Asked about pastor Steven Anderson and gun-toter Chris Broughton's repeated wishes for President Barack Obama to die, Special Agent Darrin Blackford of the Secret Service sends along this statement:
"We are aware of the situation and appropriate follow up will be conducted."
Broughton is the member of Anderson's Faithful Word Baptist Church who brought an AR-15 rifle and a hand gun to an Obama event in Phoenix earlier this month. Anderson later confirmed to TPMmuckraker that just 24 hours before that show of arms-bearing, Broughton attended the pastor's fiery sermon in which he prayed for "Obama to melt like a snail tonight" for being a "socialist devil, murderer, infanticide."
And yesterday, Broughton and Anderson took their statements even further, with the pastor saying he'd like Obama to die of brain cancer like Ted Kennedy, and Broughton for the first time publicly saying that he, too, would like the president to be dead.
No word on what form the Secret Service's follow up will take. And the agency would not comment on a CNN report that it interviewed Anderson.

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

azpaull
August 31, 2009 12:20 PM
TPM/Justin: Thanks for keeping the light on these cockroaches AND for helping advance the story. Even with the Secret Service aware, I think - over time - it will be up to you (us) to keep an eye on them (the roaches).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 4:47 PM in reply to azpaull
As support for some of the skepticism about the Secret Service keeping a close eye on these guys, I link to award-winning New Times blogger Stephen Lemons, who went to FWBC last night and spoke with Broughton and Anderson: http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2009/08/my_chat_with_steven_anderson_c.php
One upshot: Pastor Anderson says he has NOT been visited by the Secret Service, contrary to what the guy said on CNN.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
September 1, 2009 11:43 AM in reply to azpaull
I think it obvious that the Pastor is so good a Christian that he wouldn't lie . . .
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rynato
August 31, 2009 12:25 PM
Stay classy, teabaggers.
As a native of Tempe, I would like to apologize on behalf of all Arizonans for these douchebags. They are by far the exception rather than the rule. In fact I am particularly embarrassed that their church is in Tempe, which is a rather progressive city and very gay-friendly. Usually you only find this kind of nuttiness in places like Mesa or Glendale...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 12:47 PM in reply to rynato
Ditto, rynato. But, in fairness, if we're apologizing on behalf of "all Arizonans", we probably shouldn't diss Mesa or Glendale. These people are well-dispersed (and, not just thru Phoenix area, not just thru AZ, but thru the entire country).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jqheywood
August 31, 2009 12:56 PM in reply to azpaull
Yeah, but as someone who grew up in Glendale and fled as soon as I could, I have to agree with rynato's original comment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rynato
August 31, 2009 1:00 PM in reply to azpaull
azpaull, come on. Look at who gets elected year-in and year-out in Tempe, and compare to Mesa and Glendale.
You know who represents Tempe in Congress? Harry Mitchell.
You know who represents Glendale in Congress? Trent Franks.
Look at the state legislators. Ed Ableser (sp?) and Meg Burton-Cahill, both solid liberal Democrats. Glendale and Mesa regularly send to the Legislature the nuttiest Republicans they can find.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 1:21 PM in reply to rynato
Hey, and don't forget David Schapira (in Tempe)!
I'm not arguing with (either of) you; just sayin' that in a comment asking others not to stereotype all Arizonans, we shouldn't be blasting Glendale and Mesa. In fact, at the pro-Obama rally (where Broughton was standing on the opposite corner), I spoke with Democrats I know - including one who has run for the Legislature - from East Mesa and Peoria.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
lapdogs
August 31, 2009 1:53 PM in reply to azpaull
Exactly. After all, we have some nut jobs here in CT that dissed their own Republican on the Senate Ballot and voted for "Independent" Joe Lieberman! And we know where that got us.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
August 31, 2009 1:34 PM in reply to rynato
Believe me, I know where you are coming from. I live in Virginia, home of both Jerry Falwell AND Pat Robertson. They are not typical of the entire state, either. Far from it.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 3:43 PM in reply to slb
That's why it's their view that they are for "liberty" by arming themselves in order to "resist" rule by the majority.
Everything they've tried so far -- including civil war -- has failed; and everything they've tried since then has turned out to be a dead end, even when quasi-legal.
So now they are essentially at taking over a state (NH), then seceding that state from the Union so they can establish their "Libertarian" utopia of no law but that momentarily enacted and enforced by gun.
The Founders/Framers had it right with both Shays' and Whiskey rebellions: these are armed criminals hiding their rejection of the rule of law behind fake religion and the discredited term "patriot".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
THE_TRUTH
August 31, 2009 1:52 PM in reply to rynato
hey "rynato", why do u feel the need to say that Tempe is "gay-friendly"? What does that have to do with this article? I'm a progressive and I'm sick of perverts trying to indoctrinate everyone into the belief that liberal=gay.
That belief is one of the main things that is dragging down our ability to get important things accomplished in this country. Why don't u perverts create your your own party, call it the Pink Party or something.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Schmed- ley
August 31, 2009 2:12 PM in reply to THE_TRUTH
I guess that "progressive" doesn't mean "tolerant" or "broad minded" to you, does it? "Gay-friendly" doesn't mean "gay," so take your narrow-minded paranoia and peddle it somewhere else. Your kind of "progress" is apparently meant only for those who don't threaten your sensibilities.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Stiggs
August 31, 2009 2:38 PM in reply to THE_TRUTH
Why do "u" feel the need to be a bigoted, semi-literate douche bag?
And when did believing that equal rights shouldn't include a sexual orientation exclusion clause cease to be a progressive cause and instead became a hallmark of "perverts"? Didn't get the memo on that one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
psyclone
August 31, 2009 3:08 PM in reply to THE_TRUTH
I'm a HOMOPHOBE
There - fixed your typo.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 3:55 PM in reply to psyclone
Actually one can be opposed to homosexuality without it being rooted in fear -- "homophobia". Of course, slinging the latter ad hominem is intended to intimidate -- induce fear -- and silence, rather than discuss and perhaps illuminate the issue/s.
I'm not opposed to equal rights for all. I am opposed to whiners who couldn't care less about anyone's rights except their own. And who feel compelled to make private bedroom matters into a public issue.
Who feel compelled to focus exclusively on sex and their sexual orientation, and make public issue of those, while simultaneously accusing others of making an issue of those.
I do kinda pine for the days when one could have a conversation with a person without that person suddenly, appropos of nothing, popping out with the wholly irrelevant, "Oh, by the way, I'm gay!"
But we know what the objection would be, were it reversed -- if the person suddenly popped out with, "Oh, by the way, I'm heterosexual!" S/he would be labeled "homophobe".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JanetL
August 31, 2009 6:34 PM in reply to JNagarya
I can't remember ever in my entire life having someone just out of the blue, apropos of nothing, say "by the way, I'm gay." Never. If people say that to you, it's probably because you've just said something to them that presumes that they're straight, and they're correcting you. Or possibly you've just said something that, rightly or wrongly, they interpret as anti-gay and they want to be sure that you know you're talking to someone who is gay -- just as a friend of mine who was a very light-skinned black used to sometimes say, "by the way, I"m black" when the conversation took a turn toward race.
As for people not identifying themselves as heterosexual, the reason this doesn't generally happen is because it's the unmarked category. In most situations, you're assumed to be heterosexual until you say otherwise.
And finally, as far as your discomfort with people making a public issue of private matters, you may not realize the degree to which a heterosexual person's private matters are made public. You can kiss your spouse in public without fear of being beaten up. You can mention your spouse to your boss without fear of being fired. Your relationship with your spouse is publically acknowledged in law. This is not a small thing.
By the way, I am heterosexual.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
September 1, 2009 11:46 AM in reply to JanetL
In the middle of conversations with NO sexual content?
It's okay to speak with an accent, but not to HEAR with one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rynato
August 31, 2009 4:33 PM in reply to THE_TRUTH
The_Tru, why do you assume I am gay?
Why do you state liberal=gay? You don't have to be gay to be a liberal. You DO have to support equal rights for gay people, however.
If you are filled with fear and loathing of homosexuals, then you are not a 'progressive' nor a 'liberal'. End of story.
For what it is worth, I brought up the issue because I like Tempe a lot and I don't want people around the country to think it's a hotbed of assholes like this pastor and, well, yourself. Tempe had an openly-gay mayor for many years, Tempe city government grants benefits to same-sex partners, and so on. Tempe even operates a free neighborhood shuttle. Tempe and Tucson and Flagstaff - the three major university cities in Arizona - are the most liberal cities in the state. Tempe is about the last place you'd expect to find these extremist assholes, but hey I guess they have to live somewhere.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 3:36 PM in reply to rynato
How about putting together some sizable protests against these loons, and allerting the media so it is seen that these sociopaths are greatly outnumber?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
nova voter
August 31, 2009 12:35 PM
this is starting to smell like yet another "you'll never take us alive!" right-wing standoff in the making.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeffgee
August 31, 2009 1:28 PM in reply to nova voter
And the excuse for whatever terrorism happens by their sympathizers. McVeigh was avenging the Branch Davidiots.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 3:57 PM in reply to jeffgee
AND protesting the Assault Weapons Ban based upon the fundamental error that it violated the Second Amendment.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Acewrap
August 31, 2009 12:38 PM
Wait. Their "church" is in a strip mall?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 12:43 PM in reply to Acewrap
Guess all future references should be to "FWBC, the strip mall church...."
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mjshep
August 31, 2009 12:58 PM in reply to azpaull
"Strip mall church."
I like it!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
August 31, 2009 3:07 PM in reply to Acewrap
In Burlington, NC, right next to I-40, there is an old strip club that went "out of business" and was replaced by an evangelical church. I think the ushers collect tithes by the dollar in their garters.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick
August 31, 2009 3:37 PM in reply to Acewrap
Gotta love that location. And they get a discount on their drycleaning!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
par4
August 31, 2009 12:41 PM
Send them to Gitmo for an attitude adjustment!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
The Commenter Formerly Known as NCSteve
August 31, 2009 1:05 PM in reply to par4
If this had Muslims saying this stuff about Bush in 2007, we'd have been at Code Red, the MSM would have been in a 24/7 Outrage Orgy and both these guys would have been locked up incommunicado as illegal combatants.
I'm glad we don't have the Code Red and the disregard of Habeus Corpus any longer, but I'd kinda like to see a little bit of outrage and concern from the MSM rather than the "oh, well, just some blowhards blowin off a little steam" attitude they seem to be using on this.
We're well on our way to a string of terrorist attacks attempts assassination attempts by people who are to Christianity as 9/11 hijackers were to Islam and our MSM is too petrified of sponsor boycotts by religious right wingnuts to say so.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
dickday
August 31, 2009 1:44 PM in reply to par4
Good line. 'Debriefing' is the proper term I believe. hahaaha
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
eve cairo
August 31, 2009 1:06 PM
Maybe the minister is confused because if you're located between Radio Shack and the Karate school it's hard for God to find you and so you start talking crazy talk hate talk instead of actual Jesus beatitudes talk. You know like: Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied. Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.
Instead we get some snail melting talk. Escargot for God? Is there a scene in the movie about Julia Child where a snail melts? Where did he get that bizarro brain injury imagery? LSD? Late stage of syphillis?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
3star2nr
August 31, 2009 1:06 PM
throw the traitors in Gitmo
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Technowitch
August 31, 2009 1:22 PM
I continue to marvel how these extremists continue to get away with this borderline incitement to violence, against the President no less -- when during the Bush Administration you could be ejected from their political events and arrested merely for wearing a t-shirt with a protest statement on it.
I also wonder how well these gun-toting crazies would take to being rounded up and put into a fenced "Free Speech Zone" as many progressive protesters were.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
LarsThorwald
August 31, 2009 1:36 PM
Nice location for that church.
I can go there and hear messages of hate, or I can scootch next door to Jhoon Rhee Martial Arts for a better message.
That message, of course, is that when you take Jhoon Rhee self-defense, then you, too, can say: "Nobody bothers me." (Nobody bothers me, either.)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 2:59 PM in reply to LarsThorwald
Was just over there. There's no karate school. (And, darn it, it doesn't really qualify as a "strip mall".
Better than that, its neighbor (not counting the vacant spot by it) is a PAWN SHOP!
Not that there's anything wrong with a pawn shop, a religious congregation being in a "commerce center" (part retail, part office, part light industial).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 4:02 PM in reply to azpaull
Well, Broughton is only a Pawn in Their Game" (bobby d.).
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 4:16 PM in reply to JNagarya
Well played!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
August 31, 2009 1:38 PM
What in God's name is wrong with these people?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 4:03 PM in reply to slb
They are using "God's name" in vain.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
rynato
August 31, 2009 1:41 PM
OK, these wackjobs go around toting firearms outside a presidential appearance, and they openly wish death upon Obama.
Doesn't this mean the gun nuts have to STFU about Obama 'grabbing their guns' now? These assholes are still free to walk the streets after all.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
MyMy
August 31, 2009 1:43 PM
Agree with Technow. Can someone tell me if there are laws regarding this, or has it only been policy with regards to threatening the life of the president? I hear all the time that there's no law against it, but I recall several people being arrested and incarcerating for threatening Johnson during the Vietnam War. And the fact that no one was permitted a whisper of protest against Bush and yet these nutcakes are not only given free rein, but also tons of free publicity, is a bit of a shock to me...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 4:08 PM in reply to MyMy
Ask those who insist it's legal. But be prepared to be given a heavily redacted copy of whatever statute they might provide.
Exactly as they do with "Title 10," which eventuated from the "Militia Act" of 1792: they'll qoute you the section as to who are eligible by age range. But they'll leave out all the rest of the statute, especially those stipulating the duties required of, and restrictions and penalties which apply to those who are LEGALLY ENLISTED in the militia/National Guard.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
vader52199
August 31, 2009 1:58 PM
That picture on the home page ... was that an old Eyemart Express?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
August 31, 2009 3:04 PM in reply to vader52199
I think the baptismal font is located on Aisle 1 next to produce. The cash registers are on the way out.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Henrietta
August 31, 2009 2:03 PM
I'm sorry, but I am not particularly reassured by the Secret Service response. "Appropriate follow up" could be no follow up at all.
Until a couple weeks ago, I operated under the assumption that Secret Service agents were above partisan considerations. And then I read James Bamford's review of Ronald Kessler's new book, in which agents apparently wax poetic about Reagan and bitch about how Clinton could never get anywhere on time.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/21/AR2009082101668.html
Less than confidence-inspring in terms of thinking about how agents might be approaching their current obligations.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 3:00 PM in reply to Henrietta
Agree.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Rick
August 31, 2009 3:38 PM in reply to Henrietta
The Secret Service were pretty f*cking useless in Dallas when JFK needed protection.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 4:11 PM in reply to Henrietta
Did you see the news article about Nixon and Erlichman's discussion of the request for Secret Service protection from Ted Kennedy?
In which Nixon recorded himself saying, "If he get's shot, so be it"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
August 31, 2009 2:51 PM
The President's safety IS being threatened here.
Appropriate followup should include (but not be limited to):
Immediately revoke any tax exempt status of the 'church' because of their obvious transgressions of the tax law of separation of church and state.
Investigation of the 'church' for classification as a hate group.
Jail time.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
azpaull
August 31, 2009 3:03 PM in reply to ohyeathatsright
I agree, ohyeatha.... As for the tax exempt status, I did some research on FWBC last week, and came up with some possible contradictions as to their "non profit" status. Though, I did find that they have not applied for "tax exempt status". (For more details, check my post here: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/azpaull/2009/08/are-death-and-taxes-inevitable.php)
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
pythia
August 31, 2009 2:56 PM
Since these people believe in God, and are asking God to take Obama down, could this not be considered incitement? How many among the 'flock' will take these 'prayers' as marching orders? It's unbelievable that such inflammatory talk is permitted, when you would be charged, for example, for uttering the word 'bomb' on an airplane.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ohyeathatsright
August 31, 2009 3:37 PM in reply to pythia
'How many' is irrelevant. It only takes one.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 4:16 PM in reply to pythia
They don't believe in "God". They believe in hiding behind the ultimate power that represents -- an ultimate power which rejects reason and considers itself above the law.
They are lying, and they know they are lying.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Official A
August 31, 2009 3:03 PM
The SS may be aware, but is the IRS?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HopefulPatriot
August 31, 2009 3:38 PM
No Christian Pastor wishes for violence toward a man, especially one who he considers "lost". It is time for those who understand the love of Christ to denounce this type of rhetoric done in the name of our God.
This is a pastor who preaches death, destruction and wishes for chaos to our nation--let there be no doubt who he really serves.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 4:18 PM in reply to HopefulPatriot
He isn't a Christian.
And shouldn't there be a requirement that one have some certification that one is in fact legitimate clergy, instead of being allowed to simply claim one is, then open a storefront "church," and begin preaching whatever lunacy one chooses, in exchange for "donations"?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
HopefulPatriot
August 31, 2009 5:12 PM in reply to JNagarya
Certifications, with all due respect, would do nothing to stop a false prophet from spreading hate and deception.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
September 1, 2009 11:51 AM in reply to HopefulPatriot
It would cut down on the number of them to have to prove that they actually attended "Pastor school".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
way2smart4u
August 31, 2009 4:56 PM
MyMy said "...no one was permitted a whisper of protest against Bush..."? HELLO... Which planet have you been on since Jan 2000?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
JNagarya
August 31, 2009 5:30 PM
It might cut down on the number of loons pretending to be clergy.
And it might just create an agency which leads from the phony to the certifying "authority," which would then result in critical evaluation of that "authority".
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
ally
August 31, 2009 5:38 PM
Every time we hear one of these spew threats with their "religious" crazy-speak -- we need to IRS their asses with a very meticulous Audit.
Because you just know they're deducting some crazy "expense" stuff - like ammo probably.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
sherifffruitfly
August 31, 2009 5:53 PM
Can the Secret Service go to Congress for more money to head-off all of the racist assassination-stokings?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kevbo
September 1, 2009 1:25 AM
Christians strive to emulate Jesus.
Charlatans think it is enough just to praise him.
I hope that some day I shall meet a Christian...I think I'd like them. Not holding my breath though.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Johann
September 2, 2009 7:34 AM in reply to kevbo
Good luck on your looking for a "Christian". Your search has to be diligent since they do not stand on street corners and announce that they are Christians. The only way to identify true Christians is by their deeds.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GodsMichael
September 8, 2009 9:02 AM in reply to kevbo
I agree. this pastor, unless he seeks to be like Christ, is a blight on Christiandom. He Abides not in the truth of God's word, else he would pray that God help President Obama to do great things for our country. to help the needy, and provide for all Americans. The pastor has free health care, His congregatio is paying for it, when they put money in the pastor's offering. God said, Follow peace with all men and holiness wichout no man shall see the Lord. The ways of God and holiness is peace.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
GodsMichael
September 8, 2009 8:58 AM
This paster does not know God, nor knows the ways of God. God is not some erand boy hitman attack dog. If he had known anything about God, he would know that that pray will never be answered. It won't be answered, because thet pray is not in the will of God. the scriptures clearly states "2Pe 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, NOT WILLING THAT ANY SHOULD PERISH, BUT THAT ALL SHOULD COME TO REPENTANCE." God's will is that no sinner perish, but that they turn from sin to God and be saved. this paster is praying his own will and God does not hear him. This paster needs to repent and stop being so self-righteous. this is what happens when a person becomes self-righteous, they mistake their own sinful will for the will of God. In addition the word of God tells us not to seek ocassion against a man who has not done anything wrong to us. Obama could not get in office unless he was a part of Gods plan for america. now if it is God's will, for bettter or for worse, that Obama is i office, we may not like it, but God commands us to be obedient to them and to respect them, because they were God's choice. Now when we pray aganst who God has chosen, the we pray against God, God's will and Gods ways. that puts us on the outs with God. and no real Christian that Knows the word of God would pray such a prayer. This pastor is to be a sheperd, and sheperds do not pray for the death of a sheep. This pastor is leading his people strait to hell and away from God, and he needs to be very careful, because the scriptures say the :the teachers will receive the greater damnation," if they teach God's pepole wrong. Jesu came and Died for President Obama just like he came to die for this pastor. Steven Anderson and Chris Broughton need to be very careful that the prayer that they pray is not answered by the devil, because the devil does the opposite of God. and if God pulls back whatever hedge of protection they have, Satan will havew a field day on them.. "be not decived, God is not mocked, whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." Now on a personal level, I think that it is a shame that this man is a pastor and does not know enough sscripture to understand that God does not answer these tpes of prayer. He bring the name of God to an open shame, by attributing God, and relegating God to the level of "hit man" how disen glorious, he takes glory from God in a big way, and makes other Christians look foolish and vengeful for no reason. Read this portion of scripture, does it sound familiar to this case? "Joh 8:38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.
Joh 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
Joh 8:40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.
Joh 8:41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.
Joh 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.
Joh 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.
Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer (a killer) from the beginning, and abode not in the truth (The truth is God does not hear a prayer of murder, nor is God a murderer), because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it"
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?