TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

UPDATED: Office Of Former Washington DC CTO, Now Obama Staffer, Raided By FBI

The office of Washington DC's chief technology officer has been raided by FBI agents, reports the Politico.

But this isn't just a local story. Vivek Kundra, who served in the position until February 4, was last week appointed the first ever Federal Chief Information Officer by the Obama administration.

An FBI spokeswoman told Politico that the search was part of an "ongoing investigation." And a separate source told the site that the FBI had sent all staffers at the office, aside from senior executives, home for the day.

The White House declined to comment to Politico.

We'll keep you posted on this.

Late Update: It looks like Kundra may not be the focus of the probe after all. The Washington Post reports that an employee in the office, Yusuf Acar, who serves as the information systems security officer for the city, has been arrested as part of a federal bribery sting.

A spokesman for the US Attorneys office said the case is "is under seal."


23 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Politico.....There's an unimpeachable source of information....

user-pic

This story has nothing to do with Kundra or the Obama administration, yet Politico publishes a headline to suggest that Obama's appointee is being investigated. Since when does TPM take the Rove/Politico/GOP smear bait? Doesn't anyone check the facts before printing malicious information anymore?

user-pic

Politico needs to be investigated for those ugly blog rumors that they planted spies on the staffs of all the campaigns in 2006 and 2008.

user-pic

Did I forget to add "2004?"

user-pic

I assume that ALL of Obama's appointees have been cleared by the FBI. I know that the FBI has to look into the background of all the appointees and with the vetting being even more stringent than it was before, I assume that Kundra had been cleared.

user-pic

What?!? Politico SPUN this to reflect badly on Obama. I'm astonished! I'm flabbergasted! I'm appalled! I....couldn't be less surprised.

user-pic

New rule: If it comes from Politico, never publish breaking news and always, ALWAYS, ALWAYS confirm the story with a REAL news source. Politico is no better than FAUX "News". None.

user-pic

Zach, you don't even link to the main story at WaPo:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/12/AR2009031201426.html

An official in the D.C. government's office of the chief technology officer and a contractor for the agency were arrested in a federal bribery sting today and the FBI has descended on the office to search for evidence, law enforcement sources said.

Yusuf Acar, 40, was taken into custody this morning by FBI agents at his home in Northwest Washington, the sources said.

Sushil Bansal, a former city employee and a contractor with the technology office, also has been arrested.

It took me one minute to find this. Two DC city employees get arrested for taking bribes. The work in an office that an Obama appointtee came from. How is any of this relevant, other than as a sensationalist attempt at a smear on the part of those hacks at Politico?

user-pic

This is the headline at Huffington Post:

FBI Raids Office Of Obama Technology Chief, Arrests Worker

It's even MORE misleading!

user-pic

And you think that Huffingtonpost is a liberal website...LOL!

user-pic

Well I've never said that, nor will I. They are obviously not a liberal website and Arianna Huffington is anti neocon, not pro progressive.
I would implore and beg that anytime someone links to Politico to first give us fair warning that they are the source. When I see that my browser is taking me to Politico, I always groan. I wouldn't even click there if I knew the destination.

user-pic

If a guy Obama got into a fight with in Junior High School got arrested for spousal abuse tomorrow, Politico would implicate Obama and that would lead to endless speculation about a conspiracy to carry out a grudge, (this despite the fact that Bush admitted the Iraq war was a personal grudge several times and publically). So would FAUX "News", Drudge, Freepi Land, Real Clear Politics, Everything Murdoch owns and others.
What I don't get is why news sources that I trust treat Politico any differently from Hannity's America or the Drudge Report? They are indistiguishable in theor mission and philosophy and if it keeps up, they are ultimately going to sacrifice any credibility they have by continuing to publish the bile that comes from that corner and then having to clarify, correct and update. I can't think of a single occasion in which Politico published anything that was absolutely true and without a spin imparted by their belief structure.

user-pic

What I wanna know is why hasn't Obama cleaned house at the FBI yet? That outfit was transformed into a wasp's nest of right-wing loyalists and Stasi-esque thugs under Bush--and there are probably still many among the ranks who're just chomping at the bit for opportunities to embarrass or otherwise undermine the administration (or for that matter, any administration even remotely to the left of Pinochet).

user-pic

This has nothing to do with the FBI attempting to embarrass Obama. It's a sting operation that dates back to last year and involves two of the employees taking bribes. The only connection to Obama is the fevered imagination of the right wing hacks at Politico, and the suckers at Huffington Post and here at TPM that fail to do the most basic background checking before printing a story.

user-pic

Hey, read my comment again: I didn't say this specific incident was a deliberate attempt to embarrass Obama. I just said Obama needs to clean out the FBI. And that I think they would embarrass him, given the opportunity. And I stand by that.

Given the kind of organization Bush transformed the FBI into, with its having been implicated in so many overreaches of its authority, civil rights abuses and extra-constitutional activities--from spying on ordinary citizens to intimidating antiwar activists--it's just unreasonable to expect the current ranks of senior officials and even many lower-level agents to ever be able to return to the kind of respect for the constitution and the rule of law that we should be demanding from our country's chief law enforcement organization.

user-pic

Agreed. But your comment is on a thread about this particular FBI raid, suggesting that you see this as an attempt by the FBI to embarrass Obama.

user-pic

fair point. my original comment was misplaced. the mention of another fbi raid just brought that unrelated point back up and i riffed on it.

user-pic

They are indistiguishable in theor mission and philosophy and if it keeps up, they are ultimately going to sacrifice any credibility they have by continuing to publish the bile that comes from that corner and then having to clarify, correct and update.

I kind of suspect the only reason Politico came into existence was to first establish itself as a credible source for independent, even occasionally liberally-slanted perspective on events only to gradually shift its editorial perspective over time to become more right wing.

I think I read about similar PR methods having been consciously employed by "Movement" loyalists during the early days of the movement in former-neo-con journalist David Brock's "Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative."

It's a deliberate tactic to get potential targets of PR spin to drop their guard: once you come to trust the independence and objectivity of the sham media outlet's editorial perspective, that perspective begins to shift subtly, injecting more and more partisan spin and bias into its reporting (which, by now, you've come to trust implicitly) until, before you know it, it's transformed itself into a propaganda outlet for a particular ideological agenda, without ever losing your trust.

Or at least, that's the idea. I have absolutely no proof that's what Politico's doing, apart from the inexplicable and suspiciously timely echoes of certain right-wing talking points I sometimes detect in their top stories. But the fact that sophisticated techniques like these are knowingly used to shape public opinion should be enough to give anyone pause.

user-pic

FBI is now stating that Obama's appointee is NOT the target.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/03/12/1833992.aspx

"At least two employees of the District of Columbia's Office of the Chief Technology Officer were arrested today, as FBI agents conducted a search in what several law enforcement officials say is a corruption investigation.

The former head of the office, Vivek Kundra, was just last week named by the president to be Chief Information Officer for the Obama administration, but officials say he was not a target of the investigation.

The FBI vetted his White House appointment. If he had been thought to be involved in any corruption at that point, it would have been flagged, one official says."

user-pic

Actually, Vivek Kundra used to be my landlord, circa 2006 or so. He was working as some sort of technology advisor for Tim Kaine back then. He used to live on the property, but eventually had to move out because he was in Richmond all the time. Are you sure Vivek was working for the city of DC? I could have sworn he was working for Kaine.

user-pic

Grow some balls. I hear nothing but whinning about how one of Obama's appointee may or may not be involed in this FBI raid. Give the story time to be vetted and stop being so senitive. Stories get into print way before the facts againist both parties, Republicans and Democrats, so just chill out and let the story unfold. Obama's a big boy and can take it. I don't think Kundra has any involvement and the worst scenario is it was going on under his nose.

user-pic

I don't know about you, but where I come from, "growing a pair" doesn't mean grinning and bearing it like a chump when somebody drags your name through the mud.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address