TPMMuckraker

Christie's Loan: Do We Have The Full Story?


Former US Attorney Chris Christie

Read More

Chris Christie

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

It's been obscured, understandably, by the Kennedy news. But the story of Chris Christie's ill-advised loan to a subordinate is only getting more interesting -- and something tells us there could be another shoe to drop.

To refresh: Christie, a Republican, currently leads Democratic incumbent Jon Corzine in the New Jersey governor's race. And he's made his zeal as a corruption-fighter a cornerstone of his campaign. But last week, the state's public television network reported that Christie had made a $46,000 loan to an assistant U.S. attorney, Michele Brown. The loan -- given at 5.5 percent interest and secured by a second mortgage on Brown's house -- was made in 2007, while Christie was serving as U.S. attorney, and was Brown's boss. It hardly helped that Christie was forced to admit he hadn't included the loan in his income tax returns or on his financial disclosure reports. (See the mortgage document here -- interestingly, it was duly filed with the Morris County Clerk's office.)

Making things yet more awkward, Christie had twice promoted Brown -- who the Newark Star Ledger describes as a "close friend" of the candidate -- during their time together at the U.S. attorney's office from 2002 to 2008. The first promotion occurred before the loan was made, the second -- which made Brown Christie's deputy -- came after.

Then yesterday, Brown ensured the story won't be going way any time soon by abruptly resigning from the U.S. attorney's office, after 18 years there, saying she didn't want to be a "distraction" to her colleagues.

The Corzine campaign, sensing it's getting traction on the issue, has said the issue raises "serious legal and ethical questions," and has called on Christie to release all public documents from his tenure as U.S. attorney. And one Democratic lawmaker has suggested that Brown may have tipped off Christie to the slew of public corruption arrests we told you about earlier this month. For its part, Christie's camp has tried to turn things back on Corzine, suggesting that the governor has unfairly gone after Brown. Multiple female Republican politicians have now attacked Corzine for going after a woman in public service

But political back-and-forth aside, what to make of all this?

Christie has defended the transaction with Brown, calling it "a loan between friends", made after Brown's husband lost his job. "I just believe that if you have friends who are in need, that you help them," he said. Christie has also admitted to a "mistake" in failing to disclose the loan, and has filed amended disclosures and tax returns.

But a few things don't add up. Christie, who was a lawyer in private practice and a Morris County freeholder before going to the U.S. attorney's office, does not appear to be so wealthy that he can casually extend a $46,000 loan. The fact is, it's just pretty uncommon for one person to give a loan of that size to another to whom he isn't related. And any loan from a public official to a subordinate raises questions about conflicts of interest. Add to that the fact that the loan was not listed in ethics disclosure forms, and also that Brown has now resigned.

Sounds like there's more to this story than we've yet learned.

Join the Conversation!

22 comments

Recommend Recommend (8)

August 26, 2009 5:33 PM   

I wonder whether Christie had/has any pull with the Morris County Clerk's office.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 6:15 PM   

Why do I have this feeling that we're about to hear of another "family values" republican having an affair with a subordinate?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 6:16 PM   

I hope you are correct and I hope it all comes out before the election.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 6:47 PM   

Does the Appalachian Trail wind through New Jersey?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 8:59 AM    in reply to Mr.E.

It certainly does. In NW NJ. Mmmmmm!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 8:15 PM   

Rake a different muck hole, guys. You're both working this one?

The fact that the loan was secured (lender really is going to get the money back, plus interest) the interest rate seems rather mundane for the time period (5.5%), the amount is not a round number (Give me a million dollars and I'll stay quiet! NO wait, make that a secured $46 thousand dollar 5.5% loan!) and the fact that the loan was registered with one government agency all indicate to me that this is not funny business. The fact that the guy was friend enough to loan the woman this outsized amount for a friend to friend loan means that he probably thought enough of her before the loan to not fire her and probably promote her, loan or no loan, meaning the supposed conflict of him protecting a 5.5% return on his investment rather than evaluating subordinates objectively seems moot.

