TPMMuckraker

Emails Show Cozy Ties Between Federal Pension Guarantor And Wall Street Firms He Hired

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Remember our old friend Charles Millard? He's the former Lehman investment banker who, after taking over the federal agency that guarantees our pension systems, had the genius idea to ignore a host of warnings and switch the agency's investment portfolio from conservative bonds to risky stocks -- just as last year's financial storm was gathering.

We also learned -- thanks to an inquiry by the inspector general for the agency, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation -- that Millard had had extensive contacts with staff at Goldman Sachs, BlackRock Capital, and JP Morgan, during the period that the P.B.G.C. was choosing firms to hire as managers for its fund. And that Millard also raised the issue of getting a job with these firms once he left government. All three firms ended up winning contracts -- which were recently revoked, thanks to concern about those contacts.

But now the New York Times has published emails exchanged between Millard and his buddies at Goldman and BlackRock, as well as other documents that shed light on the former P.B.G.C. chief's cozy relationship with the firms seeking business from his agency, and on how aggressively those two firms wooed Millard as they went after those contracts.

According to contracting experts, Goldman and BlackRock may have run afoul of federal contracting rules in how they courted Millard. The paper details the scope of the contacts they had with Millard:

Mr. Millard had at least seven meetings with Goldman executives in the year before the bidding started, and 163 phone contacts, the documents show. BlackRock had less frequent contact -- 39 phone calls in that 12-month period.

One BlackRock exec referred to Millard, in an email to a colleague, as a "very big fish on the line." And before a charity dinner at Chelsea Piers, one BlackRock exec wrote to another: "Try to get [BlackRock CEO] Larry [Fink] seated next to Charles Millard."

But Millard himself seems to have been doing just as much to drive the relationships. Within weeks of taking over P.B.G.C. after being appointed by President Bush in 2007, he wrote excitedly to a Goldman vice chair who he'd long known:

I just became head of the pension benefit guaranty corp in dc appointed by pres bush...

"Is there a team at goldman that does this and that would be interested in pursuing this business?

Responded the Goldman-ite: "Yes, absolutely!"

And other documents show a BlackRock executive telling a colleague that Millard had told him well before the bidding process began that Millard wanted to hire BlackRock.

The emails also shed light on the cozy, country-club culture, freely mixing business and social matters, that lubricated the contacts between Millard and his Wall Street pals. Millard had attended the same high school as his top contact at BlackRock, David Mullane, and the two both now live in Rye, New York, and attend the same church.

At one point, Mullane wrote to Millard:

Hope to see you at the Beefsteak Dinner tomorrow. If you're going perhaps we can catch up business for a few minutes before I thrash you in ping pong again.


Millard responded:
As I recall, the whole ping pong issue has been the subject of an sec investigation. SEC, as u kno (sic), stands for Support the Excellence of Charlie. And I think the commission has ruled infavor (sic) of Millard having retrospectively trounced Mullane.

Haw haw haw haw haw. Muffy in the bathroom stall. Margaret by the lake.

Mullane also knew that Millard's successor at PBGC might not treat BlackRock so favorably. He wrote (chauvinistically) to a colleague:

[Millard] is a lame duck political appointee as soon as the November election occurs. When the new man comes in at P.B.G.C., all bets are off for us.

Not that any of this worked out too well for Millard. A group of senators has called for a criminal investigation into Millard's relationships with his Wall Street friends, and whether they affected his agency's hiring decisions.

And since leaving government earlier this year, he still hasn't found a job.

Join the Conversation!

10 comments

Recommend Recommend (17)

July 29, 2009 2:34 PM   

Par for the course..why else would the "Blue-Dogs" not be afraid of losing their elections...because maybe, if they "do right" by the Health Care Insurance Companies..they will be hired to a high paying Executive or lobbying position in those very same Private Health Care Companies.....and the world will move on.....

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 3:56 PM   

Every time you turn a rock over you find Goldman Sachs.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 4:18 PM   

Then pensions are but a symptom of but the overall problem with Wall Street. The real problem is the culture of lawlessness the permeates it. The attitude of anything goes as long you don't get caught. That regulations are only for the little people.

Until something is done about this, nothing will change.

C

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 4:29 PM   

corrected

The pensions are but a symptom of but the overall problem with Wall Street. The real problem is the culture of lawlessness that permeates it. The attitude of anything goes as long you don't get caught. That regulations are only for the little people.

Until something is done about this, nothing will change.

C

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 4:45 PM   

So it sounds like Millard was trying to cash in on his government position by steering contracts to Wall St firms in exchange for a sinecure when he left office. And they played him for a chump, knowing that they didn't need him once the contracts were signed. No honor among thieves.

I love the euphemism "may have run afoul of federal contracting rules". On the planet of ordinary people that's called breaking the law.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 5:01 PM   

Does this come as a surprise to anyone?

The culture of business is the culture of networking with a certain level of player and using those contacts to trade favors/business for personal gain. That is how it works folks. And that is why people like Geithner and Summers should not be allowed in government, nor should the government that just saved the asses of every major investment bank in this country allow the leaders of those institutions to remain in place.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 7:06 PM   

"I'm shocked. Shocked to find gambling going on in this establishment!"

It's time people. We need to take to the streets and make a mess until we get our way for once (or three times).

Between Wall Street, the Fed, Washington DC and the healthcare industry America "can't stands no more!"

I'm done being nice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 29, 2009 9:20 PM   

OMG OMG OMG!!!!!!Hit the presses. The GWBush administration hired a scumball unqualified opportunistic twit to run the PBGC. Shocked I am at this development. I didn't see this coming what with the tenures of HeckuvaJob Brownie and Abu"Idonotrecall"Gonzales.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2009 10:27 AM   

Zachary....did you phone in this story? Run it through Babelfish?

In my opinion, you have an important story.

In my opinion, you may not be taking it seriously.

For starters, I can't quite see the use of quasi-sly culture-ref asides as contributory.

This, in particular:

"Haw haw haw haw haw. Muffy in the bathroom stall. Margaret by the lake."

Huh? What, exactly, does this do? Never mind what, exactly, is that? Tourette's lite?

You can go read some of my blog to see that I'm fond of, but not necessarily good at, sarcasm and ranting. I applaud its use; it is a wonderful way to clear the fumes of bloviation and obscurantism, among other sub-optimal fag ends of unexamined opinion, etcetera etcetera; and I recognize your attempt as a valid attempt.

But your style...it lacks a certain something.

Sarcasm is difficult. To wittily encapsulate anger is difficult for most people; it takes practice.

In my opinion, if you aren't pretty sure you can pull off sarcasm, it's best to omit any vestige of it from your story. You have a platform, so to speak, that is quite high: TPM Muckraker. Please do not mumble from that platform banalities disguised as sarcastically sly cultural refs; it only detracts from the story.

Besides which, it tends to encourage frothing in people even less likely to succeed at it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

July 30, 2009 11:46 AM   

It's all about the money and if I can get a little power with it, it makes it oh so much better.

Who cares about integrity, honesty, character, leadership, role model...give me that money, big home and yacht and I'll steal and lie, even kill if necessary. Sometime, I wonder what the poor people are doing today?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!