« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Report: Gonzo, Then At White House, Signed Off On CIA Torture In 2002
For a while now, it's been clear that, as former FBI interrogator Ali Soufan testified earlier this month, Abu Zubaydah was tortured well before the Justice Department issued its first opinion approving enhanced interrogation techniques in August 2002.
So we've been wondering about the procedure by which that treatment was authorized. And it looks like a crucial new report from NPR may have offered an answer.
It reported Wednesday:
One source with knowledge of Zubaydah's interrogations agreed to describe the legal guidance process, on the condition of anonymity.The source says nearly every day, [CIA contractor James] Mitchell would sit at his computer and write a top-secret cable to the CIA's counterterrorism center. Each day, Mitchell would request permission to use enhanced interrogation techniques on Zubaydah. The source says the CIA would then forward the request to the White House, where White House counsel Alberto Gonzales would sign off on the technique. That would provide the administration's legal blessing for Mitchell to increase the pressure on Zubaydah in the next interrogation.
In other words, the White House -- in the person of one Alberto Gonzales -- directly signed of on the techniques.
NPR bolsters that account with this:
A new document is consistent with the source's account.The CIA sent the ACLU a spreadsheet late Tuesday as part of a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act. The log shows the number of top-secret cables that went from Zubaydah's black site prison to CIA headquarters each day. Through the spring and summer of 2002, the log shows, someone sent headquarters several cables a day.
Of course, if things did indeed go down this way, the CIA would also deserve a lot of the blame for accepting the White House's sign-off as adequate. As Brad Berenson -- a White House counsel at the time who wasn't involved in the issue -- told NPR: "[O]rdinarily the White House counsel's office is not in the business of providing advice to anyone outside the White House itself."
Of course, President Bush eventually got around this problem by just sending Gonzo to run the Justice Department.

















It's a small step from Gonzo's recommendation that 150 death sentences be carried out (as then-governor George W. Bush's counsel) to ordering torture.
May 22, 2009 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a pathetic tool Gonzo/Fredo was/is.
May 22, 2009 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
And they are still debating whether to disbar him or not????
May 22, 2009 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's the way this are here in Rick Perry's secessionist Texas. If you're a Rethugnican or wealthy, no crime is to big that they won't find a way to make you a saint. Just ask Tom (fund-raising criminal extraordinaire) Delay.
May 27, 2009 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
In military parlance, what an ass-wipe.
May 22, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
The White House counsel has no independent authority to sign off on any legal matter. He is the adviser to the president, and nothing else. The CIA, of course, knew by then that Bush had no interest in anything to do with the office of the presidency, beyond the comfort of his bed, so they saw no risk in using Gonzo as a stand-in for Bush.
Ultimately, it is Bush who is the biggest war criminal in our history. Too bad he will never be called to account for that.
May 22, 2009 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
No job too disgusting for Bush's number one toady. Disbar, nothing, they should throw him in jail - in what universe does the president's personal counsel have the right to sign off on torture for the CIA? It wasn't even the Idiot Child who was overseeing all this - Alberto apparently reported to Addington, Cheney's grand vizier.
May 22, 2009 6:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
And is this infinitely pliable lackey still swelling the ranks of the unemployed? Perhaps he's blogging to pass the empty hours -- watch for insightful legal analysis, and if you see it you'll know it's not him.
May 22, 2009 6:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
These guys are monsters. Someone sat in Gonzales' office and read the blow-by-blow description of what was being done to Zubaidah - and how it wasn't giving them enough info! And authorized even more torture,, or practically a minute-by-minute basis.
And they waterboarded this guy 183 times? Each one had to be signed off on?
And who knows how many other procedures they tried in a clinical Orwellian fashion,,, trying to get a particular story or connection out of him, and failing to get it - so they tortured him again?
These guys are monsters. They are what we fought when we fought the Nazis, or the Soviets, or the Chi-Coms, or the Spanish, or the Krauts, or whoever we fought in the enemy-seeking 20th Century.
Even if we didn't "elect" them, we let them stay in office. We have met the Enemey, and they are us.
May 22, 2009 9:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
We need to more about this James Mitchell character. Who found him, who he knew, why they hired HIM, why they thought he knew what he was doing, etc, etc.
Cherchez l'homme.
May 23, 2009 2:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
We need to more about this James Mitchell character. Who found him, who he knew, why they hired HIM, why they thought he knew what he was doing, etc, etc.
Cherchez l'homme.
May 23, 2009 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
What many of you may have missed, or have not commented on was the person writing to the CIA. This was none other than James Mitchell, the psychologist (not a member of APA) who was previously employed as a psychologist at the SERE training center just outside Spokane, WA. He conveniently got out and opened a private business enterprise and then became a contract employee for the CIA. So here we have a psychologist who's job it is to HELP survive torture techniqes now requesting authorization for torture from the Washington.
WOW!
May 23, 2009 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Torture is serious business, especially when they need urgent "information":
http://www.counterpunch.org/mcgovern05192009.html
May 23, 2009 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's not be too harsh on Gonzalez here. (Albeit I'm not sure what "too harsh" would mean.) He's almost certainly the one who signed off on the authorizations, but I'm betting that was because after the first couple of times he went to Addington or Cheney or Twit, they told him, "Quit bothering us about this penny-ante stuff! Sign the authorizations and get us some results, and only bother us with the details if they're really kinky."
May 23, 2009 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink