TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

UPDATED: Coburn Not Denying Claim That He Urged Ensign To Pay "Restitution" To Girlfriend's Family

SEE LATE UPDATE BELOW

Doug Hampton's TV interview about his wife's affair with Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) is hardly a model of clarity. Hampton meanders away from some questions, jumps forwards and back in time, and seems, perhaps understandably, still to have trouble viewing the situation dispassionately.

But there's one point on which Hampton is particularly lucid. He clearly says that when Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) confronted Ensign over the affair in February 2008, the Oklahoma senator urged Ensign to pay "restitution" to the Hamptons, including helping them to pay the mortgage on their $1.2 million house and to move out of state. And Coburn isn't denying it.

Let's look closely at what Hampton said.

He told his interviewer, Jon Ralston, that in February 2008, he went to a group of men associated with C Street, the Christian fellowship that has a house on Capitol Hill, and asked them to confront Ensign.

Said Hampton: "So I confront him with these men, and Tom Coburn." (Coburn has also been associated with the C Street fellowship, and his role in the Ensign confrontation was mentioned in Hampton's letter to Fox News, which came out last month.)

Asked by Ralston about the charge from the Ensign camp that Hampton had tried to extort him, Hampton continued:

The first money that was presented was from these men that confronted John. These men were the ones that said, 'what we need to do is get Doug Hampton's home paid for, and we need to get Doug Hampton some money, and we need to get his family to Colorado.

Hampton added:

The money and all those things came from this group initiating, initially, what they believed it was gonna take to take care of this.

Asked by Ralston whether he or his lawyer asked Ensign for money, Hampton replied:

Our attorneys did talk...because Sen Tom Coburn asked and was involved in these negotiations out of good will and good faith.

When Ralston asked what those negotiations were for, Hampton replied: "The belief from Tom Coburn and many that some restitution needs to take place here." He added, a bit later: "They just thought this was gonna be best for both of our lives."

Ralston then went over things one last time, to make sure there was no mistake:

Tom Coburn, a US senator, told John Ensign, listen you gotta deal with this, make these folks whole, let them get out of your life, and let's move on. Isn't that exactly what happened?

Replied Hampton: "Absolutely."

Seems pretty clear. And here's how Coburn's office has responded to the claim. In a statement to Politico, it said:

Dr. Coburn did everything he could to encourage Sen. Ensign to end his affair and to persuade Sen. Ensign to repair the damage he had caused to his own marriage and the Hampton's marriage. Had Sen. Ensign followed Dr. Coburn's advice, this episode would have ended, and been made public, long ago.

Politico adds:

Coburn spokesman John Hart wouldn't confirm or deny whether his boss spoke with Ensign about payments but said Coburn "categorically denies" Hampton's claim that he urged Ensign to pay millions to the couple.

(Hampton appears to say in the interview that the "millions" figure was discussed between his and Ensign's lawyer after Coburn had urged Ensign to pay restitution, not that Coburn himself said the figure should be millions.)

If Coburn acted to urge his friend to end the affair, and to help him keep it private, it would be hard to blame him. But if, as now seems likely, he pressed Ensign to pay a significant amount of money in restitution to Hampton and his family, that would seem, at a minimum, to place Coburn, as a US senator, in a very difficult position indeed. Something tells us this won't be the last we'll be hearing on this.

Late Update: Coburn has now given what appears to be a categorical denial that he urged Ensign to pay restitution to the Hamptons.


10 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

You know, it sounds shady at first, buy why shouldn't he have to repair the lives he shattered with his own wallet. If he was an army man he would be doing hard time... but politicians can do whatever they want it seems. I applaud these people for asking for the only thing that would actually be a sacrifice to Ensign... his money.

user-pic

I just watched Doug Hampton's interviews with Jon Ralston on Las Vegas One TV. Hampton seems to be not too coherent. While he denies that he ever asked Ensign for compensation, he freely admits that his lawyer did ask on his behalf. In response to Ralston's question about whether he (Hampton) thought he was entitled to millions, Hampton said, "absolutely." This whole thing seems so strange. Darlene Hampton apparently felt so dependent on Ensign for both her husband's and her employment that she gave into Ensign's advances despite the lack of reciprocity of feelings for Ensign. The Hamptons are pathetic people. They don't deserve millions, but Ensign deserves full blame for screwing up their professional and personal lives. He is a disgrace to the United States Senate.

user-pic

I got the names of the wives mixed up. It's Darlene Ensign and Cynthia Hampton.

user-pic

I think any republican involved in this needs to come clean.

user-pic

Also, I don't think any kind of attorney client privilege attaches to a deacon. Or a "doctor" for that matter (since Coburn hasn't practiced in years and doesn't have a current license).

user-pic

There is indeed a privilege, variously called the clergy privilege, priest-penitent privilege, or confessional privilege, as well as a physician-patient privilege. Both are recognized in US law. Whether either applies in this case is more doubtful... looks like Coburn is making a stretch. In other words, he's trying to hide something, but there's a good chance he will fail, unless investigators cave again.

user-pic

Having a lawyer demand something which you yourself can't legally demand doesn't remove the impropriety. If Nevada law would have permitted Doug Hampton to sue Ensign for his acts of adultery, no harm in asking. But if Nevada has no such law (a suit for "alienation of affections" is not allowed in New York, e.g.), then Ensign was after "hush money," plain and simple. And for something to ease the pain of cuckoldry.

user-pic

can we see pictures of the wives, please, to judge if it was worth the money?

user-pic

Hope Ensign takes down Coburn with him. Coburn is yet another holier than thou republican who had no problem going after Bill Clinton during the impeachment. As far as doctor/client privilege, Coburn is a practicing OB/GYN. Is there more to John Ensign than we know? I think the Daily Show is going to have fun with this one.

user-pic

I'm surprised that Ensign didn't ask Coburn the classic line from Looney Tunes of What's Up Doc since this whole escapade clearly could be described as a non cartoon version of Looney Tunes. I think it will be some time before the That's All Folks line comes in though as the story seems to get more interested each and every day, particularly in view of the peace (or piece) offering of $96,00 by Ensign's parents.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Tag Cloud



Subscribe to this blog's feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address