« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Whistleblower: Aide Reported On Siegelman Case To "Recused" U.S. Attorney "Every Day"
The New York Times has more details about the possible continued involvement of the U.S. Attorney in the prosecution of former Alabama Democratic governor Don Siegleman, even after she had formally recused herslef form ghe case because her husband was a GOP operative who had run the gubernatorial campaign of Siegelman's opponent.
The paper reports allegations made in a sworn affidavit by a whistleblower in the office, Tamarah Grimes, about the involvement of U.S. Attorney Leura Canary. Time had reported similar claims earlier this month -- in response to which Siegelman expressed outrage in an interview with TPMmuckraker.
Says the Times:
[I]n her complaint, the Justice Department employee, Tamarah T. Grimes, cited several instances suggesting Ms. Canary maintained a close watch on the case. Ms. Grimes said a legal aide in the office reported on Mr. Siegelman's trial to Ms. Canary or her top deputy "every day, sometimes several times per day by telephone." Once, she observed Ms. Canary "frantically pacing in the executive suite" after a courtroom blowup, "pleading with someone" to get on the phone to "tell Louis he has to control his temper."Ms. Grimes also disclosed an e-mail message written by Ms. Canary commenting on legal strategy in the case and suggesting to aides that Mr. Siegelman not be allowed to "comment on court activities in the media." Ms. Grimes, who is also in an dispute with the department related to her allegations that the Siegelman prosecution team had harrassed her, cited the affidavit of a former legal aide in the Montgomery office, Elizabeth Jane Crooks, who wrote that "the morning that the trial started, the U.S. attorney herself carried food and beverage over to the courthouse to support the 'Trial Team.' "
The Times also reports that lawyers for Siegelman, whose appeal begins next month in Atlanta court, have made new filings based on Grimes' claims.













Lets hope our new AG chooses to make some new filings of his own on this.
Obama should pardon Don Siegelman as one of his first official acts. I know I've said it before, but this is a drum the blogs need to keep beating, until Rove answers for what he did to Siegelman.
Can't wait for the book, if Siegelman inks a deal to tell his side of it, you can bet it will be a best seller.
No doubt there are already laws on the books, state, local AND feeral, that cover these crimes (sounding more like a RICO case every day, too) but wherever there's a weak spot in those laws and regs that might allow another travesty like this to ever occur again, the 111th needs to close those gaps.
November 21, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes this story is all about the total politicization of the Justice Department and this is just another story in the ongoing saga of the criminally inclined Bush Justice department. Firing all those wonderful federal attorneys and then covering all that up and now this disgusting trial of Siegelman based on a bunch of made up crap by the Carl Rove Justice Department cronies. Never in the history of our country has a Justice Department been so criminally inclined. In the end. God does not allow folks to prosper who are so disgustingly wicked. And these guys have a lot of stuff to answer for. In the end, it will come out and then even if we cannot prosecute the Rove types, we will know that we know what creeps they are,
November 27, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should pardon Don Siegelman as one of his first official acts. I know I've said it before, but this is a drum the blogs need to keep beating, until Rove answers for what he did to Siegelman.
_____
No, he should not be pardoned -- as if his conviction were legitimate. He should be vindicated, exonerated, the conviction reversed and the record eliminated.
November 21, 2008 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even better, but much less likely. Too many layers of Bush appointees still stand between Don and that ultimate renewal.
This was a travesty of justice, a political persecution, and that is what Presidential pardons were originally intended to remedy.
But I do agree, if they could reverse the verdict and expunge his record, it would represent Justice applied where it has not been before.
Second to exonorating Siegelman is prosecuting Rove and his Alabama posse, this was a RICO case from the first conspiratorial email. And it is obvious, that there was a conspiracy, with more than one whistleblower whistling so loudly, it is just a matter of time until the real guilty co-conspirators are clearly identified.
Betcha more than one of them sings like a Canary!
November 22, 2008 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, not unlikely. This case boils down to the jury instructions. The jury was instructed in such a way that any and every elected official would have been found guilty of accepting a bribe. The jury instructions were faulty. Had the jury been instructed correctly (by a judge who wasn't working with the prosecution to frame a former governor) the evidence presented would have been insufficient to support the conviction. The appellate court can reverse and dismiss the conviction with prejudice on that basis alone. Or they can remand for a new trial.
But not unlikely. Particularly not now.
November 22, 2008 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even better if the investigation leading to his exoneration turns up evidence that lands Canary and Rove in prison.
November 23, 2008 1:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Three typos in a row. Don't type drunk, Zach. ;)
November 22, 2008 7:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Zach is rtying to challenge me for King of Tpoys.
November 22, 2008 9:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
WFT?
November 22, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
LLO.
November 22, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whatever it takes to bring the perpetrators to justice: this case demands at least this much.
Subpoenas must be issued and honored, whistleblowers deserve the highest protection the country can afford, and the Siegelman family - after Don is exonerated - should be honored as national heroes.
Then those judges still unfairly imprisoned will speak out.
We need to hear each and every story of power corrupted absolutely.
The perpetrators must be brought before judges and juries. And they must pay for what they have done to these people, their families and our nation.
November 22, 2008 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
One of my fears is Obama and the Dems allowing the Bush/Cheney gang to escape unscathed for all the shit they pulled. Even if noone goes to jail all of their nefarious actions need to be investigated and publicized.
November 22, 2008 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hear hear, ditto and I second that emotion...
November 22, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I hope that the Obama DOJ will recognize that this is different. This is about a man who went to prison for crimes he didn't commit because he was a Democrat. Period. There is a real person involved with real liberty at stake. In the very least, the Holder-run DOJ should join in a motion for a new trial. Or concede error on appeal and ask for the remedy of a new trial. Or even better, make a motion to vacate and dismiss the conviction with prejudice due to extreme irregularity of the proceeding which negates any confidence in the outcome.
November 22, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since the economy is in such a muck, why waste any time of this bunch of hoods in this administration. We all know they are a bunch of crooks. Get the economy back in shape and later, after that is done, put them in the slammer and fine them for lost wages of those convicted, pain and suffering awards in the millions and anything else the court could dream up.
November 27, 2008 11:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I BELIEVE IN BULLETS AND FIRING SQUADS.
November 22, 2008 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
"make a motion to vacate and dismiss the conviction with prejudice due to extreme irregularity of the proceeding which negates any confidence in the outcome."
What is the make-up of the appeals court? and can those legal decisions be given from the top down by the new AG? If so, this would end the mess for Siegelman, then I wonder what sort of civil case he's got, and who all he could hold liable, for his arrest, his unprecedented shackling, and his illegal incarcaraton.
IANAL, but I am guessing that in civil court, if you can prove the same long list of co-conspirators that a RICO investigation might expose, every name on the list is a potential target for a lawsuit for damages.
November 23, 2008 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink