Perhaps the key takeaway from the just released documents on the U.S. attorney firings is this:
Karl Rove claimed recently that he and his staff acted merely as a conduit for passing on concerns about David Iglesias. But it's now clear that Rove's office pushed from 2005 for Iglesias to be canned, and was intimately involved in the decision.
For instance, the documents show:
• In May 2005, Rove's top aide, Scott Jennings, wrote in an email: "I would really like to move forward with getting rid of" Iglesias.
• The following month, Harriet Miers wrote in an email that the White House had made a "decision" to fire Iglesias.
• A "very agitated" Rove told Miers in a 2006 phone call that Iglesias was a "serious problem and he wanted something done about it," according to Miers's testimony.
• Jennings also claimed in an October 2006 email that Iglesias had been "shy about doing his job on Madrid." That was a reference to Patricia Madrid, the Democratic challenger to Rep. Heather Wilson in 2006, and to the fact that Iglesias had declined to prosecute vote fraud claims, when doing so might have boosted Wilson's chances.
The line about merely being a conduit doesn't seem to be holding up.


Acewrap
August 11, 2009 4:03 PM
Shocker.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
RandyMacon
August 11, 2009 4:13 PM
Now that Rove is even more confirmed as a liar, his standing at FOX should improve.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Jim Pharo
August 11, 2009 4:14 PM
So...you're saying Rove is a liar? Also, water wet, sky blue...
Can any of this lead to something meaningful like an indictment?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
traitorjoe
August 11, 2009 4:19 PM
Calling Eric Holder ....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MAX TARDCORE
August 11, 2009 4:22 PM
Frankly, I am still proud to see an hydrocephalic achieve so much in life.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
johnmccsf
August 11, 2009 4:26 PM
Gee the same crowd that lied us into Iraq...lied again
If this bunch gets "THEIR" country back and before they do, I gotta figure out how to cut to the head of the line for an Obama Death Panel
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Mateo123
August 11, 2009 4:27 PM
Remind me again why we care about this story? Of course Rove was involved. We've known that for years. He was involved in practically everything at the Bush White House.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SqueakyRat
August 11, 2009 6:57 PM in reply to Mateo123
We care because we want blood.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
714Day
August 13, 2009 11:56 AM in reply to Mateo123
We care because we are supposed to be a nation guided by the rule of law. It appears that machiavellian political engineers are are exempt from the order of business that would otherwise apply.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
witty1
August 11, 2009 4:31 PM
What a revelation.
The previous administration wasn't governing with laws but with revenge politics... I'm stunned.
Rove/Bush profited from the stupidity of American culture - and stupidity is the only commodity doing very very well in today's down market.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
August 11, 2009 4:37 PM
So is Rove's behavior - that we now have documented - a violation of any laws? If so, what is the process of getting him into court and the potential penalty?
Who else might be chargeable?
I also wonder what the elements of proof of the likely charge are, too.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sponson
August 11, 2009 4:50 PM
It's illegal to lie to Congress, whether under oath or not. Was Rove speaking to Congress when he said that Jennings was "freelancing?" It's open and shut if so.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Cal Gal
August 11, 2009 10:03 PM in reply to sponson
Yeah, but bet your bottom dollar he'll get an opportunity to "revise and amend" his testimony, just like Fitz the Fizzle gave him.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Joe Bob
August 11, 2009 5:02 PM
"shy about doing his job on Madrid."
I still manage to find this somewhat shocking. Or maybe I’m saddened more than shocked. There aren’t really many places where you have the political venality of the Bush administration literally spelled out for you quite so explicitly.
I mean, here you have a high White House official not-too-implicitly stating that bringing unsupported criminal charges against political opponents is the job of Republican USA appointees. Even worse, it wasn’t Madrid who was the target of investigations; which I might be willing to chalk up to political hardball, it was ordinary voters who screwed up their registration cards. That’s how this whole scandal was ginned up: New Mexico GOPers trolling for “fraudulent” voter registration cards.
If Iglesias hadn’t exhibited some integrity a bunch of innocent schmucks would have been rung up on federal voter fraud indictments…just so Rove, Domenici, and Wilson can score some political points.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyMy
August 11, 2009 5:33 PM
Let's hope Holder prosecutes. And that the attorneys in question pursue civil cases!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
fname
August 11, 2009 5:34 PM
Really frustrated reading these articles with a half-dozen 1-2 word quotes. If I was didn't know better, I'd think these were taken out of context.
You've done the hard work of finding the damning bits of information. Now be a great blogger by posting the extended quotes and trusting the reader to make their own decision instead of having to rely on your interpretation.
Frustrated.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Ouroboros
August 11, 2009 6:17 PM
Yeah he'll never go to jail and neither will Cheney. It's insane how Republicans, Birthers, Deathers, Birchers, whatever... It's completely insane that they believe Obama's a tyrant. Nobody from our side even has the nerve to begin to think about doing the right thing in terms of war crimes and criminal justice.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ivy22
August 12, 2009 8:10 AM
It is possible to be a conduit of sorts in federal prison.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Liberta! Liberta!
August 12, 2009 8:55 AM
I think this will get him a promotion at Fox News.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
hquain
August 12, 2009 10:55 AM
The 2001-2009 government is, it seems, the journalistic gift that keeps on giving -- simply because so many things that were obviously true at the time were regarded (by convention) as some kind of obscure mystery, shrouded in mere possibilities. We will eventually discover that Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, and Bush -- in something like that order -- did indeed run the Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, and Bush administration. And when it is headlined, we will express outrage.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dancesonpedals
August 13, 2009 11:58 AM
on page 62 of his july 7th interview, after a question about carol lam & the duke cunningham prosecution, Rove interupted the committee attorny to ask if Lam had been involved with that prosecution, or if it had been taken care of by the Los Ageles US Atty Office...what a lying, disingenuous bastard..
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
old timer
August 13, 2009 12:02 PM
Well, all I can say is the whole Bush outfit seems to be radio-active and neither Obama or Holder are going to do much. A great disappointment for all of us but I guess it's still better that McCain and Palin.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Just Desserts
August 13, 2009 12:13 PM
I wrote a novel in which Rove is waterboarded to the point of full confession, along with Bush and Cheney. I derived an immense statisfaction from putting lurid confessional words in his mouth, most of which are going to be proved true. I must confess that I almost enjoyed the waterboarding of him too. But of all of them, the one I love to hate the most is Cheney.
The novel is free at www.scribd.com/chazzbates
Best Regards
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?