TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Report: UK Expects To Soon Charge Others In Madoff Scheme

The Madoff trail is shifting, at least in part, across the Atlantic. And investigators are wondering whether the Ponzi scheme was a family affair.

A report from the Wall Street Journal's London bureau contains three important new pieces of information.

1) "U.K. authorities investigating Bernard Madoff's massive Ponzi scheme believe criminal offences have been committed by people other than the New York financier and expect to start filing charges within months, according to investigators."

2) "Mr. Madoff's U.K. operations 'played a significant role in the operation' of Mr. Madoff's scheme, said Glyn Powell, a case controller at U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office, which opened a criminal investigation into Mr. Madoff's U.K. business earlier this year."

3. "The SFO also said Ruth Madoff received two million of dollars in payments from Mr. Madoff's U.K. business in late November, just weeks before he was arrested."

The Journal adds that the British probe is focused on large amounts of money that went back and forth between Madoff's accounts in the U.S. and U.K.

American prosecutors have already charged that Madoff laundered clients' money through the London operation. Says the Journal:

He carried out the fraud, authorities said, by transferring client money from the investment-advisory business in New York to London and then back to the U.S. to support the U.S. trading operation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.

So far, only Madoff has been charged in the scheme. (He pleaded guilty earlier this month, and awaits sentencing.) But there has been intense speculation that additional charges could be filed against family members and associates, including Ruth Madoff and Peter Madoff, Bernard Madoff's brother.

As we noted yesterday, a law student who invested, and lost, money with Peter Madoff has filed a lawsuit against him, claiming that he knew or should have known that the Bernard Madoff operation, where the money was invested and lost, was fraudulent.


1 Comment

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Why the investigators didn't pick up on the London link earlier is puzzling.

In late 2000, Bernie significantly expanded the London operation at the same time he changed the legal strucuture of the US company from a sole proprietorship to a limited liability corporation.

This should have been a red flag for the investigators as it may be an indication that Bernie and his cohorts intentionally increased the scope of the fraud significantly after the dot com bubble burst.

One reason the investigators might have dragged their feet is that Steven Raven, Madoff International Securities chief executive, was well-regarded in London financial circles.

British authorities certainly would have been reluctant to accuse Raven of being involved in a notorious financial scandal.

It should be interesting to hear how Bernie's brother Peter thought information about which stocks to buy and sell was transmitted from the 17th floor to London.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address