« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Trooper-Gate Report Finds Palin Abused Power in Firing Monegan
The just-released Trooper-Gate report finds that Sarah Palin abused her power in the affair by pressuring subordinates to fire Mike Wooten, thereby violating an Alaska law holding that "each public officer holds office as a public trust, and any effort to benefit a personal or financial interest through official action is a violation of that trust." *
It also finds that Monegan's "refusal to fire Trooper Mike Wooten" -- who was embroiled in a family dispute with the Palins -- "was not the sole reason [Monegan] by Governor Sarah Paln" but "it was likely a contributing factor". Still, the firing was a proper exercise of Palin's authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads.
In addition, the report found that the office of Attorney General Talis Colberg failed to substantially comply with the legislature's written request for information about the case in the form of emails.
* This sentence has been updated from an earlier version.













Remember, McCain knew about this BEFORE he picked her for VP.
It's a stain on her for showing a vindictiveness that's been on full display this week anyway and a stain on him for the poor judgment in picking her.
Game. Set. Match goes to Obama.
October 10, 2008 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is TPM calling the McCain campaign for a statement regarding this?
October 10, 2008 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think that Sarah will be talking about terrorists tomorrow.
October 10, 2008 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The biggest part is WHAT SARAH ALLOWED THE FIRST DUDE TO DO. She did not keep a rein on her idiot husband. It broke the law---but it seems like the only consequence will be public relations.
October 10, 2008 8:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did you read the part where Branchflower indicates Todd while was the hatchman, as governor, Plain is ultimately responsible for his actions.
October 11, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course she is ultimately responsible: she has the ultimate responsibility to see that the laws are faithfully executed. He was going hogwild in violation of the law, and she used her authority to help him do that, both passively and actively.
October 11, 2008 3:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rein on her idiot husband? This was Palin's sister. She was just using the usual republican tactic of having someone else do the dirty work. She thought she would be protected because he was not a governmental employee.
October 11, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
THIS
October 10, 2008 8:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
IS
October 10, 2008 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
EXCELLENT
October 10, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
News
October 10, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
NEWS
October 10, 2008 9:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
FOR
October 10, 2008 9:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
SARAH PALIN!!!
And dudes, there are supposed to be exclamation points after NEWS!!!
I tell you, today's blog lizards just don't keep up the rituals. Why, when I was a little blog lizard, we used to *live* for the Idiotic Wave . . .
October 10, 2008 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
NEWS
October 10, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
in fact it is excellent news news for news.
October 10, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
WALNUTS!
October 10, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
So I guess if someone pisses you off by not doing the unlawful thing you ask them to do, it's not OK to fire them immediately because they refused to follow orders, but it's OK to fire them later because they still piss you off.
October 10, 2008 8:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ironically, Sarah may have just given Monegan a GOLDEN PARACHUTE because a substantial improper purpose, even though other reasons exist for the termination, may give him the ability to sue for damages.
October 10, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could be a problem...right to hire/right to fire without cause is active in this case.
October 11, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Also relevant is whether the cause for firing itself is ILLEGAL. If, for example, Monegan were African-American, and Palin fored him BECAUSE African-Ameircan, it would be an ILLEGAL firing becaues racial discrimination is ILLEGAL.
So firing "at her pleasure," regardless how it sounds, is limited by LAW.
October 11, 2008 3:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
But does Monegan know Bill Ayers? If so, his dismissal is entirely justified.
October 11, 2008 8:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
8 Republicans & 4 Democrats actually voted. Seems to me like the Alaskan Republicans actually released the report.
October 10, 2008 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is enough to make out a case for Monegan if the refusal to terminate the trooper was a "substantial" or "motivating factor" in her termination. Methlin v. Bartholomew (Alaska 1998) 971 P.2d 151 at page 154. Ant there are lots of similar cases.
October 10, 2008 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
And in view of the Palins contempt for and rekjection of the rule of law, they certainly didn't cthink of those considerations, and doubtless gave away the state treasury in their comments and his testimony.
Now let's watch the semi-public fighting between him and her as they begin accusing each other of being the exclusive villain.
October 11, 2008 3:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm. I was hoping this report would be the torpedo that would sink the McCain ship once and for all so I can stop stressing about the election.
