« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Texas Republicans Pushing Voter Suppression Law
We don't usually write about state-level legislative wrangling, but in this case, we think you'll agree that there's good reason.
Before the election, we wrote a lot about the Republican effort to make it harder for poor and minority voters to cast ballots. In several states, the GOP took advantage of restrictive voter ID laws, passed in recent years, to try to force election officials to purge voters from the rolls.
A well-organized campaign by voting rights groups and Democrats helped mitigate the damage. But that doesn't seem to have deterrred the GOP...
In fact, Texas Republicans have doubled down on the strategy, "pushing a bill to require voters to show a photo ID -- a requirement that, studies show, would hit poor and minority voters, who vote disproportionately Democratic, particularly hard. As usual, the stated rationale for the bill is to protect against voter fraud -- and as usual, Republicans have produced no actual evidence that such fraud is occurring.
Similar laws exist in Indiana and Florida, Republican election officials in both states sought to use those laws to make it harder to vote.
The bill passed the GOP-controlled Texas Senate today, on a party-line vote, reports the Dallas Morning News -- but not before some noteworthy developments during Senate hearings.
First, in an sign of how the movement for this bill ties in to broader GOP efforts to make voting harder, Republicans wheeled out arch voter suppression guru and TPMmuckraker fave Hans Von Spakovsky to testify about the dangers of voter fraud.
Then, the hearing, run by Republicans, ended up dragging on from Tuesday morning all the way until this morning. Some citizens who had been called by Democrats to testify did not get to speak until 6am this morning.
Reported the DMN:
One woman who waited all night sobbed during her testimony, saying she had no idea she would have to wait more than 20 hours to speak.
The bill is expected to face a much tougher time in the closely divided House. And Democrats have said they plan to challenge the bill's legality in court, under the Voting Rights Act.
Meanwhile, in Washington, the Senate Rules committee, chaired by Chuck Schumer, released an MIT study finding that up to 7 million voters were prevented or discouraged from casting votes in the November election, thanks largely to barriers to voter registration.
As Republicans understand, making voting harder can make a difference in a close election. And the terms of battle for 2010 and 2012 are already being drawn...

















They're going to ram it through and the courts are going to uphold it - they already have. This won't change until we finally change the makeup of the SCOTUS.
March 11, 2009 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Will it get to the courts if the DOJ decides it violates the Voting Rights Act? Remember that the staff decided that Georgia's law did violate it and were overruled by political appointees. I assume that would not be the case this time.
March 11, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Republican can have ID requirements, with a couple qualifications: http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/2585/ok-republicans-you-can-have-voting-ids
March 11, 2009 5:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, please. Y'all act like this is the only stupid thing to ever come out of Texas. It's as if the last eight years never happened and now you're shocked, shocked, I tell you, shocked that we've come up with new idiocy. Ya think we've gotten any smarter down here, at least in the pachyderm part of the Texan body politic? Nah.
March 11, 2009 11:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before you beat yourself up too badly, isn't the pachyderm part of Texas smaller than it used to be?
March 12, 2009 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
...same thing in Kansas and Oklahoma, but it is making the remaining Republicans very dangerous, they know their days are numbered so they are pulling out all the stops.
Beware the cornered beast.
March 12, 2009 11:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
From what I've read, Texas is azz backwards when it comes to voting access.
In order to qualify for the Texas voter rolls, you apparently just have to "intend to return" to Texas eventually. You apparently don't have to reside there.
In 2002, Karl Rove committed voter fraud by voting in Texas (supposedly from his two bedroom cotage permanent residence in Ingram, TX) instead of in DC where he lives year round and was claiming a Homestead Tax credit at the time.
Good luck Texas.
March 12, 2009 12:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
So how long until they'll re-institute a poll tax?
March 12, 2009 11:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, we are not all bassackwards here in Texas. This policy is one in a long line of idiotic approaches here in Texas. It is also one which further alienates many of the growing legal minorities in Texas. Now I realize you can not always group all minorities into the same mindset but Texas almost turned purple last year and me thinks there will be some more growth on the blue side if you know what I mean. Rick Perry's recent statements about not accepting $550 million in un-employment money will only aid this cause. The GOP in many ways is going for the fences but like many of you said their backs are up against it so we will have to wait and see how things shake out.
Gosh I wish I could have been alerted via my cell phone of Mr. Hans "I never saw a vote I liked" Spakovsky so I could have been there to give him some free advice about humanity and the dubious work he does. Is this guy still making money at the taxpayers expense?
March 12, 2009 5:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
The thing that really makes me mad is when these states decide a picture ID that has expired is no good.
If you look exactly like the guy in a 1985 driver's license, that is the same proof as a current ID.
I would also demand that all picture ID laws require the state to supply picture IDs on demand. No charge for lost cards ever and pickup available same day for emergencies. Open all day election day. Got a problem with that? Then it's not REALLY about preventing fraud, is it?
How about stored graphic pix on file at the voting booth where you sign in? Hundreds of answers that would do the job, but wouldn't get their REAL goal accomplished.
March 12, 2009 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink