« previous | MUCK HOME | next »
Georgia Military Vet, American Born, Was Flagged As Non-Citizen
Yesterday we reported on the election's aftermath in Georgia, where some ballots cast by voters who were flagged as non-citizens are now being thrown out, despite evidence that the state's system for identifying non-citizens was flawed.
We just spoke to one such Georgia voter. Karen Branch of Roswell, in North Fulton County, told TPMmuckraker that just a few days before the election, she received a letter from the office of Secretary of State Karen Handel, a Republican, informing Branch that there were questions about her citizenship.
When Branch went to vote on election day, poll workers told her she had to cast a provisional ballot. Eventually, voting-rights lawyers got on the phone with county election officers, and Branch was allowed to cast a conventional ballot.
But why was Branch flagged in the first place? Handel's office has told us it compared new voter registrations with a state drivers registry, which asks applicants for a drivers license to check a box if they aren't a citizen. It flagged any new voter who had checked that box as a possible non-citizen. After voting-rights groups sued, Handel was required by a judge to send letters to those voters -- around 4700 in all -- telling them that their citizenship was in question and that they would be forced to cast a provisional ballot.
Branch, an African-American who served in the U.S. military during the 90s and now works for a hospital corporation, said she has voted in Georgia in every presidential election since 2000, including this year's primary. She moved from one part of the state to another after the primary -- she re-registered at her new address -- making her, technically, a newly registered voter. But her citizenship has never been in question -- she was born in the U.S. and does not even own a passport. And she applied for her drivers license years ago -- since which time she has been voting without incident -- making it unlikely that she mistakenly checked the "non-citizen" box on her license application.
Branch told TPMmuckraker that she perceived the obstacles as a deliberate "deterrent" to voting, set up by the state.
It's not yet clear how many other voters, like Branch, were mistakenly flagged. But as we noted yesterday, many counties found that around two thirds of flagged voters returned to election offices after election day with documentation proving their citizenship. That would suggest that the error rate in the state's system is high, and that many of the voters who did not return with the proper documentation, some of whom are now having their provisional ballots thrown out, were also mistakenly flagged.
A spokesman for Handel's office yesterday told TPMmuckraker that the office was compiling information from individual counties which would help determine the number of errors. We'll be watching...













If the Dixiecrats can't have the poll tax - this sure looks like the next best thing -
November 11, 2008 7:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
The interesting thing is that after all the charges of "Voter Fraud" by the Republicans, the states which are being cited as having voter identification problems are controlled by Republicans - Alaska and Georgia.
It's like: "There is definitely 'Voter Fraud', and we Republicans know it because we are doing it."
November 12, 2008 9:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
It would be very interesting to see a breakdown of flagged voters as to various factors. That is, this could be plain stupid bureaucracy or there could be some kind of specific bias.
November 11, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
This just has to stop. We've got two years until the midterms and I hope the federal government can come up with some kind of standards that all states must abide by.
If the Republicans can't win without cheating then they need to come up with a new platform that has broader appeal. Trying to suppress the Democratic vote is not an acceptable election strategy.
November 12, 2008 1:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there something that the disenfranchised have in common? Party affiliation, maybe?!? Two-thirds are erroneous?!? Would this person still be employed if she worked in the private sector?
November 12, 2008 3:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I have posted before, we have an overly complicated voter registration system designed to make certain that only legal residents of any township or village can vote for the local clerk and sheriff. Since the younger and less affluent potential voters change their residencies more frequently, they will more frequently have an actual residence that does not match their driver's license and they are more likely to try to vote in a different place than the last place that they voted. This results in a systemic disqualification of younger, less affluent, likely Democratic voters; but, and here is the catch, they are not only disqualified from voting for the local clerk and sheriff because they changed their residence, they are also disqualified from voting for state and national offices. Karen Branch typifies this example of systemic disenfranchisement, but fortunately she had the determination to challenge the system. Maybe we should have two forms of registration, one for state and national elections and one for local elections.
November 12, 2008 9:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Funny how Branch just happens to be both an African-American and a woman. It's obvious how Republicans figure out male vs. female but how do they zero in on race? Is it by zip code, driver's license or in Branch's case military records?
-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
November 12, 2008 3:02 PM | Reply | Permalink