But I'll take this. It's bad press, and will add to the sour stink around these two monstrosities, and influence that many more voters to vote D. (Her supporters aren't rational enough to be reached by facts, so this report won't mean anything, and it was never going to, regardless of its conclusions).
I don't know how big of a news story it will be -- without a criminal referral it's got pretty short legs. But what do I know, maybe it will incite some major punditocracy/op-ed wiggage. Hell to the yeah!
October 10, 2008 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
IS
October 10, 2008 9:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suppose it's the best we can hope for, with it coming from a Republican Legislature.
I don't think we need more, fortunately, to swing the election.
October 10, 2008 9:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
A 12-0 vote is a great sign of unity for the Alaska legislative council.
So now that it's clear Palin violated Alaska state law, what's the punishment?
October 10, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the committee, and the legislature, will now debate punishment. Keep in mind that Palin is a backstabber who has made enemies in HER party.
Meanwhile, as I understand it, there is a RECALL effort in motion, and there will doubtless now be calls for IMPEACHMENT.
Regardless what happens, that the issue is still alive gives it sufficient legs to continue to haunt Palin and keep a cloud of criminality over the McPalin ticket.
October 11, 2008 3:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
It'll mean one more day McCain-Palin ticket won't get any traction in the polls. And there isn't that many more left.
October 10, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe they'll try to grab a couple of news cycles with the Bristol/Levi shotgun wedding. The McC campaign considered it.
They're running out of pages to turn.
October 10, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Levi Johnston shoulda kept his Johnson in his Levis.
October 11, 2008 8:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't trust Palin.One heartbeat away from the Presidency if something happens to McCaine,NO WAY for Palin.What more dirt will we find out about her since she wasn't properly vetted?I hope she goes back to Alaska and stays there.Obama is the right choice.Biden is awesome too!!!
October 10, 2008 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
The actual maverick is Biden.
October 11, 2008 3:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
GREAT
October 10, 2008 9:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fox News summary:
"Monegan firing proper exercise of executive authority."
October 10, 2008 9:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I really think if anything that any attacks on character assassination on Obama will be erased...
In any case, it was not working, so I wonder how it will play next week. I take it will be discussed until the last debate day...
So no message for McWar until the debate happens...
October 10, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is rich. From CNN:
"Ahead of Friday's hearing, Palin supporters wearing clown costumes and carrying balloons denounced the investigation as a 'kangaroo court' and a 'three-ring circus' led by supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama."
October 10, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
cnn only covers rallies in favor of palin. they dont report on the anti-palin ones. seems like they made a pact with steve schmidt.
October 10, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
It has to be pounded into the national consciousness that the first finding of the report is that Sarah Palin as Governor broke the Alaska law (statute) against abuse of power. She is a lawbreaker, according to the investigator.
She did not break the law by the mere act of firing Monegan. But her other actions and motives were a true abuse of a power.
She also did not break the Alaska laws against drunk driving, littering, speeding, assault, murder, ..., but you only have to break one law to be called a lawbreaker.
October 10, 2008 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah !
The investigation found her guilty of violating the public trust in pursuing a personal vendetta while using public resources and personnel.
October 11, 2008 12:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ummmm....."week's of effort"????
Poor punctuation makes the Baby Jesus cry.
October 10, 2008 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
The crucial parts
October 10, 2008 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, now there is hard evidence that we must, however grudgingly, reluctantly, and bitterly, accept it as conclusive fact that Palin has more experience than Obama at abusing executive authority.
October 11, 2008 3:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
How can it be said that Palin's firing of Monegan was an abuse of power by her, say it was a likely contributing factor in the firing, then go on to say that it was the proper exercise of her authority as chief executive to fire him. Which is it? Was she right or wrong?
October 10, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's not Monegan's firing that what the abuse of power, it was her attempts to get Trooper Wooten fired that constituted abuse of power. She had the power to fire Monegan so that was lawful.
However, the report stated that Monegan's refusal to do what Palin wanted was a likely factor in his firing (ie, she fired him out of spite) and pretty much gave him grounds for a wrongful termination suit.
October 10, 2008 9:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
The abuse of power has nothing to do with the firing.
October 11, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
That's not conclusively clear. And we actually know better, because we know she is a hateful, vindictive -- entitled -- bitch who couldn't care less about rules and regulations.
October 11, 2008 3:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's quite possible to do both right and wrong in the same action. Two separate questions:
1. Her firing him was within her lawful authority, so her firing of him wasn't illegal.
2. But her "reason" for firing him was illegal.
October 11, 2008 3:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's confusing.
