« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Partisan Flare-Up Over Pace Of Holder Hearings
We told you Wednesday about the developing fight over the pace of confirmation for Eric Holder, Barack Obama's nominee for Attorney General. And it looks like it's heating up.
Politico reports that several Senate GOPers took the floor of the chamber last night to agree with Arlen Specter, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary committee, who has argued that the January 8th start date for confirmation hearings, set by Democrats, doesn't allow for enough time to scrutinize Holder's record -- in particular his role in the controversial pardon of Marc Rich in the last days of the Clinton administration.
Minority Whip Jon Kyl said:
Nobody is talking about a long, long, long delay. We do ask that we be accorded the same consideration that was given to others in this situation and that there be adequate time to confirm him.
And another Senate Republican, Charles Grassley, agreed:
I understand the Judiciary Committee has a large number of boxes of archived documents relating to his employment at the Justice Department and those materials need to be reviewed. We haven't even gotten Mr. Holder's questionnaire, nomination materials or F.B.I. background investigation yet.
But Democrats fired back in support of Pat Leahy, the Judiciary chair who's pushing to begin hearings quickly.
Sheldon Whitehouse, who sits on the Judiciary committee, argued that the schedule was not out of keeping with precedent. He said that the average time between a presidential announcement of a nominee and the first hearing has been 29 days. If the Holder hearings began January 8th, that would be 38 days after the nomination was announced on December 1st.
And now Leahy himself has issued a lengthy statement reiterating his desire to stick to the January 8th start date.
Leahy argues that the politicization of the department under Bush makes it especially crucial to move quickly:
This is no ordinary time. Over the last eight years, political manipulation and influence from partisan political operatives in the White House have undercut the Department of Justice in its mission, severely undermined the morale of its career professionals, and shaken public confidence in our Federal justice system. Never has it been more important to have an experienced hand as Attorney General. I hope our Republican members will resist the temptation toward partisanship and join with us to consider this appointment fairly and promptly.
Leahy even dredges up an old quote from a Senate Republican, from last year when GOPers were pushing for quick hearings on President Bush's nominee, Michael Mukasey. "Attorney general nominees have been confirmed, on average, in approximately three weeks, with some being confirmed more quickly," said one Republican at the time, according to Leahy.
Late Update: More on that quote from last year, just dredged up today by Pat Leahy, in which a Senate Republican argues for a quick confirmation for Bush AG nominee Michael Mukasey. Turns out the quote was from none other than Jon Kyl, who now is stressing the dangers of a quick process for Holder. Thanks to reader CR for the tip.













Specter sat there and said NOTHING while Rove turned the DOJ into a subsidiary of the dirty tricks division of the permanent Republican campaign.
Leahy is show remarkable restraint in his deference to Specter.
December 12, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
When will Leahy and the Democrats realize that they are in a no-holds-barred war with the Republicans?
Their desire for bi-partisanship only works into the hands and desires of the Republicans who do realize that they are in a no-holds-barred war for control of the USA and who keep moving the bar to the right every time the Democrats compromise.
.
December 12, 2008 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give Leahy and the Democrats some credit. They know the rules of engagement. By staying above these petty partisan political games, they are taking their cue from their Party's leader. During the election, Obama proved the value of this Rope-a-dope strategy. Let Republicans punch themselves out on battles they either cannot win or win short-term but at great cost.
We have a lot of problems in our country and in our government. The American people are sick to death of the GOP's obstructionism. Blocking the auto bail out has sealed their fate. Having shown their initial willingness to cooperate, Democrats acquired additional political capital to be spent immediately upon Obama’s inauguration.
-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
December 12, 2008 10:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
F**K the Republicans...!!
December 12, 2008 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Re: the Marc Rich pardon - in a book titled "Crazy Rhythm" by Leonard Garment (former attorney for Richard Nixon), Garment discusses going to Switzerland to look into Rich's case. After much investigation he asked his assistant to look into determining whether Rich actually owed any unpaid taxes. According to Garment, the assistant came back and said no, he didn't. Their legal conclusion was that the indictment was based on a misapplication of the RICO statutes. If that's in fact true then it would seem the pardon was legit. Some interesting points about this. The book was copyrighted in 1997 long before Clinton pardoned Rich. Garment was a Republican. Last, Garment's assistant was an attorney named I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby. Check it out. The book was published by Da Capo Press, ISBN 0-306-81082-4.
December 12, 2008 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
This Lame Duck Congress gets lamer and lamer every time I here a quote from one of the supposed GOP leaders. Look at the precedent established in the record, tell your aides to do the research on the candidate and work through the holidays. I am and so are many Americans. America and the world at large look like they are on the ropes right, so I think you can be both efficient, confidant and determined to meet the pressing matters head-on by acting like the f8ck8ng congressional leaders you are supposed to f7ck7ng be! And when you come to a decision rationalize it for us(your constituents), tell us why you have come to your decision, make an arguement to present your case then I am sure that most of would be able to accept. We might disagree but we do happen to live in a democracy, right!
December 12, 2008 6:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think on Jan. 7th they should start the proceedings. If the Repubs aren't there...too bad. After what happened this week with the auto loan vote oh well.
It is time for all bets off. To quote Chabuka "F**K the Republicans...!!"
December 13, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pat Leahy: "OK Jon."
December 13, 2008 6:40 PM | Reply | Permalink