Stonewalling By Key Witnesses Proved EffectiveThe Trooper-Gate report provides an answer to something we were asking ourselves earlier this week.
It was announced, just days before Steve Branchflower was scheduled to wrap things up, that several top Palin aides would reverse course and honor subpoenas issued in the investigation, after resisting them for weeks. But would Branchflower, we wondered, have enough time to depose those key witnesses and include their testimony in his report?
The answer: no.
Branchflower writes:
On October 6, 2008 Attorney General Talis Coberg announced that some of the … employees have decided they wish to honor their subpoenas and provide information about this case to the Legislative Council. Given that last minute decision, and in view of the publication date of October 10, 2008 for this report, it has not been possible to inculde any such information herein. It is anticipated that the additional information will be submitted to the Legislative Council in a separate report prepared by the employees and/or the Attorney General.
It’s impossible to know what additional information these witnesses would have provided Branchflower. And he made clear that, even without them, he had enough information to draw firm conclusions.
Still, it’s certainly plausible that with input from Palin’s top lieutenants about the pressure they may have been under to pursue the Wooten matter, the report would have been even more damning.
In that limited regard, the Palin camp’s stonewalling appears to have worked.