TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

UPDATED: Obama: Wall Street Bonuses "Outrageous"

President Obama has weighed in on the controversy over Wall Street bonuses.

Obama this morning called the bonuses "outrageous", according to White House Robert Gibbs, speaking at a press briefing moments ago.

A report released by the New York State comptroller's office and written up today by the New York Times found that Wall Street firms awarded over $18 billion in bonuses, despite the financial crisis that many of them helped trigger.

Yestrday, it was reported that AIG paid $450 million in bonuses to the unit that sold those disastrous credit default swaps.

And of course, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating Merrill Lynch's awarding of billions in bonuses, on an accelerated schedule, before it went formally went under the control of Bank of America.

Late Update: Obama went further in comments to reporters today after meeting with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner. The presIdent said that awarding billions in bonuses "at a time when most of these institutions are teetering on the brink of collapse and they are asking for taxpayers to sustain them" is "the height of irresponsibility" and "shameful."

He added: "Show some restraint, and show some discipline, and show some sense of responsibility."


16 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'll believe Obama's truly concerned when he stops listening to the likes of Gheitner and Summers and starts listening to the Paul Krugmans of the world. God these wall street criminals make me sick.

user-pic

Amen.

user-pic

This is a blatant example of shameless greedy bastards taking advantage of the American Taxpayer. Is there remedy or actions that can be taken regarding these bonuses?

user-pic

And what, exactly, is he going to do about it?

Oh yeah, nothing.

user-pic

Broad brush assessments often seem outrageous.

user-pic

I understand Mr. Obama's "outrageous" response
as relates to banks who are guilty of the afore mentioned bonuses, and who are also recipients of
government bailout money; but if they are not benefitting from Washington dollars, and he isn't a stock holder or board member of such a bank,....
guess what....it isn't any of his business!
Maybe a course in law and constitution, would help our president.

user-pic

Josh from the front page:

One point that might be worth considering. I've heard that a number of sovereign wealth funds -- i.e., foreign governments who've invested big chunks of money -- have put us on notice that they would not sit still for seeing their own assets wiped out in any global financial sector plan.

I'm thinking there's a considerable amount of truth in this. People seem to forget how much "capital" had been invested in Citi over the past year or so before Uncle Sam started handing them money, and where it was coming from.

The problem is that Citi is insolvent, and that capital is quite literally worth $0.00 if Citi fully opened up their books and were forced to truly mark-to-market their assets.

It would be interesting to see the form in which the capital was infused, and where in the Bankruptcy Line it would put some of these "sovereign wealth funds" if Citi had to be liqudated.

John

user-pic

Yes. I've been noting for some time the example of the Saudi prince who has about 5% of Citi common stock.

Are we now admitting that we are slaves to foreign wealth? Maybe a rebellion is timely.

user-pic

I agree the bonuses for Wall Street bank robbers are reprehensible.

I also think the $4,700 cost-of-living increase for all members of Congress which stated in January (and which amounts to a cost to taxpayers of $2.5 million in 2009) is inexcusable.

user-pic

Want to solve the problem?

Post the names of all the senators and representatives who voted for this bailout WITHOUT mandating restrictions. Post them on page one of every newspaper every day until the next elections come around....

Oops, their name recognition would just get them reelected, wouldn't it...

user-pic

I refer you to my humble suggestion posted here a few days ago. A way to get the bonuses back.

user-pic

Todays presser listed high on my theater of the absurd list. Back during Thanksgiving the MSM was already talking about how smaller bonuses would effect the tax take in NY State. Governor Patterson was all over the news as was Mayor Bloomberg. Two months later our newly elected president claims his outrage over 18 billion in bonuses that are paid. Did he ever pick up a news paper or watch television after he won the election as this was one of the major financial stories back then.
I'm sorry, I've lived long enough to know that a Democrat is no different than a Republican. As I've said before a Republican will hit you with a St. Louis slugger and a Democrat will use a velet glove. It is beyond self serving that NOW Obama shows us his anger. So Mr. President, are you going to go after these scumbags billions while millions of US citizens continue to lose their jobs and homes? How many more of the elderly are going to freeze to death because they can't pay their electiric bills?
You have surrounded yourself with the same crap that got us into this mess and from the looks of it you seem quite comfortable at home with the likes of Geithner who was pulling the levers behind the scenes atthe NY Fed while Rome burned. Seems the more things change, the more they stay the same.

user-pic

I'm done with NYC for a long while.
I just don't care anymore about family connections going way back to W 86th. Or loved ones living their uber-lives of high design and ultra education.
NYC has plundered America. Period.
My invested savings are destroyed.
I am asked to pay and pay and pay to keep NYC going.
Fine.
Take it all, you greedy bastards.
You've destroyed my retirement, the ability to educate my family, and for what?
Your high stylin' lives.

user-pic

As if most NYC residents work in finance. Idiot.

user-pic

I see. So the taxes that NYC gets from these thieves works for you? How about the bailout and subsequent taxes paid to the city? Fine with you, too?

These institutions and all of the related industries, clubs, entertainment and ridiculously high priced real estate have stolen assets from the rest of the country.

Sorry if you don't like the fact that I noticed. I'm not the only one.

user-pic

Obama doesn't give rat's ass about this except in so far as it embarrasses him for voting for a bail-out with no meaningful oversight or restrictions or requirements to increase lending. That's because he is every bit as corrupt as George Bush.

If Obama actually cared about the taxpayers' getting ripped off, he would, you know, do something about it, instead of just scolding, which doesn't cost the bankers a dime.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address