TPMMuckraker

Man Behind Birthermercial First Teabagged In Mid-1970s


Gary Kreep

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The attorney behind the first-ever Birther infomercial started teabagging way before it was cool.

Back in the mid 1970s, Gary Kreep spearheaded a national tea bag-based movement to protest the Ford Administration's tax policies, he confirmed to TPMmuckraker today.

"To protest unreasonably high taxes, people stapled tea bags to their tax returns," explains Kreep, now director of the United States Justice Foundation, but then a law student and an officer in the California chapter of the Reaganite Young Americans for Freedom.

When the the 2009 teabagger movement began to emerge earlier this year, Kreep thought: "It's deja vu all over again."

Check out this AP piece that ran in February 1975, 34 years to the month before CNBC's Rick Santelli delivered his famous on-air anti-mortgage relief rant, thought to be the genesis of the 2009 teabaggers.

Kreep says he can't remember who came up with the tea bag idea back then, but knows they had the 1773 protest in mind. He believes "a lot of people -- tens of thousands of taxpayers" in fact sent in their tax returns with a teabag.

There were "little stickers on the tea bags that we handed out," he says. One was red. Another was green. They said something like "Stop Taxes."

Kreep and other activists who have attended tea parties this year have been discussing a reprise of the 1970s protest. But post-anthrax security measures have foiled the plans.

"Unfortunately, these days you cant get a tea bag to a congressman unless you hand it to them," Kreep says.

Join the Conversation!

12 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

September 28, 2009 6:29 PM   

"Unfortunately, these days you cant get a tea bag to a congressman unless you hand it to them," Kreep says.

unless you are a young page under the tutelage of Mark Foley. Then, teabagging is all in a days work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 10:24 PM    in reply to DickTater

glad you like it tom

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 6:47 PM   

I love that headline.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 10:25 PM    in reply to Thomas Rhiel

comment above meant for you

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 6:59 PM   

"It's deja-vu all over again." - made me lol.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 7:13 PM   

History of Federal Individual Income Bottom and Top Bracket Rates

1975 bottom bracket 14% (up to $1,000 income)
top bracket 70% (over $200,000)

2008 bottom bracket 10% (up to $16,050)
top bracket 35% (over $357,000)


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 8:11 PM   

Maybe he is doing all this teagagging because he is a Kreep

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 28, 2009 10:24 PM   

No-neck Gary Kreep: the apotheosis of eponymity.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 29, 2009 8:54 AM    in reply to tokin librul

OMg he does not have a neck... also hahahahahaha.. Nice one!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 29, 2009 8:53 AM   

John Waters would love this guy! Hahahahaha....He is really, really weird, just like all the characters in a John Waters film!!!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 29, 2009 10:02 AM   

I can remember when Creep was the committee to re-elect President Nixon. I still think this guy stole the moniker for his last name because he loved Tricky Dickie! (Just think if Nixon had worn a flight suit in public!)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 29, 2009 11:32 AM   


Did anyone else notice that while Rachel Maddow did a great segment on this ad, her segment was AFTER the bullshit ad from US CITIZENS ASSOCIATION?

I'm all for getting the crazeee right to pay for Kos, Rachel, TPM and the like - but why let them lie without calling BS on it?

Who is funding the USCA? Their website is a circle jerk - trying to get information from it is circuitous. And sending a "contact" e-mail results in a "Thank You For Joining" response. There are deep pockets behind the group, and it should be covered in depth, as the "Birther" ad has been.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on