whose inquiries into federal voter registration verification numbers directly preceded the SSA's press release.
The Times investigation also mentioned two more swing states where voters are being affected due to the bending of federal law.
In Michigan and Colorado, they have purged eligible voters from rolls within 90 days of the election -- which is only allowed if voters die, move out of the state or are declared unfit to vote.
According to the voter purge estimates, 37,000 voters were removed from Colorado's voter registration database in just three weeks this summer -- a number that seems inexplicable give only 2,400 deaths and 5,100 out of state moves in that time period. Similar questions have been raised in Michigan, where 33,00 voters re removed in August, though there had only been 7,100 deaths and 4,400 out of state moves.
The misapplication of federal law could lead to massive problems on Election Day and disproportionally affect Democrats, who have been registering in higher numbers this year. The thought of widespread confusion and disenfranchisement on Nov. 4 has spurred many to action and put the spotlight on the storied battle between Democrats and the GOP over the existence of voter fraud.
In Ohio, the Secretary of State (a Democrat) and the Ohio GOP are battling in federal court over the release of a list of voter registrations verified by the SSA, according to the Times. The GOP seeks to force voters who don't resolve discrepancies in their registration to vote via provisional ballot -- which are notorious for not being counted because they need extra verification.













Voting should not be this difficult. The complexity of these rules seems to be incomprehensible to some of the states Secretaries of State. In a lot of countries you can register on the day of the election at the polling station and it does seem to cause huge problems.
October 9, 2008 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who the heck has ever even noticed certain discrepancies before this?
Due to this year's voting anxiety, I've found that my passport has my name exactly as I'm registered to vote. But my driver's licence (and even my checkbook! - that must be based on driver's license) have an extra initial (which is mine... I have 3 names and then a last name) which I really don't use. It's not on any diploma even. Or my psychology license.
This whole thing is becoming an added nuisance and anxiety. I've already gone to my city hall and been assured I don't need to re-register. But it's making election day an anxiety over voting and having my registration challenged - that should not be.
Imagine if I were a poor person. Or had an accent. Or a skin color that was not "white" - mine isn't white anyway... it should be called tan or something.
October 9, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
the media is going overtime on this ayers thing. they are completely ignoring this story. cnn is quite frankly freaking me out. they seem to be doing everything they can to keep this fantasy about ayers in play. you would think that illigally purging voters would be a story since it's based in reality. cnn just finsihed up a pro palin piece of journalism that would make hannity proud.
October 9, 2008 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
ohhhh wait they are doing a story about voter registration. not surprisingly it's about accorn and it sounds like a republican black ops project.
it doesn't take much for republican operatives to turn in forms to accorn for registration that are fraudulent and then blame accorn for having them in their possession.....this all the registrations are "bad".
October 9, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alabama and Georgia are doing something very different than the other four states. Both Alabama and Georgia are submitting several times as many social security checks as they are registering voters. Alabama has increased registered voters by 117,000 but has requested more than a million voter verifications. Georgia has about 400,000 new registered voters and have requested about 1.9 million social security verifications. It may be a coincidence, but in both states the number of social security verifications requested are very close to the number of non-white registered voters in each state. Have previously registered voters been purged from the rolls because illegal social security verifications did not match?
October 10, 2008 2:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
If the Rethugs can't win on the issues, they will shut down the election process. This should be front page news throughout the country. Shows yu why the newspapers are dying - they have an aversion to issues.
October 10, 2008 4:04 AM | Reply | Permalink