October 11, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Notice that they didn't find that she "associated with" or "knew of" or "palled around with" an abuse of power - they said that she "abused her power." This is not guilt by association - this is just plain vanilla guilt. Wonder if it will give JM a chance to pick another running mate - just something the maverick might consider given all the negativity surrounding her and his potential loss of his base after being forced today to defend Obama from attacks by the base at his campaing rally today. Time to energize that bunny again.
October 10, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who could he pick that would change the game 3 weeks before the big day? The troglodyte Palin fans would go ape-shit and stay home on election day. She 's the reason his rallies are as big as they are. People start leaving after her speeches are over and it's just the old man and Cindy on the stage.
October 10, 2008 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but one can't predict what McSenile might do -- either because he's erratic, or because he's, as Impertinent Palin -- ImPalin fer short -- a maverick "filled with mavericky goodness".
And his kicking her off the ticket and replacing her with someone equally unqulified or even worse might be seen as a reborth of that maverickiness and give him in a noticeable uptick in the polls of, say, 2 votes.
October 11, 2008 4:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe this election has me completely out of my head but... Christine Whitman? (assuming she would even consider it) You you add a moderate female who is an energy expert and can't be tied closely to Bush. The Mccain camp already has the Evangelicals insane with fear about Obama, so he isnt going to lose themover Whitman's abortion views. She starts campaigning and suddenly you have someone on their side who can actually address issues. Of course this would also hinge on Palin exiting gracefully. She has a few good reasons ; putting country first, needing to deal with Alaska, personal family issues, etc.
He needs a game changer or it is over.
October 11, 2008 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fat lady, that's your cue.
October 10, 2008 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do re me fa so la ti do!!!!!
OHHHHH say can you SEEE
BY the dawn's early light
What so PROUUUDLY we hailed
At the twi light's last gleaming . . . .
Whose broad stripes and bright stars . . .
October 10, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ahah! Excellent! You're in fine voice this evening.
October 10, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about the Willie Nelson classic (popularized by Don Meredith):
"Turn out the lights, the party's over!"
October 10, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, thus far, per this legislative committee, Sarah is guilty of gubernatorial error?
Is tpm guilty of typographical error?
October 10, 2008 9:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
People don't get impeached for errors. They get impeached for abusing the public trust which is the first issued clarified by Branchflower, complete with references to Alaska'sLaws and Constitution.
October 11, 2008 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
DOES ANYONE THINK THIS A WAY TO GET PALIN OFF THE TICKET AND HAVE MCCAIN PULL ANOTHER RAZZLE-DAZZLE?
think about it
October 10, 2008 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Come on down, Joe Lieberman!
October 10, 2008 9:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Still, the firing was a proper exercise of Palin's authority to hire and fire executive branch department heads. "
According to who?
October 10, 2008 9:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Alaska law, apparently.
October 10, 2008 9:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to the Alaskan statutes, she can hire and fire at will without cause or reason.
October 11, 2008 12:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
That, again being limited to LEGAL cause or reason. She could not, as example, fire an African-American BECAUSE an African-American, because that "cuase" or "reason" is ILLEGAL.
She would have the legal authjority to fire the person. But she would not have the legal authority to violate the law prohibiting that particular reason: racial discrimination.
October 11, 2008 4:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin will absolutely have to step down from the ticket now. There is no other possibility in light of these charges. The country cannot risk another Spiro Agnew crisis like we had in the crisis plagued year of 1973. The nation is already going through the historic trauma of the market collapse, and we need a plausible vice presidential nominee in case Senator McCain becomes president. This is why the nominees have to thoroughly vetted prior to being selected. This has been an amazing development!
October 10, 2008 9:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
It really depends on what the Alaskan legislature plans to do. If they sit back and do nothing, what are we to make of it?
October 11, 2008 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
what the hell are you guys reading?
October 10, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does that statute stipulate penalties? Does it stipulate that it's a civil or criminal violation? Does it stipulate whether it is a misdemeanor or a felony?
