TPMMuckraker

Justice To Probe Decision To Drop "New Black Panther" Voter Intimidation Case

Share

Twitter Facebook Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

The Justice Department's internal ethics unit has opened an investigation into the decision to drop a voter intimidation complaint against members of the New Black Panther Party, the Washington Times reported yesterday.

In a letter sent late last month, Mary Patrice Brown, who runs DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility, told Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) that OPR had "initiated an inquiry into the matter."

On Election Day 2008, two members of the New Black Panthers were filmed standing outside a Philadelphia polling place, one of them wielding a night stick. The footage was featured prominently on Fox News, which used it to suggest intimidation of white voters.

In January, the Justice Department filed a civil complaint against the New Black Panther Party, charging that the two men, wearing combat boots and black jackets with military insignias, had intimidated voters with racial insults, slurs and the nightstick.

But in May, the complaint was dropped, with little explanation. That decision set off aggrieved protests from conservatives, as David Weigel of the Washington Independent has detailed. Smith claimed yesterday: "The Justice Department's decision to drop a case against political allies who allegedly intimidated voters on Election Day 2008 reeks of political interference."

That seems to go way too far. First of all, a Justice Department spokeswoman told the Independent it has obtained an injunction prohibiting the man who brandished the night stick from doing so again, and added: "The top career attorneys in the Civil Rights Division determined that the facts and the law did not support pursuing the claims against three of the defendants."

Also, it's not obvious why the Obama DOJ would feel compelled to intervene on behalf of a group of fringe activists -- the New Black Panthers don't even have a formal tie to the Black Panther party that became famous in the 1960s -- or in what sense the men can even be considered "political allies."

Finally, it's not clear who the men sought to intimidate. As Weigel wrote, Obama won the precinct over McCain by 596 to 13. In 2004 and 2000, George W. Bush won 24 and 8 votes respectively. So the intimidation effort doesn't seem too have been too well targeted.

Beyond that, well have to wait for the results of the OPR investigation, if they're released publicly.

Join the Conversation!

6 comments

Recommend Recommend (2)

September 10, 2009 3:37 PM   

Just what we need to vote, poll tax, voter roll purges and punks carrying truncheons. I'm sure it'd be legal to carry holstered 9mm pistols, modified (?) AK47's, Mac 10's and AR15's, in states such weapons can be carried in public, as long as the weapons are not "targeted" at any group at the polls. Not sure who their intimidating? Voters.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 10, 2009 3:37 PM   

Maybe they found out that these "New Black Panthers" were the 8 votes Bush received there during the 2000 election?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 10, 2009 4:03 PM   

What is the difference between the New Black Panthers' actions, brandishing nightsticks on election day, and the right wingnuts' actions brandishing their guns outside of Obama events? The difference between a nightstick and a gun? Or the difference between a black man and a white one?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 10, 2009 7:11 PM   

Two facts need to be reiterated here:
- one of the individuals (the one without the baton) was there in his capacity as a poll watcher (he also lived in the building where the polling station was located). The fact that he was large, black, and dressed up like a member of the S1W may or may not have been all that intimidating to the local residents who use that polling station. He had every right to be there regardless of how he was dressed.

- the individual with the baton left immediately upon being asked to do so by the police.

The only allegations, that I've heard, that they were actually intimidating voters came from the Republican poll watcher, but I've yet to hear any specifics of who and in what form they were actually intimidating anyone. I would think that the lack of any evidence of intimidation may be the reason the cases were dropped?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

September 10, 2009 10:49 PM   

Finally, it's not clear who the men sought to intimidate. As Weigel wrote, Obama won the precinct over McCain by 596 to 13. In 2004 and 2000, George W. Bush won 24 and 8 votes respectively. So the intimidation effort doesn't seem too have been too well targeted.

[wingnutMode]Obviously the intimidation has worked for the past 12 years.[/wingnutMode]

:).

--Kibitzer

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

AJM

user-pic

September 12, 2009 10:44 AM   

The real offense is being large and carrying a weapon while black.


That said, I don't want weapons of any kind whoever carries them at polling stations.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!