« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Financial Crisis Panel Will Probe AIG Bailouts, Says Chair
The man who will lead the special congressional effort to probe the causes of the financial crisis says his panel will also consider the government's response to the events of last fall -- including the controversial serial bailouts of AIG.
In an interview with TPMmuckraker, Phil Angelides, the former California treasurer who was recently named by Congress to chair the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, noted that the statute that created his panel required it to look not just at the financial institutions that failed, but also at those that would have failed but for massive government intervention. That means that "it's going to be hard not to touch on those issues," said Angelides, referring to the various AIG bailouts -- which some have portrayed as disingenuous backdoor efforts to save AIG counterparties like Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch from the consequences of their bad bets -- as well as other moves by the government to prevent a wider collapse of the financial sector.
Angelides -- a Democrat who ran in 2006 for California governor and who was appointed by Nancy Pelosi to lead the commission -- identified several broad areas that he expects the commission's work to focus on: the failure of the regulatory system; the financial sector's lending and securitization practices; the actions of the credit rating agencies; and fraud and abuse in the mortgage marketplace.
"It's important to lay things out," he said, "so that everyone takes a look at what happened, and asks themselves: 'now that we know that, how will we act differently in the future?'" He added the commission has the power to refer evidence of criminal wrongdoing to state and federal law enforcement authorities.
Angelides -- who has made a name for himself in part by pushing state pension funds to file lawsuits over corporate misbehavior -- was at pains to stress his confidence that the commission can fully investigate the financial sector practices and regulatory failures that triggered the crisis, without regard for the political fallout. He brought up a TPMmuckraker story from last week in which we raised questions about the commitment of the panel's Republican appointees, particularly vice chair Bill Thomas, to an aggressive probe, and countered that he expects his fellow commissioners to approach the task in good faith. Angelides said he concurred with a quote Thomas recently gave to his local paper, in which the former GOP lawmaker said that "we need to make sure success has behavioral consequences and failure has behavioral consequences."
Said Angelides: "I'm going into this with the belief that regardless of party the people will be interested in seeking and finding the truth." He added: "I actually would not have taken this on unless I believed that the commission as a whole could rise to the occasion."
Angelides said that he and Thomas were already searching for "someone of credibility and respect" to serve as the commission's staff director. Indeed, he received a call relating to the search during the interview.
And he sounded eager to get started. "I don't think there's any purpose served, no matter what party you are, in sweeping things under the rug," he said. "Let's get it out there."

















Oh Boy, another costly investigation by disparate players with totally different agendas. I look forward to a lengthy and tepid findings report.
July 22, 2009 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the inevitable "sternly worded" letters.
July 22, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unless this panel names the names of the people who profited from these bailouts (tax money giveaways) - not just the companies hiding those people, or the companies hiding the companies hiding those people, they are only engaged in a cover-up.
Don't expect any names.
July 23, 2009 8:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Angelides is an excellent choice
July 22, 2009 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think so, too.
This is Angelides' chance to show the California Democratic elite that they shouldn't have abandoned him in 06 in favor of the bodybuilder.
July 22, 2009 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please!!!!!
Does anyone really believe this limp dick bureaucrat's tough rhetoric that will soon turn into mush? This pig lipstick of a little goo guzzling yes man will fold like a cheap suit when his master Barack tells him to back off.
This puny cowardly poor excuse for a male spews pablum I have heard before. Wait, watch and learn again
July 22, 2009 3:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Angelides has a window of opportunity to gain national prominence by becoming the Patrick Fitzgerald of the financial crisis. Fortunately for all of us, he has the brains and chutzpah to follow through. Let's hope he does just that.
July 22, 2009 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Watch and learn what I believe you already know will happen here; namely, nothing of consequence.
July 22, 2009 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow
Is it at all possible to read a serious discussion about a serious issue without a flood of snarky, juvenile, and irrelevant cynicism? TBHull especially strikes my nerve when I consider that Phil Angelides is not my Governor because too many Californians mistook steroid inflated muscles and a light and confident on-camera persona for leadership. There are issues that people of good faith from opposite political orientations can and should agree upon. China's human rights record is one example and the abuses of the various recent corporate bailouts are another.The Fact that Angelides and Thomas seemed genuinely committed to this task is an encouraging sign that some light can be shined on the rip off of the new century. I sympathize with Hull and others for their skepticism about Government panels in general, but it seems to me that the answer is not to merely write off the effort from the git go, but rather to pay especially close attention to commissions work and findings.
July 22, 2009 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Name one recent government appointed panel or commission that accomplished anything of substance.
There is much reason for cynicism, very little reason for anything else.
July 23, 2009 8:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cynicism is never irrelevant, especially when one's govermment is currently hopelessly corrupt, feckless and beholden nothing other than world wide wealth.
Further, I am not from California, have never taken steroids and empathize wil those that live under the stewardship of Arnold. Governor good hair Rick Perry might be worse, except Texas has a better grip on its budget despite having a ridiculous bozo at the helm.
By the way, I agree China continues to thumb its nose at human rights, however, the US has done nothing except lick China's boots for dollars lately. Where was little Goldman yes man bitch Timothy Geithner when he vistited China? Voicuing human righhts concers? No he was crunching the skulls of the populus while walking to his master, China $$$$$. It is not bowling for dollars, it is analingus for dollars these days if you are the US Treasury aecretary. This makes cynicism relevant?
Keep playing Ken and Barbie if you must, even if your ideas are well placed.
July 22, 2009 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for sharing this very informative article.
this really shows interest on the topic which it shares its ideas on new topics.
Thanks for the post!
Web Hosting Reviews
August 13, 2009 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink