« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

The Daily Muck
Angering civil libertarians and others on the left Monday, lawyers for the Obama administration went along with a Bush administration policy designed to keep the details of controversial anti-terror policies secret. In a case filed by five detainees against Boeing and its subsidiaries for their involvement in extraordinary rendition flights, lawyers for the administration made the same state-secrets argument--that details of certain cases are too sensitive to national security to even be discussed in court--that was so controversial during the Bush years. Simultaneously, the administration announced that Attorney General Eric Holder has ordered a review of all claims of state secrets, "to ensure that it is being invoked only in legally appropriate situations." The controversial state secrets privilege was famously invoked by the Bush administration to fend off legal challenges to its warrantless wiretapping program. (New York Times, Associated Press)
In another piece of fallout from the Bush administration's war on terror tactics, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has proposed a "truth panel" to investigate Bush anti-terror programs. The panel would be designed to probe misdeeds by former officials relating to issues like torture and the use of intelligence in the lead-up to the Iraq war. At his press conference last night, President Obama appeared lukewarm to the idea, saying that he would rather "get it right moving forward." (Associated Press)
Jackson, Mississippi mayor Frank Melton may have his bond revoked for trying to personally serve a subpoena to a witness in his case. The mayor has pleaded not guilty to three felony charges that he violated civil rights during an incident in which he destroyed a suspected crack house with a sledgehammer. Melton said that he was simply keeping a campaign promise to root out crime in the city. (Associated Press)
For the second time in as many years, prosecutors expressed frustration with former Washington, D.C. mayor and current city councilman Marion Berry's inability to file tax returns and urged a judge to throw him in jail. Prosecutors argue that the judge should revoke Barry's tax probation even though it is weeks away from expiring. Barry responded by calling the actions "frivolous" and says that his tax problems are a "personal matter." (Washington Post)
Despite acute economic troubles throughout California and widespread budget problems, local governments in that state spent a record amount lobbying the state government in the most recent legislative session. $58 million were spent in the last two years, the most in a decade. The most recent numbers seem to indicate an ongoing upward trend in spending by cities, counties and school districts. (Sacramento Bee)













With regard to Obama's answer about Leahy's plan or anything else like that, I listened very carefully to what Obama had to say. And while he was not calling for anything specific, he did clearly state "nobody's above the law" and that if there were clear instances where laws had been breached it was appropriate to investigate (I don't have the exact quote on that one).
Obama seems to be taking a careful path. But he's not ruling out carrying out the law. Over and over he has insisted the law must be obeyed. And when it comes to war crimes, the law itself mandates their investigation. And Obama said yesterday "nobody's above the law."
I read that as ominous for the Principals of bushco.
February 10, 2009 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your quote is pretty accurate to what President Obama said. I think his administration is going to investigate a lot - but that he does not want to advertise it - and let the rightie media go nuts against him - even more than they do now.
I think we will see the DOJ US Attorney, Don Siegelman, and those related cases come out first. I think those will be huge investigations by Holder's new DOJ.
February 10, 2009 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Regarding TheraP's comments:
TPM posted some remarks by Panetta Staurday or Sunday in which he stated two things in the same paragraph...
1. This administration will return the rule of law to the presidency and
2. This administration has no plans to prosecute any folks who actually tortured, since they were just following orders by the past administration...
Although this was a paraphrase of Panetta's comments, I have come to the conclusion that once again, we have voted in folks who will continue to dispose of our democracy at their own whim. This also reinforces my belief that we, as a nation, will not be able to stop this downhill slide as long as we continue to vote those people into office who are connected with the Republican and Democrat mobs.... IMHO
February 10, 2009 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm afraid you are right. America will continue harboring known (and self-admitted) war criminals. And pay them a lucrative pension to boot!
February 10, 2009 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
What about plans to prosecute those people in the Bush Administration who ordered that torture?
Is there also no plans to prosecute them?
.
February 10, 2009 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
While I sympathize with Marion Berry's inability to file tax returns, his comments sound suspiciously like "Personal Priviledge" related to the "Executive Priviledge" claimed by the political appointees of the Bush Administration.
Can anyone else except a politician claim that their tax problems are "personal matters" and are not reviewable by the courts or by the IRS?
February 10, 2009 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink