TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Gross Profits: PIMCO Hired To Manage Bailout That Benefited It

Over at TPM, we noted earlier today the news that the Federal Reserve has hired four investment firms -- BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, PIMCO and Wellington Management Company -- to manage its mortgage-backed securities purchase program, in which it will buy up $500 billion worth of mortgage bonds, in an effort to boost the housing market.

It'd be nice to know more about why all of these companies were selected, and how much they're being paid -- and we've put those questions to the Fed. But for a number of reasons, one of the four firms, bond giant PIMCO, stands out as a particularly interesting choice.

As of June 30th, 61 percent of PIMCO's holdings -- $500 billion -- were in the very mortgage backed securities that it's now being hired by the Fed to buy back on behalf of US taxpayers, according to a September Bloomberg report that cited data on PIMCO's own website.

That could explain why, as financial blogger Rolfe Winkler pointed out earlier today, PIMCO chief Bill Gross was sounding the alarm in early September about the disastrous fate that would befall the US economy unless the government started buying up troubled mortgage assets.

In a September 4 post on PIMCO's website, Gross warned:

If we are to prevent a continuing asset and debt liquidation of near historic proportions, we will require policies that open up the balance sheet of the U.S. Treasury.

Within days, the Treasury had done what Gross was asking. In other words, as Peter Cohan, a professor of management at Babson College, put it at the time in a post on Bloggingstocks.com:

Bill Gross, who manages $830 billion, has convinced the U.S. Treasury to use your taxpayer dollars to bail him out of his bad investments.

And Gross seems to have had his eye on the endgame for a while here too. Later that month, he argued in a Washington Post oped that a broader bailout -- what became the TARP -- was also desperately needed, and he seemed to suggest that his own PIMCO would be a perfect candidate to manage the funds.

He wrote (via nexis):

Calls for appropriate oversight of this auction process are more than justified. There are disinterested firms, some not even based on Wall Street, with the expertise to evaluate these complicated pools of mortgages and other assets to assure taxpayers that their money is being wisely invested. (itals ours)

PIMCO, or the Pacific Investment Management Company, is based in Newport Beach, California.

In an interview shortly afterwards with CNBC's Erin Burnett, Gross presented his willingness to take on that job as a patriotic stand, pledging that PIMCO would work for no fee, "if everybody else worked on the same basis." (It's around the 4:25 mark).

And now the Fed has given him what's essentially the same job.

Will Gross stand by his pledge to work for free? We've called PIMCO to ask, and will keep you posted on what we found out. But given how Gross has made out so far, we're not holding our breath.


5 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I think you should really think about doing some more work before putting this sort of article out.

Yes, PIMCO owns a lot of MBS, but that is basically a bet around the notion that, now that the government has taken over Fannie and Freddie, there's no real reason why these bonds should have a significant interest premium to treasury debt. Certainly a defensible position -- and with the Fed's need to inject capital into the markets, and the flight to Treasuries by other central banks and large buyers, what else were they to buy than MBS? You might also note that PIMCO has moved out on the yield curve -- will you also cry foul when the Fed starts buying back longer dated Treasuries?

Second, it is hard to say that PIMCO 'needs a bail out from its bad investments'. Their largest fund, Pimco Total Return, is down about 2% according to Yahoo Finance - not bad for this year. The numbers would seem to be worth more than some quote from some dude on some blog somewhere, and are readily accessible to you.

Finally, the fee against managing these funds is dwarfed by the increased information advantage provided to the firm -- presumably, exactly why the Fed has chosen 4 agents rather than just one.

There's no doubt that Pimco has a cosy relationship with the Treasury - how could they not given their size in the bond market - but as someone who's listened to Gross for some time now, it seems like he trots out mostly to soften the market for some planned Fed/Treasury initiative, not to 'talk his own book' as is often claimed. I'm pretty sure he can talk to folks in Treasury without posting on the Pimco site or going on CNBC. I probably could too if I managed a trillion dollars.

FWIW, I have no relationship with Pimco other than as a small retail investor in some of their funds.

user-pic

"Pimco has sold credit default swaps that guarantee $760 million of debt issued by AIG, according to Bloomberg. Should AIG file bankruptcy, Pimco would likely have to pay out on those swaps."

Wellington also a huge investor in AIG - so there is a big collusion here (especially with Goldman Sachs) - having to do with AIG so that their big investors losses are lessened.

"However, according to Reuters, Blackrock's President, Robert Kapito, was unfazed. While he thinks that there will be a much bigger slowdown in 2009, citing slowing growth in emerging markets and tightening pressures on the U.S. consumer, he sees big value in commercial mortgage backed securities." [7/1/2008]

So apparently Blackrock went big with CBMS - and that will be the next big collapse - and I bet there is a coverup reason that Blackrock is going to oversee AIG's assets.

user-pic

Wow. So much for the appearance of a conflict of interest.

user-pic

I'm still not clear on the whole thing of the *Fed* buying MBS instruments. Why and under what authority?

What management is needed, for how long? Does "manage" include buying and selling and setting market prices?

????????????

user-pic

Doing my own research

"Without any public debate or authorization from Congress, the Federal Reserve has embarked on the most radical financial intervention in history. ...

"Last Tuesday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson announced that the Fed would buy $600 billion of toxic mortgage-backed securities (MBS) from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, in effect, buying up its own debt. ...

"The Fed also initiated a program to purchase $200 billion of triple A-rated loans from non bank financial institutions to try to revive the flagging securitization market."

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Tag Cloud



Subscribe to this blog's feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address