The circus down in Texas surrounding new history textbook standards continues.
Now, a panel of experts appointed by the GOP-controlled State Board of Education has released reviews of the proposed curriculum, which, as we noted recently, would require students to be conversant in Reaganomics and the heroes of movement conservatism.
The group of six experts is "extremely influential" in the curriculum writing process, says Dan Quinn of the Texas Freedom Network, which closely tracks the activist board of education. And they can be broken into two groups: mainstream academics and right-wing ideologues.
Take the Rev. Peter Marshall. His Peter Marshall Ministries -- whose Web site is, sad to say, down today -- seeks "to restore America to its Bible-based foundations through preaching, teaching, and writing on America's Christian heritage and on Christian discipleship and revival."
Marshall's books include "The Light and the Glory for Children: Discovering God's Plan for America from Christopher Columbus to George Washington," from Christian publisher Revell.
In his review of the proposed textbook standards, Marshall denounces Anne Hutchinson as "a favorite of modern feminists" but "not sufficiently 'significant'" to include with Roger Williams, John Smith, and William Bradford. (Read an excerpt of Marshall's comments here.)
He declares the term "imperialism" applicable to European expansionism, but inappropriate for the US adventures in Hawaii and Mexico.
Finally, Marshall weighs in on the section of the proposed textbook standards we recently flagged that require knowledge of Newt Gingrich, Phyllis Schlafly, and the Moral Majority. To that list, Marshall recommends adding "Jim Dobson (Focus on the Family) ... Rush Limbaugh ... and the National Rifle Association." And for the sake of balance, adds:
I personally do not have a problem with adding an SE that would include liberal organizations such as Planned Parenthood, Move On.org, and the Sierra Club, provided the students are made aware of Planned Parenthood's funding of abortion clinics.
Marshall is expected to speak tomorrow when the board meets to discuss the standards for the first time (we plan to be watching).
Another board-designated "expert" who will likely speak is David Barton, founder and president of Wallbuilders, which is "dedicated to presenting America's forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on the moral, religious, and constitutional foundation on which America was built." Barton's books include America's Godly Heritage and The Role of Pastors & Christians in Civil Government (Wallbuilders Press).
In his review of the textbook standards, Barton, to his credit, criticizes the inclusion of individuals merely because they are conservative. However, he also set off a round of War on Christmas hysteria over the deletion of a reference to the holiday in favor of the Hindu Diwali in a 6th grade world cultures course. (Read an excerpt of his review here.)
In all of this, the thing to remember is that the State Board of Education doesn't merely have the power to unleash a Gingrich-based history curriculum on kids across the Lone Star State. Because of the state's size and the dynamics of the national textboook market, what happens in Texas, experts say, doesn't stay in Texas.
Quinn and his colleagues at the Texas Freedom Network are not optimistic. "I think the signs are not good, particularly considering what happened with the science standards -- [that is,] the watering down of instructions on evolution," he tells TPMmuckraker.
Without getting too much into parliamentary technicalities, here's how the process culminating in the the adoption of new standards will unfold (thanks to the University of Texas for laying this out):
--This Week: Discussion by the board, with expert reviewer and some public comment.
--November: Board discusses revised recommendations from the curriculum writing teams.
--January '10: First vote by board on new standards, preceded by public hearing.
--February '10: Revised standards posted online, open for public comment.
--March '10: Final vote by board on new standards Revised standards posted online, open for public comment.
--Fall '11: New standards implemented in Texas public schools
--Fall '12: Board adopts new textbooks
--Fall '13: Texan high schoolers -- and potentially their peers around the country -- use the new textbooks

TPM Stories Now Surging on Digg.com

Chabuka
September 16, 2009 2:06 PM
No wonder these people din't want President Obama speaking to their children...wouldn't this violate the line between church and state...? Time to pull all federal funding from these schools and fools in Texas..they want to teach this crap..let them teach it in private schools...thats why "private schools" were invented
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 16, 2009 2:42 PM in reply to Chabuka
I still don't get why they can do this without being guilty of mixing church and state. This is just bizarre. I am leaning more and more toward their being encouraged to secede.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Richardxx
September 16, 2009 8:01 PM in reply to Chabuka
They also didn't want Obama speaking to their school children because they did not want those children to have to be exposed to a competent, well-educated and well-spoken man of African heritage speaking from the exalted position of President of the U.S.
How could such a man be inferior? Yet according to the parents, African-Americans are supposed to be inferior. Who do the kids believe? Their parents or their own eyes?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
jeepsdad
September 16, 2009 2:22 PM
Is there any chance that Texas really will secede? Please?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
soupson52
September 16, 2009 2:43 PM in reply to jeepsdad
I say GO!GO!GO, GO TEXAS,GO!
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
four legs good
September 16, 2009 6:05 PM in reply to soupson52
Excuse me, but some of us live here and aren't quite ready to concede our homes to the crazy people.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Campesino
September 16, 2009 3:01 PM
It's funny, but I can't find anything anywhere on this site about the ACORN controversy. Seriously, how long can you ignore this and call yourselves "muckrakers"?
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jxhq8CPN8LdLntDEDtE5NrEBQ2IgD9ANCH580
WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Monday to block the Housing and Urban Development Department from giving grants to ACORN, a community organization under fire in several voter-registration fraud cases.
The 83-7 vote would deny housing and community grant funding to ACORN, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.
The action came as the group is suffering from bad publicity after a duo of conservative activists posing as a prostitute and her pimp released hidden-camera videos in which ACORN employees in Baltimore gave advice on house-buying and how to account on tax forms for the woman's income. Two other videos, aired frequently on media outlets such as the Fox News Channel, depict similar situations in ACORN offices in Brooklyn and Washington, D.C.
The Senate's move would mean that ACORN would not be able to win HUD grants for programs such as counseling low-income people on how to get mortgages and for fair housing education and outreach.
Sen. Mike Johanns, R-Neb., said that ACORN has received $53 million in taxpayer funds since 1994 and that the group was eligible for a wider set of funding in the pending legislation, which funds housing and transportation programs.
Just last week, the Census Bureau severed its ties with ACORN, saying it does not want the group's help in outreach efforts on the decennial count
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
kenga
September 16, 2009 3:25 PM in reply to Campesino
Is that some sort of admission that you can't even read your own comments?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
realist
September 16, 2009 5:14 PM in reply to kenga
Sadly, ignoring the ACORN nuts doesn't make them go away.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 16, 2009 3:10 PM
I don't get why Texas gets to decide textbook content for the rest of the country. Why don't other states simply say to the textbook makers "Screw you. You can publish this trash but we won't use it." Texas may be a big state, but they're still less than 8% of the total US population.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
shazam
September 16, 2009 4:08 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
Texas gets to decide because a lot of other conservative states follow their lead. Publishers are always chasing dollars and can't really afford to say no in an era when textbook publishing is on life support as it is.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Justin Elliott
September 16, 2009 5:28 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
I talked to some edu-wonks about this very issue here: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/could_texas_gingrich_based_curriculum_go_national.php
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Winski
September 16, 2009 3:13 PM
This is a part of a much bigger agenda to help the children adjust to further re-education. This is brainwashing - pure and simple. What we need in our public schools are professional educators that are experts in 'DE-PROGRAMMING" of our children from this kind of right-wing, hate-filled garbage.
This has gone on for generations and has GOT to stop....
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
tokin librul
September 16, 2009 4:01 PM
If I were still in a position in which I could make such decisions, I would NEVER allow any student brandishing a credential from Texas schools to darken my classroom door.
I don't get why Texas gets to decide textbook content for the rest of the country. Why don't other states simply say to the textbook makers "Screw you. You can publish this trash but we won't use it." Texas may be a big state, but they're still less than 8% of the total US population.
because of Texas' centralized purchasing power...
Text books cost a TON of money to produce. Getting a text accepted in Texas almost guarantees the pay-back. Publishers cannot afford to supply more than one version of any given text--which is why, despite what anybody says, there's already a national curriculum in place, driven by the Texas textbook adoption committee...
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nowukkers
September 16, 2009 4:14 PM in reply to tokin librul
Perhaps NY and California should get their act together in advance of TX.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
mans_best_friend
September 16, 2009 4:24 PM in reply to tokin librul
But Texas still accounts for less than 8% of the population. NY is almost as big and CA is bigger, yet they don't have nearly the same leverage. The other conservative states are mostly small. Taken together, I'm sure textbook sales in blue states exceeds textbook sales in red states. So why is the tail wagging the dog?
This seems to me to be more a case of Texas being the loudest and drowning out everyone else (a familiar theme). If other states simply refused to buy them, the publishers would have to give some ground.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
September 16, 2009 5:39 PM in reply to mans_best_friend
Do New York and California decide on textbooks and buy them at the state level? I gather that it's because Texas does this, and because their order is consequently a very large one, that they have the level of influence that they do.
If states like New York and California leave those decisions to be made on a local or regional level, or if they give localities choices among several standard textbooks, then the impact on any particular title is reduced.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nowukkers
September 16, 2009 4:12 PM
*sigh*
I wonder if, "for the sake of balance" the students will be "made aware of" Limbaugh's multiple mariages, his serial lying and his Oxycontin issues. Or for that matter Gingrich's marital hypocrisies. I'm not holding my breath.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Nowukkers
September 16, 2009 4:13 PM in reply to Nowukkers
Sorry, *marriages*.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Matt Jones
September 16, 2009 4:52 PM in reply to Nowukkers
Of course not. But you can expect a ten-page digression on Chappaquiddick.
I also doubt you'll find any mention whatsoever of things like the Business Plot or Iran-Contra.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
slb
September 16, 2009 5:26 PM
I found this suggestion of Marshall's interesting:
Now why do you suppose he would want to omit the word "democratic," hmmmm? Couldn't possibly have anything to do with delegitimizing the opposition could it?
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
SOS ICEBERG
September 16, 2009 5:51 PM
They're Texas Taliban.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
Powkat
September 16, 2009 7:00 PM
Is Cullen Davis still on the textbook committee? You remember, the dude who murdered his stepdaughter and tried to kill his first wife and the judge who presided over his trial and then paid a zillion dollars to Racehorse Haines to get him off.
Just asking.
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
trittydi
September 17, 2009 2:48 AM
If my kids were school age now - I would home school them.
*
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?
davcbr
September 17, 2009 10:16 AM
Nobody here has a snse of humor. Come on! It's a hoax.
That's a picture of Kelsey Grammer!
Isn't it???
Reply | Flag Abuse
Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?