TPMMuckraker

Gonzo On Support For Torture Probe: Um, Never Mind

Spread the word and support this article by retweeting it!


Fmr. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Oh this is good...

Remember how Alberto Gonzales came out the other day and said he supports Eric Holder's decision to investigate torture, as long as the probe is limited to CIA personnel who exceeded the lawyers' legal guidance?

Well it looks like even that qualified position was too much for torture supporters on the right. Because now Gonzo has crawled back to the Washington Times to say that, actually, he didn't really mean it.

"Contrary to press reporting and based on the information that's available to me," he told the paper, "I don't support the investigation by the department because this is a matter that has already been reviewed thoroughly and because I believe that another investigation is going to harm our intelligence gathering capabilities and that's a concern that's shared by career intelligence officials and so for those reasons I respectfully disagree with the decision."


As you'll remember, Gonzo had left little doubt earlier this week that he supported the probe:

We worked very hard to establish ground rules and parameters about how to deal with terrorists. And if people go beyond that, I think it is legitimate to question and examine that conduct to ensure people are held accountable for their actions, even if it's action in prosecuting the war on terror.

Gonzales' volte-face on the issue echoes that of his Bush administration colleague Tom Ridge on the question of whether the Bushies played politics with the terror alerts. In excerpts from his book reported recently, Ridge asserted that they had. But -- presumably under pressure from fellow Republicans -- Ridge this week backtracked on the claim.

As for Gonzo, he spent a portion of the rest of the interview twisting himself into knots to explain why his new position isn't really a contradiction of his old one.

And to think, this is the man who used to be the country's top prosecutor.

Join the Conversation!

29 comments

Recommend Recommend (7)

September 3, 2009 3:51 PM   

That boy needs another whuppin', better take him out to the woodshed again! Consarn yung'uns, gotta beat it into 'em.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:27 PM    in reply to Confound Them All

Let's be fair. Gonzo probably "could not recall" that he had been neck deep in felonies as the Attorney General. We saw his failing memory in action when he testified. When someone reminded him that he could be jailed, of couse he recanted his confession.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 3:53 PM   

So what did Cheney say to him, "Take that back or you'll never work again."? Wasn't that already a given?

And how did he whip Ridge back into line?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 9:24 PM    in reply to kqrbob

Well, considering the topic...
I'd say torture.

Cheney is a self-proclaimed expert after all.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 3:59 PM   

The Bush White House has long possessed some kind of Spockian mind-melting device that causes people to gladly undergo the public embarrassment of contradicting something they said mere days in the past. You can't help wondering how it works, but it sure does work.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:16 PM    in reply to JimmyBobby

This trend is very troubling. There is something that Gonzo and Ridge are very much afraid of that is causing them to double back on their statements. With the Rush retractions that have happened this year, it was very clear where the change in heart was coming from (elected officials getting hundreds of vitriolic phone calls from their base is a compelling motivator). The fact that it is completely unclear who is pulling the strings or what the motivating fear is makes me very nervous.

To speculate for a moment, I don't think there is a financial threat here. Both men have income from a variety of sources and it would be suspicious if they made controversial statements and suddenly that all dried up. What seems like a stronger possibility is a threat to their freedom. I think it is well within the realm of possibility that both men violated laws which if prosecuted would land them in jail for a few years at least. Somebody holding evidence of these misdeeds over their heads could certainly explain the contradictory statements they've made.

If this is the case, it could be a very good thing. If there is somebody out there blackmailing these people to cover up the wrongs of the past administration, that suggests the situation is a fragile one. A solid criminal case would strip the power from whoever is pulling the strings and the past blackmail could make a deal for testimony very attractive. That could lead to the whole house of cards crashing down and the wrongs of the Bush years getting dragged out into the light of day.

Justice and the complete discrediting of those who undermined so much in this country would be very sweet indeed.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:21 PM    in reply to Stiggs

Of course Gonzo and Ridge are being blackmailed.

Good luck getting whoever is blackmailing them into court. Those blackmail files are divided into two sections, one for each party.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 5:35 PM    in reply to diachronic

History tells us that it's impossible to keep this kind of stuff secret for long. There's too much incentive for someone to start talking. Keep pulling on the string.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 12:09 AM    in reply to mans_best_friend

It's tough to say. I would tend to agree with you in this situation but at the same time, I think there are lots of secrets which have been kept for quite a while.

What makes me think you are correct (the easily unraveled theory) is that there are people coming out and all but waving flags and shouting "something not right here" who have to double back and do damage control. So it is possible that whatever is causing these people to be retroactively loyal will fall apart (the strong criminal case scenario) or somebody who can't be controlled will come forward.

There are few things that I want more than to meet an attractive red head working on a poli-sci PhD and for the Bush years to unravel. I'm flexible on hair color.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 6:19 PM    in reply to Stiggs

I'm not so sure Gonzo has a good income. He was a mediocre lawyer, and now he is the same. He could barely find a job after his stint at Justice. If he writes a book, who will buy it? What "Think Tank" would hire him?

It could be that he WILL get hired at a tank if he plays nice.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 7:21 PM    in reply to CVille Dem

It would have to be a "I Don't Recall" tank, though I don't recall whether the party-before-country has established any of those yet.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 8:14 PM    in reply to JNagarya

The "tank" would be buying his silence. They would not want him to say anything, since every word he speaks is just an embarrassment to any brained humanoid.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 11:00 PM    in reply to CVille Dem

How long does it take to get tenure as a diversity recruiter and poli-sci lecturer at Texas Tech? That's still thin ice as a new career.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 12:03 AM    in reply to CVille Dem

He does get 30k for his speaking engagements. He did struggle for quite a while to get a job. So it is possible that somebody could be threatening to pull it. I guess I feel like if somebody had the pull to get him fired, they would have had the pull to get him hired. And that doesn't seem to be the case.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 7:23 PM    in reply to Stiggs

I don't think it's blackmail. I think it's Cheney, obviously a bully-par-excellance who is expert at intimidating and browbeating, behind it.

All he need do is insist that his target join him on a hunting trip.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 12:53 PM    in reply to Stiggs

This same thing occurred to me - who is blackmailing them and with what? We need to learn who is pulling the strings. This has been the ugliest political period I can remember, and everytime someone comes forward with an iota of evidence against the Bush people, within days, he/she is backtracking. What are they being threatened with? Who is doing it?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:00 PM   

Nobody could have foreseen...... God I love that line now.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:05 PM   

Gonzo was the laughingstock of America for many years, then he showed signs of rising above this status.
False alarm. He is more of a laughingstock than ever..

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:31 PM   

He got "the call" from Limbaugh.

Just like Ridge the day before.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:36 PM    in reply to theWalrus

In case anyone dismisses this as farfetched, consider what happened to the last Repub to defy Limbaugh:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/25/sanford-rush-limbaugh-is_n_170041.html

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 4:49 PM   

Gonzo just does what other people tell him too. what a skunk

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 5:12 PM   

What strikes me is that, with Gonzales and Ridge, they don't simply have the balls to say "On further consideration, I've changed my mind." No, they say "I never said anything like what's being reported I said." It's a very 1984-ish approach--trying to change history, with the only difference being that they can't destroy the evidence, but instead they engage in a stage performance designed only to save face--so they think--among their peers. It's a real "the emperor (or his employees) has no clothes" situation--deluded that they're making one impression, while actually making another.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 6:16 PM   

First Tom Ridge, now Gonzo. Does the Cheney/Bush regime have a hit squad? Are they afraid of getting offed?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 11:57 AM    in reply to CVille Dem

Nah, It's just that I am a very persuasive guy!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 7:29 PM   

Well, Cheney did set up a super-secret assassination squad with him as sole director.

And what with him being a gangster and terrorist, his penchant for privatizing violence, and the allegations against the Blackwater founder, I wouldn't be surprised if that squad were still intact and on call.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 7:30 PM   

What a gutless crowd. They all hide behind phony laws that they invented to get away with crimes that they willingly committed. Now, although it's obvious they'd love to clear their conscious but not pay a price for their allegiance, they're still as gutless as ever.
Integrity isn't a word or value that anyone connected to the bush/cheney/rove tyranny knows or understands.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 3, 2009 7:42 PM   

What the hell? It's like ever since Michael died, Republicans have been veying for who will inheirt the moon walking!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 4:31 PM   

What respectable law firm would hire Gonzales? Can you see him working alongside Ted Olson?

Was he ever offered membership in The Federalist Society?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 4, 2009 11:25 PM    in reply to JohnW1141

does he look like he's been offered anything lately except...

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

Most Popular