TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Attorney: Rove Will Cooperate With DOJ Probes

Karl Rove will cooperate with a federal criminal inquiry underway into the firings of nine U.S. attorneys and has already spoken to investigators in a separate, internal DOJ investigation into the prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman, his attorney said in an interview.

Rove previously refused to cooperate with an earlier Justice Department inquiry into the firings. The Justice Department's Inspector General and its Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) said in a report released last September detailing their earlier probe of the firings of the U.S. attorneys that their investigation was severely "hindered" by the refusal by Rove and other senior Bush administration officials to cooperate with the probe.

Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, said that Rove, however, will cooperate with a federal criminal probe of the firings being led by Nora Dannehy, the Acting U.S. Attorney for Connecticut who was selected by former Attorney General Michael Mukasey to lead the investigation. Dannehy has recently empaneled a federal grand jury to hear evidence in the matter.

Luskin told me that Rove had earlier not cooperated with the Inspector General and OPR probe into the firings because "it was not his [Karl's] call... it was not up to us decide." Luskin said that Rove was directed by the Bush White House counsel's office not to cooperate with the Inspector General and OPR.

Regarding the more recent probe by Dannehy, Luskin said: "I can say that he would cooperate with the Dannehy investigation if asked."

In recent days, according to legal sources, two former Bush White House officials, including one former aide to Rove, have been contacted by investigators working for Dannehy and asked for interviews. One of the two has agreed to be interviewed.

Regarding the decision to cooperate with Dannehy, Luskin said that Rove "has not and will not assert any personal privileges." He also said that in regard to the earlier probe, Rove had not done so, but had rather only "followed the guidance of the White House."

Justice's Inspector General and OPR in their investigation could not compel testimony from witnesses other than that of current Justice Department employees. The two Justice Department watchdog agencies also cannot initiate criminal investigations.

But both the Inspector General and OPR can refer allegations of criminal wrongdoing to the Attorney General, who can then name a criminal prosecutor or special prosecutor to build on the earlier investigations.

Glenn A. Fine, the Inspector General, and H. Marshall Jarrett, the head of OPR, sought the appointment of a special prosecutor in the matter because they said they could not get to the bottom of the U.S. attorney firings because of the refusal by the Bush White House and the senior Bush administration officials to cooperate with their efforts.

Besides Rove, the Inspector and OPR said that former White House Counsel Harriet Miers, former White House counsel William Kelley, and Associate White House counsel, Richard Klingler, declined requests to be interviewed by investigators. The Bush White House also refused to "provide internal emails or internal documents related to the U.S. attorney removals," citing executive privilege concerns.

In a related matter, Luskin disclosed that Rove has already been cooperating with a probe by Justice's OPR into the prosecution of former Alabama governor Don Siegelman. At the request of Congress, the Justice Department watchdogs are probing whether prosecutors acted ethically in their prosecution of Siegelman as well as allegations that Rove might have encouraged the federal investigation in the first place. Siegelman, who was governor of Alabama, from 1999-2003, was convicted in 2006 of federal charges of bribery and mail fraud.

Regarding Siegelman, Luskin said: "At no time has he or will he assert personal privilege in that matter." While declining to discuss specifics of what Rove has told investigators regarding Siegelman, Luskin said: "What Karl has said [to investigators] is entirely consistent with what he has said publicly--that he absolutely nothing to do with this."

The conclusions of that OPR investigation are expected sometime soon.

(ed.note: Murray Waas is a longtime investigative reporter based in Washington D.C.)


46 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

He's probably rushing to "co-operate" with Bush DOJ appointees before the Obama Administration and Holder can put their own people in place. We've seen how Bush cronies were let off the hook about lying to congress recently. If the Bush appointed attorney finds nothing and the Holder re-opens it and finds something, well then Rove will scream partisan witch hunt.

user-pic

He won't have to do the screaming about a witch hunt. Limbaugh and Coulter will do it for him, to be meekly echoed by the droopy David Broder.

I don't expect the Bush crowd to be brought to justice or even to shed any light on what really was going on in the White House for the last eight years, ever.

user-pic

I would much rather have seen him squeal like a pig in a local DC pokie!

user-pic

You know, every time I see Rove, I can't keep remembering the scene in "Deliverance" where they had Ned Beatty bent over and telling to scream like a pig!

user-pic

Limited hangout.

Like the Plame case, people will rub their hands together and talk about Fitzmas. Some mildly outrageous actions will be exposed (like the 9/11 Commission did), the papers will have a few editorials along the lines of "how dare he," the transgressions will be determined to be unprosecutable, a few wrist-slaps administered, and Karl will go on another round of interviews.

If Karl is cooperating, that means he has nothing worth finding out. We won't be able to determine if someone ousted attorneys for political reasons; we'll have to be satisfied with some distaff person being convicted of lying to a jury, which lie will have made prosecuting the rest of the case "impossible." Yeah. I know the routine.

user-pic

Won't stop Rove from the old tried and true "I don't recall" answers...I don't trust any one in the "Bush's lawyers pool".... isn't this just a way for the Obama team to avoid doing the right thing and moving forward with an actual criminal investigation..you know the old "pass the buck" ploy..?

user-pic

READ the article. There are no individuals involved in this issue, either as potential defendants or investigators, from the Obama administration. That means they can't be "passing the buck".

If the Bush/Mukasey AG finds nothing, will the Obama administration look at that finding, and if necessary re-investigate? Too soon to tell.

So go bash a Democrat who's actually involved in this or some other legal issue.

user-pic

First, I would like to apologize about the wording that I stated, Rove would cooperate with the DOJ, Second' the Bush administration has never cooperated with anyone.

Third, I will whole heartily agree they are all connected to one another, as they Cherish power and money and will lie for either party, regardless of their so called affiliation.

It becomes apparent, as one's power is diminished that in the best interest of one's pocket book, he (Rove) will testify before the DOJ, but it will be nothing more than, I don't recall, I don't remember and I'm not sure of that.

user-pic

It's uncharitable and juvenile of me, I know, but every time I see that smug, arrogant, fat little face, I just want to punch him straight in the nose. Preferably with a brick.

user-pic

Not a brick. An iron bar is much better.

user-pic

A tar arn; you know, one of those things you use to change a flat tar.

user-pic

Let's make darn sure that anything Rove says is said under oath. He avoids that like the plague because he knows if they catch him in his lies he could go to jail. Let's make sure he has incentive to tell the truth or else pay the consequences. This guy functioned as a thug and hurt a lot of people. Time for accountability.

user-pic

You will notice that Rove hasn't said anything yet. Everything is being said by his "attorney".

This allows him to change "his" statements as often as he wishes to change them.

user-pic

Yea, but he'll lie like the dog he is.

user-pic

Uh-huh, just like Palin promised to cooperate with the 'troopergate' investigation.

user-pic

Ever the weasel, Rove agrees to cooperate just as Eric Holder is confirmed. Like coward he is, he caved when it looked like he would have to stand for something. The same tactic was employed in the Scrotum Liver case when Rove finally sang like the proverbial canary when it looked like Fitzpatrick would prosecute.

user-pic
user-pic
user-pic

If Rove truly will cooperate doesn't that indicate that investigators have him by the short hairs, so to speak?

user-pic

May I also say how pleased I am to see Murray Waas reporting here.

user-pic
"At no time has he or will he assert personal privilege in that matter."

Legal doublespeak?

What about "executive" privilege?

Here is how that goes:

"Sorry sir, I personally would love to answer that question, but I have been told the answer to your question is covered by executive privilege. My hands are tied."

So basically TPM, the smarmy lawyer gotcha.

user-pic

It may take a few years, but I truly believe that Turd Blossum will spend time in jail. I don't think that Fitzgerald was/is the great prosecutor that he's made out to be, or he would have indicted and convicted Rove in the Plame case for perjury.

user-pic

As I understand it, the Plame investigation/case is still OPEN.

user-pic

"At no time has he or will he assert personal privilege in that matter."

Well, then, lets rumba!

Oh the irony; if SOMEONE were to put David Iglesias in charge of the Siegelman investigation, not only could Rove not have him disqualified because of the DOJ firings (that would be tantamount to a confession in that OTHER case,) Iglesias has some experience with that "You can't handle the truth" defense that Rove surely has hiding just 'neath the covers...

user-pic

No, it would not be tantamount to an admission. There is such a thing as "prosecutorial bias" or "prejudice". In other words, as Iglesias has an interest in the firings case, as does Rove, at least by speculations, allegations, suspicions, and appearances, their would be an ETHICAL conflict of interest for Iglesias.

user-pic

please-oh-please-oh-Please, committee members, choose your words with precision.

Don't ask, "Did you ever tell/say/talk ....?"
Instead, use the phrase "communicate in any manner."

Rove is the leader of word-parsing.

Don't let him get away with Gonzales' and other Justice Department members' phrase "I don't recall." Instead, follow up with "But COULD you recall . . .?" "CAN you recall?"

There's a difference in the technical meaning of each, and Rove knows it.

Please-oh-please-oh-please.

user-pic

Rove was a bulldog, while he had the mussel behind him. Now we're seeing the real poodle dog he is. He's still going to beat this, because he's a politician and regardless of party affiliation they take care of one another. They just have to put the show on for the taxpayers and tht's all it is, a show.

user-pic

". . . regardless of party affiliation they take care of one another."

Horseshit. The cynicism-as-pseudo-sophistication/maturity is tiresome. And the first indication that basic civics is not understood.

user-pic

Hey J, It's been ten months and running and just what policy changes has Obama done on Bush's policies?

user-pic

And you haven't the least clue the tangled mess left by the Bushit criminal enterprise. It's been reported, as example, that the files on any given "detainee" are spread across agencies. Those have to be pulled together and organized before they can be evaluated.

Again: your ignorance of basic civics -- and should I add administrative process -- bureaucrazy -- and legal process? -- is glraingly obvious.

user-pic

My impression of Rove is he is a coward. He talks tough until the law starts talking jail time, then he'll do anything and anybody to save his own fat pink ass. It was obvious he ran back to Fitzpatrick at the eleventh hour and sang like a starling to get the indictment against him dropped.
I look for him to sell out the whole crowd, including Cheney and the chimp, to avoid jail time.

user-pic

ooooh, you're getting my hopes up here.

user-pic

And who was it, again, that paid the price for his "singing"? It wasn't Rove. And it wasn't Libby.

Who, again?

user-pic

no snark here -- just an honest "I don't know the answer to this."

Who "paid the price for his singing" ?

user-pic

As Rove has said before, he's willing to cooperate/testify in any investigation, as long as pre-conditions are met. No notes, recorders, etc.

Is this more of that or is this different?

user-pic

Murray Waas? Is this a trend? IT WOULD BE GREAT!!

user-pic

in the end, Rove and Club will testify.... with immunity...
as "We THE PEOPLE" continue losing our democracy....

user-pic

Nearly all of us wish we could predict the future. The exceptions are those -- such as you -- who can predict the future.

user-pic

How Rove is handled will be the turning point of how Obama is handling the "will of the people". Obama has consistantly stated he is merely the instrument to accomplish change . . . Let's see if he puts his money where his mouth is!

user-pic

So far he has sure put your and my money where his mouth is...but then so did Bush.

user-pic

You sure got that right.

user-pic

This will be under oath? Waterboarded?

Whatever it takes.

user-pic

Rover may show up, to forestall the marshalls at the door.

But he'll plead the Fifth...all day...

that's why Bush didn't pardon him. Pardoned, Rover'd hafta answer. This way, he walks away...

user-pic

According to what legal authority would a pardon mean he would be required to talk.

And to tell the truth?

user-pic

Karl Rove's Lawyer, Bob Luskin, the Liberal?

Dancing the Potomac Two-Step

Karl Rove's attorney is very good at the Washington two-step. They say Robert Luskin is an earing-wearing, motorcycle-riding bald-hippie liberal lawyer from Harvard. The only common thread we might find between these two men could be their cocktail preferences, or their drugs. Otherwise, it seems odd that they would find themselves together at the epicenter of the biggest political coverup since Watergate, or maybe Iran-Contra.

More in...
The Locust Fork News-Journal
http://blog.locustfork.net/2009/02/03/roves-lawyer-bob-luskin-the-liberal/
LocustFork.Net

user-pic

If memory serves me, Rove's mouthpiece has claimed before that Rove would cooperate.
Robert Luskin may be one of the idealists who thinks that even a guilty person is entitled to be protected by technicalities and loopholes.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address