TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Leahy: You Guys Voted For Gonzo, So What's Wrong With Holder?

The bad blood between Senate Judiciary chair Pat Leahy, and ranking Republican Arlen Specter, over Attorney General nominee Eric Holder, shows no signs of abating.

Yesterday, Specter pointedly questioned Holder's record of independence, even comparing Holder to Alberto Gonzales -- a low blow by any measure.

Leahy, who supports Holder's confirmation, seems to have taken exception. His office today released the following statement in his name -- which tries to turn the Gonzo precedent back on Specter:

We need the new Attorney General to be a person of experience and independence. Eric Holder's long record of public service has earned him strong support from law enforcement organizations, civil rights groups, victims' rights advocates, former Reagan and Bush administration officials, and others. Any effort to question his character is unfounded. Every Republican voted for Alberto Gonzales, and felt his character merited confirmation. Certainly Eric Holder greatly exceeds that test.

Oh snap.

For weeks, Leahy and Specter have been bickering over the nomination. Specter prevailed on his opposite number to delay the confirmation hearings, citing a need to look more closely at Holder's record, in particular his role in the pardon of Marc Rich


21 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Spector is in a twit mode due to his re-election bid in 2010. I hope he ass gets handed to him for all his bs during the last eight years of talking crap then voting w/ the bush agenda. Spector thinks he is a scholar and a champion of civil rights when in reality he is a arrogant sob who deserves no respect for the next 8 years!

user-pic

I hope they vote against holder, because it will give him more cause to investigate their asses for everything they have done over the last 8 years. Bush didn't do it all by himself!

user-pic

The only "low blow" here comes from Roth. If you read what Specter said, he's right: We don't want to rubber stamp nominees since we learned our lesson with Gonzo. That's not "comparing Holder to Alberto Gonzales", it is learning from hard experience. Of course Specter is also grandstanding. But questioning Holder's independence is a legit move. What is not legit is inflating any questions of independence out of proportion.

Leahy's statement is just silly.

Holder just needs to be prepared to knock down the strawman issues Specter will put forward. If all Specter offers is what he's clearly telegraphed, it should be a short and easy hearing.

user-pic

it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt that you are a fool

you shoulda kept yer mouth shut

I've read what specter said. I've got the quote RIGHT HERE:

I am convinced that many of Attorney General Gonzales’ missteps were caused by his eagerness to please the White House. Similarly, when Mr. Holder was serving as DAG to President Clinton, some of his actions raised concerns about his ability to maintain his independence from the president.

it's not "learning from hard experience"

it's flat fucking hypocrisy

and you're a fucking idiot for defending this piece of shit

maybe you learned your lesson

never support a lying corrupt hypocritical asshole, less you be found to be a lying corrupt hypocritical asshole

lie down with dogs, and ya wake up with fleas

repuglitards are indefensible, and only fools like you are willing to try to defend the indefensible shit

user-pic

Nice to see we can disagree without being disagreeable. :-(

user-pic

disagreement is fine

flat fucking stupidity demands an answer

and defending a repuglitard by trying to make the despicable look reasonable ???

that's just blatant stupidity

if your stupid enough to lie for repuglitards, I'm mean enough to make you regret it

user-pic

So much for the end of "partisan rancor" in your house.

If it helps you to label Specter a hypocrite, all I can say is... Whatever!

user-pic

I'm all for playing nice, but "hypocrite" has Specter's picture next to it in the dictionary.

user-pic

'free patriot' has no history showing at TPM, could be an offended sock puppet?

user-pic

or I could be an offended human who doesn't tolerate hypocritical repuglitard talking points and the pathetic people who claim to be Democrats but repeat the repuglitard falshoods

user-pic

Will you settle for "foul-mouthed attack machine"?

user-pic

Add Roberts and Alito to that list and I'll agree with you.

user-pic

We should give Holder Leahy's job. Leahy is a blowhard as are all too many Democrat Committee chairs.

Specter is playing politics to get him some publicity and TV time. Expect Specter to milk this for all he can.

By the way, he's one of my Senators, I've known of him since his days as the DA in Philly.

user-pic

as long as specter is milking a bull, I'll let him try

specter just admitted that abu gonzo is a FUCKING CRIMINAL

then he PROJECTS ABU GONZO'S CRIMINAL ACTS ONTO HOLDER

FUCK HIM AND THE HORSE HE RODE IN ON

specter is gonna have some fun explaining that statment in 2010

first the wingnuts are gonna make him renounce his statements on abu gonzo, then specter is gonna try a double hypocrisy back flip and reclaim the words if he survives the wingnut primary

user-pic

Don't hold back FP, tell us how you _really_ feel! ;-)

user-pic

I fully expect Leahy to bend over and take in ass as he always does in the Holder matter. The repubs will run circles around this old goat. If Leahy had any balls he would use the same tactics the repubs did to get Bush's AG's through.

user-pic

Snarlin' Arlen "El Foldo" Specter makes some nice noise once in a while. I'm not saying this is some, but hey. He always always did right by Bush/Cheney when it came to actually making a decision, hence the cartoonish spanish nick. (think it came out of FDL) I admit I like the guy, but I'm not in PA, so I'm not a close follower. My uneducated guess is he'll not run for re-election.
Staying in the Senate-as-spectator-sport vibe, I can't wait to see Think Progress rehash Orrin Hatch's endless bloviating about Gonzo's marvelous and historic hispanicness. yeah, I know. nice word. Orrin Hack should be more entertaining. what's my point. eh

user-pic

I know, I know! My point was to say that Specter might ride along with Obama. Also wanted muck out the profile thingies cuz I had to change my... I think I'm ok, all kluge aside.

user-pic

still bites

user-pic

Arlen Specter likes to make headlines by pretending to be "anti" (fill in blank here) and has done so regularly the past 8 years at least, but in the end he ALWAYS gives in to the Bush agenda. He's doing the same now with the exception that he might not vote for Holder in the end (afterall this isn't his party's nominee). Specter and Leahy have seemed to have a good relationship until now, but I'd hoped Leahy would not give in to delaying Holder's confirmation hearing start. Yet he did and now Specter is putting out this BS comparing Gonzo to Holder which is ridiculous. No one can really hold a light to Gonzo, he's in a "class" all by himself and I use that term loosely.

user-pic

Specter is a toothless tiger. He will huff and puff and spread his peacock feathers for the benefit of his rightwing constituents and vote 'reluctantly for Holder to get the DOJ working'. He and Voinovich are two of a kind, bombast and no gonads. He has no shame. He enabled Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Mukasey to dismantle the Constitution to suspend habeas corpus, torture, warrantless wiretap, rendition to other countries that knowingly torture. to out a covert CIA agent among a hundred other egregious actions. Of course, no conscience renders you shameless. He is just paying Bush back for helping him get re-elected. No Bush next time.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Tag Cloud



Subscribe to this blog's feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address