I don't get the statement "does not appear to be so wealthy that he can casually extend a $46,000 loan." Well casually or not he did, so therefore he is.

Also "interestingly, it was duly filed with the Morris County Clerk's office." Interestingly? That's only interesting if it's already known or assumed the lender was actually up to no good right? As in: Interesting, why file something potentially criminal into the public record? But isn't your story that current facts indicate some wrongdoing MAY have occurred if indeed more damning facts come to light? In this context what's interesting about a known fact that seems to indicate a willingness to disclose the loan?

Hope the Democrat wins. The shape of Christie's neck will probably lose him more votes than this non scandal though.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

EH

user-pic

August 26, 2009 8:32 PM    in reply to unknowncitizen

Mundane interest rate? What rate do you think a person who could not get a loan elsewhere would get? And don't forget she was not only friend-to-friend, but subordinate-to-boss.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 9:57 AM    in reply to EH

yeah. you can bet the 5.5% on the second was better than the interest rate on the primary mortgage. but then those are friend prices. with the workplace subordinate's discount. and since she works for the government he probably shaved an extra .025% off - the Christie & Friends Mortgage Corp. calls it their Civic Duty Deduction.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 9:18 PM    in reply to unknowncitizen

"The fact that the loan was secured (lender really is going to get the money back, plus interest)"

is the lender really going to get paid back? has the lender been getting paid back? do we know the answer to that?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 9:51 AM    in reply to jaybean

I'm thinking like you on this one. This could be a clever payoff (or some other sketchy transfer of funds).

Christie gives Brown a pile of cash and reports it to a government agency as a loan in the hopes of having it fly under the radar. He doesn't pay taxes on it because he's not actually getting paid back and so there is no interest to be taxed on. I seem to recall him making a statement about the taxes only being a few hundred dollars, which doesn't make sense at all. Unless Brown paid off a significant chunk of the principle already, it should be more along the lines of $2,000 (5.5% on a little less than $46k).

Speculation of course, but until things start adding up in an airtight kind of way I think there might be a story here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 9:59 AM    in reply to Stiggs

Interest paid on mortgage loans is tax-deductable. This could also be a tax fraud scheme.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 11:34 AM    in reply to Citoyen92

Christie would be responsible for any taxes that Brown was exempted from. Besides, unless Brown was hugely over reporting the interest on the loan we're only talking about a few hundred dollars. I'm sure there must be more efficient (and legal) tax loopholes these two could jump through.

A possible motive for Brown to resign is to avoid an ethics investigation. I suspect that it would be a lot easier to initiate an investigation into this matter if Brown is an active employee of the DOJ (anybody know for sure?). I guess my hope is that the DOJ would have the minimal cause requirements to look into suspect financial dealings of employees for purposes of internal review.

So was her resignation to avoid proof of misrepresentation in Christie's story coming to light? The two obvious scenarios I see are that either the initial loan or the repayments never took place. Either would be plainly evident from a cursory viewing of her financial records. I suppose another possibility is that Christie was receiving some sort of payoff and Brown was acting to launder the money (her payment being the two promotions).

Can we get the FBI on this? I'm really starting to get curious (and for all the tax money that gets wasted on things like Iraq and bank bailouts, I'm entitled to a little entertainment, dammit!).

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 2:09 PM    in reply to Stiggs

"I suppose another possibility is that Christie was receiving some sort of payoff and Brown was acting to launder the money (her payment being the two promotions)."

This is what my Spidey sense is telling me.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:27 PM    in reply to jaybean

"The fact that the loan was secured (lender really is going to get the money back, plus interest)"

is the lender really going to get paid back? has the lender been getting paid back? do we know the answer to that?"

Do you not understand the meaning and mechanics of securing a loan? If the borrower defaults, the lender has an enforceable legal claim to the collateral. Why would the lender go to the trouble of attaching a lien on real property if this was a pay-off? An unsecured private loan between friends is completely legal by the way, yes any income the lender made would be taxable, (the tax on the $2,000 (the income)that another poster made hay about calculating would probably be "a few hundred dollars" for Christie)

But if this is a case of Christie trying to slip his clandestine whatever some cash then what's the motivation to make up an interest rate at all and why secure it with her very real assets? Let me think - how can I slip my booty call some secret money? I know - I'll draw up an official loan document, secure the loan by publicly filing a lien to her real property, then give her the same money that I could have easily withdrew from my account in only 5 non-reportable withdrawals and handed to her in a paper bag with absolutely no one knowing about but me my bank teller and her. And you can tell it's dirty because I forgot to file the income I made from my phony and pointless scheme, which also is probably my only source of income that didn't mail me a document that I put in my pile of tax filing documents. I obviously forgot to file this income and the small amount of taxes on it to keep the already public loan secret.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 9:43 AM    in reply to unknowncitizen

the only time it isn't unusual to get a mortgage from your boss is when your boss is a mortgage broker.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 9:37 PM    in reply to fkaZk0sm0

"the only time it isn't unusual to get a mortgage from your boss is when your boss is a mortgage broker."

I've always been better with my finances than some of my aquaintances, but I know two electricians and an appliance saleswoman who were reliable employees but got into financial binds and hit up there employers for loans- one friend told me about his boss: "he didn't like it, but he loaned me the money"

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 5, 2009 12:45 AM    in reply to unknowncitizen

and these loans were secured as five figure mortgages?

well, i guess your scientific study on the borrowing habits of the american worker proves it: getting mortgages from your boss is not only NOT unusual, it is absolutely typical.

i wonder what kind of interest rate my boss is advertising.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 9:23 AM   

Doesn't Christie's wife work as an investment banker (or did she at one time)? If so, his wife may very well earn more than he did as US attorney.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 9:28 AM   

A few questions:

-As 'jaybean' asked, has Ms. Brown been repaying the loan thus far? Can we see her canceled checks to prove it?

-Has anyone asked about the 5.5% interest rate? By borrowing from Christie, she took out a second mortgage on her home. Second mortgage rates are higher than 5.5%... usually in the 6.25% range.

-What is the status of Ms. Brown's first mortgage? Has the value of her home dropped under the principal owed?

-What sense does it make for Ms. Brown to quit her government job. Her husband apparently is out of work, so who is going to pay these mortgages?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 12:51 PM    in reply to Citoyen92

-What sense does it make for Ms. Brown to quit her government job. Her husband apparently is out of work, so who is going to pay these mortgages?

I was wondering the same thing.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 27, 2009 12:52 PM   

From what I can steal from other blogs too numerous to mention, USA Christie, at the time of his appointment, was nothing more than a Bush fundraiser with no trial experience. It seems like the career USA, Brown, was the one wearing the knowledge jock in the NJ DOJ family. Christie's Cheney if you will.

Brother Paul Christie, the ex-CEO of Spear Leeds & Kellogg, is
the money guy, thanks to a Goldman Sachs buy-out and some slick SEC investigated trading.

Paul is rumored to have been given a pass by USA David Kelley, who in turn was awarded the deferred prosecution monitoring contract for Biomet Ortho.

Interestingly, a Joseph Bongiorno got caught-up in the same SEC investigation as Paul. Wasn't Annette Bernie's secretary?

One can only assume that Ashcroft too was instrumental in saving Paul's hide.

Brown's husband was supposedly a medical device consultant, which would link somewhat to the monitoring contracts.

But, how can you knock a guy like Chris Christie when he has Karl Rove standing on one side and the GOP Governor's Mark
Sanford on the other? Corzine's Goldman Sachs sure can't.


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 1:16 PM   

Upon further review, the SEC investigation involving Paul Christie includes a few more interesting names.

Michael F Stern was a trader for Van der Moolen. He was banned for life from the securities industry for refusing to testify.
Any relation to Christie's contract winning Judge Stern?

Donald R Foley, a trader for Fleet. Any relation to GOP Fundraiser Tom Foley? Also, Scott G Hunt & Thomas J Murphy of Fleet.

No mention of Mary Pat Christie of Fleet

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on