« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Former FDIC Chair, Now Advising Paulson, Is Looking To Profit From Bailout
The New York Times reports that several former government officials who helped organize the savings and loan bailout of the early 1990s are now putting that expertise to use by working as lawyers or lobbyists helping banks get a piece of the financial bailout -- or even by investing in some of the bad assets to be offered for sale.
Much of this, it appears, amounts to little more than an example of the decades-old revolving door between government and private business. But the paper reports that at least one former top government official is advising both the Bush and Obama teams on how to respond to the crisis, while at the same time being involved in efforts to profit from it.
Some of these former federal officials, like L. William Seidman, the first chairman of the R.T.C., are serving as advisers -- sharing ideas with Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and the transition team for President-elect Barack Obama -- even while they are separately directing investors or banks on how to best profit from this advice."It is an enormous market," said Mr. Seidman, who has already joined two such potential money-making efforts and is evaluating proposals to participate in a third. "I am enjoying this."
As the chair of the Resolution Trust Corporation and the FDIC in the early 1990s, Seidman directed the government's disposal of the assets of failed savings and loans. So no one's suggesting that Paulson, and advisers to Obama, shouldn't be able to call on him for advice this time around.
But it would be nice to know more about what kind of ideas Seidman, and others like him, are sharing with current and future policymakers, and how those ideas line up with their own flourishing financial interests. And that's only more true given what we've learned about the inadequate efforts to monitor what the federal government has done with the bailout money and to protect against conflicts of interest.













Didn't that use to be what's called a felony? At the very least, his clients have access to material nonpublic information, and but I guess the out is that his contract with the government doesn't have any clause requiring him to give advice that he thinks is good for the country as a whole rather than for his clients...
December 29, 2008 12:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
This entire "bailout" is solely designed to bankrupt the USA.
In Economics 101 we learn that when spending exceeds income, the solution is to cut back spending and increase income, not the opposite like the Federal Government is doing.
By increasing spending (bailouts) while decreasing income (tax cuts) the Federal Government is only making things much worse.
George W. Bush had a $500 Billion annual surplus when he came into office. If he had just left spending and taxes the way it was under Clinton, The USA could have paid off the entire National Debt by this time.
Instead GWB has spent almost $1Trillion per year more than has been taken in through taxes.
This is a simple geometric progression - a continued increase in the national debt and the accompanying interest costs will soon eat up the entire tax income of the Federal Government.
The only solution then will be to resort to massive inflation, hurting those people most who are on fixed incomes.
Creating debt does NOT create wealth.
December 29, 2008 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
How succinct, what is good for the country vs what is good for the customers. As Al Capp had Gen. Bullmoose say; "what is good for General bullmoose is good for the USA". Of course, that was in jest, kinda!
December 29, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
There has been talk of creating an independent body to decide how to distribute stimulus package funds to guard against misallocation. The same should be done with TARP funds.
December 29, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's nice to see someone with a positive enough outlook on life to "enjoy" the misery felt by tens or hundreds of thousands of us little people.
I vote we create a 10th level of hell for vultures like this. Not at the bottom necessarily but maybe Level 3.5 just above child molesters and just below probate lawyers.
Hell's levels _are_ controlled by popular vote still, right?
December 29, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
More proof that there is one thing this country will never have a shortage of: White-collar Looters.
December 29, 2008 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is how the rich get richer...robbing from the poor....while talking about "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps"...what unmitigated gall....!!
December 29, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is like allowing the people that stole the bank's money to now steal the FDIC funds that are insuring the deposits.
Al Capone: "This makes me wonder why Ness picked on me."
December 29, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quote from article: "It is an enormous market," said Mr. Seidman, who has already joined two such potential money-making efforts and is evaluating proposals to participate in a third. "I am enjoying this."
"I am enjoying this"? The country is on the verge of economic collapse and he is "enjoying" this? What kind of a twisted, sadistic pervert is this a**hole?
December 30, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
"This entire "bailout" is solely designed to bankrupt the USA."
I don't believe this is exactly true. What I DO believe is that those folks at the top are making sure that if we DO go down the tubes, they will still be rich and powerful enough to not be that affected by our downfall.
Stimulus packages, in my belief, are to circulate money. The more folks the money runs through, the more stimulus.
Whether it begins its circulation from the bottom or the top is of no importance... except to the folks who plan on NOT being left out....
and the clowns we have been voting in all this time are fully aware of this. After all, they have the best paid vronines in the world working for the (paid for by us commoners, BYW)...
December 30, 2008 11:00 AM | Reply | Permalink