« previous | MUCK HOME | next »

Tom Ridge: I Fought Against Raising Security Threat Level On The Eve Of 2004 Election
In his new tell-all book, former Secretary Of Homeland Security Tom Ridge reveals that he was under intense political pressure to raise the national security threat level on the eve of the 2004 presidential election.
In The Test of Our Times: America Under Siege...and How We Can Be Safe Again, to be released September 1st, Ridge says that he fought against changing the terror alert and wondered at the time whether the Ashcroft- and Rumsfeld-backed request was about "security or politics," because while there was "nothing to indicate a specific threat and no reason to cause undue public alarm...Post-election analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the president's approval rating in the days after the raising of the threat level."
From the book:
On Friday, October 29, 2004, Osama bin Laden delivered a new videotape message that aired on the Arab language network Al Jazeera. The presidential election scheduled for the following Tuesday was tightening. The most recent polls had Bush leading Kerry by no more than two or three points. Having won my first congressional election by 729 votes and experienced the volatility of the election cycle during several campaigns, this race was literally a dead heat going into the final seventy-two hours....
We huddled that Friday night. Next morning we met early at the department's headquarters. The country was unaware that all levels of government had quietly ramped up security several weeks before the election, although not to the level that would have been required had we actually gone to a higher public threat level (orange). The timing of the tape may have been a surprise; the content was not. Within the department no one felt it necessary to consider additional security measures or to call the Homeland Security Council into session.
In a conference call with members of the Bush administration's national security and counter-terrorism team, Ridge pushed back against the request, which Attorney General John Ashcroft and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld were eagerly promoting.
"A vigorous, some might say dramatic, discussion ensured. Ashcroft strongly urged an increase in the threat level and was supported by Rumsfeld," writes Ridge. According to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Ridge's aides carried the message to the White House that an Election Eve threat escalation "would court accusations of politicizing national security." In the end, the terror alert level was not raised. Ridge himself writes that he was "incredulous" about the whole debate and acknowledges "we were on the verge of making a huge mistake."
He continues:
Admittedly, the notion of an attack during this period had been discussed...We were all mindful of the impact of an actual attack on the outcome of the Spanish election earlier in the year. But at this point there was nothing to indicate a specific threat and no reason to cause undue public alarm. And as the minutes passed at our videoconference we concluded that others in the administration were operating with the same threat information and didn't know any more than we did, and that the idea was still a bad one. It also seemed possible to me and to others around the table that something could be afoot other than simple concern about the country's safety.....
I believe our strong interventions had pulled the 'go-up' advocates back from the brink. But I consider the episode to be not only a dramatic moment in Washington's recent history, but another illustration of the intersection of politics, fear, credibility and security.
The terror alert system is currently in the middle of a 60-day review for possible alterations by the Department of Homeland Security, which Secretary Janet Napolitano announced in mid-July.
The incident left its mark on Ridge, who describes it as a serious turning point in his career. "After that episode, I knew I had to follow through with my plans to leave the federal government," he writes. Ridge resigned after the election, on November 30, 2004, and at the time said it was in order to devote more time to his family.
Ridge revealed clashes between his department and the executive office on terror alerts back in 2005 in a much more mild-mannered way, saying "sometimes we disagreed."
Late Update: Frances Townsend, former Homeland Security advisor to Bush, appeared on The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer on CNN this evening to refute Ridge's allegations. "Nobody's more surprised than I am," she said. "Of course, Tom Ridge never expressed those concerns while he was in the administration, nor did he when I spoke to him after he left...[He] wasn't the only one in that meeting who suggested the terror alert shouldn't be raised. At no time was there a discussion of politics in that meeting. And the president was made a consensus recommendation from the council that he accepted - not to raise the terror alert."
This post has been revised since it was originally published.

















Bush manipulating the public through manufactured fear? Couldn't happen.
August 20, 2009 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Karl Rove says would have been burned at the stake for trying something like that.
August 20, 2009 6:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have no respect at all for people like Ridge, among others, that come out long after the fact (usually when they have authored a book they are hocking) to decry some wrong that ocurred when they were serving in the government. Where was his ethical compass at the time when it could have mattered? He was either too concerned with his own self interest or too cowardly. Both, of which, should earn the disdain of the public who put their trust in him. Silience can be as dispicable as any overt act.
August 20, 2009 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Totally concur - such ostensible "patriots" become virtuous only when it's financially advantageous to appear so: "I woulda stood up to them at the time, but, hey, they were my bosses!"
However, if Ridge is "hocking" his book, he must not have made as much $$ in the private sector as he would have liked...think you mean "hawking." ;^)
August 20, 2009 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
On April 21, 2005, Savi Technology, Inc., then a private company, created Savi Networks LLC, a new joint venture company, with Hutchinson Ports Holdings to install active RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) equipment and software in participating ports around the world and to provide users with the information, identity location and status of their ocean cargo containers as they pass through such ports.
Tom Ridge, the first secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, joined the Savi Technology board April 5, 2005, just prior to the deal.
Savi Networks was capitalized at $50 million from the joint venture partners. Savi Technology holds a 51 percent interest in Savi Networks while HPH holds the remaining 49 percent.
On the same day, April 21, 2005, HPH made a concurrent $50 million investment in Infolink Systems, Inc., the parent company of Savi Technology, which provided HPH with 10 percent of Infolink on a fully diluted basis.
On May 4, 2005, GlobeSecNine, made a $2 million strategic investment in Infolink Systems, Inc., the parent company of Savi Technology.
On June 8 of this year, Lockheed Martin acquired Infolink Systems, Inc., thereby acquiring Savi Technology, Inc.
GlobeSecNine’s chairman of the board is Brent Scowcroft, who served as national security adviser to Presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush. He also was chairman of President George W. Bush’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 2001 to 2005. From 1982 to 1989, Scowcroft also served as vice chairman of Kissinger Associates.
August 20, 2009 8:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not only was he craven at the time - now he's making money off his craveness! Presidential administration or crime syndicate?
August 20, 2009 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Holder doesn't investigate this crime syndicate, he is more craven and contemptible than any grovelling ex-Admin hack like Ridge.
I seriously would rate Holder below Gonzo as an AG if no special prosecutor comes out of this and indicts half the Republican Party.
Gonzo's job was never to uphold the law- it was to destroy it. We all knew that.
Holder claims to take his job seriously. And I would love to believe him. If he refuses to perform his job- impeach him and find someone who will.
August 20, 2009 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh come on - now it's Holder's fault. how ridiculous.
August 20, 2009 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
How long does AG Holder have to refuse to take any action before he becomes complicit?
Obama has bought into the Afghanistan occupation so that is now his occupation. Obama has bought into holding prisoners without charges or trial - that is now his policy. Obama has bought into the unitary executive theory - that is now his theory. Obama has bought into the idea of perpetual war to provide profits for the "defense" contractors - that is now his policy. Obama has bought into the idea that massive debt and deficit spending is a good thing - that is now his policy. The Obama Administration still has contracts with Blackwater (Xe) - they are now Obama's contracts. Obama is protecting admitted war criminals from the Bush Administration - those are now his crimes. Obama has done nothing to return this country to the "rule of law" and restore our constitution as a viaible blueprint for American society - those excesses are now Obama's excesses.
How long will people give Obama a pass for NOT creating "Change we can believe in"?
.
August 21, 2009 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cosign.
It would have required courage to oppose what was going on and resign then.
August 20, 2009 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
The cravenness of the past administration is staggering but, sadly, it's losing its ability to shock or anger me because I'm so used to hearing about it.
That may indeed be the worst aspect of it.
August 20, 2009 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
But the Ridge family maintained a close enough relationship with the Bushes, post "resignation" to have the First Lady throw Ridge's daughter a pool party at the White House pool.
http://wonkette.com/180474/bitchin-pool-party-at-the-white-house
August 20, 2009 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whistleblowers can get a lot more out of a book deal then a stupid whistle.
August 20, 2009 7:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Does this surprise me? No, not at all.
August 20, 2009 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, Ridge lied as to why he left office. He may have been required to lie since the reason why he was fired is apart of a federal grand jury's proceedings. The specific grand jury was referenced at the time Mitchell Wade was being sentenced. His cooperation w/another grand jury--the one I am referencing had been limited. There are about 1,000 people to be indicted apart of this grand jury which is why prosecutors made reference to something big to be going down.
Tom Ridge was fired because in 2002 DARPA, the White House Office of Science & Technology Policy and Office of Homeland Security selected the "smart wallet" (NIST's name) tech standard was selected to be the US' future credentialing standard. When the DHS opened its doors special interests took over the DHS. Literally, the Assistant and Under Secretaries, their Deputies, Chiefs of Staff and Program Managers all were lobbyists, or the 1998 Federal Inventories Reform Act was breached when defense contractors filled the officials positions to favor their own divisions and technology solutions. Ridge himself became a lobbyist.
In November of 2004 Immtec--then based in CO and now based in NY with me--inventor of the smart wallet blew the dust off of a 19 months old German financing package to break the Buy American Laws. We had been declining a 100 % financing package from the Kremlin, aka organized crime controlling it from St. Petersburg, Russia. Germany was the lesser of evils after Dusty Foggo, Brent Wilkes and VP Cheney ordered that our US RnD operation be sabotaged.
3 days after my biz partner arrived in Erfurt, Thuringen to accept the financing package Tom Ridge was fired. The reason why the public knew he was fired was because General Hayden--then head of NSA told Fox News later that day that Ridge had failed to fund the next generation of technologies.
2 1/2 weeks later General Hayden again was asked by Fox News why Ridge left and Hayden said it was because Ridge failed to dedicate staff to medium and long-term planning. Today, there is no one handling this at the DHS with impartiality. I follow these things since with Ridge having been fired because of our decision I stayed behind to continue heading federal operations. This is also why I have the skinny on how many people are to be indicted. No one after speaking with me lasted long in their post, and in fact, usually were subjected to office raids...I called in the middle of some of them after things that were said to me by the official that weren't appropriate.
What happened to our German finacing package...TPM reported on it but was told the wrong dates. Brant Bassett took Wilkes to Erfurt in 1/05, and their actions next forced my partner to France. The Foggo indictments picked-up the story from there. Some of the wire fraud charges, involvement of ER at General Counsel and the private security installer all involved Immtec.
August 20, 2009 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
P.S. Seth Hettena did the best coverage of the Wade sentencing hearings in 12/08 in Hettena's blog.
August 20, 2009 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anybody remember Howard Dean saying this before the 04 election? Everybody made fun of him. Same goes for when he said getting Saddam Hussein wasn't going to make a real difference in the Iraq War. Ditto for the 50 state strategy. Anybody have a doubt that Dean would have done a much better job selling the Obama health plan than any of these other fools they have out there selling it?
August 21, 2009 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not here.
August 21, 2009 8:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Could Dean have sold Obama's health plan any better than Obama himself, given that he has a far lower mendacity quotient than Obama?
Well, yes, I suppose he could have.
August 21, 2009 10:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
xargaw, hank, and pinson:
You're not giving Tom Ridge due credit here. His job was to advise the White House in the decision. He persuaded them to maintain the threat level. (Maybe u didn't notice: "In the end, the terror alert level was not raised.")
No well-run organization, democrat or republican, political, business, or non-profit goes public with internal discussions like that. That's called leaking and the leaker will usually get the boot.
Whistleblowing only applies when there is actually criminal wrongdoing, such as torture, fraud, or perjury. Political monkey business like this does not belong in that category.
Ridge did his job. And he was effective too. I'm not going to buy his book, and you don't have to either.
August 21, 2009 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree.
August 21, 2009 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
How much more do we have to hear about the Bush administration abuses before someone is held accountable? terrorizing American citizens by changing the alert level calls for an immediate investigation , if true. There is a related post at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588
August 21, 2009 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
carlyt, it ain't the "terrorizing of Americans", its the theft of the 2004 election!!!
August 21, 2009 9:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Re the 2004 "selection":
"What this election tells me, unfortunately, is that it doesn’t matter to most Americans if their government lies to them repeatedly.
They no longer care if their leaders erode their civil liberties, push this country further towards a police state, or shroud their actions in additional layers of official secrecy.
They don’t mind if their government operates strictly for the benefit of the rich and the corporate class, as long as their own taxes don’t go up.
Nor do they care if their government spends itself to the brink of bankruptcy. As long as they feel threatened by some external evil, everything is permitted."
- Gary Webb
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/coke-or-pepsi/
August 21, 2009 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rumsfeld was a prophet. For months before September 11 he carried around copies of a book about Pearl Harbor, handing them out like candy.
Yet as No. 2 in the chain-of-command he was somehow AWOL from the NMCC during the attacks, playing EMT for a photo op until 10:30.
Maybe he was late to respond because of those slow Pentagon clocks:
http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/2008/12/18/clock-stoppers/
August 21, 2009 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ridge took the job of DHS chief less than a month after 9/11. For the first director of that agency to admit there were political motives in some of its actions is big news. It's interesting Blitzer's program booked so quickly a guest to "refute" Ridge. Also, if you read Townsend's key statement included in this article, he doesn't actually refute anything Ridge alleges; it's counterpoint by doubletalk.
August 21, 2009 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm not surprisd Ridge waited until the Bush/Cheney gang were out of office, much safer that way.
John DiLullio, head of Faith Based Initiatives, left the Bush gang and wrote a very critical column claiming everything was politics. It took about a week for the Bush gang to get to him and he wrote a rebuttal of his original column.
Ari Felischer; 'Watch what you say.'
August 21, 2009 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
John DiLullio.....that guy was so clouded by his own religiousity that he could not imagine how the good doggies with bad habits could morph into jackals and attack.
August 21, 2009 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink