« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

The Daily Muck
Two Pennsylvania judges pleaded guilty yesterday to charges of taking kickbacks in exchange for sending juvenile offenders to private detention facilities. Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan allegedly took $2.6 million in bribes and may have tainted the convictions of thousands of juvenile offenders. One 17-year-old girl who faced Ciavarella was given three months in a center for making a mock website that made fun of an assistant principal at her school. (Associated Press, New York Times)
On Monday prominent Mississippi attorney Richard Scruggs pleaded guilty to charges of bribery. In the same cause, the Mississippi county circuit judge who was the target of Scruggs' bribery pleaded not guilty to bribery yesterday, saying that his decisions were not influenced by a promise that former Sen. Trent Lott (R-MS) would help him get appointed to the federal bench. Judge Bobby DeLaughter had presided over a case argued by Scruggs over the awarding of millions of dollars in fees from asbestos litigation. (law.com)
Foundations that invested with Bernard Madoff may face tax fines for exercising poor judgment in handling their money. The fines could be assessed under an obscure law designed by the IRS to penalize foundations for not vetting managers properly, not diversifying prudently, or taking on too much risk that could threaten their survival. The fine would likely apply only to those foundations which invested exclusively with Madoff. (New York Times)
Investigators from three federal agencies are currently investigating a possible fraud in Houston, Texas. Two former brokers filed a wrongful termination suit against Stanford Financial, alleging that the company overstated the asset value of individuals in order to mislead potential investors. The firm has long attracted scrutiny for posting results that were twice the national average. R. Allen Stanford, the head of the company, has denied any wrongdoing. (New York Times)
Britain's Serious Fraud Office has launched a probe into possible criminal misconduct by a British subsidiary of AIG. Authorities with the SFO have yet to describe any charges that may be filed against AIG Financial Products, describing the probe as a preliminary inquiry into suspected irregularities at the company. The investigation is the third inquiry AIG Financial Products currently faces and the second by a British investigative group. AIG was essentially taken over by the U.S. government last fall. (CNN Money)
A 2007 research paper regarding unprecedented concentrations of lead in the Washington, D.C. water supply and assuring residents that they had not been harmed by the contaminants is under scrutiny because of concerns that it was only published after final approval was given by the city's water authority. The author, Tee Guidotti, was a paid consultant to the city's water authority and failed to disclose that he had to get the authority's approval of any research he publishes about the utility. Editors at the National Institutes of Health journal found that the conclusion, that residents had not been harmed, had in been published even though they asked Guidotti to remove it. Experts reviewing the paper rejected that finding as scientifically dubious. (Washington Post)













That story about the judges taking bribes to send kids to private prisons isn't just sad. It was inevitable when prisons were privatized. The cost of prison is a deterrent to imprisoning people frivolously, but private prisons create a strong incentive to lock up more people. The corruption of these two judges and the companies that bribed them is just part of it. This might be going on anywhere prisons are private. Something I hope to see both sate and federal governments do is deprivatize. It's one of the best things to get our governments functional again.
February 13, 2009 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
You'll be happy to know that the judges were on paid administrative leave, and are now free on $1 million unsecured bond until sentencing in 60 to 90 days.
All the kids were, of course, hauled out of court in handcuffs on the spot, many of them are still incarcerated.
I think it's safe to assume, Eric, that this IS going on everywhere prisons are private. Sort of helps explain why we have the highest incarceration rate in the world.
February 13, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh yes, very happy to know that theyre free pending sentencing. Glad both our criminal justice systems, the one for those in power, and the one for out, continue to operate.
February 13, 2009 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Being free with no bail allows them to hide the millions they got in bribes.
There should be civil cases with hugh awards for the children whose lives have been ruined by these felons.
The state should be named as a co-conspirator and be liaible for a lack of oversight for these 'judges'.
February 16, 2009 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
And now they're building private prisons for illegal immigrants. Hmmmmm
February 13, 2009 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Foundations that invested with Bernard Madoff may face tax fines for exercising poor judgment in handling their money. ... The fine would likely apply only to those foundations which invested exclusively with Madoff.
And they will pay the fines with ...?
Note to Bernie and Ruth Madoff: "Do the right thing. Join hands. Now JUMP!"
February 13, 2009 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, let's not go there. I refer to "Now jump." As angry as we are, let's not push the idea of wishing death on someone. I just heard a podcast of a liberal radio show where the host said something like people would like to see Madoff separated from his bowels. That sort of rhetoric is what conservatives engage in, and it sometimes leads less-stable people to act on it.
Actually, let's wish Madoff a long life --- of making restitution and living like the people he hurt.
February 13, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think there is a big difference between wishing for them to jump (bad humor) and being separated from his bowels (wishing him physical harm/violence). That said, I will admit "You're right" and I accept your gentle admonishment.
February 13, 2009 5:07 PM | Reply | Permalink