« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Leaked Email: CNBC Went To Tea Partiers Looking for Angry Protests
CNBC approached Tea Party activists, looking for angry protest events that would make good television, according to a leaked email from a Tea Party discussion group. And one Tea Bagger responded by flagging an upcoming event that, he said, "should be a riot ... literally."
Yesterday, Tea Party Patriots national coordinator Jenny Beth Martin sent an email, obtained by TPMmuckraker, to a Tea Party google group. Martin told the group: "We have a media request for an event this week that will have lots of energy and lots of anger. This is for CNBC."
She then asked: "So, where are the big events this week and where can TPP best be represented on the news?"
Later that day, a Tea Bagger named Pat Wayman responded with a suggestion, also obtained by TPMmuckraker: "This one should be a riot! literally...." he wrote.
Wayman then posted information for an upcoming "health fair" hosted by Rep. David Scott (D-GA), at which the uninsured will receive free medical coverage*.
As Wayman noted, "[t]his is the Congressman who got a swastika painted on his office sign last night."
Wayman also included a link to a far-right website which lists the Scott event.
You can see both the Martin and Wayman emails here.
So, at least in Martin's telling, the pro-business CNBC was specifically looking for an event with "lots of energy and lots of anger." (Earlier this year, they just relied on their own correspondents for that.)
And of course, some Tea Baggers were only too happy to try to provide that anger.
Late Update: Martin tells TPMmuckraker that she did not forward the Scott event -- or, in fact, any event -- on to CNBC as a candidate for coverage. She stressed that her group "does not endorse anything that incites violence of any kind," adding that the email list is un-moderated. "I can't moderate every single comment," she said.
Asked whether CNBC had specifically told her they were looking for an event with "lots of energy and lots of anger," Martin replied: "That was the impression that I received from them." She declined to elaborate.
CNBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Late Late Update: Martin has forwarded an email to TPMmuckraker, sent this morning before this post appeared, in which she directed that the Tea Party Patriots would have no involvement in Scott's health fair, because of the nature of the event, which she called "a perfect example of free market events."
She wrote:
I have thought about this more and think it would be best to send a press release saying how we think the health fair is a perfect example of free market events. That we support free markets and the fact that in America we are compassionate and take care of the uninsured. Look at these businesses who are doing this without the government taking over our health care.I think TPP does not need to have a presence there. If the other groups want to do it, that is their prerogative. Right now Tea Party Patriots is under a ton of scrutiny and we need to make sure our methods are above reproach.
* This sentence has been edited from an earlier version.

















Let's not forget the political context:
When Bush was President, speaking ill of our Commander-in-Chief during a time of war sent the wrong message to our allies, to our enemies, to our troops in harm's way and to the American people."
But now that Obama is President, apparently, calling openly for armed revolution and accusing the President of wanting to destroy his own country and plunge the world into chaos and tyranny is the height of patriotism.
Does anyone think we *aren't* going to see mass violence from the right? We've already had half a dozen right-wing shooters -- all of which have been waved away by the Right (as secret plants by the Left), the Republican politicians are stirring the "death panel" anger, the Glenn Becks of the world are already covering their asses with insincere exhortations not to do anything "nuts", and both the political heirarchy and the mob nuts have learned that neither Democratic politicans *nor the media* intend to do anything to even protest their behavior. So why would it do anything but intensify?
They have realized that they can have the best of both worlds -- just as with the "War on Christmas" and the "homosexual agenda", the nuts on the right will simply pretend (or tell themselves) that we *already* started it. They already are -- they're claiming that their anger righteously derives from perceived offenses committed by Obama, such as "death panels" and forcing their priests to perform gay abortions. It's madness, and it's America.
America today is like that mentally retarded woman wrapped in explosives that insurgents sent into a crowded marketplace in Iraq and then remotely detonated. I'm just waiting for the button to get pressed.
August 12, 2009 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Amazing when your skin changes color. That's the MAIN Reason for all of this, with the Big Pharma and Healthcare taking second place.
Just look at Dobbs and I rest my case.
August 12, 2009 1:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, and I think it was J Stewart who pointed out that the tax structure wasn't different, say, a year ago when Bush was president. But suddenly, this year, it became "oppressive".
Also, having US citizens potentially detained, kidnapped and declared "enemy combatants" with no trial was a-okay accordign to these supposed libertarian types.
I do think clearly that some of this is discomfort (to say the least) with a black president and all he represents -- demographic and cultural changes.
August 12, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh yeah, this is grass roots, from the heart type of anger, all the way....
August 12, 2009 12:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNBC needs to be reigned in. Now they are ordering up violence for the cameras. That is illegal. They are becoming coconspirators.
August 12, 2009 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't speak to the legality, but it does seem mind-bendingly inappropriate/unethical for a cable "news" network to invoke this sort of reality tv stage direction into such a volatile atmosphere.
August 12, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any lawyers out there know just when words turn into prosecutable incitement to riot? It doesn't sounds like CNBC deliberately encouraged violence, but they sure implied that the possibility of tensions blowing up would bring press coverage.
August 12, 2009 4:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I suspect that the lawyers at CNBC ensured there words did everything up to but without crossing that line...
August 12, 2009 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Left-wing media, indeed!
August 12, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNBC's audience is mostly finance people, who are largely righties. (Ever visit Yahoo investment boards? Try NYT's to see how partisan it can be)
So it makes sense they pander to righties, even if that actually imperils their money. (That is, if these freaks actually take their faux "inflation" fearmongering because of "Obama deficit horrors" to heart and throw all of their wealth into gold.)
August 12, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I won't necessarily go as far as to accuse CNBC of illegality, but their professional ethics can most certainly be called into question here.
Rather than being the proverbial "dispassionate observer" reporting on events, CNBC is dangerously close to becoming enmeshed within its own storyline, which is exactly how the New York Times got in so much ethical hot water over Judith Miller's behavior, first during the run-up to the Iraq War, and then with the unfolding of the Valerie Plame affair.
August 12, 2009 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is this something the Georgia Bureau of Investigations (the local boys) or the feds can do something about? This is out of hand and needs to be slapped down. This feeds into the usual hatred of southerners for anyone who is not under their thumb such as blacks who don't "know their place" and this man could become a fall guy for those too afraid to go after the president. Why aren't law enforcement doing something?
August 12, 2009 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wouldn't it make sense for the administration to publicize activity like this? I think Obama has already established, perhaps too well, what a rational, charming, compromising guy he is.
Maybe what Obama needs to give us is a Fireside Chat in which he talks about what's happened to politics, from the Swiftboaters, through the Brooks Brothers Mob, on past the birthers, right to the Astroturf Health Care rioters.
August 12, 2009 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it's time - unfortunately he won't do a thing to change the mind of the nutcase whackjob crazies, but hopefully it might get other people to stop look and listen.
The folks who only watch Fox News won't get to see the fireside chat because Fox News won't broadcast it, like they didn't broadcast the Town Hall Meeting.
I heard one guy at Claire McCaskill's TownHall meeting cite the liberal news agency Associated Press!!!!!!
August 12, 2009 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, those are fighting words to Ron "WALNUTS!" Fournier.
August 12, 2009 3:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Having CNBC involved is the very same as having cluster-fox involved... they are the same people..AND, you'll get the same kind of coverage...all bad.
August 12, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wear an anti-war t-shirt to a Bush-era townhall and you go to jail; wear a gun to an Obama townhall and you are a patriot.
August 12, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's an excellent way to sum it up.
August 12, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm just waiting for the MSM to point this out and undercut these folks...
Oh wait....
August 12, 2009 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is virtually impossible to take any of this seriously when the term 'Tea Baggers' is used, representative of how truly inane and ridiculous this all is.
http://www.enewse.com/
August 12, 2009 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
These clows who are continuously shouting Liberty and Freedom actually want the the freedom to do what every the hell they damn well please with no consiqueces for their actions.
Just a bunch os sorry assed irresponsible and immature jerks.
C
August 12, 2009 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Somehow I doubt that Keith or Rachel will be covering this story. It's up to the netroots to spread this story. Great job by TPM!!!
August 12, 2009 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone read "The Grapes Of Wrath"? Remember the dance at the worker's encampment that became a riot when ringers snuck in and started causing trouble? That event actually happened. The idea was to make the workers look like a danger to the community so the public would support running them out of town.
Look for right-wingers to do the same here. They've already created a very hostile atmosphere. I fully expect someone to cause trouble and blame it on the left.
August 12, 2009 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is my favorite book (and movie) of all time.
August 12, 2009 4:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, I'll bet they didn't. They hate it when they are busted for conspiring to script "news" stories. And now they'll hate it even more if something happens and the cretins involved at CNBC are exposed.
I'm thinking of the Robert Downey Jr. character in Natural Born Killers for some reason.
August 12, 2009 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
What? It wasn't Fox? Come on.
This is the video of Glenn Beck's show from last night (8-11-09) condensed into 10 minutes.
I have never seen so many health care scare tactics and talk about eugenics in such a short period of time.
You have to watch.
http://progressnotcongress.org/?p=2505
August 12, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
atticus- "I have never seen so many health care scare tactics and talk about eugenics in such a short period of time.
Just tuning in now I see... Unfortunatly it only gets worse from here.
August 12, 2009 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know. The eugenics thing kind of appeals to me. Think we could get a law passed that would prevent anyone with in IQ lower that 80 from ever having kids ? That would erode the republican base.
C
August 12, 2009 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
"CNBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment." Well keep trying, 'cause they need to own up to this one! Santelli and Cramer are the conniving weasles John Stewart thought they were!
August 12, 2009 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
& derail Palin/Santelli 2012 before it even begins!?
Egad! You're mad, my good man.
August 12, 2009 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Bush administration believed that the opposition shouldn't upend their message to the world.
The Obama administration is a whole lot more tolerant about such things, notwithstanding the reported desire to have people tell 'em who is spreading incorrect rumor and innuendo, according to conservative opposition sources. I never did get the url to that reported request on the WH site from the opposition, they just said "The WH site". That isn't a cite, its a "go fish!"
The conservative opposition has worked on this strategy and these tactics for some time, so like Palin's intro, they're doing pretty well for the first few days. Let's see if this has legs.
August 12, 2009 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could have been WhiteHouse.org. Havn't been in about three years, but wouldn't put it past the right to cite a satire as the real thing.
August 12, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is getting to be really out of hand.
I see why Dems would give these jokers enough rope to "hang themselves with" in the court of public opinion. These yahoo's are bound to be called out for "jumping the shark" on their rhetoric. The problem is the Media is doing little to give an acurate representation of the facts and the teabagger adherance to misinformation to to try and bring down a Black President. If teabaggers and birthers go away so do the ratings associated with the sensationalism.
I see that the Repubs are trying to ramp this up to the point of arrests being made, so they can say the Administration is is trying to stifle dissent, trample 2nd amendment rights etc. The problem is they have moved their rhetoric past the stage of dissent to outward incitment of violence. And they are getting away w/ it both from a law enforcement standpoint and by being givin a platform by the Media
How is it that an unarmed, middle-aged Harvard professor get arrested on his front porch for being loud and angry, and these yahoo's carrying loaded guns, indending to intimidate, with signs supporting the overthrow of the government are somehow patriots.
I remember a time when Vietnam veterans who lost limbs in a war the Pres and Vice-pres activly avoided were called treasonous and compared to Osama bin Laden for questioning the president. How are these same people OK with comparing the president(in time of war no less) to Hitler?
Racism and Hypocrisy know no limits...
August 12, 2009 2:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNBC inciting a riot?
This should get at least as much news coverage as Sarah Palins "death panels", but then again, in this case, the "news" is guilty.
August 12, 2009 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm)
n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
from
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
It's about time we call a Spade a Spade....
August 12, 2009 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Once again, the movie "Network" proves to be prophetic. Ask for a televised riot and you will get one.
August 12, 2009 2:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Faye Dunaway and the radical militant group. The ratings will blow the competition out of the water.
I thought the same exact thing. I can not find that clip on YouTube where she is screwing Bill Holden and talking about the next ratings blockbuster all the way to orgasm. God, who do you think is most like Faye Dunaway at CNBC?
August 12, 2009 4:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I want to see all the right-wingers who argued that Gates should have been more deferential to the police when a right-wing town-hall protestor gets tazed and arrested. Suddenly, they'll have to come up with talking points where they distinguish between "patriotic police" and "Obama's lackeys", based entirely upon whether they're helping or hindering them.
Right-wing authoritarianism apparently involves a complete adoption of certain huge double-standards as being normal and proper. Terrifying...
August 12, 2009 2:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Contessa Brewer was just on MSNBC dismissing the Administration claims that the media was more interested in entertaining than informing. She was all huffy that they would even insinuate that it was media coverage that was driving the hate.
Wonder if MSNBC will have the guts to report on their own networks misbehavior? Not from Contessa obviously. What a shill!!
August 12, 2009 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are limits to msnbc. It's called GE ownership.
August 12, 2009 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNBC and MSNBC are both owned by GE, will one call out the other for their actions?
I'm not holding my breath. Although, I wouldn't put it past GE to try to make money off both side of this issue.
August 12, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wouldn't bet the ranch, but it's possible. CNBC is part of the NBC Universal entertainment division, while MSNBC is part of NBC News.
August 12, 2009 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember seeing Ms Brewer's nipple thru her sweater when she was doing the Sat-Sun late local news in the Miltown. So, always have had an har... I mean, soft spot for her.
August 12, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
The founding fathers may have been part of a revolution that included the Boston Tea Party but as soon as they were the government they raised taxes themselves. This lead to the whiskey rebellion and Shay's rebellion. What I believe the founding fathers were more concerned about, was living with a standing army. The U.S. Army in Iraq and Afghanistan is playing the modern role the British Army played over two centuries ago. The American military has a presence in over 150 countries around the globe. The founding fathers were anti-imperialists who embraced the idea of government by the consent of the governed.
Tea Party style activism tries to paint their modern movement with an old patriotic sounding label. “Limited government” is new and not from the 18th century. They may say they oppose big government but they support the world's most expensive military. Taxes were not their concern when Paul Bremer was tossing around cash in Iraq or when Medicaid part D was in congress. Tea Party style activism is a reaction to Obama in the white house. The Tea Party theme may make them feel as if they are doing something traditional, but they are a new response by people angry about something other than taxes. Anyway most “Real Americans” are coffee drinkers these days.
August 12, 2009 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sounds like your one of those Latte sippers though...
August 12, 2009 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The truth is it's not just CNBC, the entire media is begging for these riots because it's colorful. They don't want to cover Obama's townhall meetings much because they say they're too boring (in comparison to riots). The problem is the pro-reformers have not accepted that there is a media war going on, and we're losing.
August 12, 2009 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let CNBC know how unethical their behavior is -- a complete breach of public trust. Here is their corporate number: 201-735-2622.
August 12, 2009 2:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for posting that number. I have made my call.
August 12, 2009 3:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think the 'media war' (to Debra) could ever be winnable, given the tremendous bias they exhibit toward anything remotely socially responsible. They never covered anti war protestors like this, from Vietnam, to Gulf Wars I and II
Everyone, just start keeping count how often the news says that Obama is "struggling" and "on the defensive". When old Ed Schultz came out dazzled by Obama's performance in the NH town hall and asked Chuck Todd, political director of NBC, if he didn't agree, Todd answered very circuitously by speaking ONLY about the crowd OUTSIDE the hall...
The question asked by Schultz was unanswered, except that Todd said that there was greater courtesy in the hall because he was the President. Come on. Todd looked for all the world as if he were getting words fed to him, or was constrained by some NBC/MSNBC talking points that basically said give Obama no credit.
August 12, 2009 2:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
While we talk about weird media: now the fed is saying they have been bailing out the us economy for over 2 years.
That would be this time or earlier in 07.
That never came up before at least for me.
Didn't the schrub-con say the economy was fine?
Or is this another case of kenronlay talk?
Both are the same so don't answer.
It's good to tell people they have lots of money when they don't because you took it all.
August 12, 2009 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
In TV, the News and Entertainment divisions were combined to create "Info-Tainment." Then Scripted Drama and News divisions were combined to create "Reality TV." Now CNBC, by asking the right wingers where they were going to strike next, is creating .... "Info-Reality-Tainment?"
Anyone got a better description for this?
August 12, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
See my above post at 2:16 for your answer...
August 12, 2009 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Terrorism?
ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm)
n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
from
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
It's about time we call a Spade a Spade....
August 12, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
This leak only confirms what I have thought for the last week.....the media wants all hell to break lose because it is all about ratings and in their evil, greedy minds it makes money and ratings.
GE/MSNBC/CNBC/NBC should be real careful because Jeff Immelt and GEFinancing got a big bailout from TARP because they were on the ropes in a big way.
I think the time has come to let both GE/NBC and their sponsors to know that we won't tolerate this. Let's bring the fairness doctrine back now...it's clear it has crossed the line and is now being patently abused.
August 12, 2009 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNBC would lose its credibility if it actually still had any.
After being perma-bulls cheerleading us into the abyss, now they've become the doom-and-gloom anti-Obama channel that can't cope with or explain the nascent recovery.
August 12, 2009 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is what troubles me the most - that there is a good chance that the media (as a whole) is giving a small but vocal group much more of a voice than it deserves, for the sole purpose of agitating the rest of the country to goose viewership.
Honestly, they'd endorse a fascist coup just because more people would watch if that was going on...
August 12, 2009 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Idiocracy" is starting to look like a documentary at this point.
August 12, 2009 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nice... Glad I'm not the only one...
August 12, 2009 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
This country sucks..the Pres is great but the country sucks!
August 12, 2009 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
One more media misstep and a partial rectification. Apparently the black woman ejected from McCaskill's town hall had unfurled a Rosa Parks banner. Then she put in on the chair in front of her. A white woman 'protestor' came up and ripped it to shreds, to great applause from her cohort, and when the black woman protested this act, it was she who was ejected from the meeting. (Just now on David Shuster, MSNBC)
August 12, 2009 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
America's true colors showing through. I have never been amazed that Obama has exhibited the ability to be President. The amazement is that America "allowed" him to become President. At least the 60% of Americans who voted for him. The remaining 40% of 300 million plus leaves an awful lot of wiggle room for the kind of media sanctioned behavior that is being injected by the so-called patriots. If someone had showed up at a Bush town hall meeting with a water pistol and compared him to Hitler, these patriots would have tarred and feathered, lynched, and torched the poor soul (in that order) and had a picnic while doing it, webcasting it on MSNBC with commentary. These truly are desperate times for Republican Party leadership and the good ole boys in the south who have been used to electing every President in modern times.
August 12, 2009 4:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
It actually only required an anti-war t-shirt to be arrested at a Bush rally...
August 12, 2009 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
CNBC is a sideshow, and their ratings are CRAP. Probably because they are more interested in trying to push a corporatist agenda down our throats than covering actual financial news.
http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/08/why_did_cnbcs_ratings_fall_off_a_cliff.php
August 12, 2009 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Didn't CNBC tell us there's no housing bubble? GM will be fine. Bear Stearns is great.
August 12, 2009 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Check this out folks. You all may have seen a clip from Claire McCaskill's town hall meeting where there is a disruption and a black woman is escorted out of the hall. Well, thank goodness someone else had a camera and recorded what happened before she was escorted out.
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/12462/lowlife-teabagger-protestor-tears-up-poster-of-rosa-parks-at-health-care-town-hall
August 12, 2009 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I still don't get it,....they're Liberty is at stake because we want affordable healthcare? At the end of the day it doesn't matter what their argument is,...they'll make one up like they do every year all in the name of lower taxes and party fidelity. How about the freedom to pay a reasonable amount to stay healthy without losing everything you ever worked for if you get sick,...is that so treasonous? I wanna know what's so un-american about that?
August 12, 2009 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is almost as bad as the Brazilian talk show host, recently busted, who ordered murders to increase his show's ratings.
August 12, 2009 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
And TPM went to leaked material to find CNBC looking for angry protests. However many steps away you are, the end point is still ridiculous, distracting, non-newsworthy material.
http://www.enewse.com
August 12, 2009 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
When you hear CNBC, see Lou Dobbs. They have zero credibility as long as this hateful, fear-mongering, racist is calling the shots.
Is his own wife even a citizen? I'm just sayin'.
August 12, 2009 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was listening to CNN in my car the other day when Sen. Cardin was having his townhall. The anchorwoman assured me that they would cut to if it "got heated". What clearer way is there to say "we're only interested in the conflict not the content"? CNBC obviously shares this viewpoint.
August 13, 2009 11:09 AM | Reply | Permalink