« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Report: More OLC Torture Memos To Come
It sounds like we could soon be getting a look at a few more of those Bush administration legal opinions justifying the use of water-boarding and other "harsh interrogation techniques" for use in the War on Terror.
Newsweek reports that the White House is moving to declassify and release three of those memos, written by Justice Department lawyers in May 2005. In doing so, President Obama is siding with his attorney general, Eric Holder, over the objections of current and former CIA officials, who argue the disclosure could compromise "sources and methods". Ex CIA director Michael Hayden is said to be "furious" about the decision, and to have tried unsuccessfully to intervene directly with Obama officials.
The ACLU is suing, under the Freedom of Information Act, for release of the memos. Several were put out last month. It's unclear exactly when the new ones will be released.
Newsweek also has fresh reporting on a related controversy. As we noted last week, a secret 2007 report compiled by the International Committee for the Red Cross, and revealed last week by the New York Review of Books, contains accounts of CIA officers using extremely harsh techniques on three high-value al Qeada targets, including Khaled Shaik Mohammed, at secret CIA prisons.
In response to the NYRB story, Dianne Feinstein, the California senator who chairs the Senate intelligence committee, told Newsweek: "I now know we were not fully and completely briefed on the CIA program." A federal official responded that Feinstein and other lawmakers had seen the ICRC report. But according to Newsweek, it was given a higher than top-secret classification, meaning it couldn't be discussed publicly.

















CIA is concerned about disclosing "sources and methods?" What a crock. Just delete the names of any CIA personnel who may have asked for the memos. As for methods, we don't need to protect the public from hearing about those robust interrogation methods after being told for years that the methods were necessary. Let's find out all about it, and lets learn more about those doctors and psychologists who helped the CIA in their dark arts. After all, it was my tax dollars at work. I want to know if I should be just a little ashamed, or filled to the top with grief and remorse.
March 23, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
A tag on for this piece is that the British High Court has just released some additional information on the Binyam Mohamed case.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jFL180sgT0Tc4CKGXoo6U3U59w_gD973RJ100
Seems Bushco offered him a plea 6 mos ago, that would have required that he plead guilty and also waive rights to toture claims.
I have to wonder, do they not teach concepts like contracts of adhesion, coercion, unenforceability of contracts to cover up criminal activity (itself a crime), contracts against public policy, etc. in the law schools that Bush's - and now Obama's - Exec branch lawyers attend?
What, they think if a kidnapper has a parent executive a contract agreeing to pay a million for their kid and to never mention the kidnap that it would be an enforceable contract? Or is it just that they use that as the lever to say - hey, the way we would expect to enforce this contract would be by . . . kidnapping you or your friends and family and torturing you if you violate it?
March 23, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The only thing which terrified the Bush Administration more than their own cowardly fantasies was the fear that their criminal conduct would be made public. Bush Admin's illegal wiretapping: state secrets; their torture of detainees: subject to privilege; use of the DOJ to persecute and Democrats: subject to executive privilege. Let them quake with fear that they will be prosecuted.
March 23, 2009 3:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Busxhit's gonna pee his flight suit again.
March 23, 2009 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, make it ALL public. Make every bald-faced lie about "we do not torture" public. Make it clear that they shredded the Constitution, and did more to recruit terrorists than they can ever know. I hope and pray they ARE prosecuted, and spend the rest of their miserable lives in prison. Throw away the key. Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Addington, Yoo, Feith, Libby...the list could go on and on.
March 23, 2009 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
War crimes.
If the alleged perpetrators - Cheney, et als. - are indicted for their actions, they can be arrested if they leave the United States of America.
citizens against torture approve.
March 23, 2009 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
How is it that the US government can place a "secret" classification on a report by the International Committee for the Red Cross?
March 23, 2009 10:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
ICRC reports such as these are never published by the ICRC itself.
March 24, 2009 1:54 AM | Reply | Permalink