« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
The Daily Muck
More earmark trouble for Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK). Stevens, who is awaiting a verdict in his federal corruption trial, pushed $2.7 million in federal money to Alaska to pave a road that leads to his friend Bob Persons' bistro. Persons has deep ties with Stevens - he not only looked over the reconstruction of Stevens' Girdwood home but also appears in Stevens' indictment as "Person A" and testified as a witness for the defense. (AP/Anchorage Daily News)
Embattled Rep. Tim Mahoney (D-FL) dropped out of a debate Friday night and may be avoiding public appearances in general leading up to election day. Mahoney, who was preceded by former Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) is accused of having at least two affairs with seedy circumstances. (Palm Beach Daily News)
Sarah Palin has apparently returned a third of the clothing bought for her at high-end stores by the RNC. A McCain strategist said that the clothes were returned immediately due to size issues. (AP)
Problems have arisen with early voting in multiple states, including Virginia, Florida, and Georgia. Absentee ballots and large numbers of early voters in particular are posing a problem in multiple states. (AP)
The Pentagon official who has been supervising the Guantanamo war commissions is at the center of two investigations into his conduct. The more severe of the two is an internal Air Force investigation, which in part is looking to see if the supervisor, Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann, abused his power. (LA Times)
Newly filed documents show the three year long struggle between guards at Guantanamo Bay and a detainee who refused to eat. The documents show that the guards occasionally had to use force to end hunger strikes. (AP)
The head of the International Monetary Fund will stay on despite having an affair with a subordinate. The IMF board of directors decided that although the relationship was "regrettable," it did not warrant Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn's removal and he did not abuse his authority. (Financial Times)
If you had a pirate problem, who would you call? Well, merchant fleets off the shore of Somalia have called contractor Blackwater Worldwide to help fend off groups of pirates who have been looting their ships. The hiring of Blackwater, infamous for their actions in Iraq, has been criticized by some maritime organizations. (AP)
A shadowy paid informant is likely to take the stand early this week in the trial of five men accused of planning an attack on Fort Dix. The defense plans on trying to lessen the credibility of the ex-convict informant who is a key witness in the case. (AP)













Like her notorious Bridge to Nowhere ballyhoo, Gov. Palin's natural gasline, lauded as one of her greatest accomplishments, comes up short. Taxpayers could once again be stuck with a massive bill for an incomplete project. It would seem the only Palin laying any pipe up in Alaska is, oilman Todd.
www.thetruthburns.wordpress.com
October 27, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
If they were returned immediately, why was the RNC billed for the clothes? That claim makes no sense.
October 27, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
My question exactly. Or were the returns ALREADY deducted from the bills that were submitted and they're trying to make us think $150,000 is $100,000, when the actual start number was $200,000, and only after the returns it became $150,000?
I love the "they don't belong to me and even talking about it is sexist" argument. That the GOP would spend money on attiring a candidate for the very first time on their very first female candidate means some GOP operative decided "the woman" needed to be dressed. The sexism started there.
October 27, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Boy these Palin clothes sure do have a long shelf-life!
October 27, 2008 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does anybody really believe they bought baby clothes just for the campaign? Especially after Palin got caught abusing per diem and travel reimbursements? It looks like it's just her pattern to treat public and campaign funds like a piggy bank. What drives me nuts is when someone complains that it's sexism, and ignores that using campaign funds for personal expenses is illegal.
October 27, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The fact that they're still playing defense here, that says it all!
October 27, 2008 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still betting on the idea that someone other than Palin decided this money would be a great slush fund, and that the filings bear only a coincidental relationship to what Palin and her family might be wearing.
I'm also wondering just how far the new-clothes-for-family things goes. If you have a friend who might be seen with you during the campaign, do they get a selection of new suits too? How about your plumber?
October 27, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, this is quite common and is known as a consolation prize. Apparently, it is a gift for those who do not get the "Grand" prize...
First time I've heard of it cropping up for election losses, though.
Perhaps we need to take a look at ALL of the Republican losses this year... see just how well they are dressed during their "I know we lost, but you all did a great job" speeches...
October 27, 2008 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink