TPMMuckraker

Top Clinton Fundraiser Charged With Defrauding Citigroup


Hassan Nemazee

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The top fundraiser for Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign has been charged with fraudulently applying for a loan of over $74 million from Citigroup.

Federal prosecutors allege that Hassan Nemazee, a New York businessman who was national finance chair for the Clinton campaign, "submitted, and caused to be submitted to Citibank numerous documents that purported to establish the existence of accounts in Nemazee's name at various financial institutions containing many hundreds of millions of dollars. In fact, those were fraudulent and forged documents."

A Justice Department press release offers details on the alleged scheme:

Specifically, the various accounts referenced in the fraudulent documents that Nemazee submitted, and caused to be submitted to Citibank either never existed or had been closed years before he submitted the documents referencing those accounts. Furthermore, on many of the documents at issue, Nemazee falsely provided as the address and telephone numbers of various financial institutions purportedly vouching for his financial strength an address and telephone number that was, in fact, controlled by Nemazee. As a result, in the event anyone at Citibank made an effort to confirm the existence of the assets reflected on the fraudulent documents submitted by Nemazee, they would in fact be contacting a telephone number assigned to Nemazee himself, and not any financial institution.

The Feds explain that they interviewed Nemzaee on Sunday at Newark airport, as he was checking in for a flight to Rome. The following day, he repaid the over $74 million loan to Citibank.

The Wall Street Journal adds (sub. req.): "According to an FBI report, Mr. Nemazee first contacted Citibank in December 2006 to borrow $25 million, and later raised the sum to $80 million."

Nemazee's lawyer, Marc Mukasey, told TPMmuckraker: "We are reviewing the allegations."

A Citigroup spokeswoman told TPMmuckraker: "We are working with the authorities on this matter."

Nemazee, 59, is the chairman and CEO of Nemazee Capital Corporation. He's charged with one count of bank fraud, which carries a potential prison term of 30 years. He's expected to appear in court this afternoon.

Join the Conversation!

14 comments

Recommend Recommend (4)

August 25, 2009 4:25 PM   

No honor among thieves!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

wyt

user-pic

August 25, 2009 4:30 PM    in reply to GTFOOH

Hey, he repaid the loan once caught. He may have borrowed under false pretenses, but he didn't squander it. This compares him favorably to Geo. Bush Jr., who stole an election, then squandered it all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 5:13 PM   

Uh... did he pay back the loan using his own money? Just asking...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2009 5:56 PM   

So this fellow was a fundraiser for Clinton. Why does Bloomberg.com say he was an Obama contributer? Weren't they on opposite sides?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 1:42 AM   

Someone defrauded Citibank? Man bites dog!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 9:46 AM    in reply to Nancy Irving

My thoughts exactly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 6:02 AM   

This reminds me of a con artist piece I red on this kid in Seattle a few years ago. Apparently, if you're one of the many that goes into a bank asking for a $50,000 to 1 million loan, you're heavily scrutinized, expected to put up some form of collateral equivalent in case of default, and generally have a hard time.

But if you go in asking for a loan in the millions, tens of millions, or hundreds of millions then outside of checking references the banks don't go any further scrutinizing you record because they don't want to embarrass you and figure if you have the chutzpah to walk in and ask for that much, you can't be bluffing.

Apparently, some in the jet set crowd like this guy took advantage of such lax oversight to make even more money. His liquidity must have been phenomenal to have paid 74 million back on a next day payment.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 9:32 AM   

THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR HILLARY!!!!

!!!HILLMENTUMâ„¢!!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 11:35 AM   

Not surprised in the least, since the most popular game in Washington is "Follow The Leader", and most of the leaders being voted in are nothing but scoundrels.... IMHO

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 11:36 AM   

So, which would be better: a person who accurately and truthfully applied for a 74 million dollar loan and failed to repay it or a person who inaccurately and untruthfully applied for a 74 million dollar loan and paid it all back.

Torturers and human rights violators to go free under Obama, but a guy who paid back a loan to get prosecuted (seems like solely because he was a Hillary supporter).

Seems about par for the course.

BTW, why didn't Citi actually check on these things BEFORE approving the loan and then why check such stuff afterwards? Isn't the check supposed to come BEFORE the loan is paid out? Does Citi go back and recheck the applications of EVERY loan recipient or only those of certain people associated with certain politicians.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 12:26 PM   

Looks like we dodged the bullet on this one. Well, mostly.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 1:02 PM    in reply to Cool Blue Reason

Who's "we"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 26, 2009 12:49 PM   

What's the point of fraudulently obtaining a loan for $74M if you have enough money to repay it? Maybe for an 'Obscenely Wealthy' theme party, where everyone cavorts among piles of bills, but then you'd only need the cash for a day or two.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 28, 2009 6:57 PM   

I remember a few years back there was a guy named Bruce McNall who took out multi-million dollar loans (maybe as much as $50 million I don't recall) from Bank of America based on his coin collection and his baseball card collection, which he claimed were worth tens of millions of dollars. When he defaulted on the loan, it turned out the bank had not only failed to appraise the collections, but further had allowed him to retain possession of the collections, and they were actually worth less than $100,000. But the bank could not even get that because by the time they realized they had been had, Mr. McNall had pledged the collections to a foreign bank, which at least had the sense to hold the collections in their vault.

So anyway my point is this happened 20 years ago, and you would think the geniuses that run banks could figure this out, but you'd be wrong. Because they are not geniuses but dumbasses.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!