TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Congress: IG Firing Was "Legitimate" And Lawful

A congressional committee looking into the White House's firing of the AmeriCorps inspector general has said that the firing was carried out for "legitimate reasons" and did not violate the Inspector General Act.

Late last week, Gerald Walpin filed a lawsuit against three officials from the Corporation for National and Community Service, accusing them of unlawfully firing him as inspector general for the agency last month.

Rep. Ed Towns (D-N.Y.), who chairs the House Oversight committee, which has been probing issues relating to inspectors general, released the following statement:

The independence and accountability of Inspectors General is a priority for me personally, and for the Oversight Committee. At the Corporation for National and Community Service, the Committee has reviewed the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of Gerald Walpin as Inspector General. We have met with White House staff and interviewed staff at the Corporation for National and Community Service, and Democratic and Republican board members, and have reviewed hundreds of pages of documents. This evidence shows that the Corporation board's report expressing concerns about Mr. Walpin's performance was fact-based, unanimous, and nonpartisan. Based on this evidence, I am satisfied that the President had legitimate reasons for removing Mr. Walpin, and complied with the Inspector General Act.

In light of our review, and because Mr. Walpin has now filed a lawsuit challenging his dismissal, I do not expect the Committee to take further investigative action at this time.



3 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Is that statement supposed to reflect the entire committee, or only the chairman? Do the Republicans on the Committee feel the same way?

user-pic

I thought the GOP in general was for tort reform and wasteful lawsuits.

user-pic

Johnson's replacement as Executive Director of St. Hope, Rick Maya, was forced out in June with a $100,000 payout - pretty classy for a struggling non-profit that has to pay back $400K. What did Maya claim in April? That a Board Member had deleted emails during a federal investigation. Oops. Johnson's office said it was only an IT guy. Plumbers and cable guys, they always take the fall. Anyway, 3 others resigned/were forced out as well - perhaps none of them like that the settlement that was supposed to end it all didn't end the new federal investigation into deleting the emails. Wonder how St. Hope will keep going to repay all its money.

http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/1940228.html?mi_rss=Our%2520Region

But anyway, we start to get more light as to why Walpin had to go in a bipartisan way. Americorp was set to triple its size from the US under the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act. And there Walpin was not only pursuing St. Hope, he was looking at CUNY to the tune of $80 million. Imagine what Murdoch and the New York Daily Post would do with that.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/AmeriCorps-feared-bad-press-if-IG-investigation-continued-48998746.html

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address