« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Military Judge Rejects Obama's Request For Delay Of Gitmo Proceeding
Last week, in one of its first moves, the Obama administration told its military prosecutors to ask for delays in the proceedings of 21 Guantanamo detainees who have been charged, so that their cases, and the military commissions process as a whole, could be reviewed.
Most military judges have complied with that request. But one judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, has now declined to do so, saying he found the government's reasoning "unpersuasive," reports the Washington Post.
Pohl wrote:
The Commission is unaware of how conducting an arraignment would preclude any option by the administration. Congress passed the military commissions act, which remains in effect. The Commission is bound by the law as it currently exists, not as it may change in the future.
Pohl is presiding over the case of Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri, a Saudi citizen of Yemeni descent accused of planning the October 2000 Al Qaeda attack on the USS Cole warship, which killed 17 service members.
The Pentagon may now be forced to withdraw the charges against Nashiri if it wants to impose the broader delay. It could bring them up again, but that would bring the case back to square one, costing the government time.
But the wider impact of Pohl's opinion isn't yet clear. It may be limited to this specific case, but it could also potentially throw a wrench into the new administration's plan to put the process on hold pending a review, and even complicate Obama's plan to close Guantanamo.
We'll keep you posted as things become clearer.
Late Update: The ACLU has called on Defense Secretary Robert Gates to withdraw the charges against Nashiri so that the charges can be tried in a legitimate court. In a statement, the group's executive director, Anthony Romero, said:
Judge Pohl's decision to unabashedly move forward in the al-Nashiri military commission case shows how officials held over from the Bush administration are exploiting ambiguities in President Obama's executive order as a strategy to undercut the president's unequivocal promise to shut down Guantánamo and end the military commissions. Judge Pohl's decision to move forward despite a clear statement from the president also raises questions about Secretary of Defense Gates - is he the 'new Gates' or is he the same old Gates under a new president? Secretary Gates has the power to stop the military commissions and ought to follow his new boss' directives.
Later Update: But the commander of the USS Cole, Kirk Lippold, who is now affiliated with Military Families United, a group that bills itself as a "the nation's premier military family advocacy organization", takes the opposite view. Lippold said in a statement:
Today's decision is a victory for the 17 families of the sailors who lost their lives on the USS Cole over eight years ago. This trial is a long overdue step toward accountability and justice for the attacks on the USS Cole. The seventeen American sailors who lost their lives on October 12, 2000, when we came under suicide terrorist attack by al Qaeda, were not just sailors. They were sons and daughters, husbands and wives, and friends to so many. The sacrifice of these sailors and all of our brave military service members who have died to protect this country and apprehend terrorists is a key reason why we should not close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay precipitously.By President Obama signing the executive order to close Guantanamo Bay within a year, he is not considering or addressing the impact on the families who have paid so dearly to defend our freedom.













Good for Pohl! If Obama's going to talk the "rule of law" talk, he's going to have to walk the walk too.
Thumbs down to the sensationalists.
January 29, 2009 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
How, in any way, does requesting a delay in proceedings violate the "rule of law?" Prosecutors and defence counsel make tons of such applications every day.
January 29, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
White House interfering with ongoing Court proceedings for no good reason (per Pohl). If you have a good reason Pohl missed, please post it.
January 29, 2009 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many of these gitmo detainees waived their rights to speedy trial, I wonder?
January 29, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some of you might want to do some research before you spout such nonsense.
Obama's order last week was an EXECUTIVE ORDER. LEt me quote part of it:
" But, and this is a big but, the executive order released the following day, on the closing of Guantanamo and disposition of detainees, specifically directs the cases to cease:
Sec. 7. Military Commissions. The Secretary of Defense shall immediately take steps sufficient to ensure that during the pendency of the Review described in section 4 of this order, no charges are sworn, or referred to a military commission under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the Rules for Military Commissions, and that all proceedings of such military commissions to which charges have been referred but in which no judgment has been rendered, and all proceedings pending in the United States Court of Military Commission Review, are halted."
In other words, the judge acted in violation of Obama;s Executive Order - and his decision will not stand.
January 29, 2009 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
President Obama is the Commander in Chief....The Commander in Chief can fire (retire) Pohl...
January 29, 2009 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
To the Families of Servicemen:
Proper legal proceedings should have been brought against these defendants in an expeditious manner many years ago. There is no excuse for the delay in their prosecution caused by Bush Administration incompetence. If found guilty, the defendants should and will be punished. However, it was wrong for the United States to create a military commissions court, with relaxed rules of evidence and procedures, all arranged to make convictions more likey. A trial is either fair or unfair, and these military commission courts are so rigged that some U.S. military officials have resigned rather than take part in farcical proceedings.
I say this with the utmost respect for you and your loved ones. If America stands for anything, it stands for fair trials, not kangaroo courts, and Obama's delay is well-reasoned and appropriate.
January 29, 2009 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hear, hear!
January 30, 2009 3:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey, wait a minute.
"the commander of the USS Cole, Kirk Lippold, who is now affiliated with Military Families United"
When did members of the military get to start engaging in political advocacy? How does he get away with this blatantly partisan behavior?
Just wondering.
January 29, 2009 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Time to REMOVE the Judge - today.
January 29, 2009 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
While in a civilian court system, this judge may have been more free to offer his opinion, one very important fact that many of his supporters seem to be overlooking is that this man is not just any judge..he's a member of the U.S. Military, and as a member of the Military, when the Commander in Chief issues an order, you cannot simply just -choose- to ignore it, and do what you wish.
What would happen if all of our military men and women now serving in Iraq decided that they were going to disobey their commanders, simply because they didn't believe in the cause?
It would be one thing for a civilian lawyer to oppose a presidential policy, but a military lawyer doing so, in direct defiance of a command from the top of his chain, and in violation of stated Pentagon policy of cooperation is , in my opinion, in violation of the UCMJ, and should be subject to the same standards of punishment as any other military member would be held to given a willful disobedience of a direct command.
As far as the families of those servicemen and women who were victims of the attack on the U.S.S. Cole... my sympathies are with you, I am saddened for your loss.. but as a nation, we have to hold to our standards, and not surrender the values we hold dear. We should be striving toward -justice-, not vengeance, and to do so, we must not take matters into our own hands, against our own standards.
My 2 cents worth.
January 30, 2009 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Amen.
January 30, 2009 3:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Exactly. It's a military court.
In a kangaroo court, the judge must jump when commanded.
You can't disobey an order because it's "unpersuasive". It would need to be "unlawful", and it's not.
January 30, 2009 8:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
C'mon, we've already held this murderer for over six years without trial. Now suddenly Pres. Obama's request for 120 days to review the case is unreasonable?
That's really messed up.
-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
January 31, 2009 2:59 AM | Reply | Permalink