« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

"Sensitive" Oil Industry Memo Lays Out Plan For Astroturf Rallies Against Climate Change Bill
The memo -- sent by the American Petroleum Institute and obtained by Greenpeace, which sent it to reporters -- urges oil companies to recruit their employees for events that will "put a human face on the impacts of unsound energy policy," and will urge senators to "avoid the mistakes embodied in the House climate bill."
API tells TPMmuckraker that the campaign is being funded by a coalition of corporate and conservative groups that includes the anti-health-care-reform group 60 Plus, FreedomWorks, and Grover Norquist's Americans For Tax Reform.
The memo, signed by API president Jack Gerard, asks recipients to give API "the name of one central coordinator for your company's involvement in the rallies."
And it warns: "Please treat this information as sensitive ... we don't want critics to know our game plan."
Aside from the astroturf nature of the planned events, which appear aimed at passing off industry employees as independent citizens, the memo also raises questions about the positions of several major oil companies on the issue of climate change. BP and Shell both are members of API, and also of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a coalition of groups that supports Waxman-Markey, the very climate change legislation the memo criticizes.
API has spent over $3 million lobbying against that bill this year.
Bill Bush, a spokesman for API, told TPMmuckraker that there's no deception involved with the rallies. "I don't think anyone's hiding the ball about this," he said. "I don't think anyone's trying to suggest that this doesn't have anything to do with the oil and gas industry."
He described the campaign as preliminary. "A good bit is still in the planning stages," he said.
In a letter to Gerard, Greenpeace has called on API to reveal the member companies funding the astroturf effort.
A Greenpeace spokesman declared in a statement to reporters:
The question is, will BP and Shell continue to hand out millions to the API after this? If these companies want us to believe that they are serious about legislation to reduce climate emissions, it's time for them to pull funding from lobby groups who use underhand tactics to create a false impression of voter concern over Waxman-Markey.
Bush said he's not aware of any planned response to Greenpeace. And he said the campaign is being funded by members of the "Energy Citizens" alliance -- a coalition of corporate and conservative groups that 60 Plus, FreedomWorks, Americans For Tax Reform, the American Conservative Union, and the National Taxpayers Union.
A Washington lobbying group has already been caught sending forged letters, on behalf of a coal industry organization, purporting to come from local minority groups and urging lawmakers to oppose the climate change bill.
A congressional inquiry into the matter is ongoing.
Late Update: Shell Oil Company, which is a member both of the anti-Waxman-Markey API, and of the pro-Waxman-Markey USCAP, says it won't be involved in the rallies. A spokesman sent TPMmuckraker the following statement:
Shell's position is not aligned with the consensus opinion of the API on Waxman-Markey, therefore Shell will not participate in the rallies.

















Remember back in 73 when the leading tobacco manufacturers sent an "internal" memo?
It read somethimg like this: "we are losing the younger generation.We need a new approach to get the 10-12 year olds hooked now.Please make this a priority in our marketing"
This was accompanied by stats showing how sub-teens needed to be caught and hooked "with light filtered cigarettes producing lots of smoke".
This making them look cool without throwing up.
This was at the same time the industry was being questioned about the addictive qualities of nicatine and the chemical additives in all smokes.
Read this in washingtom monthly from early 90's. They have the whole memo.
Same with oil and mic. They control / own the media and can have a platform anytime anywhere.
Truth is not part of their agenda.
btw: what was the solution to the tobacco industry sagging growth with pre-teens??
Think about it......remeber when "joe camel" came out? Now you see what we are up against.
These greedy frauds have enough to spend to make you think and believe everything they feed.
Watch out.
Don't be distracted!
August 14, 2009 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Everyone needs to forward this to their Representatives and every news organization out there.
August 14, 2009 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have been trying for years to tell people its about corporate take-over, of our government, about a corporate owned and operated government, not about "wedge issues", or Christian vales and morals, not about right vs left...its pure and simple corporate take-over and rule of our "democratic government" (which would be called fascism)..and yes that would include the "corporate" cable news programs..(get it?) But you might as well be talking to the man in the moon or telling them that martians have taken over Congress.....you get that "no ones home" "blank stare" re-action...maybe if we spread these types of articles as far and wide as possible...some people will start to catch on to whats really happening in our country
August 14, 2009 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yup. When business provides approximately 75% of all political campaign financing, it's difficult to see this as a government "for the people" anymore.
August 14, 2009 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
It just clicked with me, chabuka. I was thinking why are these people bothering? They can still drill for oil, they can still mine coal and drill for natural gas. They can still make gobs of money. They know, better than most people in the world that we will run out of oil one of these days and if the U.S. is not prepared to replace it with alternate forms of energy, the world will be a very dangerous place What you have said is the only thing that makes sense.
August 14, 2009 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Chabuka - you're not alone. I've been saying the same thing for years. Our country is really an oligarchy, not a true democracy. What's especially galling for me is arguing for reform gets you branded a "socialist," "communist," etc. I'm all for private enterprise, not for corporatism. But a certain element of the population, is, unfortunately, out of their minds.
August 14, 2009 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's space here for some follow-up investigation/reporting:
Will the companies be paying employees to attend, or managers for facilitating attendance? (I assume the astroturf organizers are sensitive to this, and that's why they've scheduled the events for "lunchtime" if at all possible). I assume, however, that the organizing pieces will take some management time. When does that happen? What internal credit to employees get for participating/not participating. "Your latest performance review indicates that you're not a team player..." If not paid, are the companies providing for employees to take time away to participate outside of normal leave procedures?
As an interesting analogy, a reporter might draw the parallel to "equal treatment" by other organizers/protesters around issues that directly impact the owner's bottom line. For example, will the ARI member companies be providing similar opportunities for Greenpeace? ["Bob, I just wanted to let you know that I'm taking an extra hour for lunch today so that I can participate with a Greenpeace group attending the 'new pipeline' town hall meeting..." "Could you help me put together a list of other interested employees..."]
August 14, 2009 1:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
In other words, where does the job end, and civic participation begin (or visa-versa)?
August 14, 2009 1:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is the mosty intruigign part:
"Aside from the astroturf nature of the planned events, which appear aimed at passing off industry employees as independent citizens, the memo also raises questions about the positions of several major oil companies on the issue of climate change. BP and Shell both are members of API, and also of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership, a coalition of groups that supports Waxman-Markey, the very climate change legislation the memo criticizes."
Is this double dealing? Is it like the US Chamber, where some hardcore ideologues are far to the right of many of their members?
August 14, 2009 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very much so. It would be good for the world if not all the oil companies are squarely in line with the Exxon/Mobil campaign of evil. BP has its problems with plant safety. Shell has its problems with Nigeria as an oil source. But both companies also show some public conscience - or make a show of it. Hell, Shell used to employ Stewart Brand (as in Mr. Whole Earth Catalog) as a high-level consultant.
Do we have oil companies that don't want to be evil?
August 14, 2009 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
There are certainly none that have their hands clean, but as you say there are definitely grades of evil. BP and Chevron are probably the least bad of the major oil companies, Shell and Exxon the worst. Shell doesn't just have Nigeria as a source (which is bad enough), they're more actively involved in the violence than other companies that operate there.
August 14, 2009 3:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Corporate Liberalism" is a business strategy to make continued domination of a sector of our economy palatable to those that live under the influence of the business interests that employ it rather than face open rebellion. I seem to remember it traces its roots to Andrew Carnegie who was searching for an answer to the steel wars around the turn of the last century.
August 15, 2009 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Industry employees are not independent citizens, but they are citizens and have every right to represent their interests at these meetings. It should be expected and accepted that various interest groups on all sides will rally their supporters to attend. The memo does not say that, a) people should hide their affiliation, and b) should be disruptive in an attempt to take over the session and stifle debate. Those tactics are what have made the astroturf efforts at health care town halls so distasteful.
More investigation is needed on this to see if those are part of the effort, but from the evidence so far the accusations of some responders are a little over the top.
August 14, 2009 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think why this is particularly sleazy is that it is a pretense for wider support. Busing in phone citizens, some of whom are operatives, and some of whom are just crazies from out of town, is lying about the state of the electorate. And the MSM assclowns lap it up. "People are angry". etc etc
August 14, 2009 8:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I used to take liberal criticism of the oil business with a grain of salt. My father worked on an oil company exploration crew in the thirties and in the exploration business until he retired in the 70s and my former husband was in the oil business. Income from the industry fed me and clothed me and provided shelter for me until I was almost 50 years old.
But the industry fighting against alternative energy and global warming policies simply doesn't make sense, or it didn't until I read chabuka's comment above. Globalization has created monster corporations that have more power than entire nations. This isn't true just of the oil companies. It includes the financial industry, insurance industry, the communications industry and on and on.
August 14, 2009 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
yes indeed, and they're often able to weasel out of the environmental, labor, and tax laws in host countries due to their bargaining leverage. the book "saving capitalism from the capitalists" that made a big noise just a couple years back got into this -- and how guys like berlusconi can use their power as heads of these behemoths to get elected to national office -- and then change national and global regulation for the benefit of their own corporations.
youre definitely on the right page, and i also appreciate hearing the insights of someone that has been around for awhile. thanks for having the patience to stay current! cant really blame those that dont, but i certainly appreciate those that do.
August 14, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The protest the oil companies are making is merely a delaying tactic. They will postpone the conversion to renewables until they can figure out how to monopolize and control it. We could have thousands of wind turbines made failry quickly and it would do a lot for reducing our use of other sources, but what mega-corporation makes money from that. These corporations are all about the wind turbines as big as a house, that no one can afford, and every one has to pay them to share the power generated.
If you think about it, the roof to Safeco Field on Seattle runs on about a dozen small engines to open and close. A lot of little things makes a big thing, but a big thing is just a big thing. Some people are impressed by that. But really, we would do better with quantity then size.
August 15, 2009 2:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since the Republicans failed at get-out-the-vote efforts during the election, they've decided to employ a get-out-the-mob strategy to defeat the Democrats' agenda and advance their own, disguising it as grassroots democracy. Reminds of the scene from The Grapes of Wrath in which town leaders send thugs into the government-run camp to start a fight so the local sheriff will have a pretext to raid it.
August 14, 2009 2:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome! This way, the teabaggers can just recycle their anti-Obama posters and literature and get more bang for their buck!
August 14, 2009 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hereโs a germane personal anecdote for you: Iโm signed up with Harris Polls for invitations to interactive online surveys. Probably 95% of these surveys Iโve taken are related to consumer products but every once in a while they survey on a current political issue.
About three weeks ago I took a survey soliciting reactions to two print/TV ad campaigns in opposition to climate change legislation currently being developed in the House. The ads werenโt too subtle, so it was plain they were being sponsored by oil & gas industry interests. If you could read the fine print and knew what API stood for then you knew the American Petroleum Institute was behind the ads.
The gist of the ads was that any legislation that limits carbon dioxide emissions by the oil and gas industry will lead to: 1) $4/gallon gasoline with $20/gallon looming in the future. 2) The loss of 2 million jobs, many of them well-paying union jobs. The overall tone of the ads was no different from the stereotypical negative campaign ad: sensationalistic with a strong appeal to fear.
So, this:
He described the campaign as preliminary. "A good bit is still in the planning stages," he said.
is a half-truth at best. Maybe the astroturf campaign is preliminary, but the API has a multimedia anti-climate change legislation ad campaign in the can.
August 14, 2009 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thousand of people out protesting to defend the rights of the trillion dollar corporate empires??? How does that happen?
August 14, 2009 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Its a concerted effort on the part of the corporate media, conservative groups, and the republicans party to incite fear in those people who are easliy manipulated, which keeps their corporate sponsors happy and campaign contributions rolling in.
Dont bite the hand that feeds.
August 14, 2009 2:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Breaking News - Oil Industry will stage a grass roots rally in support of the Exxon Valdez because the massive oil spill coated fish and birds with precious lubrication to protect them against the harsh Alaska winters.
August 14, 2009 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
What do we call it when big business allies with local thugs to shut down others from exercising free speech rights?
Anyone? Anyone?
"Fascism" or "Protofascim"
August 14, 2009 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shorter Shell Game: We don't have anything to do with what the organization we are funding is doing.
August 14, 2009 5:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nip this in the bud - NOW!
August 15, 2009 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
This old fat man seems to believe that Mother Nature gives a damn about his money and his army of lobbyists. Bad news, Gerard: she doesn't.
This is what is most deranged about political and industry opposition to anti-global warming efforts. Global warming is happening. It cannot be compromised with. It cannot be reasoned with. It cannot be bribed. And most importantly, it cannot be ignored in the hope that it will simply go away.
Global warming will lead to more drought, more disease, more war, more devastation, and overall more catastrophes in the lives of every man, woman, and child on the planet, and every animal and plant, too.
Do wealthy people like Jack Gerard think they are somehow immune? Do not think that their oceanfront properties will not get flooded and destroyed? That they can't be bitten by mosquitos carrying diseases that heretofore were confined to the tropics? And on and on?
And if fat old Jack Gerard thinks he'll die before the worst happens, what about his kids? Or, are his kids just figures on the balance sheet that he apparently has instead of a soul?
August 15, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
For more teabagging analysis check out- http://unreasonablysafe.wordpress.com/2009/08/15/teabaggingtownhalls/
August 16, 2009 6:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Am I the only one who finds this memo too good to be true? It just sounds like a plant - it sounds like some environmentalist wet dream of what oil is doing..I want to see the birth certificate!!
August 16, 2009 8:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bingo, mhoney. You all ought to read - or reread - the last part of Matt Taibbi's "The Great American Bubble Machine." There's a bucketload of money to be made building yet another bubble, this time in carbon credits. Goldman Sachs is setting up a carbon exchange, and oil companies can play that market to their great advantage. Be careful what you wish for - and work for.
August 17, 2009 10:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Recently a local wingnut, who happens to be a mayor of a local town, wrote an newspaper essay filled with wingnut talking points sarcastically including "whatever happened to acid rain?". My response was recently published in the same newspaper:
In the essay titled "Many signs point to America in crisis" published August 8, 2009, Rick Pastecki poses the the question 'whatever happened to acid rain'? Acid rain was eliminated using a cap and trade program on sulfur dioxide emissions. The cap and trade program was established within the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and in 2002 The Economist magazine declared it "probably the greatest green success story of the past decade." It achieved 122% of its goals for a cost that was only 25% of the original estimate (data from the Environmental Defense Fund web site). Cap and trade has been demonstrated to be an effective way to reduce emissions and that is why it is being proposed today as way to help reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
We need to push back.
August 16, 2009 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP and industry lobbyists are taking a page from the Atwater-Rove playbook on using fear-mongering tactics and maliciously disseminating misinformation to sway public opinion.
The health insurance industry will spare no cost in their efforts to defeat any substantive, meaningful health care reform legislation, and the petroleum industry will do likewise with energy reform/climate change legislation. It's why the banking industry fights tooth and nail to neuter regulatory reform in the financial sector.
It boils down to the Gordon Gekko mentality -- it's all about profit margins and their bottom line.
The industries that are financing the "global warming denial campaign" share the same unethical "profit at all costs" philosophy that has dominated the decision-making process of the tobacco industry as it repeatedly denied any health-related consequences of using their products.
Economic impact cannot be the sole factor in every regulatory policy of the U.S. government. Those that do not learn from their mistakes are doomed to repeat them. We can no longer afford to be so short-sighted when the long-term consequences of our inaction are so great.
August 16, 2009 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
There was a "kick-off rally" in Houston for the group "Energy Citizens" today.
It was held at the office building where Chevron Oil has its headquarters -- and at lunchtime.
So, it's already starting.
I agree with an outhouse, we have to keep pushing back, especially with he acid rain example.
August 18, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is really an informative post!
This seems to give ideas with regards on what is happening on the community and the status of government in deciding big deals on business.
Thanks for the post!
Web Hosting Reviews
August 21, 2009 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink