TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Gonzo Still Stonewalling In Retirement?

Why is it taking so long for the Justice Department to answer written questions from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee?

That's the question Judiciary Chair Pat Leahy posed to Attorney General Mukasey in a letter sent today demanding answers to hundreds of written queries from 11 Judiciary hearings going back over a year. Over one hundred of the unanswered questions were directed to then-AG Alberto Gonzales in July 2007.

Leahy writes:

It is my hope that the Department will answer all outstanding questions before the adjournment of the 110th Congress. You can set an example by promptly returning responsive answers to the questions posed to you in connection with the July 9 oversight hearing, which was more than four months ago.

The questions are typically submitted in writing to the DOJ in the days after committee hearings, and witnesses have two weeks to respond, Leahy says in the letter. Attached to the letter is a chart with the list of unanswered questions -- there are over 300 -- date of submission, and the submitters. The questions, on issues like department oversight and voter protection, were submitted by senators of both parties to officials including FBI Director Robert Mueller and Mukasey himself.

A staggering 104 of the unanswered questions were submitted for Gonzales following this storied July 2007 hearing, at which the AG was grilled on his visit to John Ashcroft's hospital room. The Gonzales item indicates that "partial answers" have been received.

So what exactly are the unanswered questions about? The letter doesn't specify, but we'll look into it and let you know what we find.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Oh, goody. A sternly worded letter. Gonzo is probably hiding under his bed.

user-pic

It shows how weak the Demos are.

A strong party would shut down Congress or impeach the Executive for treason (or at least threaten it to get cooperation).

user-pic

I have to agree that it illustrates the lack of leadership of the Congress. Of course the DOJ are going to push it as much as they can get away with, although you would hope their honor would overcome any childlike tendencies. But if the Congress doesn't then assume the role of a parent, who is to blame, the forgiving parent or the bratty child? Do they not see their role as our representatives important enough to issue some contempt of Congress or at least rail against and rally some constituent pressure. It is great to see their distaste on CSPAN, but no one watches that - so find another stump. Sometimes it makes me angry...

user-pic

Contempt of Congres is not a crime it's something Republicans do for their own amusement and without penalty.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address