October 11, 2008 4:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
It is so SHAMEFUL for Sarah Palin, and so disappointing for REAL Conservatives like me, but then again, this is NOT the first time she has been disappointing, nor do I suspect it will be the last. OsiSpeaks.com
October 10, 2008 10:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just for fun - check out the blog at the Alaska Daily News - fun reading:
http://community.adn.com/adn/node/132565#Comments_Container
October 10, 2008 10:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
here's a copy of the report with selectable text I made
http://rapidshare.com/files/152841412/Branchflowerreport.source.prod_affiliate.7.pdf.html
October 10, 2008 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is a sort of good news but it is sad that there was a big compromise for the "release": The nearly 300-page report does not recommend sanctions or a criminal investigation.
This means she abused authority but she did not commit any crime and will walk away unpunished.
Will this have political effect only for a day or just this weekend unless the Obama campaign is ready to capitalize on it to reap maximum benefit out of it by linking the abuser with McCain's judgment?
Right now, Obama is playing everything safe because he is well ahead in polls. He does not have to go negative on anything, but should he let go a grave issue like this without raising any question about it? Should he just let the surrogates do the dirty job? "How far should the campaign go on this? These are some of the questions the campaign must be trying to answer right now.
October 10, 2008 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
But does his recommendation (or lack thereof) have any enforcement power?
October 10, 2008 10:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect that's the McCain fix with the repugs up there. Go ahead and let the report out, but take no action or indicate a crime was committed. That way Palin may be tainted goods, but not damaged goods.
October 11, 2008 12:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
The report has only just been released. Constitutents will be contacting their legislators about it. The committee, and the legislature, will debate what to do next -- either something, or nothing.
Until they do, we won't know whether the matter will be pursued further. It appears to me that what the investigator did was open the door for Palin to finally testify -- under oath -- or under that scrutiny look mighty peculiar for refusing to testify.
He is, in essence, setting an objective trap for her: either testify, and potentially vindictate yourself; or continue to refuse to testify, and accept the consequences for that decision.
Either way, she is in the process of destroying her political career. We'll be lucky if Alaska accepts her back from the "lower 48".
October 11, 2008 4:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand how they can find she abused the power of her office but recommend NO form of punishment at all.
October 10, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The INVESTIGATOR was assigned the task of FACT-FINDING, and drawing preliminary conclusions from the evidence. It is not his province to determine where to go from there; that is the province of the committee, and the legislature.
Both committee and legislature have much to consider: she can be sanctioned to varying degrees, up to and including impeachment. This is only the investigation phase, which may not be quite finished: she agreed to cooperate, then flip-flopped against cooperating.
This isn't finished yet by a long shot.
October 11, 2008 4:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin is history. I think she resigns over the weekend, reluctantly. "You see that glow in the corner of your eye. It's your career dissipation light and it's going into overtime."
I think we see Mitt no later than Monday as the new VP candidate.
October 10, 2008 10:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt that... how could he jump on the sinking ship? I mean, if he is smart enough to think about his own political future.
October 10, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can they even find a Republican willing to replace her at this point? It's career suicide.
October 10, 2008 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup, McCain has completely boxed himself in.
October 10, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, it ain't over 'til "BACKDRAFT" is quoted appropriately! :D
October 10, 2008 10:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember the important Republican Spinning Points for tomorrow morning:
This was a "partisan" investigation. Obama was behind it.
So far behind it, in fact, that he started this investigation before she was even on McCain's short list. He's sneaky like that.
And he did it through the Republican Alaska Legislature ... AKA ACORN!!!
October 10, 2008 10:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
He chooses his words carefully, right?
October 11, 2008 8:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nah they will try to play the its partisan politics banner. She is here for what is left of the shambles of their disgraceful campaign.
October 10, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Monegan may get himself a "golden parachute" Sarah may have given him a cause of action for damages for wrongful termination. It is enough to make out a case for Monegan if the refusal to terminate the trooper was a "substantial" or "motivating factor" in her descision to terminate him. Methlin v. Bartholomew (Alaska 1998) 971 P.2d 151 at page 154. And there are lots of similar cases.
October 10, 2008 10:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm hoping to see the O-Man at one of his FOUR public events in Philly tomorrow morning! Bring on JOEMENTUM
October 10, 2008 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Palin will never step down nor will McCain ask her to do so. It would be such a huge mistake to admit a blunder (selection of VP) that big this late in the game. My guess is that they will continue to rant and rave about the usual nonsense and hope for the best. I'm sure they wouldn't mind starting a few riots along the way. After Bush was elected, I thought he would enter history as the worst president ever to be elected. The thought of McCain and Palin just makes me outright scared. I believe they would be worse.
October 10, 2008 11:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think Obama will softplay as he should. Reason is simple. Let the media run with it. Obama should just concentrate on issues and cast doubt on McCain's judgment without mentioning Palin. Only an idiot will not know what he means. He plays is cool is what I say.
October 10, 2008 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. Obama should remain focused on the fact that McCain is popping smoke grenades every day in an attempt to cloud the issues at hand. Just give McCain/Palin enough rope. They will hang themselves. McCain truly must be senile if he can't see that he is his own worst enemy right now. Just plain mind boggling!
October 10, 2008 11:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Saturday's headlines:
New York Times: Inquiry Finds Palin Abused Power: Efforts to Oust Trooper Found to Violate Law
Washington Post: Alaska Probe Finds Palin Abused Executive Power
Wall Street Journal: Alaska Probe: Palin Abused Authority
Alaska Gov. Palin broke state ethics law. . .
Chicago Tribune: Panel: Palin abused power
Sarah Palin unlawfully abused her power as governor. . .
Los Angeles Times: Sarah Palin investigation cites unlawful abuse of power
McClatchy: Palin abused power in 'troopergate,' probe concludes
AP: Alaska panel finds Palin abused power in firing
USA Today: Panel: Palin misbehaved
CNN: Palin abused power in firing, Alaska panel finds
CBS: Palin Abused Power, Ethics Report Finds
"Troopergate" Probe Finds GOP Vice Presidential Candidate
Unlawfully Abused Authority In Firing State Employee. . .
MSNBC: Probe: Palin abused power
A legislative committee's investigation concludes GOP VP nominee Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin unlawfully abused her authority. . .
ABC News: Troopergate Report: Palin Abused Her Power
Fox News: Panel: Palin 'Abused Her Power' in Trooper Case
BBC: Palin abused power, probe finds
NPR: Panel: Palin Abused Power Of Office
October 10, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fox News: "Democrats, Lead by Obama, push smear agains Palin, liberal press has field day"
;-)
October 11, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome! The headlines are unanimous -- what happened to "USA Today"? --
She violated the law. She abused her power. She is a hateful, vindictive bitch.
October 11, 2008 5:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
and a fucking moron. her stupidity irritates me even more than her considerable character pathology.
October 12, 2008 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
anyone think it's funny that there isn't a single mention of this on drudgereport ;-)
October 10, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, but look at the post just above you! Who gives a crap about Drudge. And guess what will be the main topic on Sunday's talking head shows? There is nothing the MSM loves more than a scandal.
There is also going to be an aftershock when people start asking what right Todd Palin had to stick his nose in official state business.
Remember the adage "the bigger they come the harder they fall," and Palin was big, really big.
October 10, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
He and hannity are in bed as we speak wondering how they can prove that Obama killed Hoffa. I love to watch them squirm! It's justice after 8 long years of this horrid party being in office. This is the proverbial "turd in the punch bowl!"
October 10, 2008 11:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
No matter how McCain spins it, it all comes back to his poor judgment in picking her with an open ethics investigation against her in progress.
Can we repeat? Poor judgment, Poor judgment, Poor judgment.
Obama needs to make that the mantra for the next three weeks.
October 10, 2008 11:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
My fellow prisoners, there's a turd in the punch bowl and I believe it's covered with lipstick!
Sorry, but this is just too good to be true. Writers of Letterman or any comedy routine should not get paid this year! This crap is just falling in their laps just the same as when Cheney shot a fellow hunter.
October 11, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
palin won't step down - the republican sheep will follow the faux news line that she fired him legally and McCeymouse won't be able to admit an error. plus like many have said, no repub would hop on this aircraft with a wing blown off.
October 10, 2008 11:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let me get this straight.
The report tries to make it look like Palin gave the "First Dude" way too much leeway to pursue his vendetta. So she didn't do anything legally wrong, she just abused the power of the office by not reigning him in.
Give me a break! What a white wash. I think they are letting the First Dude be the fall guy, when it was Palin who truly abused the power of her office.
Whatever. The message is clear. McCain is "Failin with Palin". Game.
October 11, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let them hand Todd Palin out to dry as the fall guy -- he won't STAND for it, so we'll likely see semi-public fights between him and her pointing the finger at each other.
ESPECIALLY as it becomes clear that he had no business sticking his nose into public business. And he had an enormous, suspicious amount of freedom in acting with the governor's "passive" authority.
"Passive" my eye.
October 11, 2008 4:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Philn,
I laugh out loud every time I read that post. For me, the first sentence is a sort of homage to McCain2008. Pure genius.
October 11, 2008 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Palin says in the race. Her official response blamed the Obama camp. Those socialists in Alaska are out to get her!
October 11, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dam the members of the partisan investigation committee they are picking on the bulldog with lipstick!
Ops! Ten republicans and four democrats, blame them anyway it is McCain’s style of politics.
Oh! I know it was the Moslems on the committee, what no Moslems?
Ok! Lets blame the Blacks, what!!! No blacks?
That leaves us with the fact that the members were sexist, lets get the Hillary Clinton supporters to protest the sexist Alaska legislature.
If all else fails just blame the liberal media for reporting this.
You go girl, wink, wink. ;-)
October 11, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
CW before today was McCain loses and Palin becomes rising star in Republican party for 2012. Now what
is the CW?
October 11, 2008 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
McCain fades in to senility, Palin become rising star on FOX, leaving all her problems (children) behind in Alaska.
October 11, 2008 6:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Monegan wins big. They will pay him off millions to keep this thing out of court.
October 11, 2008 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing about Troopergatet on Drudge, of course.
I have never seen him so biased as I have on this campaign.
October 11, 2008 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Honestly, a million monkeys typing for a million years are more likely to create a great Shakespearian play than a character as ridiculous as Sarah Palin. I mean who names their kids, Trig, Track, Willow, Bum and Brillo? Who has a husband known as "First Dude"? Jesus, I feel like the whole nation has wandered into a tawdry scene in a trailer park meth lab.
October 11, 2008 3:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bum? Why would you call your kid Bum?
October 11, 2008 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
To see great video of Alaska Representative Les Gara confront Palin flack Meg Stapleton, go to Anchorage TV station website, ktuu.com. Gara asks Meg if she'll apologize for lying about Monegan and Branchflower and others. It'll help you "lower 48" folks understand what a small state Alaska is. The two of them stand there for over 10 minutes talking (well, arguing, but at least they shake hands in the end). Great stuff.
October 11, 2008 3:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wait...is this saying that she
can be found to have clearly
abused her power...but that
that doesn't necessarily break
any Alaskan law?!?
October 11, 2008 3:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
No. The report EXPRESSLY states that she violated the law.
October 11, 2008 5:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not a lawyer but I think it does break Alaskan law. Under the "Recommendations" section of the public report it states:
But a finding is not a conviction. What would next be required, if my layman's understanding of due process is correct, is a hearing or a trial.
Help us out lawyers, what is the next step?
October 11, 2008 4:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
All that has happened is that the investigator, appointed by the committee to investigate, did the investigation as well as he could under the circumstances, then presented the report to the committee.
The committee has so far voted -- unanimously -- to release the report. It is now up to the committee, and the legislature, to discuss the report, and what to do -- if anything.
Keep in mind the politics:
1. The REPUBLICANS control the legislature, and the committee.
2. Palin is a backstabber: she got her pretend-reformer mask by throwing a REPUBLICAN under the bus. By that means, and others, she has made ENEMIES in HER OWN party.
(Yes: the investigation has been partisan: HER OWN party has in some respects been out to "get" her. The Democrats are in the minority, so couldn't do anything if the REPUBICANS didn't want anything done.)
3. She has, what with her tawdry performance nationally on the McSlimer campaign, and "Troopergate," given a worldwide black eye to the state of Alaska. Alaskans -- especially REPUBLICANS -- are not happy campers with those realities.
4. There has got to be SOME consequence as result of the investigator's findings -- and there are at least a few REPUBLICANS champing at the bit for payback and blood. And the person to whom those consequences are going to be pinned -- NAILED -- is named SarahTodd Palin.
This isn't over by a long shot. Palin is currently destroying her political career as concerns national office. Her state political career is finished also.
October 11, 2008 5:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
"This isn't over by a long shot. Palin is currently destroying her political career as concerns national office. Her state political career is finished also."
While this could be true, we'll be stuck with her for a while. She'll capitalize her fame as the Joan of Arc for Joel's Army, or selling Kool Aide on the noose outlets -or something at least as annoying as her voice, (which makes me want to rub my ass on broken glass to forget the pain).
October 11, 2008 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
What we have to make very clear here is that the firing of Monegan and the efforts to get him to fire Wooten are treated as two entirely separate acts in the report.
1. Palin abused her power by trying to get Monegan to fire Wooten. This was a violation of Alaska law in and of itself, irrespective of whether she fired Monegan or not.
2. The firing of Monegan, although it was partially motivated by Monegan's failure to fire Wooten in response to pressure from Palin, was, nonetheless, a legitimate exercise of her authority as governor.
Josh, Greg, David & Co. -- don't let the Repugs get away with their inevitable attempt to cause her innocence on Count 2 to overshadow her guilt on Count 1.
October 11, 2008 5:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hear me now and believe me later: nothing will come of this. It will make no difference in the campaign. The Kool-aid drinkers are loudly proclaiming they are "vindicated". The sainted undecideds don't care. Only we fools who see Palin for the horror she is give a shit. Forget about it and move on.
October 11, 2008 5:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am sitting here in remote northeastern Canada(I am an Amer. citizen), which is 1 1/2 hour later than Eastern Time and like 7 1/2 or 8 1/2 later than Alaska time. When I went to sleep last night, the report had not been released. I was concerned that the Republican majority of the Alaska Legislative Council wasn't supporting public release of Branchflower's report.
I went to sleep imagining a conversation in the Alaska Legislative Council, with the Dems arguing that releasing the report is their responsibility to those who elected them and to the legislative branch of government and the Republican arguing that they had not read the report and so couldn't vote for releasing it.
I was just joyous this morning when I turned on the computer and up pops Troopergate at the top of AOL. While Sarah is a vicious and, we now know, selfish "Country First" partisan, it is McCain who is damaged by all of this. What an idiot not to have vetted the person to be "one heartbeat away." Game Over!
October 11, 2008 6:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
This won't make much of a difference. Not because people won't be concerned--they will--but because it doesn't matter. Their numbers are already scraping the bottom here. McCain is done for. So's Palin. This isn't a deciding announcement because it appears decided already.
The Alaska legislature will act, I think, but they will wait. Wait until Sarah is back in Alaska. Wait for her to be done with all this VP nonsense. Wait for her, there, in barrow, teeth sharpened, in 30 days of night....
October 11, 2008 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
It will only have legs if the network pundits continue the conversation.
October 11, 2008 8:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sarah Palin, the gift that keeps on giving.
Seriously though, if McCain had picked Crist,Huckabee, Romney, Pawlenty, Rice, Powell, or even that idiots Giuliani, this rice in all likelihood would be a lot closer.
So big THANK YOU to the McCain and his team for their abject failure of judgement, and complete lack of strategy and tactics.
October 11, 2008 9:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
sp* "this race in all likelihood would be a lot closer"
October 11, 2008 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, Mr. & Mrs. Joe Six-Pack, what do you think of those Palins now? It's the ethics of the thing that comes through immediately. Forget the legalities since that takes time to work out conclusively. No republican will be able to play the ethics card from now to Nov. 4 without reminding everyone of these she-nanigans. Even questionable Dems like Congressman Wm. Jefferson in LA may get a lucky break due to this. Landslide? Do I smell a landslide?
October 11, 2008 10:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Can I call you Sarah?
Say it ain't so, Sarah....
Ha ha ha ha ha.
October 11, 2008 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm beginning to wonder if this country is somehow stuck in a bad Twilight Zone episode.
I mean seriously, Gov. Palin is found to have "ABUSED POWER" and all I see from the news is that it was a "politically-biased" investigation
(even though it came from a Republican-led legislative group). Worse yet, so many of the news outlets seem to counter-balance this story by saying that even though she was found to have abused her power as Governor, she did not break the law that allowed her to fire executives??? What the ###$$?
Of course she has the right to fire executives … who cares… she ABUSED HER POWER!
As for the Republican pols that still support her, I ask … are you serious?
As for the news outlets that are so afraid of telling the story like it is … do your job!
As for the whole country that has seen the "abuse of power" by our current VP, Dick Cheney … do I need to say more?
October 11, 2008 11:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree with Lars on his view of the impact of the Alaskan Legislature's report. Unfortunately, this report will not make a big difference because the McCain/Palin campaign is already losing. The report will take away some of the baseless allegations the M/P campaign can raise about Obama because she opens herself up for a return smack-down.
IMHO Palin will return to Alaska after losing in the November election, she will survive an ethics hearing but is a lame duck as Governor. She is done in Alaska politics because she is out of her depth and lacks the basic political science training and experience to really run a large (geographically) state which has a lot of natural resources. The oil/gas people now realize the empress has no clothes and will run roughshod over her.
She has shit on the floor too many times to be given another shot in local politics (unlike McCain, she is not a legacy and her bonehead mistakes have consequences.) McCain cannot and will not help her locally after the election. Sarah will get a job, after resigning as Governor or at the end of her term, with some conservative think tank or as an executive for an oil/gas company. Her rabid, hard core, take no prisoners mentality does have a following in some dark, scary parts of our society.
First Dude will revert to being just "Todd" and will have to earn a living working in the oil & gas field, oh, and tune up the snowmachine for the next Iron Dog run. Start making an honest living dude.
Track Palin, if he is smart, will re-up once or twice until he earns enough credits to join the Blackwater team. Bristol and her baby daddy will get married and he will proceed to cheat on her (or vice versa).
October 11, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
All I know is that
The arguments of smears about Obama will disappear. They can no longer bring this another for several reasons:
1/ It does not work
2/ I raises up their negatives to a maximum
3/ Abuse of power is enough to bring credibility issues to pitbull and move away the independents.
4/ It shows McWar has poor judgement.
The narrative will be Pitbull has no credibility until the Wednesday debate....
Long term she is toast. And short term she only brings the right wingnuts extremists and move the independents away...
October 11, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sadly, the smears won't disappear for this reason. Other Republicans who are running for election or re-election are suffering the consequences of McCain-Palin tactics:
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/102538/bipartisan_concern_about_the_dangers_of_mcpalin%E2%80%99s_hate-mongering/
If you ignore the part where they try to equate McCain's 100% disrespectful and racist negative campaign with Obama's 10% repectful negative remarks, this is well worth watching and that issue is touched upon at the end.
October 11, 2008 2:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, this story is all over the cable news cycle....NOT.
You know what happens to stories that are released on Friday night of a holiday weekend?
October 11, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand the media on this. The story is either preceded by the disclaimer that Palin was within her rights to fired Monegan or that disclaimer is highlighted somewhere in the story.
These are two separate ethical issues:
1. Palin abused her power while in office.
2. Monegan was terminated, in part, due to this abuse of power.
This is not a vindication. I'm so sick of that being reported as if THAT were the story.
October 11, 2008 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Richard, your a real psychotic freak. Anyway,
Palin was well withing her rights to dismiss Monegan. Senator Hollis French who spearheaded this political smear campaign is a staunch Obama supporter and Walt Monegan and him are close friends. In fact French had stated that he promised his party he would do whatever he could to bring down Palin. Senator Hollis French is also known in Alaska as the "phony soldier" for lying about his so-called service record by falsely stating that he was a Marine. As far as the conclusion of the legislative panel, when questioned stated that its opinion was based on an assumption by the lead investigator. The problem with the investigators case on ethics is that Palin did not negligently or accidentally violate the law or do so for personal gain. This case should have been handled by
the state's personnel board and Palin could now press for a procedure violation suit against the
state.
October 11, 2008 4:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's still abusing her power by inciting these crowds to frenzied rage. Sick.
http://thetruthburns.wordpress.com/2008/10/11/we%e2%80%99ve-gone-from-silly-season-to-hate-week-what%e2%80%99s-next-kristallnacht/
October 11, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Hatch Act violations were criminal nobody would be left in the Bush WH. This is what the Bush administration has been engaging in for the past 8 years. I hope this story stays out front and is picked up my the big Media. If she abuses her power as a small-time governor imagine what she'll feel entitled to do as VP!
October 11, 2008 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great piece in Time about TrooperGate: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1849399,00.html
The money quote:
But the Branchflower report still makes for good reading, if only because it convincingly answers a question nobody had even thought to ask: Is the Palin administration shockingly amateurish? Yes, it is. Disturbingly so.
October 11, 2008 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please pass this link around: http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site163/2008/0721/20080721_111415_PalinLetterofRecomend.pdf
It's a letter written by Sarah Palin recommending her brother-in-law for a job as a state troooper back in 2000. You'll be amazed at her glowing impression of him. Just proves that she wasn't afraid of him, just mad that he left her sister. Pass it on!
October 12, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink