« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Expert: Allegation That Cassano Blocked Auditor Is "Analogy To Obstructing Justice"
We've told you about allegations from AIGFP's internal auditor, Joseph St. Denis, that the unit's leader, Joseph Cassano deliberately thwarted St. Denis' effort to do his job. And according to one expert we just spoke to, those allegations, if borne out, could put Cassano in serious jeopardy.
To review: In a letter to congressional investigators, St. Denis claimed that Cassano repeatedly prevented him from participating in the process in which AIGFP valued its assets -- a crucial piece of the accounting puzzle St. Denis was hired to put together. According to St. Denis, Cassano told him in September 2007 (a time when evidence of the assets' exposure to the subprime mortgage mess was mounting): "I have deliberately excluded you from the value of the [credit default swaps] because I was concerned you would pollute the process." In addition, around the same time, Cassano berated St. Denis for pointing out accounting irregularities in a target company's hedge accounts. Cassano created a new organizational structure for AIGFP which isolated him from AIG proper, significantly reducing his influence. St. Denis resigned soon after, citing Cassano's moves as the reason.
These allegations -- and others, in which Cassano also limited the involvement of the firm's outside auditor, Pricewaterhouse Cooper -- are contained in an investor lawsuit filed in Delaware chancery court, which names Cassano and AIG's board as defendants.
The suit also charges that Cassano should be held liable for pushing "excessively risky" credit default swaps "in order to enrich himself." But according to Lyman Johnson, an expert in securities law at Washington & Lee University Law School, its the effort to obstruct the auditors that could be most damaging.
"If [Cassano] was deliberately interfering with the standard internal controls mechanism...then that's a much more culpable misdeed than simply making bad business decisions," Johnson told TPMmuckraker, adding "If it's not a red flag, it's a pretty serious yellow flag."
Stressing the seriousness of interfering in this way with internal controls, Johnson called it "a civil analogy to obstructing justice."
And he added that the charge was reminiscent of both the Enron and WorldCom cases, in which key accounting details were alleged to have been withheld from outside auditors.
Those, of course, were cases of criminal wrongdoing. So it's worth noting that what little we know about the criminal probe of AIGFP suggests that investigators are more focused on the issue of whether Cassano and others gave false statements to investors about the company's exposure to losses, than on the issue of obstructing auditors. Still, that fact may be doing little to help Cassano sleep at night.
Neither St. Denis, nor Cassano's lawyer, Joseph Warin, immediately returned calls from TPMmuckraker.

















On the criminal side, I think it's called guilty knowledge. Unless Cassano is panning to plead insanity or Nietzchean Uebermench status, the belief that auditors would not approve of what you're doing is a belief that you're doing something at the very least in breach of your fiduciary duty and at the most flat-out criminal.
March 20, 2009 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
OOHHH...blood in the water...I believe most of these crooked bastards belong in prison...bring on the RICO, fraud, obstruction and theft of public funds lawsuits...and then break this company's up into little bits..use the Sherman Anti-trust laws and then regulate them to the point they can't take piss with out permission from the government..(that would be us...folks!) force the GOP into another fifty years (at least) to tear down all the regulation and safe-guards down, for their corporate friends
March 20, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
St. Denis' story is a bit weak, but maybe it's the tip of the iceberg which can sink the uncertainty of what happened and free us from titanic guesses and illusions so we can get on with life.
March 20, 2009 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink