« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

For Some Culprits In Financial Meltdown, Life Is Still Pretty Good
This probably won't come as a surprise. But some of the major culprits in the financial crash -- former CEOs or top execs at banks whose billion-dollar losses helped precipitate the turmoil -- don't seem to be paying much of a price for their catastrophic mismangement.
Dick Fuld, the former CEO of Lehman -- whose collapse in September directly ushered in the broader panic -- is already plotting a comeback. According to the Financial Times, he's thinking about starting a "small advisory boutique to help companies with strategic and financial issues." The venture would "harness [Fuld's] contacts in US companies," says the paper.
Meanwhile, two former Wall Street honchos appear to be living the high-life after seeing taxpayers step in to rescue their troubled firms.
The New York Post reports today that Peter Kraus, a former top executive with Merrill Lynch, just bought a $37 million Park Avenue apartment -- "featuring 11-foot-high ceilings, three fireplaces, three maid's rooms, a library, a gallery and a family room/gym." In September, Kraus got a $25 million golden parachute from Merrill when it was sold to Bank of America, even though he had only started work there that month. B of A received $25 billion in taxpayer money as part of the bailout.
And back in March, Jimmy Cayne, the ousted CEO of Bear Stearns, bought two adjacent apartments at the Plaza, perhaps New York's swankiest locale, worth $28.24 million. That same month, his collapsed former firm was bought by JP Morgan Chase, with major government backing. Cayne reportedly spent much of his time playing golf and bridge while Bear Stearns was reeling last year.
Next to these characters, the case of Ken Thompson, the former Wachovia CEO, may appear minor. But Thompson, who was forced out of Wachovia after the bank posted a $708 million loss in the first quarter of this year, nonetheless seems to have held onto some of his reputation as a member in good standing of the business elite: he remains on the board of Hewlett Packard. Wachovia has since been taken over by Wells Fargo.
And even Daniel Mudd, the former head of mortgage giant Fannie Mae -- now controlled by the US government -- still seems to have bright career prospects. The Financial Times has reported that he frequently travels to New York City for job interviews.
Bernard Madoff, there's hope for you yet!













Truly mind boggling.I have less and less to say about the high paid swindlers on Wall Street because words cannot express my feelings about the stupendous business and government scams being thrust upon us.Enraged is mild compared to what I am actually feeling.
December 30, 2008 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Only three maid's rooms! That poor li'l parvenu son-of-a-BITCH!!! If there be karma's just hand abiding, Mr. Kraus will end his sorry days with his head jammed three feet up a boar hog's ass.
December 30, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Don't hold your breath.
December 31, 2008 1:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Accountability needs it's own section in the Constitution.
December 30, 2008 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
All salaries should be regulated by law! And bonuses over $25,000 should be prohibited.
December 30, 2008 9:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, Zach... "now for something completely different:"
Those with a golden parachute obviously have a contract. (enuf said) Those without jobs are going to try to find work... somehow... and are not exactly going to have a skill set outside of financial services. So what you're really saying is "how dare they accept the terms of their legitmate contracts," which i don't have... "how dare they spend their money as they wish," when i can't... "how dare they try to make a living," and "don't they have any shame?"
Well, to the last, apparently no...
So let's take a look at what aspects of corporate governance are offending us. CEOs, like the POTUS or even a church committee chair, are going to surround themselves with friends and those who think like they do... so if CEO-A is on Company-B's board, CEO-A likely will seek to put CEO-B on his board. CEO-B may say to that board, "if we really want to keep this smart, outstanding person, then we need to sweeten the pot with a golden parachute, lots of perks, stock options, fat salary, etc." so as not to lose him/her to Company-C; and notes that tying those sweeteners to performance is a tricky business during "precarious times" blah, blah. CEO-B then puts CEO-A on his/her board to insure similar treatment.
Company-A's stockholders try to influence the Board's compensation committee, but, let's face it, how many stockholder proposals are ever passed... How many of you have ignored even voting in annual meetings... afterall, you're very busy people, too, and know how outnumbered you are.
I'm telling you nothing new... but I would be interested in hearing effective and realistic proposals which you might have to overhaul corporate governance... proposals which don't drive the talent we do have out of the country... because I'm stumped
December 30, 2008 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would be interested in hearing effective and realistic proposals which you might have to overhaul corporate governance... proposals which don't drive the talent we do have out of the country... because I'm stumped
"Talent"? Does anyone seriously think that what those gentlemen did is something we want to see repeated? That we lack anyone else of equivalent brilliance (or stupidity)?
"Out of the country"? If they want to move to Uzbekistan to run a corporation there, and can get the necessary visa, I say, let them.
December 31, 2008 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Are the Obama people aware of this? This is so maddening...Maybe we should have a revolution?
December 30, 2008 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey United Auto Workers - see what happens when you don't make wage concessions? I want my hard earned taxpayer money back NOW! Perhaps tax payers should file a lien against all of that NY real-estate.
December 30, 2008 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
What did anyone expect? That the robber barons were going to put on sackcloth and ashes? Get real. Money makes the world go 'round. He who has the gold makes the rules. Wanna hear another one?
December 31, 2008 1:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
What did anyone expect? That the robber barons were going to put on sackcloth and ashes? Get real. Money makes the world go 'round. He who has the gold makes the rules. Wanna hear another one?
December 31, 2008 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
I didn't double-post. I swear. It's the software gremlins.
December 31, 2008 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
well, Dave... offhand I'd say that, yes, some of these people were grossly negligent, and, yes, some were various degrees of greedy, and, yes, some may have been hopelessly self-absorbed... while others got over their heads... but stupid? hardly
yet, somewhere along the line, this country lost its moral compass, but not just in business. we've seen it in politics (don't get me started)... in the general acceptance among students to cheat... in our churches (from the volunteer secretary who embezzles small sums for years to the sexual escapdes of preachers on a monumental scale)... in the aeronautics/space manufacturer which wants to save 13 cents on Columbia's o-rings... in the labor leader who steals from the union coffers... to the kids who beat up homeless people... in the insurance company which won't cover "a previous condition"... and on and on.
most of us figured those were someone else's problems... until one day we woke up and found out that they all are costing us (money and otherwise). so we're each sitting around now with a black eye (for our negligence and indifference), and I'm asking, what do we propose to do about the situation in which we find ourselves?
December 31, 2008 4:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
having looked at fulds' houses on Google earth, i am pleased to say that there appears to be some nice long sight lines, sufficient ground cover, sufficient elevation, and nice highway access. i should need no more than a 10x scope.
do they sell glasers in new york?
December 31, 2008 6:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
So are you implying something here? I'm all for CEO accountability and I think what CEO's did during the era of deregulation was wrong and punishable by imprisonment. I hope you explain what you're implications are, because it sounds like you're implying something else entirely.
I'm as liberal as most people on this and many other liberal blogs. That being said, I don't believe that regulating CEO pay is the answer. We're stepping dangerously close to regulating the pursuit of prosperity, an important foundation of our country's innovation and productivity. Our history supports this. Its what made your ability to comment on this website possible, if you like it or not.
I agree with Liz, regulating morality is not the only answer - its fix for symptoms of the larger disease of dishonesty and greed. Everyone in this country needs to fight that in their own way. Capping your earning potential is not one of them.
December 31, 2008 9:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps corporate law could be re-written such that boards are actually responsible for the well being of the companies. Writing up a contract whereby a person gets a $25M parachute JUST FOR TAKING THE JOB does not sound to me to be in the best interests of the company.
December 31, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps corporate law could be re-written such that boards are actually responsible for the well being of the companies. Writing up a contract whereby a person gets a $25M parachute JUST FOR TAKING THE JOB does not sound to me to be in the best interests of the company.
December 31, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why not regulate CEO pay..they are more than happy to regulate your wages..the wages of the UAW (unions in general, and who can forget the fight over the minimum wage?)...through extortion,(we'll give you a loan..but FIRST...!) through legislation, etc....some how regulating a CEO's wage is "dangerously close" to regulating prosperity.... then regulating minimum wage is what..? regulating poverty? Kick the worker to the curb...(but go through his pockets first) "Are there no work houses, no prison..?"...Ebenezer Scrooge to Spirit after the children "ignorance" and "want" are revealed...
December 31, 2008 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink