« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

The Harman-AIPAC Story: A Timeline
CQ's blockbuster story, about a wiretap that picked up Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA) discussing the AIPAC spying case with a "suspected Israeli agent", picks up on a sequence of complex events from several years ago, and involves several moving pieces.
So we thought it would be worthwhile to put together a timeline of events laying out the major reported developments in this sprawling story.
Without further ado:
* November 2004: The New York Times, after intense lobbying from the Bush administration, decides to hold a planned report on the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program.
* A few months later: Harman, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence committee, tells Eric Lichtblau, one of the Times reporters on the as-yet-unpublished wiretap story: "The Times did the right thing by not publishing that story ... This is a valuable program, and it would be compromised."
* May 2005 - Larry Franklin, a former employee of the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans, is indicted for passing to lobbyists for AIPAC information about US policy on Iran.
* Around mid-2005: The Justice Department expands its investigation into the AIPAC spying case to include whether Harman schemed with AIPAC to have wealthy supporters lobby House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi to reappoint Harman as the top Democrat on the House intel committee. In return, it was alleged that Harman said she'll press DOJ to go easy on Steve Rosen and Ken Weissman, two former AIPAC staffers implicated in the Franklin indictment.
* Aug 2005: Rosen and Weissman are indicted (pdf) for receiving classified information from Franklin.
* Oct 2005 - Franklin pleads guilty to unauthorized disclosure of classified information, and is later sentenced to almost 13 years in prison.
* Around Oct 2005: An NSA wiretap picks up a phone call between Harman and a "suspected Israeli agent," discussing the quid pro quo involving Rosen, Weissman, and the intel chair job. (A different report suggests that the wiretap was carried out not by the NSA, but by the FBI, as part of the Rosen-Weissman probe.)
* Soon afterwards: Justice Department lawyers read the transcripts of the call, and decide that Harman has committed a "completed crime," meaning they thought evidence existed that Harman had tried to put the scheme into motion. The government lawyers are prepared to open a case on Harman, involving FISA-approved wiretaps.
* Soon after that: Then-CIA Director Porter Goss reviews the transcript of the call and signs off on the Justice Department's FISA application. Goss also decides he's required to notify then-House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Pelosi, of the impending probe, since it involves a sitting House member.
* Soon after that: Then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales short-circuits the investigation, saying he "needed Jane" to publicly support the administration's warrantless wiretapping program, which was now, finally, about to be exposed by the Times. Gonzales told Goss that Harman had helped persuade the Times to hold the earlier story on the program (a claim Times executive editor Bill Keller today appeared to deny, though his statement was narrowly worded), and could serve as an important public defender of the program.
* Dec 16, 2005: The Times breaks the warrantless wiretapping story.
* Dec 21, 2005: Proving Gonzales right, Harman issues a statement on the wiretapping program: "I believe it essential to U.S. national security, and that its disclosure has damaged critical intelligence capabilities."
* Several months before Oct 2006: Haim Saban, an AIPAC supporter and major Democratic fundraiser, calls Pelosi, lobbying her to reappoint Harman as the top Dem on the intel committee. (By this time, the Democrats appear likely to retake the House, meaning the job at issue is chair of the intel committee.)
* Oct 20, 2006: Harman hires top Washington lawyer Ted Olson, in response to a report by Time magazine about the Justice Department probe of the alleged Harman-AIPAC quid pro quo, and about the Saban-Pelosi call.
* The following week: Several major news outlets report that, according to DOJ sources, the Harman probe is dormant and didn't turn up evidence of wrongdoing.
* Dec 2006: Pelosi announces that Rep. Silvestre Reyes will chair the House Intel committee, disappointing Harman.
* April 2009: In response to the CQ story, Harman denies contacting DOJ on the AIPAC case, but not that the conversation with the "suspected Israeli agent" occurred.

















How do you say "toast" in Hebrew, Jane?
April 20, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
טוסט
April 20, 2009 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
A man of many talents...
April 20, 2009 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
All corrupt roads lead to Gonzales, who obeyed the orders of Bushit, who obeyed the orders of Rove-Cheney.
This is the first solid leak about the illegal NSA (FBI?) wiretapping, and it is a piece of thread to pull, and pull, and pull, etc.
April 21, 2009 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
This also helps explain the acrimony between Harman and Pelosi. What was often depicted as two women fighting for power is more likely Pelosi having known of this crap for quite some time...
April 20, 2009 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the words of Felix the Cat - Right-eoo!
April 20, 2009 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
One wonders what other blackmail was committed against Congress members, over the past 8 yrs. I suspect the truth is far worse than what we can imagine.
April 20, 2009 6:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've been thinking the same thing. For a long, long time....
April 20, 2009 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
After all, they had means, motive and opportunity.
April 20, 2009 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
yep, leaving Dick Cheney or his minions with the ability to drop in on some poor nsa analyst, ask him to type in some Democratic legislators names into the "computer that snoops all emails and phone calls without warrants" and make him swear to never mention it again, and to make the investigation of such a thing impossible due to "states secrets"...
Or to be more obvious, allow someone to type into this computer the names of fortune 500 ceo's and the keywords "mergers", "acquisitions" and just have your distant cousin make a well informed call to their stock broker, if you get caught? Well it can't be investigated because its so darn top secret.
It's the perfect crime, enabled by President George Bush...
But hey, let's have a tea bag party because Obama's giving us a tax break...
April 20, 2009 6:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't see a whole lot of evidence for the blackmail angle. And I would hate for a "blackmail" meme to distract from what in itself is a terrible abuse of power.
If Gonzales made the investigation go away because he was ALREADY getting what he wanted from Harman -- if he didn't ask (i.e. blackmail) for anything more -- that's still a political non-prosecution. A political non-prosecution is every bit as dirty and damaging as a political prosecution a la Don Siegleman.
I can only wonder about other instances in which the Bush DOJ came across evidence of wrongdoing by an influential figure, but the investigation or prosecution was squashed because that person was helpful to the administration's political ends.
April 20, 2009 7:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
That was the whole point of the ILLEGAL wiretapping: blackmail.
Rove? Answer the doorbell: FBI calling.
April 21, 2009 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry to say I can't find a single mention of this story on a single cable news website. Not even Fox News is jumping on this one even though it's a Democrat accused of corruption.
This thing is not a bombshell because the MSM has decided that it isn't. It's a damned shame.
April 20, 2009 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Give it another week or two and the MSM will eventually give it some coverage...the internet/blogs are always a week or more ahead of the real breaking news.
April 20, 2009 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's now the lead story on the NY Times site.
April 20, 2009 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
actually it is a bombshell exactly because the MSM is under pressure to ignore it.
April 21, 2009 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
In too many beds of influence Jane....playing it to the middle to often.
April 20, 2009 6:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Josh, I'm afraid you have your "mid-2005" timepoint exactly backward. You say Harman was trying to protect her committee position and offered protection to Rosen/Weissman in return.
But according to CQ, the point of the contact was first and foremost to get the charges reduced on the AIPAC employees. Help with her committee position was only something offered in return.
April 20, 2009 7:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wonder how this time line lines up the the Sibel Edmonds stuff?
Sibel Edmonds - Official Web Site - www.JustaCitizen.org
April 20, 2009 7:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love ClosetLuddite's kitty.
April 20, 2009 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
The CQ story mentions a source requesting "anonymity because of the sensitivity of domestic NSA eavesdropping".
Isn't "felony" a better description than "sensitivity"?
April 20, 2009 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Missing from your timeline is the September 2005 public campaign by Rep. Harman and TMPCafe regular Steve Clemons to keep her chairmanship of the Intel committee.
It kicked off with a Charles Babington story in the Washington Post on September 27, quoted approvingly in a Clemons Washington Note post the next day, followed up a few days later by another, both addressed to Nancy Pelosi. Philip Weiss also posts at Mondoweiss today a reader's catch of Roll Call articles from late June and mid-July 2005 that report Pelosi's probable replacement of Harman and the pro-Harman lobbying in the Democratic Caucus.
TPM itself covered fairly closely the maneuvering wrt the Intel chair decision between the November 2006 election and Pelosi's choice of Reyes in December.
April 20, 2009 9:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Neil -- Thanks for remembering the story. The piece is still up -- and I did recommend that Harman be elevated to the chairmanship of the Intel Committee because she has the technical competence to understand the evolving satellite and electronic surveillance methods that the intelligence bureaucracy increasingly prefers -- and because Alcee Hastings, who was then the only apparent alternative, was a much worse choice. I also thought that it was useful to have an AIPAC star begin to communicate a willingness to engage Iran and to move out of the zero sum game approach of "Israel only" takes on the Middle East -- and Jane Harman had done that in a couple of key speeches that I encouraged her to do.
Had I known of this intercept, I would have obviously had a different take on this -- and I do think Jane Harman owes us an explanation.
best, steve clemons
April 21, 2009 7:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're such an expert on Harmon -- how did you miss the fact that she was publicly supporting Bushit's blatantly violations of law? That was okay because she allegedly has such technical expertise
She your paymaster?
April 21, 2009 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
The NY Times now has an article on the Harman bombshell. While Bill Keller denies that Jane Harman spoke to him, he says that she did speak to the Time's Washington bureau chief in an attempt to prevent publication of the warrantless, i.e. illegal surveillance story.
See, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/us/politics/21harman.html?hp
April 20, 2009 11:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand this story.
Who is in trouble? Harman? Bush Officials? DOJ?
NSA?
April 21, 2009 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seems like you are bending over backwards not to infer any quid pro quo between Gonzales and Harman. Perhaps I haven't looked closely enough but it seems we have no more evidence of the "surprise! Gonzales was right!" scenario than the "surprise! Gonzales blackmailed a sitting congresswoman!" scenario.
Simply "Harman issues a statement" seems more prudent.
April 21, 2009 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh. The fucking money in politics. When can we get public financing?!
April 21, 2009 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Absolutely! I'm so sick of the worst politicians money can buy.
April 24, 2009 3:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
When someone like Harmon has "technical expertise" I wonder how does that occur? I don't see any technical expertise on her CV. Where did she get expertise?
Is it via osmosis becasue her husband is a billionaire electronics businessman?
Or is it becasue many of her top contributors are major military contractors, wingers, and industries that rely heavily on projection of US power. Do they lobby her and provide the briefings giving her technical "expertise?"
Her donor list pretty much is the "military-industrial complex" as Dwight Eisenhower called it.
Northrop Grumman
Physical Optics Corp
News Corp (FOX News)
Boeing
Honeywell
Raytheon
AT&T (main NSA wiretapping telco)
Applied Signal Technology
Bechtel
etc..
April 21, 2009 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Proves once again, Israel is the 51st state but always #1 in getting Federal money and weapons.
They seem to be one of the top weapons exporters as well.
Marc Rich and other top weapons dealers live there.
Some of these Russian mobsters (Israeli leaders) seem to make quite a nice chunk of change exporting weapons.
Thats really what this is all about.
April 24, 2009 3:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This looks more like an effort to set up Harman than anything else - it seems to revolve around the identity of the "suspected Israeli agent" who placed the wiretapped call to Harman. Who was this person, was it an NSA or an FBI wiretap, and where is the FISA court approval of the FBI wiretap - or was this part of the NSA "Total Information Awareness" data-mining project initiated by Poindexter and Rumsfeld and boosted by Hayden at NSA?
May 6, 2009 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink