TPMMuckraker

Gonzo: My Time As AG Hurt My Reputation

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Alberto Gonzales self-rehabilitation tour continues?

The former Attorney General, who launched a mini media blitz in May, is back, this time trying his hand with New York Times magazine interviewer Deborah Solomon.

Among other tidbits, Gonzo says he hasn't talked to George W. Bush since the president left office. And he confirms that no law firm has offered him a job in the years since he resigned. (Though his lawyer told TPMmuckraker in May he was engaged in unspecified "legal work.")

Gonzo is clear-eyed about how his tenure as attorney general affected his reputation:

Would you agree that your reputation was damaged by your service as attorney general?

It has had an effect, a negative effect, no question about it, and at times it makes me angry because it is undeserved. But I don't want to sound like I am whining. At the end of the day, I've been the attorney general of the United States. It's a remarkable privilege, and I stand behind my service.

The former AG's legal bills have been "substantial" -- "a burden," he told Solomon. Those are likely to continue, as a prosecutor's criminal investigation into the 2006 U.S. Attorney firings is ongoing.

Gonzales might be able to cover some of those bills with proceeds from his forthcoming memoir -- a book, he told Solomon, that does not currently have a publisher.

Late Update: It's also worth reading in full this classic bit of Gonzo obfuscation when asked about the U.S. Attorney firings:

Some 70 professors at Texas Tech have signed a petition that protests your appointment and cites your "ethical failings," including misleading Congress abut the firing of nine federal prosecutors. What will you tell your students about that?

All the inspector-general investigations, they're now over with. They found that I had not engaged in any criminal wrongdoing.

Isn't there still an ongoing investigation by a special prosecutor who was appointed last year to look into the removal of the attorneys?

I wish I could comment on that, but because it's an ongoing investigation, I cannot.

Join the Conversation!

65 comments

Recommend Recommend (14)

August 10, 2009 10:45 AM   

Perhaps Gonzo can find solace in the fact that he did even more damage to the DOJ.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 2:13 PM    in reply to Dogger

....did you do worse damage to the DOJ than to yourself?

Gonzales: I don't recall.....

The standard Republican response to their screw-ups, incompetence and criminal activity, be they the ones committing the acts, or the amnesiac zombies of Bush Base:

They just don't recall or accept responsibility...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 9:33 AM    in reply to NobleCommentDecider

"Gonzo: My Time As AG Hurt My Reputation".

It wasn't really the time he spent as AGAG, it was the constant deliberate flouting of every standard for which America stands.
.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

mJJ

user-pic

August 13, 2009 8:15 PM    in reply to Johann

No doubt that Gonzales will go down as one of the worst AGs our country ever had. He is responsible for the politicization of the Department of Justice and the all-around disgusting conduct of the Justice Department's business during his tenure. Seldom has one man wreaked so much damage on any Federal Agency like Gonzales did to the Justice Department. He seemed to have NO moral rudder and he forever disgraced himself with his disgusting behavior. I do not hold the Hispanic Community at large responsible for his behavior. Only Gonzales and the President for allowing such malfeasance once Gonzales was appointed. I was never certain if Bush appointed him for the express reason that he knew Gonzales would allow the sort of malfeasance in the firing of Feds attorneys. I find it absolutely disgusting that Gonzales whines about how his stay at Justice has made it so difficult for him to get a job. It was his conduct while being the AG that ruined his future employment prospects and that is as it should be. He participated in the most illegal mess in the Justice Department since Iran Contra.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 10:56 AM   

I suppose that his troubles are simply a ramification of playing with fire and getting burned. Yet as a loyal acolyte in the GWBush-machine prior to his AG days he surely could have predicted how the machine chews up and spits out underlings as necessary. As a putative Christian shouldn't he also believe that telling the truth about his smellier activities as AG and doing some penance will solve these problems best? Time to 'fess up Al!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:25 PM    in reply to theod

Alberto seems to be a bit naive even after being around a power center.

As an adult and a professional, he should know that nobody is ever going to cover his ass but himself unless he has a chip in the situation. And if he did favors for W, expecting or trusting that there'd be a quid pro quo he's an idiot for thinking that way.

Alberto has no money, he has no power base, anybody could have been chosen AG. He got used and abused and that's really his problem now to deal with the aftermath.

Now he's out whining that he didn't see it coming and it's undeserved. Well, the attorneys who were fired for no reason feel that they way they were treated was also undeserved.

to quote my favorite NJ Housewife: When somebody is being nice to you, you gotta wonder why they're being nice to you.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:01 AM   

How about a stretch in a federal penitentuary, Al? Would that hurt your reputation, as well?

You are scum, pure and simple. If you had not been an Attorney General, you would probably have been disbarred by now. You make John Mitchell look like Oliver Wendell Holmes.

What this cretin does not seem to understand is the damage he and the other neo-nazis in the Buscht Regime did to the US Constitution and the rule of law in America.

They are traitors and why the HELL are they not in jail yet?

SG

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 5:04 PM    in reply to SaintGenesius

[[You make John Mitchell look like Oliver Wendell Holmes.]]

For. The. Win.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:21 AM   

The former Attorney General of the United States of America cannot get a job in any law firm in the country.

That tells you everything you need to know about the man.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:46 PM    in reply to serge

That's amazing when you think about it. While many attorneys are good decent people, there are others who specialize in perpetrating fraud or protecting polluters or protecting the interests of the mob or the the most unthinkable sorts of criminals. But all of them said "The one thing we will not resort to is hiring Alberto Gonzales. That would be wrong."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

CN

user-pic

August 10, 2009 3:18 PM    in reply to serge

Amen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 3:47 PM    in reply to serge

serge,

it seems like even the Republican party won't hire him.


Has The Federalist Society offered him a membership?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:38 AM   

The questioner suggests:

Your reputation was damaged by your service...

But AGAG answers as if his "reputation" was solely in the hands of his critics. Gee.... if his "service" had been such that it deserved "honor" - seems to me you'd see all sorts of repubs praising and honoring him - in addition to the repub "owned" media.

The man seems incapable of accepting responsibility. Which, of course, is a fact if all he is is a lackey. Then again, one chooses whether or not to become a lackey.

He says he doesn't want to whine. But he is the incarnation of whining!

Poor, poor abandoned guppy - which is still casting aspersion on guppies... (I was gonna say "puppy" but didn't want to annoy a hoard of TPM people whom I admire.... so I said guppy, which isn't fair to guppies either! Piece of sh#^t might fit!)

Anyway, what sorry example of an AG!!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:40 AM   

"I do not recall" being his motto of infamy and his attempt to obstruct justice through witness tampering, calling Monica Goodling into his office to say "as I recall the situation as being ..." in attempt to get their stories straight and tacitly encourage her to lie to congress with regards to caging and a whole host of other issues are such flagrant violations of law, that to say they are unfair is absurd.

Not to mention how he overtly turned the justice department into a subservient arm of the executive branch, telling the US attorneys that they remember they 'work for the GOP', allowing the most egregious of political prosecutions and orchestration of a wholesale liquidation of the civil rights division with Liberty and Oral Roberts University bigots, and also hiring strictly on party affiliation and he somehow thinks that the lack of interest in his services is somehow 'unfair'? Employers hire based on past job performance, of which he was simply one of the worst AG's in history. The fact that he was a former SC justice in Texas is a rather scary joke.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:42 AM   

You're angry? Ask Don Siegelman how he feels.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:46 AM    in reply to traitorjoe

Here, here.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:51 AM    in reply to twoviragos

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:50 AM   

"All the inspector-general investigations, they're now over with..."

Then only one short question later:

"I wish I could comment on that, but because it's an ongoing investigation..."

Mr. Gonzalez is a liar---that's why his reputation is in the tank.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 3:38 PM    in reply to JosephP

I don't know. I don't know whether he's a liar, wholly unreflective upon his actions, or really, really, really stupid.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:50 AM   

I'm surprised that Gonzo has any "recollection" of his time as AG.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:22 PM   

This is what happens when radical religious fanatics pray too much. Those morning sessions did nothing but cause destruction of innocent folks around the globe.

Perhaps asking for guidance from a loving god, rather than wishing for your own warped desires and revenges from an evil genie would have been better....

Too bad the fanatics cannot see the difference... IMHO


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:27 PM   

[Fredo's] lawyer told TPMmuckraker in May he was engaged in unspecified "legal work."

Well, Gonzo said he's got a lot of legal bills and has (or will be?) setting up a legal-defense fund.  He might as well do a little bit of work on his own case.

OTOH, as the old saw goes, "A lawyer who defends himself has a fool for a client."  In Gonzo's case, that's especially true.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:28 PM   

I think he is genually perplexed. He, like others (Cheney), really believe he was fighting the good fight, just doing what was right. Those lefty prosecuters and judges were bad for the country and finding ways replace them with right thinking people was a good thing.

How could anyone think he did anything wrong?

.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 3:40 PM    in reply to _agave_

So his reputation is "hurt"? Then there's justice after all, even if only in small measure.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:29 PM   

It helps to remember that Gonzo has never had power (or responsibility) except through the graces of the Bush family. GW liked him, helped him along like a frat bro, and used him.

So yes he is a ridiculous spectacle, but only as a direct reflection of Dubya. The shame is that USA was unable to correct this problem at its root, but instead kowtowed to the lawless wishes of this crime family. That's what suks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:30 PM   

Fifty years in a Maximum Security cell in the Hague for TREASON and WAR CRIMES will give you ample time to consider your ultimate stupidity.

You can be as angry as you want....we don't care.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:30 PM   

I’m somewhat surprised that Gonzo hasn’t found a comfortable sinecure somewhere on the Wingnut Welfare circuit. Why haven’t the Heritage Foundation or American Enterprise Institute provided him a home? Even if Gonzo is too much damaged goods to those esteemed organizations you would think that maybe Pacific Legal Foundation or some similar outfit would have him.

(dis)Barring that, maybe Regents or Liberty University could find a place for him on their Law School faculty. You would think that after providing gainful employment for so many loyal Bushies at the DoJ somebody would throw Gonzo a bone.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:34 PM   

Look at Gonzo's facial expression in that picture.

Didn't someone once do a post of all the disgraced leaders, officials who have that same expression? Clinton, Blair, Bush, Rumsfeld, Spitzer, etc.?

It's classic.

Regarding Alberto's difficulty in finding a job. I don't wish that on anyone, but he did make his own bed, he's got to spend some time sleeping in it, no?

It's not surprising that others from the Bush years have actually landed on their feet. It saddens me to see how easily the grossly corrupt, even criminal can find such great jobs.

Look at Rove. He slithered his way through public life, was responsible for getting the worst President in American history elected. He colluded in the collapse of virtually all our cherished Democratic principles. He was essentially the brain, the rallying force behind the most incompetent leadership this country has ever had, and yet he escaped unscathed.

Worse. He's one of the most sought after conservative opinion makers on the scene today.

No bad deed goes punished. It goes rewarded.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 1:32 PM    in reply to tpmgary

Yes, someone did a post showing many examples of that facial expression. Can't recall who it was though... And I seem to recall the "face" shows up when a public figure has to "face" scrutiny for misdeeds.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 3:43 PM    in reply to TheraP

I wouldn't include Clinton: his error was not illegal.

I would include Erlichman doing his impression of Mussolini.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:42 PM   

I'm sorry. I don't understand. Wasn't it more that you were a lying, Constitution manipulating buttplug, rather than your tenure as AG that hurt your reputation?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:47 PM   

One aspect ripe for speculation is the apparent estrangement between him and Dubya.

W doesn't seem to care much for Dickwad Cheney much these days, either.  Prolly blames him for many of administration's disasters.  Dubya may see Gonzo as having done much of Cheney's bidding.  (See:  torture memos.)

But that covers only the foreign-policy part.  On the domestic front, Gonzo did much of Rove's bidding.  (See:  US Atty scandal.)

Hmmm.  I wonder how relations have been between Dubya and Rove lately?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 2:56 PM    in reply to jzap

Well, Gonzo didn't write the torture memos; they came from Yoo and Bybee at OLC, writing under the pseudonym "Alberto Gonzales" (specifically the one repudiating the Geneva Conventions as "quaint," a derisive turn of phrase utterly alien to Gonzo's wheedling, evasive phraseology).

Given that Gonzo is a pliant yes-man, and that this was the source of his appeal to W, it seems uncharitable of W to hold it against Alberto that Cheney- a master manipulator, whose abilities in this direction are unmatched- was able to exploit his pliability as needed.

One possibility is that Gonzo's proposed memoir is his hedge against his former master's ingratitude. Things could become interesting if Gonzo's legal troubles mount, and W- his only influential ally, really- keeps freezing him out.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 3:06 PM    in reply to diachronic

Well, Gonzo could write such a memoir- but it would purely be self-immolation. Holder's DOJ would much rather go after Gonzo for perjury than pursue his revelations. W, Cheney, et al. know this.
Gonzo can embarrass Obama's Administration with his insider's knowledge of Bush era crimes against humanity (by reminding us of the crimes they will not prosecute), and that's all. Maybe W and co. are trying to get him to perjure himself, and give the opposition a pitiful prize.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 12:51 PM   

Maybe he should have thought about his bad reputation before he "couldn't recall" anything for congressional investigators.

Does Alberto Gonzales have an ounce of integrity? I don't recall.

He apparently doesn't have any self-awareness either.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 1:13 PM    in reply to Tamyrlin79

He's jealous of Barney.  He thought he was Dubya's favorite lapdog.  When Dubya described Barney as the son he never had, Gonzo was crushed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 1:00 PM   

If you weren't such a douche Alberto, you wouldn't have this problem.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 1:16 PM   

Gonzo did this interview to shame Bush into helping with his legal expenses. Too bad Bush doesn't read newspapers.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

RWN

user-pic

August 10, 2009 1:45 PM   

When you sum it up and translate his attitude it conjures up the attitude of how 3rd World upper class consciousness view the world.

His reputation was ruined by following orders of his authoritarian Administration, and that the marketplace of democracy is now deemed that sullied and wrong character. He is offended and angry about that.

In many ways that is the conflict between the Authoritarianism of the Bush Administration's view of the world and the rest of the world. We get to make judgments on the character, the law (not the man) and the outcomes, not the authoritarians he served.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 1:50 PM   

Gonzoles did accomplish one positive thing. He took some of the heat off of John Ashcroft who looks somewhat ethical now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 1:54 PM   

Until a full investigation of what went wrong with Bush and Cheney is completed, a boil will fester on the body politic of this great nation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 2:21 PM   

there's lots of evidence that our former AG suffers from some sort of memory problem. just recall all the times he said "i can't remember."
one wonders how he ever passed any law exams with such a lack of ability to remember.
no wonder nobody wants to hire him; he probably needs medical intervention to cure his terrible brain disorder.
lack of memory can be due to a number of causes-
though in his case, it may be due to prevarication, which was apparently an epidemic during dubya's administration.
alberto- either have your head examined, or else admit that you were lying when questioned. make your choice!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 13, 2009 10:09 AM    in reply to baltimore

Concerning Gonzo's lack of memory -

Loss of memory is a function of Altzheimer's disease.

A great suggestion would be to take him at his word, admit that his memory is gone, and confine him, for his own protection, to the Altzheimer's unit at Leavenworth for the rest of his life, or at least until his memory returns.
.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 2:24 PM   

"Hurt" his reputation? Say WHAT???? Gonzo had only two principal attributes going into his jobs in the Bush administration: he was W's Latino of choice; and he was a Bush lapdog. Not to worry, 'Berto, your reputation is intact. Absolutely nothing you did as AG diminished those qualities in the least.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 2:34 PM   

If his reputation was damaged, he has no one to blame but himself. All he had to do was refuse to do Bush's/Cheney's bidding and walk away. He made the choice. He enabled the damage. Live with it.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 3:07 PM   

He thinks his time as Attorney General hurt his reputation? Frankly, I'm surprised that he can even recall!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

CN

user-pic

August 10, 2009 3:19 PM    in reply to GTFOOH

Oh, he CAN'T recall anything that happened during his time as AG. He just knows that whatever it was he did, it hurt his reputation.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 3:21 PM   

he had one?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 5:42 PM   

dear Fredo, keep whining. i'm reloading.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 8:59 PM   

"Gonzales might be able to cover some of those bills with proceeds from his forthcoming memoir -- a book, he told Solomon, that does not currently have a publisher."


And the one thing that made him useful was that he remembered nothing.

It might not be a good idea to publish that "memoir."

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 10, 2009 11:49 PM   

Somehow, Mr. former "Attorney" General, the phrase we're all grasping for seems to be –

TOUGH SHIT!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 11:02 AM   

Oh, I think he's wrong. We still think he's a yes man and a prostitute who'll do anything for an "attaboy".

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 11:23 AM   

I'm amazed the wingnut welfare circuit hasn't stepped up to take care of him. What, Fox News has no room for yet one more Bush/Cheney apologist? Or is Karl Rove sucking all the air out of that particular atmosphere?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 5:16 PM   

I can muster no sympathy. I've been out of work since January, and I'm not even the one who politicized Justice, backed torture and defecated all over the Constitution.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 11:18 PM   

At the end of the day, I've been the attorney general of the United States. It's a remarkable privilege, and I stand behind my service.

How in the hell does someone stand behind what they can't recall ?

The reason this clown can't get a job is because he has absolutely no redeeming qualities. Even clowns like Rove & Cheney have (republican) redeeming qualities, people listen to him.

Gonzo wasn't even smart enough to use as a fall guy, they tried, but no one took the bait.

My hope is that in his desperation to get some cash scrapped together for his legal woes, he writes a tell all book. But he strikes me as the dimwit who will never betray the people who used and betrayed him out of some whimsical sense of loyalty.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 11:19 PM   

Your time as AG hurt my country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 11, 2009 11:21 PM   

Dude, you were only the AG of the US because you would agree to anythong Cheney and Rove cooked up. There is no justice in a world where you still have a law license.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 1:21 AM   

I know it's just an ending tid bit but like another commenter wrote, Gonzo's flat statement that all special investigations are over and in the very next sentence his refusal to comment specifically because of an ongoing investigation is an absolute classic.

This should be engraved in bronze and hung on the wall at TPM hq. G. Dukeworthy for sure even as a repeat winner.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 5:27 AM   

"Gonzo: My Time As AG Hurt My Reputation".
I think your actions as AG hurt your reputation! Of course, you can come on out and plead that you've come to Jesus and he'll forgive but maybe about 20 years in prison would allow the public to forgive ... out in 10 or so!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 8:09 AM   

Oh, come here little Alberto. Let me put a Bandaid on that owie. Your reputation will heal nicely after about 20 years in jail, but it may leave a nasty scar.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 3:58 PM   

Distorted concept of cause and effect...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 12, 2009 3:58 PM   

ps...have fun in Lubbock...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 13, 2009 1:49 PM   

Sir, your time as attorney general hurt our country.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 13, 2009 3:50 PM   

At least Lewinsky was a female. What Gonzo was doing was the same thing to Bush, only better at it. I don't Think Bush ever told him that when his term was over he and Gonzo might just leave Laura and the two of them would live happily ever after.

I would imagine, Gonzo has had to buy new pants, as the knees are were worn.

Gonzo, the Cork soaker, or was that he's a Sock sucker, Or maybe the Grocery store Coke sacker? I'll just bet it wasn't any of them, I think he's the real McCoy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 13, 2009 9:49 PM   

Every nano-second of your time on this planet hurt your reputation, crawl back under your rock and expire, do the world a favor.

The US Constitution is not a personal supply of toilet paper for you, nor addington, nor cheney, nor bu$$$$$$h..
~

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!