TPM Muckraker

« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Co-Treasury Secretary Lloyd Blankfein? Paulson And Goldman Exec Talked 24 Times In Week Of AIG Bailout

Blockbuster stuff from the New York Times Sunday on stunningly frequent contacts during the height of the financial crisis between Henry Paulson and his successor as CEO of Goldman Sachs, Lloyd Blankfein.

The then-Treasury Secretary and Blankfein spoke by phone two dozen times in one week in September 2008 when AIG was bailed out -- a deal that handed Goldman, a key counterparty of AIG, $13 billion in federal money.

Perhaps the most remarkable thing about the Times' account of the contacts between the two men, for which Paulson belatedly sought and received an ethics waiver, is that the phone calls were often coming from the Treasury Secretary.

In one day, Sept. 17, Paulson called Blankfein four times. Then after taking a call from President Bush in the evening, the Treasury Secretary called Blankfein yet again -- almost as if he felt obliged to keep the Goldman CEO constantly abreast of his progress. He spoke with Blankfein "far more" than with other executives, the Times reports.

The Times describes the tick-tock of the contacts, based on Paulson's calendar, obtained through the Freedom Of Information Act:

On the morning of Sept. 16, 2008, the day the A.I.G. rescue was announced, Mr. Paulson's calendars show that he took a call from Mr. Blankfein at 9:40 a.m. Mr. Paulson received the ethics waiver regarding contacts with Goldman between 2:30 and 3 the next afternoon. According to his calendar, he called Mr. Blankfein five times that day. The first call was placed at 9:10 a.m.; the second at 12:15 p.m.; and there were two more calls later that day. That evening, after taking a call from President Bush, Mr. Paulson called Mr. Blankfein again.

When the Treasury secretary reached his office the next day, on Sept. 18, his first call, at 6:55 a.m., went to Mr. Blankfein. That was followed by a call from Mr. Blankfein.

In all, Paulson spoke with Blankfein 26 times before he received the waiver from his ethics agreement, which barred substantive contact with his former firm, the Times reports. The former Treasury Secretary's spokesman maintains the agreement allowed him to talk to Goldman executives about market developments.

The Times story contains two more important developments: First, according to a "former senior government official," that Treasury lawyers had warned Paulson not to contact Goldman executives directly. The official says Paulson didn't take the advice "because the 'crisis' required action."

Paulson's spokesman responds that, "Hank doesn't recall saying that."

Second, according to two senior officials and several other sources cited by the Times, that Paulson was deeply involved in the discussions that lead to the AIG bailout -- which directly benefited his former firm, Goldman.

That seems to contradict Paulson's statement to the House Oversight Committee in July that "I had no role whatsoever in any of the Fed's decision regarding payments to any of A.I.G.'s creditors or counterparties."

Paulson's spokesman maintains that the waiver he sought to make contacts with Goldman was in anticipation of a need to bail out Goldman itself -- not so he could be involved in the AIG bailout.

Paulson himself is not talking to reporters because "his publisher had barred him from granting interviews until his manuscript" is done.


5 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Humm...almost sounds as though Paulson and the Treasury Department (under G.W. Bush) were engaging in racketeering and should be indicted and prosecuted under the Federal RICO Act..(?)

user-pic

In the end, there's probably a thousand or so things Bush/Cheney/Paulson et. al. could be indicted for using RICO... might as well extend it to most of the GOP during Bush's term.

Does Holder have the balls to pursue this?

RICO offenses

Under the law, racketeering activity means:
Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, extortion, arson, robbery, bribery, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act);
Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and several other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18);
Embezzlement of union funds;
Bankruptcy or securities fraud;
Drug trafficking;
Money laundering and related offenses;
Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in illegally entering the country (if the action was for financial gain);
Acts of terrorism.
Pattern of racketeering activity requires at least two acts of racketeering activity, one of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of which occurred within ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission of a prior act of racketeering activity. The U.S. Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to follow the continuity-plus-relationship test in order to determine whether the facts of a specific case give rise to an established pattern. Predicate acts are related if they "have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events." (H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.) Continuity is both a closed and open ended concept, referring to either a closed period of conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition.

user-pic

"Does Holder have the balls to pursue this?"

In a word - "NO".

There are to many Democrats who were complicit in these crimes from the time they took over Congress in 2006 until the present. Especially the Democratic leadership for enabling these crimes by taking impeachment off the table and helping cover to up the criminal behavior of the Bush Administration.
.

user-pic

everyone should read Matt Taibibi's piece in rolling stone on the the history of goldman and describing in detail how they run our country.

this is a huge story that the MSM refuses to touch, although, it appears the NYT is willing to nibble around the edges.

looks like paulson is being set up to be the sacrificial lamb, but, he'll simply retire with his riches to greener pastures courtesy of goldman.

user-pic

A crook in the Bush/Cheney administration? Impossible!

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe
Tip Line

Josh
Marshall

Bio

Zachary
Roth

Bio

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address