TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Book: Rumsfeld Didn't Cut Weapons Programs Because Of 'His Own Financial Situation'

Here's an intriguing detail from the new 685-page tome on Donald Rumsfeld, Bradley Graham's By His Own Rules: The Ambitions, Successes, and Ultimate Failures of Donald Rumsfeld: Several Rumsfeld associates say the defense secretary didn't order any cuts of major weapons programs early in his tenure because of financial stakes he held in the defense business.

Rumsfeld valued his personal fortune at between $50 to $210 million at the beginning of the Bush Administration. The problem was many of the securities he held were in companies that did business with the DOD, which could put Rumsfeld in violation of government ethics rules.

So Rumsfeld had to divest some of these assets -- a whole lot of them, it turned out. And during that process, which went "slowly," Graham reports, Rumsfeld simply put off canceling any major weapons programs, a move some on his staff apparently expected him to make. Rumsfeld's specific thinking is unclear.

Graham writes: "Several of Rumsfeld's associates saw the secretary's inclination to put off big cuts early on as a direct result of his own financial situation."

Now, it's not entirely clear here whether Rumsfeld was worried his policy decisions would cause his stakes to gain or lose value, or if he just wanted to avoid any conflict of interest. But whatever his reasons, it sure seems like a bad way to make decisions about the national military budget.

Here's how Graham describes the episode:

Until Rumsfeld had things all figured out, he appeared reluctant to move ahead with any major decisions on weapons programs. For all his bluster, Rumsfeld was at the same time strikingly averse to risk, even though the cancellation of a major problem could have underscored the seriousness of his transformation agenda.

Several of Rumsfeld's associates saw the secretary's inclination to put off big cuts early on as a direct result of his own financial situation. Rumsfeld had taken steps to sell interests he had in firms that did business with the Pentagon so as to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. During his Senate confirmation hearing in January 2001, Rumsfeld had said he owned "a large number of investments and activities that would have to be characterized as 'conflicts' were they to be maintained during service as secretary of defense" and had promised to divest them.

But the divesture process was going slowly because a considerable amount of Rumsfeld's wealth was in private partnerships and closely held corporations that were difficult to sell. Under the circumstances, Rumsfeld told associates he was hesitant to take significant action on defense acquisition programs.


13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Am I supposed to be surprized by this?

user-pic

Another "financial stake" through the heart of our country. No department should exist to hide this offense. Isn't war profiteering a crime?

user-pic

Last I heard, it was.

user-pic

So, um, did Rummy own defense stock when we went to Iraq under false pretenses?

It's just a question.

user-pic

Let's see:

Using official position, check
To make a profit or avoid a loss, check.

Add this to the list of thing we know that we know...

user-pic

Wow. Did Rummy just meet his maker? I hope this is dirty smelly greedy on his part to end any illusion that he was a sincerely wrongheaded man. He was an arrogant greedy fascist to the nth degree. The second pillar of Cheney's shadow presidency. Did he own stock in Haliburton or what? He had assets between 50 and wtf million? None was defense related? Please let there be a vengeful god on this one. His lawyers can put bible verses on his court briefs to sooth his blackhole soul.

user-pic

This guy basically used his position to financially pimp the country. Capitalizing on everything from declaration of flu empidemic to weapons investment.

user-pic

More interested in Rumsfeld's involvement with Gilead Sciences:

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/culture-of-deception/

user-pic

Did Rumsfeld cut the black budget for that time-travel program he demonstrated on September 11?

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/

user-pic

Don't forget he also owns a lot of stock in the company that makes Tamiflu.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/tamiflu.asp

user-pic

Rumsfeld was an evil,greedy and powerhungry.
The first president Bush had some sense or maybe
intuiton beccause he did not want to have anything to do with Rumsfeld. This was no problem for Rumsfeld anyway . His best friend was Cheney who was then The Big Boy in DOD.
The rest you can guess. Cheney propably had many ways to use him and help him make enough money to become one of rich and behind the scenes powerfull.
It is also now wonder that he became big and powerfull inBush II administration, just to spite Bush I.

user-pic

You didn't cut the nano-explosives program either, did you, Mr. Rumsfeld?

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/the-rest-is-silence/

user-pic

just another reason he should be in jail,,, people like him dont serve for honor its all the little man syndrome, Bushey and his band of merry idiots should be in jail, all of them for what they did to our country and killing our kids,,,, typical right wing republicans, the religious right can be proud of putting these people in office, I sure hope they are praying for forgiveness,,,,,,,what is a greater slap in the face is that they are still walking around spitting on us,,, someone ought to spit on them and put cheney and all of them in the slammer! Cheney, meet bubba,,,,

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address