« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
White House Endorsed Torture in Memos to CIA
Two memos sent by the White House authorizing the use of torture in CIA interrogations firmly tie the Bush administration to the controversial techniques used on detainees and investigated by the Justice Department, the Washington Post reports.
The White House's written approval of the CIA interrogation methods were provided at the request of then CIA Director George Tenet, who was seeking "top cover," should the administration try to distance itself from the decisions later.
One memo, provided in 2003 approved the methods later used in prisons like Abu Ghraib. When the scandal over that prison erupted, Tenet requested a second letter from the White House which was provided in July 2004.
The memos are the latest in recent admissions from the Bush administration on their role in authorizing and shaping CIA interrogation techniques -- charges they denied for years. In late September, Condoleezza Rice admitted White House officials discussed using torture against detainees.
From the Washington Post:
Tenet first pressed the White House for written approval in June 2003, during a meeting with members of the National Security Council, including Rice, the officials said. Days later, he got what he wanted: a brief memo conveying the administration's approval for the CIA's interrogation methods, the officials said.Administration officials confirmed the existence of the memos, but neither they nor former intelligence officers would describe their contents in detail because they remain classified. The sources all spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not cleared to discuss the events.
The second request from Tenet, in June 2004, reflected growing worries among agency officials who had just witnessed the public outcry over the Abu Ghraib scandal. Officials who held senior posts at the time also spoke of deteriorating relations between the CIA and the White House over the war in Iraq -- a rift that prompted some to believe that the agency needed even more explicit proof of the administration's support.













Kate. Kate. Kate. George Tenet would tell you (in spite of the paper trail he wanted to get his ass out of the sling in case the torture employed by his peeps came to light) that the United States doesn't torture anybody. And, Kate, Kate, Kate, don't argue with me, or I'll have to cut you off and say your name a few times in succession again. You don't want that now, do you?
October 15, 2008 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey... Congress...
GOT ENOUGH PROOF YET!!!
October 15, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ms. Klonick is a great addition to the TPM staff, IMHO. I don't feel it's time for me to repeat her name over and over, tho.
October 15, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who knew that Harvard Business School would produce such a craven, ignorant, illiterate, misbegotten Torturer-in-Chief?
Remember, "We don't torture"? That obviously meant "We torture, enthusiastically" And then there was a whole supporting cast of aiders and abettors. Folks, it's time, yet again, to get out the megaphones and placards: What do we want? Prosecutions. When do wwe want them? Now! (Repeat.)
October 15, 2008 11:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
When Bush said "We don't torture" he meant him and Laura. They personally don't torture.
But hey, this is the foundation of American Exceptionalism. "If America (the government) does it, there's nothing wrong with it"
October 15, 2008 12:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
And he used the present tense. Not the past.
Remember the meaning of "is?"
bush: we is not torturing...
October 15, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
They are putting food on their families. Very, very hot food.
October 15, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're quite a good German, there, Georgie. Then again, 'just following orders' didn't save any of the Nazis on trial in Nüremburg either, did it?
Hope you don't plan on traveling outside the US!
October 15, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
How about a sting where we tempt him with a million dollar speaking engagement in The Hague?
October 15, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I was just following orders" was not an acceptable defense at Nuremburg. However, it's a lawful excuse now codified by congress for telcoms. It gives hope to hatchetpeople everywhere.
October 15, 2008 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Personally, the results of all these investigations should be placed in evidence bags and sent to the Hague after January 20th, for the indictment, arrest, trial and ultimate conviction George W. Bush, et al. for Crimes Against Humanity.
October 15, 2008 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
No wonder Cheney fibrillated. Nuremburg is a slam dunk, now. :(
October 15, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Put they asses in JAIL!
OOoh, it's getting scary! Like some political Poe!
Happy Halloween!
Quoth the Maverick...
http://thetruthburns.wordpress.com/2008/10/28/quoth-the-maverick/
October 28, 2008 4:35 AM | Reply | Permalink